Mini 1499 - State Farm Mafia 2 - Game Over

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:12 am

Terrible modding? excuse me?

ABR and Bob did nothing to warrant being modkilled or force replaced. They were not violating any game or site rules. They felt a player was playing against his win condition so instead of making the decision to do something I went to Mr. Flay and asked for advice. Mr. Flay said he was going to discuss it with the mod team or whoever and let me know. Luckily for me peacebringer asked to be replaced before Mr. Flay had given me his opinion on what I should do.

If you felt ABR, bob, or any other place did something that deserved moderator action you should have brought that to my attention. Replacing out because you felt like your chances of winning went out the window is a shitty reason to replace out. You sir are a bad player for replacing out for such a crappy reason.

I followed the proper channels thank you very much, so you have no right to call me a bad mod.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:15 am

PB was playing against his win condition. "Lynch me". What?

That's against the spirit of the game.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:16 am

Did Flay ever come back with an opinion? Because PB was so far out of line it's incredible he's not banned from the site already.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:18 am

In post 1127, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Did Flay ever come back with an opinion? Because PB was so far out of line it's incredible he's not banned from the site already.

He replaced out before flay ever responded so I told him to forget about it.

Peace left the site again and this time I am sure it's permanent. He never liked this place and only came back because i convinced him too. I am sure he is fond of me now

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:39 am

Actually, he's in two ongoing games right now.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:41 am

Oh I thought he said he was leaving.

Garmr · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:57 am

he told me his leaving after finishing them.

Magua · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:18 am

In post 1124, Slandaar wrote:Mod was terrible too weak getting rolled over by two townies who never should have been allowed to continue playing. Was there a legitimate reason to replace PB? nope. Could PB continue to play after the ABR/Bob posts? nope. Mod should have done something.

What?

No, seriously, what?

Garmr · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:14 am

I actually thought Jake was a great mod. Friendly, fair ect. I would play in one of his games any day.

1baldeagle1 · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:19 am

In post 1133, Garmr wrote:I actually thought Jake was a great mod. Friendly, fair ect. I would play in one of his games any day.

QFT.

Dry-fit · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:26 am

The modding of the game was good. I didn't think peace needed to be replaced but the answer wouldn't be modkilling/replacing Albert and Bob. Jake did the right thing to try and get things sorted out.

Good game everyone. It was interesting and very competitive! And damn it Banksys I had you!

RachMarie · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:45 am

Well great job by the scum especially banksys. I knew that I would get NKed and banksys had me fooled. I felt a bit unsure on the Mastin lynch, but I knew if we were wrong I would vig Magua. If I had been vt, I would have been more contrary. I had a strong gut read on Magua.

RachMarie · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:46 am

But did not have enough to back up my gut yet.

Banksys Flareon · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 6:43 pm

GG all, I'd play with any of you again, and hopefully will.

Garmr · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 7:49 pm

I'll lynch you I mean play with you to little flareon

.

Slandaar · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:03 pm

In post 1126, Albert B. Rampage wrote:PB was playing against his win condition. "Lynch me". What?

That's against the spirit of the game.

No he didn't. He said IF x lynch me he did not ask to be lynched.

In post 1125, Jake from State Farm wrote: Replacing out because you felt like your chances of winning went out the window is a shitty reason to replace out. You sir are a bad player for replacing out for such a crappy reason.

You got me.

PB was playing to his wincon he just wasn't very good. When you have players demanding he replaces out he cannot stay in the game in such a situation therefore Mod must deal with the accusors not the accused.

My win% sure would go down if PB were replaced though so when I saw he was being replaced (no he wasn't NOTE: he was he couldn't continue to play unless ABR/Bob were removed) I was like oh better replace too can't win without PB!!!

Yeah.

Slandaar · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:08 pm

In post 1125, Jake from State Farm wrote: ABR and Bob did nothing to warrant being modkilled or force replaced. They were not violating any game or site rules. They felt a player was playing against his win condition so instead of making the decision to do something I went to Mr. Flay and asked for advice. Mr. Flay said he was going to discuss it with the mod team or whoever and let me know. Luckily for me peacebringer asked to be replaced before Mr. Flay had given me his opinion on what I should do.

Any result other than ABR and Bob being replaced actively encourages forcing players out of games for no reason other than being bad this is clearly not acceptable.

You are encouraging people to pressure mods to replace people who have done nothing wrong. Nice.

In post 1125, Jake from State Farm wrote: If you felt ABR, bob, or any other place did something that deserved moderator action you should have brought that to my attention.

I did. You failed. I replaced. The actual version of events.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:29 am

are you reading the same game? I don't think you are because I addressed the issue that I do not think he deserved to be replaced. I had 2 players demanding it so I asked Mr. Flay for advice.

In post 412, Jake from State Farm wrote:
Having gotten in trouble for force replacing a player I'm always cautious about doing it. I don't feel like any rules have been violated so I am not going to replace peace. If he wants to replace out on his own he's more than welcome. If you feel a rule has been violated, please bring it to my attention.

In post 415, Jake from State Farm wrote:
I have contacted flay and await his feedback.

If ANY PLAYER feels that site rules are being violated they are within their right to report it to the mod and it is the mod's job to make a ruling on it. I made a ruling, these people complained and said I was wrong and I decided to confirm with someone who was more familiar with the rules.

I am encouraging players to complain to the mod when they feel a site rule has been broken? Well I guess I am, because

PLAYERS SHOULD COMPLAIN TO THE MOD WHEN THEY FEEL A SITE RULE HAS BEEN VIOLATED.

"Play to win" is a site rule and if a player feels that someone isn't doing that they are allowed to complain to the mod. if you disagree go cry to Flay or Mith and have them remove that from the site rules, until that happens players are absolutely in their right to complain to the mod if they feel a player isn't playing to win.

And on that note I will just lock this up. Salander is wrong, I am right.

Tierce · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:02 am

Please do not lock the thread after the game is completed. I will lock the thread when I move it to the completed games section.

Tierce · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:23 am