Mini 740 - Communiqu├® Mafia 2: Game Over and the Winner is..

[Casey]

@Casey: I don't understand how you can proceed with this plan while there's still people who haven't agreed to this. I can think of more useful way the town can use their communique. You've got at least three people in that list who are either on the fence or in opposition.

The more I think about the mechanics of the game, the less I'm fence sitting about it.

This whole idea REEKS of scum tactic. The scum are trying to get the town to burn any potential advantages of day communication.

Once this line of communication is complete, what is this going to tell us exactly?

It's going to tell us who sent the PM that implicated you. This is a no-reveal game, so this is very vital information.

Sorry if I'm overeager, but I feel there's been enough support to go through with this, and I'm tired of just sitting around.

I don't want to OMGUS, but you're not helping yourself by calling a plan that's supposed to clear you (or condemn you) scummy. It feels to me like you just skimmed over the topic and haven't paid attention to the details. +scum

Please reread.

I can think of more useful way the town can use their communique.

And those are...?

[hohum]

Answer my question first and then I'll answer yours.

WHAT "vital" information is this going to reveal to us?

[hohum]

it's only you and ecto really pushing this plan. You've only managed to convince other

people

sheep to follow along.

[Ectomancer]

Casey has a valid point Hohum. Why are you concerned about us having a better view of your alignment? I see no reason why you wouldn't want town to know you are town seeing as scum already knows, unless of course you are already scum.
Shall we lynch you on the basis of a rumored one-shot cop investigation on you?

I've stated what my beef is with you Juls. I don't like your action if it was as stated, and it is such a weak excuse that I believe the chances are good for it to be a lie.

Since Hohum (suspiciously) doesn't want the plan, and Juls (also smoked out during this process) doesn't like it either.

Let's get a real show of who supports this. This is also a good activity check. If we don't get answers within 24 hours we start asking for prods.

YES

to directing today's communique's.

[hohum]

Casey has a valid point Hohum. Why are you concerned about us having a better view of your alignment? I see no reason why you wouldn't want town to know you are town seeing as scum already knows, unless of course you are already scum.
Shall we lynch you on the basis of a rumored one-shot cop investigation on you?

I've stated what my beef is with you Juls. I don't like your action if it was as stated, and it is such a weak excuse that I believe the chances are good for it to be a lie.

Since Hohum (suspiciously) doesn't want the plan, and Juls (also smoked out during this process) doesn't like it either.

Let's get a real show of who supports this. This is also a good activity check. If we don't get answers within 24 hours we start asking for prods.

YES

to directing today's communique's.

Neither of you have yet to explain exactly what this is going to reveal. How is burning the town's ability to communicate during the day going to reveal anything about anyone's alignment?

[Juls]

@Ectomancer: I am fine with the plan for today because it serves a purpose. But, you proposed this plan before it had a purpose. That is when I objected to it and I object to it on D2.

[Ectomancer]

Neither of you have yet to explain exactly what this is going to reveal. How is burning the town's ability to communicate during the day going to reveal anything about anyone's alignment?

Heh, that's easy cheesy. We expose who sent in the guilty result, we lynch both of you and we have a 1 town for 1 scum exchange. That's good for us. You should be happy to die for the cause.

[Ectomancer]

Juls, preventing scum daychat and possibly exposing exactly what we found is stated in my very first proposal of this plan. It appears the long shot came through, we'll just have to hope that scum daychat really is blocked (for the most part at least).
Anyhow, the fact that you came forward right away, and then protesting is actually 2 or 3 points in your favor.
The contents of your message are fine being held between you two.

[hohum]

The system breaks down if someone lies, then we have to go through the process of counterclaims, and it's going to be a mess but potentially useful. Since I seem to be the only one still opposed to this idea, I'm going to shut up and send my message.

[hohum]

also it doesn't appear as if we've heard anything from magicrabbit in a while

@Mod: can we get a prod?

I want to make sure my message target is alive before I send.

[BSG]

@Juls
When you receive the communique, you can find the password


here (two empty lines between the real message and the password)


Will start writing mine now.

[hohum]

Unvote

[Juls]

I feel sorry for our mod...he is about to be bombarded my messages I think.

[Casey]

WHAT "vital" information is this going to reveal to us?

Your accuser. This has been said multiple times by many people. PLEASE read.

The system breaks down if someone lies, then we have to go through the process of counterclaims, and it's going to be a mess but potentially useful.

The only people who have reason to lie are scum, and the code word system stops counterclaims.

We expose who sent in the guilty result, we lynch both of you and we have a 1 town for 1 scum exchange. That's good for us. You should be happy to die for the cause.

I was actually hoping we could find out which one was guilty through post analysis, because otherwise it'll be a 3 town for 1 scum (barring vig roles), because we'd have to spend 2 lynches to get them both (provided roffman didn't make up the original communique that started this in the first place).

[Ectomancer]

So you're saying find the ones involved (or potentially implicated), put a big bold mark around them and keep going?

[dahill1]

Vote Count

3 - hohum: (roffman, Reecer6, Ectomancer)
3 - Ectomancer: (dorvaan, Budja, Juls)
1 - Juls: (Braeden)

5 - Not Voting: (Casey, RossWilliam, houseofcards, hohum, magicrabbit)

12 alive means 7 to lynch

Prodding magicrabbit

[roffman]

message sent to BSG. I think that means our loop is done

[Juls]

BSG, got your message. Password: Dedede

[Casey]

So you're saying find the ones involved (or potentially implicated), put a big bold mark around them and keep going?

No, I'm saying that hopefully, after we find who sent the message, we'll be able to get that person to talk (and hohum to talk) and determine if the message is the truth or a lie.

[magicrabbit]

also it doesn't appear as if we've heard anything from magicrabbit in a while

@Mod: can we get a prod?

I want to make sure my message target is alive before I send.

i'm here. glad we are doing loops and not pairs like i suggested.

so I should send to reecer now?

[Ectomancer]

I think we have a quorum, so yes.

[dorvaan]

Got Casey's message. Code word: Laundry

[hohum]

So you're saying find the ones involved (or potentially implicated), put a big bold mark around them and keep going?

No, I'm saying that hopefully, after we find who sent the message, we'll be able to get that person to talk (and hohum to talk) and determine if the message is the truth or a lie.

Why the hell am I being singled out? Have I not been active in this thread?

Jesus. You and Ecto are tag-teaming me.


I just got my communique from ecto, password plain

'bout to send mine off

[Juls]

Hohum, you were the one that was targeted by the "one-shot cop". The proposal is to kill both of you so that we are guaranteed to catch scum. If the cop is legit, you are scum. If the cop is not legit, he/she is scum. Therefore, we trade 1 town for 1 scum.

[hohum]

I see.

Thanks.

BTW, Ecto is rolefishing. Scum Scum Scum

If you have a role you can't claim - password secret
If vanilla - password plain
Tell me tonight