Yeah, okay, your explanation isn't shit. If it looks like shit and it smells like shit, that must mean it's a bundle of roses.In post 1224, Elyse wrote:2. No, my explanation is not shit. And no I'm not going to fabricate one to meet your standards.
Wrong. I'm not going to take complete credit for getting Gambler lynched, but I was instrumental in catching him. That's more than can be said for your contributions this game. You have no right to criticize my methods when your track record is even worse than mine.In post 1224, Elyse wrote:3. Same number as you, hon. Except I'm not acting like an arrogant asshole and employing all of these "gambreaking" concepts that lead to nothing.
Do you think that petty name-calling is going to make me more willing or less willing to listen to your side of the story? Serious question.
Because it says so in the rules, maybe? Here, I'll even quote it for you because I'm so nice.In post 1224, Elyse wrote:How are you even so sure that scum don't talk in a QT unless they're in the same room? How are kills even submitted that way? Your cases are based on too many unreliable hypotheticals.
Plus, in the first game, Scum players were not allowed to communicate with each other during the night phase if they went into different rooms. What disorder of the brain would make you think that it would be any different this time? Who is making unreliable hypotheticals now?
And while we're on the subject, why don't you go ahead and explain why my current suspicion of you is "based on too many unreliable hypotheticals." I reread the thread, I analyzed the interactions between DCLXVI and the three remaining suspects, and I made a conclusion based on what I had read. Where do unreliable hypotheticals play into that process?
I wanted to see if you'd try to make up an excuse. You didn't. Here, have a cookie.In post 1224, Elyse wrote:4. Because I wanted to see if you were going to be insistent on that point or casually drop it once you realized you were wrong. What reaction were you expecting to garner here?