Want to elaborate on this?In post 1414, implosion wrote: I still think Moros can be scum but I think this page makes me think it isn't.
Maybe you can convince me!
Want to elaborate on this?In post 1414, implosion wrote: I still think Moros can be scum but I think this page makes me think it isn't.
this is still tangential at best. my read on you is not based on preflips.In post 1406, May wrote:Preflip associations are fundamentally bad approach to mafia. But I can't resolve 3 MD threads of discussion convincing you of that.In post 1399, Moros wrote:this is the third time that you've used language that frames my points in an inaccurate way that allows you to be dismissive of them, which is i think enough reason for me to want to vote you on its own. you may consider the vote to be purely for that reason instead if you find that one to be less annoying.In post 1397, May wrote: It's like pretty annoying to be declared mafia purely on a preflip assoc with experience.
I also don't want to like, go deep on antiassociatives with experience's slot because it can get wifomy. It's better to just try to express my alignment individually and nudge you in some sort of way to table the full team tinfoils.
But also annoyed is an emotion you made me feel
i didn't do either of those things. i said if experience is scum, then may fits as a possible partner. and i said if implosion is scum, experience is more likely town than scum. no conclusions can be made as a result of these statements because we don't know if the ifs are true. but i think that pulling together these if-thens helps me get closer to an overall understanding.In post 1410, Tsawwassen wrote:You used scum!exp as the basis to assert scum!May. Yet you used town!exp as the basis to assert implosion can't be partner with him because he TMI'd his read.In post 1405, Moros wrote: the reads build on each other but i believe the structure is sound if you construct it on a foundation of scum experience. i think it's true though that building the house before checking if the foundation is there or not is unwise.
There are two polarizing hypothesis there.
honestly, because it is how i feel but i am also self-aware that it's the convenient stance for me to have at this moment. like, i'm very self-aware that some of my stances (i.e. that tired person was a good lim late yesterday when i had been thinking they were town a bit earlier) have tracked what is convenient for me to think. Probably the reason for this in practice is just that i'm really persuadable in this game because i haven't really felt that good about any of my stances except black since like, umlaut era. also i was kind of contrite because i felt like i should have posted earlier yesterday but got distractedIn post 1419, May wrote: Why does 1414 use the word frankly? Is it to rebut a presumption you would lie about your opinion of experience or to condescend to people who disagree with you
what exactly can i convince you of? my position that moros might be but is probably not scum? because that doesn't sound like something i particularly care about anyone believing or not believing at this junctureIn post 1425, Tsawwassen wrote:Want to elaborate on this?In post 1414, implosion wrote: I still think Moros can be scum but I think this page makes me think it isn't.
Maybe you can convince me!
I'd maybe need to actually meta them to be confident on this but experience's play reads to me like someone who is just not used to playing this kind of mafia where there is no hard info. Like, experience as scum does not have a particular reason to not form reads right now. Even if experience was scum and genuinely did not know what to do, they would have a scumbuddy that could coach them. They would know that as scum in their position they're supposed to give stances. There's no way that experience is like, deciding to give 0 stances because they think it's optimal play as scum or something like that, they're doing it, i can only guess because they're not exactly explaining themself, because they feel out of their depth (as either alignment) or they are genuinely having trouble picking up reads in the absence of hard info (as town) or something like that.In post 1394, Moros wrote: i don't think experience is town because he was able to find reads easily and quickly when he needed to form a coalition but has lost that now. i think when he needed to push a coalition with his partner, he did that, but now he doesn't know what to do.
duck's stance evolution now just feels to me like scum who is now acknowledging that ultimately they might have to step in and be the winconIn post 1422, the worst wrote: oh I voted implosion because I think his scum wincon is to embrace absurdity and hope this fairly volatile town implodes around him
i see.In post 1386, Moros wrote: experience, it seems like you had more reads and opinions when you first joined than you do now.
Why do you think we are townIn post 1440, experience wrote:i see.In post 1386, Moros wrote: experience, it seems like you had more reads and opinions when you first joined than you do now.
i'm leaning towards you/black being town which is making me doubt my initial trs.
as in i'm no longer sure of ducky/may/implo being all town.
is this a bad thing? why are you even unvoting here
I find you clear and have found you clear all game but I think your voice is becoming clearer (or I'm getting better at hearing it)In post 1427, Moros wrote: is my manner of speaking or manner of thinking difficult to parse in general? it seems like people keep missing the point of things that i say and if that is universal then i should be more hesitant to ascribe ill intentions to it.
I just don't want to fade anyone yet. We have 8 days