Nothing quite like a double mod abandoned game to make me not give a crap anymore. I also thought we had a hammer a few days back, but no one cares about/believes that, so let's just get into it.
@Wicked
Wickedestjr wrote:
Pads wrote:
(Yes, I realize the kills might have been randomized once a kill wasn't sent in, but the choice of targets indicates that they were not randomly chosen).
The kills didn't look random to me. Also, didn't you say Slicey wasn't SK because he hadn't been around?
I did, and here I'm acknowledging that some game setups/mods won't let a serial killer not kill.
Wickedestjr wrote:
The maximum possible size of Jupiter Mafia right now is four people. If there were more then it would be impossible for anybody else to win.
Incorrect. The maximum number of Jupiter Mafia, assuming the single mafia/SK theory, is three. Four scum automatically win in a eight player game, as per normal mafia rules. Normally I'd say this isn't a big deal, but since you're been peddling multiscum for a good portion of the game I'm inclined to think differently of it.
Wickedestjr wrote:
I think at the moment, hunting down the rest of Jupiter Mafia should be our main priority during the day at least until circumstances change.
Has there been some moment in which hunting scum was incorrectly selected as our priority?
Wickedestjr wrote:
Next, either Pads reads are inconsistent, or they change a lot, because in post 1 he says he likes xRx and is content with Cyberbob, but then in post 7 he votes Cyberbob, and in post 9 he says xRx may be a buddy. What happened?
Reading people, changing your mind, and reacting to new stimuli is what townies do. Scum don't do that, because they've already got a 'plan', so their 'changes of mind' tend to be more slow and well documented, so that no one questions their motives. When scum change their 'suspect', it's more of a decision to do so, rather than being convinced by something in the game.
And if you don't believe me, just look at Reckoner. He's the closest thing we have to a confirmed townie, and he's a damned tornado of voting. As I recall he was even happy to lynch you at the start of the day, and now he's calling you town. Zomg what happened!?!? Nothing happened. He changed his mind as he's seen new info, just like he's supposed to.
Wickedestjr wrote:
Pads seems to try to just shake it off. He also seems to feel the need to show he isn't worried about it. He does the same thing later here:
Pads wrote:
Kise wrote:
Pads is Jupiter Mafia BTW.
Hurray, that was easy!
Lazy scum hunting gets a lazy reply, plain and simple. When Kise did actually make a case on me later, I responded with a normal defense. I noticed you made no mention of that.
Wickedestjr wrote:
Another thing:
Pads wrote:
Empking, despite the contentless Swimmer vote, is likely not Exalt or MonkeyMan's scum buddy. If Exalt had the nards to defend self-destructing scumbuddy MonkeyMan, then there's no reason to think he'd feel forced to bus Empking for his (Empking's) play.
You say this, yet you were attacking me for my interactions with Exalt earlier. That seems odd to me.
What the heck are you talking about? Your interactions with Exalt consisted of him taking your machine gun questions seriously when no one else did. The fact that he also supported MonkeyMan is a strong indication that he supported any other scum buddy(ies) of his, which in turn is a strong indication that his support of you was because you were his buddy.
Wickedestjr wrote:
Pads wrote:
Zoraster - His vote is a 180 flip from yesterday, but he hasn't actually called muh scummy. Looks like testing the wagon to me, always good for town points in my book.
This is scummy considering Pads uses this against zoraster later in the game.
Of course. In hindsight, his action looks scummier than it did at the time. Do you really look at stuff that happened on Day 1 in the same light that you look at it now? If you do, it's because you're scum.
Wickedestjr wrote:
Pads wrote:
And the Tar vote is terrible. You and your scumteam know you can't kill Tar at night (I've already explained why I think Tar is almost certainly town), so you're trying to lynch him for whatever reason you can fabricate (No chance that a townie Doctor/Roleblocker would be 'highly interested' in protecting himself, eh?).
Pads wrote:
I think someone else mentioned it today, but Tar is also not the Serial Killer unless something immensely funky is going on, due to what looks like a blocked kill on Night 3 at the same time someone was brutally murdered.
Yet, later Pads brings up several reasons to suspect Tar as SK only a few posts later.
You continue to equate 'changing your mind' with 'scumminess'. I must then assume that you equate 'never changing your mind' with 'towniness'. And that's so ridiculous I don't even think I need to refute it.
Your attack on me is just about the textbook definiton of an OMGUS, fabricated case. And you are Exalt's buddy (Hey, look, something I haven't changed my mind about all game.)
The seemingly sudden willingness of several other people to lynch Wicked at the beginning of the day struck me as odd and gave me pause, but 'sudden willingness to wagon someone' seems to be be par for the course today, and I no longer think anything of it.
As unpopular of a sentiment as this might be (atleast with scumTar), I think Socrates' behavior today is highly indicative of him being town.
If we are at:
4 townies
1 SK
3 scum
...which I believe we are, the scum aren't out of the woods with a mislynch today. They need to survive the SK shot. And 'defending' (and I use the term loosely here) Raivann is not an action designed to endear one to the masses, which is what makes me think he's town speaking his mind. I really don't see him saying that unless he's town, or Raivann's buddy.
And, loathe as I am to admit it, I think he may be right about SK Raivann. Granted, that would be the move for Raivann's scumbuddy, too. But I still like my townSocrates read.
Zoraster wrote:
sure. Vanilla Townie. I assume you're scum?
Zoraster wrote:
er reckoner asked me that, I thought Socrates did. Ah well. I'm sorry I played this game so poorly, guys. The fault is mine more than anyone else's. Just didn't devote the time necessary.
Hey that looks like a lynched town. Except that...
Zoraster wrote:
It was not lynch, and I remain not scum and not SK. I'm more than happy to go with a dan lynch over a me lynch.
Zoraster knew it was not the lynch. And the current wagon on Dana seems to half be because the former wagon's target chose any wagon other than his own.
At L-1, he claimed vanilla townie, apologized for his play, and ... did no scum hunting? No scum list, nothing?
I'm good for a Wicked wagon, obviously, but for whatever reason (possibly my absence) Wicked seems to be soaring high in the polls. Let me know when you guys are ready to lynch Exalt's obvbuddy.
As for Dana and Zoraster, based on Wicked's behavior during the two wagons, I'm inclined to believe exactly one of them is his buddy. He asked for people to remove votes from Zoraster, but once the Dana wagon got going, he says he's more in favor of a Zoraster lynch than a Dana lynch.
Lets' see if he really is.
vote: Zoraster