I'm a fan of revealing info and unraveling the mystery !!scotmany12 wrote:I drive a Saab? Oh come on, I can afford better than that...
Anyways, I have 4 rolenames mentioned in my pm, one is Yos. Two others seem irrelevant at this point, but there is one name that might help us. I don't think it will help us with the situation with me and yos, but I think it might lead to something. Should I reveal this?
Investigation.Guardian wrote:Yosarian2, which PM are you referring to that said scot was your father Baxter? Role PM, or investigation PM?
No, I didn't know much from my role PM. My role PM only mentioned his name, mentioned that I hate him, and mentioned the Saab in relation to another character.Did you know he was your father before you watched Melissa? Did you know you had a father playing? Did you know he was scotmany? Did you have a hint that he was a bad guy?
Eh...perhaps, but if I was going to claim today, it was probably better I do so before he got wagoned to a claim; otherwise I couldn't prove I knew his rolename.Also, you've touched on this, but why not go after scotmany without revealing your role, etc. Sure you may be more likely to be killed than the average bear, but it seems that there was nothing to be lost from pursuing scotmany with logic rather than role claims, for a bit.
Um...let me see. Nope, nothing about location in the investigative PM.FrankyPeanuts wrote:In addition to guardian's questions Yosarian, do any of your PMs add insight to where you saw Baxtar/scot kill Marissa? Also, do any of them add detail in what caused your character's hatred for his father?
So you're connected to two of the three dead people .. Interesting !!scotmany12 wrote:Ok, I don't know how much help this is going to be, but I'm going to reveal one of the names in my role pm. I know who Jake Riddles is. He was the person that I hired to edit the video cameras, so that was why he was in town.
I would like undo to comment about what he knows about Baxter Johnson ..undo wrote:Anyway, the flavour about Baxter Johnson you described matches mine somewhat, so my votes stays on scotmany12.
Skruffs warned that we shouldn’t base our suspicions on flavour because we would be probably be wrong.Yosarian wrote:Scotmany's flavor claim or whatever is interesting, but it don't seem to explains the PM I got. And I'm not sure why people who were already voting for him are unvoting him now that there's role-based info against him; could the three of you explain that? I don't expect you to take my information as 100% gospal truth, I don't see it as quite that myself, but why would it make you LESS suspicious of him then you were before?
You seemed to be, when you said something like “too bad I can’t vote him twice”.Beep Beep wrote: Because with the role he's got, he's a prime candidate for being set up and take the blame for the kill, though I have no idea of what the mechanics may be, I'm not willing to lynch him on Day 1 just like that.
Not relevant. I’d rather not comment about it, we already have too much information out this first day.ooba wrote: I would like undo to comment about what he knows about Baxter Johnson ..
Not on flavor, sure, but to not form opinions based on actual role information, especally when there's a contradiction between what the mod told me happened and what Scot is claiming...that seems extreme.undo wrote: Skruffs warned that we shouldn’t base our suspicions on flavour because we would be probably be wrong.
" I don't know, exactally. While my role PM was extremly long and flavorfull and went into a lot of detail, the PM I got in response to my night choice was much shorter and didn't have much detail.Guardian wrote:Curiosity -- how did Scot kill melissa?
Well, I wasn't especally confident of my (or, I guess, my character's) assessment that Scot was a "bad guy"; that was what I was worried about in terms of sanity issues. However, I am quite sure that Scot killed Marissa (not Melissa, btw), and I'm not sure how he could do that and not know. So yeah, he's lying about that.Really, my biggest problem at this point is Yosarian2's claimed possible sanity issues.
Yosarian2, how sure are you that Scot killed Melissa, Scot knew he killed Melissa, and is thus lying? I am pretty much ready to lynch Scot, unless your response to this is really weak.
Heh. That would be the worst plan ever.Scum wouldn't claim to be a investigation role day 1 and out themselves to get rid of one stinking townie, unless your plan was day 2 to be all "oh damn, I got a townie lynched. Sanity issues
I am sure Scot is scum, yeah. Only thing that could have changed my mind was if he had given some plausable explination for killing Marissa.So I want to hear from you more on how sure you are that Scot is scum.
(shrug) I'm not sure how to respond to the "lyncher" accusation here; I can understand why you might suspect that. All I can say is that I hope other people might have role flavor that helps confirm what I've said, but even if so I'm not sure they should claim it unless it becomes necessary.Unless... you are a lyncher. Then this is a great ploy....
What do you guys think about us hearing more about Yosarian2's role, in totality. Especially with his acknowledgment that he will likely die tonight if we have no doctor, getting that info isn't bad. And it would help us evaluate his truthfulnes... Lyncher bugs me.
You see, this is the way I see it:Yosarian2 wrote:Not on flavor, sure, but to not form opinions based on actual role information, especally when there's a contradiction between what the mod told me happened and what Scot is claiming...that seems extreme.undo wrote: Skruffs warned that we shouldn’t base our suspicions on flavour because we would be probably be wrong.
