In post 1024, Hoopla wrote:Right now, I think it is you. How do you feel about that?
Better. At least that's
In post 1024, Hoopla wrote:Right now, I think it is you. How do you feel about that?
In post 1026, Elias_the_thief wrote:Statistically speaking, the smartest play is a no lynch. Why would we want to make a choice out of 4 at LYLO when we could be doing it at 3 with that much less chance of mislynching for the loss?
In post 1024, Hoopla wrote:Right now, I think it is you. How do you feel about that?
Elias_the_thief wrote:Statistically speaking, the smartest play is a no lynch. Why would we want to make a choice out of 4 at LYLO when we could be doing it at 3 with that much less chance of mislynching for the loss?
Carbondioxide wrote:
I'd like to hear people's thoughts on these at least before we tie up a quick no lynch and just give the scum another NK in their lap, without at least making them work a bit.
Also, 4 left means there MUST be only 1 scum left - else it'd be game over. Those that argued long and hard, right to the last (yes Ran, largely you again) that there was more than 1 - I'd like to hear your thoughts now.
In post 1030, Ranmaru wrote:Hoopla, why do you think it's Carbon?
In post 1029, Ranmaru wrote:Here is what we are going to do:
We all give two top scumpicks, and why.
State if you would rather lynch today or tommorow. Why or why not.
In this order:
Elias, Hoopla, Carbon, Me.
It's that simple.
In post 1030, Ranmaru wrote:
Elias_the_thief wrote:Statistically speaking, the smartest play is a no lynch. Why would we want to make a choice out of 4 at LYLO when we could be doing it at 3 with that much less chance of mislynching for the loss?
Of course, but we aren't going to without some discussion. For example, why did you wait until 1 minute to vote after deadline? Are you some sort of indy? Spit it out. You have been tunneling HARD on Hoopla for some reason. Are you not allowed to be on a lynch? Why HAVEN'T you been on a lynch THIS WHOLE DAMN GAME. Tell me.
In post 1038, Ranmaru wrote:Carbon, I have still not gotten your scumpicks. You have a problem with what I'm trying to do, so why don't you give your two picks and reasons in why you believe them.
Do you agree with no lynch today, or do you think there should be a lynch today?
In post 1039, Carbondioxide wrote:
Y'see, I must've missed the part where I agreed to you being in charge and dictating who does what and when. You want to know my "picks"? ISO me. I've been pretty clear about who I suspect lately.
I'm aware that, mathematically there's no reason to lynch today but I'm finding this game so exasperating I'm tempted to go for a 'f**k it lynch' - as my fellow Townies seem SO apathetic about whether we win or not its making me feel like an idiot for giving so much of a damn.
In post 1040, Elias_the_thief wrote:
How are you simultaneously complaining about town being apathetic and about someone trying to take charge?
In post 1039, Carbondioxide wrote:
I'm aware that, mathematically there's no reason to lynch today but I'm finding this game so exasperating I'm tempted to go for a 'f**k it lynch' - as my fellow Townies seem SO apathetic about whether we win or not its making me feel like an idiot for giving so much of a damn.
In post 1046, Ranmaru wrote:In post 1039, Carbondioxide wrote:
I'm aware that, mathematically there's no reason to lynch today but I'm finding this game so exasperating I'm tempted to go for a 'f**k it lynch' - as my fellow Townies seem SO apathetic about whether we win or not its making me feel like an idiot for giving so much of a damn.
Are you serious?
Do you want to no lynch, yes or no? Then answer why.