Double-Dip Mafia, Game Over

[DrippingGoofball]

From imaginality:

"Red Coyote,

[Low Key]

,

iamausername

, smallpeoples343, all are good townreads for me at the moment. "

Two dead townies among his town reads.

Also,

Ellibereth

was a minor town read of his. Also NK'd.

[Flavour Analysis]

Anyways. Here's something about Imag that I didn't like earlier on:

However, I agree the way he's stalling his claim really doesn't look good. Refusing to claim is okay in my book, but stalling in the way he's doing is suspect. Also, Ranmaru's attempts to deflect away from Hiraki (e.g. 509) look, as [Low Key] says, more like posturing than genuine, and his attacks on [Low Key] could be a chainsaw defense kind of thing, so if we get a scum flip on Hiraki, Ranmaru looks like a likely buddy.

I also didn't like Ranmaru's rolefishing tone in 448.

Seeing as how I never deflected from Hiraki's wagon, this was a lie. In fact, it was LK who was deflecting from Hiraki to "Ran being buds with Hiraki" and it went from there. This seemed like mudslinging and I had a scum read on him early on because of his fence sitty ness. This is why I'm worrying about my read on him. #549

That was the only things I didn't like about his play.

Also DGB, what is your read on Amrun?

[Ranmaru]

Anyways. Here's something about Imag that I didn't like earlier on:

However, I agree the way he's stalling his claim really doesn't look good. Refusing to claim is okay in my book, but stalling in the way he's doing is suspect. Also, Ranmaru's attempts to deflect away from Hiraki (e.g. 509) look, as [Low Key] says, more like posturing than genuine, and his attacks on [Low Key] could be a chainsaw defense kind of thing, so if we get a scum flip on Hiraki, Ranmaru looks like a likely buddy.

I also didn't like Ranmaru's rolefishing tone in 448.

Seeing as how I never deflected from Hiraki's wagon, this was a lie. In fact, it was LK who was deflecting from Hiraki to "Ran being buds with Hiraki" and it went from there. This seemed like mudslinging and I had a scum read on him early on because of his fence sitty ness. This is why I'm worrying about my read on him. #549

That was the only things I didn't like about his play.

Also DGB, what is your read on Amrun?

Oopsies.

[Ranmaru]

Hold on...

Imag accuses DGB of hammering Kunk without a claim... even tho Kunk did the same D1? Thoughts plz

[DrippingGoofball]

Hold on...

Imag accuses DGB of hammering Kunk without a claim... even tho Kunk did the same D1? Thoughts plz

AND

day 2!

[DrippingGoofball]

Who is Flavor Analysis?

[Ranmaru]

FA is my hydra. : D

Well I mean, Hiraki was stalling a claim, and Kunkstar hammered, but then Imag had a town read on him and wasn't mad about that.

[Ranmaru]

Oh yeah Wey didn't claim yet either lolz

[DrippingGoofball]

Also DGB, what is your read on Amrun?

Amrun was on every wagon. Scum will be self-conscious to avoid some. So they don't look like they're on every wagon.

[DrippingGoofball]

FA is my hydra. : D

Well I mean, Hiraki was stalling a claim, and Kunkstar hammered, but then Imag had a town read on him and wasn't mad about that.

Imaginality doesn't know how to change his mind as scum.

[DrippingGoofball]

Where is Tar? Is he scum?

[Ranmaru]

I dunno. ;-; He's doing his modding thing. But idunoo... : [

I hate flip flopping. I want scum ded

[Amrun]

Crazy, I must have missed that flip flop.

Dgb I already moved my vote.

[Ranmaru]

Also DGB, what is your read on Amrun?

Amrun was on every wagon. Scum will be self-conscious to avoid some. So they don't look like they're on every wagon.

Ya but I wasn't on every wagon. For example, Hiraki. At best I would think this would be a null tell.

Amrun, why did you suspect Hiraki again?

[DrippingGoofball]

Ya but I wasn't on every wagon. For example, Hiraki. At best I would think this would be a null tell.

To be on every wagon is a wagon-tell, haha. Scum, ideally, should be on every townie wagon, for their wincon. But in the interest of deceit, they will hod back being on EVERY wagon, otherwise, they will fear detection.

Empking is very high on the scumputer, which measures exactly that. He's on all wagons minus 1. He also tends to favor voting townies.

[DrippingGoofball]

SCUMPUTER Day 4 - error corrected

INPUT

2 scum out of 6 players = 33 pts

1 scum out of 4, 25 points

iamausername

smallpeoples343
Amrun
Ameliaslay
RedCoyote

kunkstar7

2 scum out of 6 players = 40 pts

2 scum out of 4 players = 50 pts

iamausername

Crazy

Ellibereth

Empking
Amrun
RedCoyote

1.5 scum out of 5 players = 30 pts

0.5 scum out of 2 players = 25 pts

iamausername

kunkstar7

imaginality

Ranmaru

Amrun

1.5 scum out of 5 players = 30 pts

1.5 scum out of 5 players = 38 pts

Amrun
Empking

iamausername

Crazy
smallpeoples343

2 scumz out of 7 players = 28 points

1 scum out of 5 players = 20 points

Amrun
Empking

iamausername

Crazy
smallpeoples343
Quilford.

kunkstar7

OUTPUT

138 Amrun
108 Empking
108 Crazy
83 smallpeoples343
75 RedCoyote
45 Ameliaslay/Quilford
25 imaginality

===============

imaginality, in addition to valuing his consistency like his virginity, is also avoiding wagons with a meaningful momentum:
This is the only one:
5 DrippingGoofball (iamausername, kunkstar7, imaginality, Ranmaru, Amrun)

All other imaginality votes are on piddling wagons that won't lead to lynches.

[Empking]

"No kunkstar vote. Ever." - A DGB wquote about me.

Amrun: What are your thoughts about DGB lying (its self-evidently a lie since she had quoted an even older post of mine in the same post aboutr Kunk) in order to get townies lynched. Do you think that's scummy?

[DrippingGoofball]

Vote: Ran
Vote: Kunk

I stand corrected.

[DrippingGoofball]

Try something else, scum.

Other than attacking your attacker.

[Empking]

Try something else, scum.

You think I should make so many lies that it impossible for anyone to check all of them? I'm afraid I'm too stuck in the mud for that.

[DrippingGoofball]

You're voting two townies right now, but you probably know that.

Vote

Tar

&

imaginality

. You get to bus your buddy, and vote a townie, too!

[DrippingGoofball]

I'm being facetious, but I realize one of my suspects Tar/imag/Empking is town.

If it's you, Empking, you should vote the others. It would mean that they are both scum.

But you're my #1 suspect right now.

[Amrun]

I pretty much let the fence rip a hole in my ass on Hiraki.

I had some reasons for suspecting him (don't really remember what they were, but they existed, probably they are in my iso), but I wasn't totally sure.

That's just the truth.

[DrippingGoofball]

UPDATE I

think

this is correct. I still seem to be missing a Crazy vote.

4

DrippingGoofball

(

imaginality, Empking

,

smallpeoples343

,

Tarhalindur

)
3 smallpeoples343 (

Ranmaru

,

imaginality

, Quilford)
3

Empking

(

DrippingGoofball

, Quilford, Amrun)
2

imaginality

(

DrippingGoofball

, Amrun)
2 Quilford (

Empking

,

Crazy

)
1

Crazy

(

Ranmaru

)
1 Amrun (

Tarhalindur

)
1

Ranmaru

(

smallpeoples343

)

Useless votes that need to move:

3 smallpeoples343 (

Ranmaru

,

imaginality

, Quilford)
2 Quilford (

Empking

, Crazy)
1 Amrun (

Tarhalindur

)
1 Ranmaru (

smallpeoples343

)

@ Ranmaru, Quilford, Tar & Crazy

The scum is already entrenched, smalls's votes are cast in stone because he needs replacement, and we need at least two or three of you to get together and decide on a lynch. It's in YOUR hands. I was scum recently in Mafia Invictus, and we tried to have a lynch without any of us scumbaggos on it. IT IS BLOODY HARD for a lynch to go through without the scum's help. Almost impossible. Like I said, the scum is voting, and they won't change. We need to organize a townie wagon.

@ Crazy

- we may not be able to lynch unless you move that Quilford vote. Please do it ASAP.

@ Ranmaru

- FOCUS - That smalls vote needs to be placed somewhere useful. It's SO HARD to get a lynch without the scum's help, it's going to be pretty much impossible to lynch IMAGINALITY, especially with smalls AWOL - that puts us at a disadvantage. Empking won't bus. Imaginality won't vote himself. 5/7 townies, one of whom isn't around - so really, 5/6. We can't waste votes to send a message now.

@Tar

- your vote on me is stupid, but you may be scum, so you can leave it there for evidence tomorrow, If not, you are voting with scum. You need to move BOTH your votes, they both are the most useless votes in the whole count. If we no-lynch, it's on you, and you should be lynched tomorrow if that happens. Maybe you're the scum, and maybe imaginality is the townie. So don't mess with us Tar. We need a lynch.

We need two more votes to lynch Empking, a very green wagon.

Three more to lynch imaginality, another gree wagon.

It's to late to lynch Tar.

WE WANT TO AVOID LAST-DITCH, UNREASONED HAMMERS - everyone changing their votes needs to explain it. Don't wait for deadline minus 5 minutes, the scum can sneak in.

[DrippingGoofball]

@ Quilford

- smalls isn't happening. Please move that vote.