Only mafia "knows" things.millar13 wrote:Probably scum.
That the difference....iknowur scum
2 people said stuff... Lowell's was useless (FIND TIME) and Ash...well...his is relevant.
Still waiting on people to play.
Only mafia "knows" things.millar13 wrote:Probably scum.
That the difference....iknowur scum
Only mafia "know" stuffBeyond_Birthday wrote:Only mafia "knows" things.millar13 wrote:Probably scum.
That the difference....iknowur scum
2 people said stuff... Lowell's was useless (FIND TIME) and Ash...well...his is relevant.
Still waiting on people to play.
Tunneling? Even Skitzer dropped his (poor) case against me because it had merit. Now, you act not only as though you lack a case but you fail to advance or support conversation by commenting on your opinion of Ash.millar13 wrote:Beyond_Birthday you change votes quicker than I have seen for a long time.
Scum or just indecisive townie?
If you're going to quote Lowell's post like that, you might want to take a look at the post where I tear into his position on Xenaroth. Also, this whole affair seems seriously delayed; why vote on Page 5 based on a secondary source from Page 2?AshKetchummm wrote:@NabNab
This is the post where I got my suspision of xena, since Lowell brought up basically what I was thinking.Lowell wrote:Quick runthrough:
xenalooks worse as time goes on. At first he spent a lot of time worrying about who was and who wasn't posting enough for his liking. That struck me as scummy, but would be fine if that's the kind of player he is (ie. overattentive). Since the game has settled down he doesn't seem to have anything else to say. It makes me think he was using metagame posts at the beginning because he didn't want to risk saying anything incriminating.
But I agree his voting may not of been as erratic as I said it was, but still I have to agree with the majority of what Lowell said.
To be honest I don't really have one...he doesn't seem scummy but he doesn't seem town either. What can I say?charter wrote:No, you have majorly raised in scumminess by entirely ignoring giving your opinion on Ash.
NabakovNabakov wrote:If you're going to quote Lowell's post like that, you might want to take a look at the post where I tear into his position on Xenaroth. Also, this whole affair seems seriously delayed; why vote on Page 5 based on a secondary source from Page 2?AshKetchummm wrote:@NabNab
This is the post where I got my suspision of xena, since Lowell brought up basically what I was thinking.Lowell wrote:Quick runthrough:
xenalooks worse as time goes on. At first he spent a lot of time worrying about who was and who wasn't posting enough for his liking. That struck me as scummy, but would be fine if that's the kind of player he is (ie. overattentive). Since the game has settled down he doesn't seem to have anything else to say. It makes me think he was using metagame posts at the beginning because he didn't want to risk saying anything incriminating.
But I agree his voting may not of been as erratic as I said it was, but still I have to agree with the majority of what Lowell said.
This just hammers home the points charter has made about Ash's scuminess. I would prefer to stay on Lowell, but let's see where this wagon goes.Unvote; Vote: AshKetchummm
@Your "Delayed" argument: So, time makes a statement less scummy as time goes on in this case? Wow, Time really does heal all wounds.
Your vote is wagon hopping. If you don't think Ash is scum, why vote him?
@Charter: Where exactly is your opinion on me coming from?
The first few pages, off the top of my head there was the self vote and you had questionable interactions with BB. If I decide to pursue this I will be more specific, but for now Ash needs votes.Nab wrote:@Charter: Where exactly is your opinion on me coming from?
You could have said that. You could also go back and take a closer look at his posts and tell us if you still don't have an opinionmillar13 wrote:To be honest I don't really have one...he doesn't seem scummy but he doesn't seem town either. What can I say?charter wrote:No, you have majorly raised in scumminess by entirely ignoring giving your opinion on Ash.
@Your "Delayed" argument: So, time makes a statement less scummy as time goes on in this case? Wow, Time really does heal all wounds.NabakovNabakov wrote:If you're going to quote Lowell's post like that, you might want to take a look at the post where I tear into his position on Xenaroth. Also, this whole affair seems seriously delayed; why vote on Page 5 based on a secondary source from Page 2?AshKetchummm wrote:@NabNab
This is the post where I got my suspision of xena, since Lowell brought up basically what I was thinking.Lowell wrote:Quick runthrough:
xenalooks worse as time goes on. At first he spent a lot of time worrying about who was and who wasn't posting enough for his liking. That struck me as scummy, but would be fine if that's the kind of player he is (ie. overattentive). Since the game has settled down he doesn't seem to have anything else to say. It makes me think he was using metagame posts at the beginning because he didn't want to risk saying anything incriminating.
But I agree his voting may not of been as erratic as I said it was, but still I have to agree with the majority of what Lowell said.
This just hammers home the points charter has made about Ash's scuminess. I would prefer to stay on Lowell, but let's see where this wagon goes.Unvote; Vote: AshKetchummm
@Charter: Where exactly is your opinion on me coming from?
I'm just waiting for his explaination. If by some miracle he has some great explanation for his behavior, then I have a number two I will look at. If the explanation is lacking, then I'm all for lynching. Pretty sure he's not the mystery role either.BB wrote:Your vote is scummy. If you do not think Ash is scummy, why vote him? His wagons grown enough in the past few posts. (in the past page?)