Mini 1811 [Game Over]

Impoetic · Post Post #1475 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:31 am

In post 1474, Xkfyu wrote:Why did you ignore my question, Impoetic?

probably cuz I have no idea what you're talking about. Quote it please?

Xkfyu · Post Post #1476 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:31 am

In post 1454, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 1453, Impoetic wrote:I don't think my reads are very good and I'm being totally feckless about them so there's that. I know from my first game this comes off as ate/wanting to not be held accountable for reads, but it's really true. If I really had confidence in either of my scumleans, I would be pushing.
Tam has been a lynch candidate for a LONG time now. Why do you think it's so difficult to get her wagon to gain any serious traction?

Impoetic · Post Post #1477 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:37 am

Oh right, I was gonna answer that but got sidetracked when I noticed Jarjar's annoying cliché of a post and quoted it to rant.

I haven't noticed that it's necessarily any harder than I would expect for it to gain traction; she writes like a good player regardless of alignment and players like her are players I normally hesitate to lynch, myself, although I clearly am not this time. I don't have much experience in forum mafia but I would think it'd be more true, if anything, that people who have an air of skill about them are less likely to be wagoned. She was on 4-5 players several times, and all the other wagons have been about the same, I thought.

Frankly, I feel like

all

the assertions about

all

the wagons are going straight over my head.

It could also be because she's scum, though. I certainly hope it is...........

Impoetic · Post Post #1478 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:38 am

well, to be wagoned early on, i.e. d1

Xkfyu · Post Post #1479 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:50 am

A couple of things to note if Tam is scum:

1. The only people who have not voted for Tam at this point are pacman, ira, and Sonrio.
2. The Trivium/Rob/Sonia slot was on the Tam wagon, and jumped off it once the votes started to pile on. Now, Rob was the one who did the unvote, and it appeared to be simply because he had just replaced in. However, even though he constantly has Tam in his scum pile (even saying that Tam is the one most likely to be lynched today), he kept his vote on me, and Sonia hasn't shown any interest whatsoever in moving that vote, even though she appears to be scum reading only MC, Accountant, and.....herself apparently.

We've talked about how hard it's been to get traction on the Tam lynch. Do not ignore all of this in the event that Tam flips scum.

Xkfyu · Post Post #1480 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:52 am

In post 1477, Impoetic wrote:Oh right, I was gonna answer that but got sidetracked when I noticed Jarjar's annoying cliché of a post and quoted it to rant.

I haven't noticed that it's necessarily any harder than I would expect for it to gain traction; she writes like a good player regardless of alignment and players like her are players I normally hesitate to lynch, myself, although I clearly am not this time. I don't have much experience in forum mafia but I would think it'd be more true, if anything, that people who have an air of skill about them are less likely to be wagoned. She was on 4-5 players several times, and all the other wagons have been about the same, I thought.

Frankly, I feel like
all
the assertions about
all
the wagons are going straight over my head.

It could also be because she's scum, though. I certainly hope it is...........

Well, I can tell you this much. This is probably the hardest D1 lynch that I have ever been a part of.

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1481 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:55 am

If I vote Tam will it be a hammer?
Sorry for inaction, I know it's not helping anyone townread me but I agree with the Tam lynch and can close it out if it needs it

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1482 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:55 am

I guess I'm basically waiting for MC to show and decide if he wants to support the pac lynch cause there's no way that lynch happens w/o his (and jareeds) backing.

If he continues to push XK then I'll vote Tam.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1483 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:56 am

OMG Pac. Please answer this:

In post 1321, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1298, evilpacman18 wrote:SORRY I AM AT A PLACE WITH NO INTERNET FOR DAYS
I'll do some phone reading
If you do nothing else, answer this already:

In post 1236, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 953, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 591, Accountant wrote:
In post 589, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 587, I Am Innocent wrote: Good luck town
LOL way to screw over whoever comes into this slot
are you subtly implying this is a scumtell and if so why
Was wondering this too. Please answer Pac.
would like to point out that pac keeps ignoring this.

Xkfyu · Post Post #1484 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:56 am

In post 1481, evilpacman18 wrote:If I vote Tam will it be a hammer?
Sorry for inaction, I know it's not helping anyone townread me but I agree with the Tam lynch and can close it out if it needs it

Tam is on 4 votes, right now. Your vote would put her on L-2.

Nahdia · Post Post #1485 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:57 am

Votecount 1.25

Tam (4):

Bacde, Accountant, Impoetic, Xkfyu

Xkfyu (3):

MURDERCAT, JaeReed, xSoniaNevermindx

evilpacman18 (1):

JarJarDrinks

Accountant (1):

iraonavp

Not Voting (3):

Sonrio, evilpacman18, Tam

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2016-07-18 18:00:00)

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1486 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:57 am

also can you explain why it is that u scumread Tam?

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1487 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:42 am

In post 1483, JarJarDrinks wrote:OMG Pac. Please answer this:

In post 1321, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1298, evilpacman18 wrote:SORRY I AM AT A PLACE WITH NO INTERNET FOR DAYS
I'll do some phone reading
If you do nothing else, answer this already:

In post 1236, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 953, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 591, Accountant wrote:
In post 589, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 587, I Am Innocent wrote: Good luck town
LOL way to screw over whoever comes into this slot
are you subtly implying this is a scumtell and if so why
Was wondering this too. Please answer Pac.
would like to point out that pac keeps ignoring this.

Oh shit lol, my bad. I just didn't think there was really a town reason to say that. Like it just seemed really scummy to me to leave a slot while still trying to influence peoples' read of your alignment in a way.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1488 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:45 am

Yet you never mention the slot again.

Impoetic · Post Post #1489 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:45 am

it's called wishing town luck...

but thank you for explaining, at least.

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1490 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:46 am

I have barely mentioned anything since then, I'm busy.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1491 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:47 am

evilpacman18 wrote:I have barely mentioned anything since then, I'm busy.

You've talked about several other reads since then.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1492 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:49 am

OMG YOU CALLED THAT SLOT ONE OF UR BIGGEST TOWNREADS.

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1493 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:49 am

Regarding Tam: I noticed that my strongest town reads and the confirmed town were all voting Tam so I was like hmmmm that's probably a good vote, so I checked her iso and she seems to lack like a town-ish tone of uncertainty. Plus she's said A LOT OF WORDS while basically only tunnelling Trivium.

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1494 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:50 am

Is that Impoetic now? She came in and sold me with her first post, I quoted it

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1495 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:50 am

In post 1000, Nahdia wrote:
Tam (4):
Bacde, JaeReed, MURDERCAT, Impoetic

In post 1011, evilpacman18 wrote:also can't really resist a wagon of 4 of my strongest townreads

Impoetic · Post Post #1496 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:51 am

tam tunneled trivium????? man why is my brainpower so low

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1497 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:52 am

In post 1004, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 636, Impoetic wrote:On page 16 and clearly out of my league. How do you guys get such certain reads ;-;
I love this tbh

Impoetic · Post Post #1498 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:52 am

In post 627, Impoetic wrote:just for the record I'm on page 2. I'll try to catch up as soon as possible! In the meantime, who the fuck is this mafiascum guy and why does he think he's allowed to complain at Bacde's overconfidence read-wise?

this post? why?

evilpacman18 · Post Post #1499 (ISO) » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:53 am

One of your first posts*