1.)
Flavour Analysis, Post 1190 wrote: Petroleum Jelly: You think Glowball is lying about lying? Then what need would there be for Four's soft counter? And I do not think she'd openly lie about another claim then.
I don’t understand the question. Fourseen countered Watcher
before
glowball countered Bo Peep, so whether or not glowball was lying has nothing to do with whether we "needed" FourseenCircumstance’s soft counter.
My point is that I still consider it entirely possible that glowball is in fact Bo Peep who feels she might as well retract her claim for the moment. I don’t care
how
confident a player is that somebody is scum – Townspeople just
don’t
lie about their role-name. It's stupid and risky. If glowball is Town and
not
Bo Peep, then I will probably unofficially blacklist playing with her, because I
hate
playing with people who lie as Town. And so because I actually had a mild Town read on her from Day One, my assumption for now is that she is not a complete idiot, and that she is in fact Bo Peep.
Also, is there a particular reason why you used the eye-rolling emoticon? Trying to make me look ridiculous? Like I don't know what I'm talking about?
2.)
I’m gonna jump in here and defend NanooktheWolf from these “lurking” accusations (and yes, in part because I feel this pretty much happened to DonJosh on Day One). This game is
fast
and there are a
lot
of pages for this game only just starting Day Two. Now check Nanook’s posts; he has actually posted (and posted content) almost every real-time day at least once, save for the time period of August 1 – August 5, for which he apologized and explained that “real life was setting in.”
Y’all need to get your definition of lurking straight. Players who can’t consistently keep up this ridiculous pace are not necessarily “lurking,” and from the looks of his posts, Nanook most certainly is not.
3.)
Flavour Analysis, why are you directing Cops to investigate glowball?
4.)
It’s already been said by both SpyreX and Rainbowdash, but apparently it needs repeating: the “two Vigs” comment was clearly not
actually
postulating two Vigilantes. The point of the comment was very obviously that the two deaths overnight are strange nightkill choices, because neither player who was nightkilled looked very Town. In other words, the two dead players seem more like Vigilante nightkills than scum nightkills.
