Corsato, thank you for your brilliant words of wisdom. Let me see how I can adequately express my thanks for this tip: "DUH!!!" I've played this game before, I know how to win. I just find it interesting that you constantly change your vote seemingly without reason, except to "put a little pressure on them" This would seem logical, except that the change is so constant, as in nearly every time I log in, you are voting for someone new. So if you can convince me that I should vote for someone else, I'll vote for them. But for now my vote stands
And I also don't believe in the whole 'sacrificial lamb' scenario, where one mafia member volunteers to take a striking blow being LED by one of his own, just for the greater good. No one would be stupid enough to volunteer for something like that, especially so early in a game:
but he was the one who first voted for Mackay. Now I know what you're all thinking, "Mackay was Mafia", but what if he's just randomly voting for people until he gets around to voting for the people that he actually thinks are mafia, so that it doesn't look like he's mafia, and convincing everyone else to follow his lead. On the basis of this argumentvote: corsato
If I didn't know any better I'd say that you are using mafia strategy, but seeing as how you all but confirmed innocent because of the whole Arminger/Mackay debacle I'm not going to vote for you. There is, however, ANOTHER reason why I'm not going to vote for you.
Since all that is going on at the moment is a whole lot of "
this
person is quiet, therefore I'm going to vote for this
person" and then this
person replies with the whole "I'm not quiet, I have my reasons, you
suck, therefore I'm going to vote for you
."Granted, most of the time this is how mafia is played, unless a character (or more) reveals their role(s). So this is what I'm going to do. I wasn't going to say anything as if I am correct then it would almost surely get me killed off tonight, but I'm going to take my chances.
In case it hasn't been noticed, I've kept my vote on Roadbird for a while now, and there is a reason. Since claiming cop is the obvious, I'm going to tell you more detail. I am a Police Chief, specialising in gang-related crimes. This entitles me to a normal, investigativetype role. On night one, I investigated The Accountant, and found out he was guilty. If you'll notice, this is why I was eager to vote off Accountant in the early days. But then with the whole Arminger/Mackay thing I quickly changed to Mackay as it started becoming obvious towards the end, of her guilt, and Accountant's innocence. This left me to think that I was either paranoid or insane. But, on night 2 I decided to investigate Roadbird, for the reason stated in my earlier post. From this I found out that he was innocent. Since I had 2 conflicting outcomes from 2 different investigations I believe I am an insane cop and that Roadbird really is in fact GUILTY. I hope everyone chooses to believe me and follows suit, but if not then I understand, I would be a little hesitant as well. But, if we are going to get the day over with then someone must be lynched, and I STRONGLY believe that Roadbird would be a wise choice. Even so far as to say that if I am wrong, then, please, feel free to lynch me on the next day. But for the time being, I implore you all, let's weed out all the mafiascum.
Strongly confirm vote: Roadbird
).