There's a huge difference between building cases and pointing out suspicious acts, and saying someone is 100% scum. My point is that voting for no one has a scum motivation as I have already shown. Therefore I voted for the person who did it. I think the no lynch vote was scummy, and ConSpiracy is scummy for it, but I am not saying he is 100% confirmed needs-to-die-today scum.
Look at this post:
AurorusVox wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:No.
With this logic, if you flip town, you'd shock me.
In fact, lets take a majority vote. Who here thought that ConSpiracy's NL vote was particularly scummy because he was trying to stop any and all voting analysis?
My logic is sound.
Scum know who is town and who is scum: Y/N
Scum do not therefore vote randomly: Y/N
A vote for no one prevents a vote on a someone: Y/N
A vote for no one prevents connections between the voter and a someone: Y/N
4 Yesses = A vote on no one circumvents scum's predicament of not being able to randomly vote
You take ConSpiracy's vote and you do not apply just scum motivation behind it; instead, you are using the basis of him being scum behind your core logic. You're saying, basically, "In order for Conspiracy's vote to be scum, he would NEED to have been scum in the first place, or else my logic doesn't make sense". It's circular logic.
For him to be scum,
he would need to have been scum
when making his "Random vote", so says you.
I'm asking for you to prove that bolded.
As far as my thoughts on everyone else:
aaah is alright; I'm keeping an eye on him but I think his shakiness of the english language puts himself into scummy positions. I've sort of ganged up on him in the last game we were in because his presentation of the language created straw man arguments and circular logic, so I'm being more careful when assessing him this time.
Antihero needs to post more. The lurkiness is getting to me; IIRC, he's not usually this lurky.
CES is biting on the aaah wagon due to scummy wording. It's a little alarming that he's discrediting our exchange as being worthless information, so I'm not so sure about him at the moment. He also needs to post more.
CS started out okay, but he's in the realm of picking out fake scumslips and tunneling where it's not needed. Under Antihero, he's probably my third suspicion. It wouldn't surprise me, as well, if you were scum and were RVS-bussing scum CS.
DRK is okay in my opinion. Nothing really has scum motivation, I feel. Same with RC.
Uite is like AV lite, only more lurky. I need more information and possibly meta on him; somehow, I feel as if you are scum, AV, then he wouldn't be, and vice versa. That's just a feeling, though, so I can just cast that away.
DJ is...alright, but he needs to give us more information too. Everything is an offhand comment or a criticism.
Don Johnson: can you give us a top 3 scumlist please?
mothrax, he said himself clearly that he voted him because he is scum, knows who scum and town is and tried to deny everyone information by voting No Lynch. So, how can you mistake that fact? Go back and read again.
SV is alright again, but he's another aaah biter. I don't think that means much in his case; he's doing decent scumhunting. Silver's also okay in my eyes, even though he might be on the wrong track with his scumhunting.
