Open 86 - Lovers Multiball (Game Over)

[Raging Rabbit]

Make that

unvote, vote cerebus3

.

[armlx]

Nice misrep. Never said I don't want you to post stuff, only that the method you use to tell us your thoughts is highly ineffiecient since you comment so much on things that have since become irrelevant that nobody's likely to reread everything you refer to just to check if any of them still has merit. Therefore, flooding us with info like that results in us being less likely to figure out what you actually think. You should filter through all that stuff and tell us what's still relevant to you, rather than expect every player in the game to check for himself in order to see if he agrees with you.

We've already had this convo, I'm saying the same things I said then. You are calling it a misrep now?

And I've also explained why filtering is irre.

[Raging Rabbit]

Yes, because my disagreeing on the best way to share info =/ "not wanting you to post stuff". Disagreeing with me is one thing, twisitng my words and using them as a scumtell is another one altogether.

[sekinj]

@armix: funny how I never showed up in your comments until I criticized you.

[armlx]

@armix: funny how I never showed up in your comments until I criticized you.

You weren't being dumb and not posting content till a while after pg 12, where the first post cut off. you didn't make any comments that were worth mentioning.

[destructor]

.::] Vote Count [::.

*

OpposedForce (4)

- Adel, Crazy, Knight of Cydonia, neko2086

kloud1516 (3)

- ThAdmiral, Erratus Apathos, armlx

cerebus3 (2)

- SleepyPanda, Raging Rabbit

Crazy (1)

- OpposedForce

Battle Mage (1)

- charter

Knight of Cydonia (1)

- pwnz

Not Voting (10) - sekinj, Harvey Pew, DarlaBlueEyes, Cephrir, cerebus3, WaltWishbone, Darox, kloud1516, Alabaska J, Battle Mage

Twelve

votes to lynch.

Battle Mage replaces somestrangeflea.

The

deadline

is a little under 72 hour away.

[destructor]

OpposedForce, Harvey Pew, ThAdmiral, pwnz, DarlaBlueEyes, charter and Erratus Apathos have been prodded.

[ThAdmiral]

Still here.

This game is pretty hard to keep up with, but I'm fairly sure I'm happy where my vote is. I don't really think there have been any other cases to get me to turn my head.

Lover! Post more!



(i miss you...)

[Darox]

Deadline is painful.

Reading Crazy again, his plan does suggest that only a town would come up with it. I dislike his play throughout the game immensely, but his bad play with his 'super secret scum tell' is in his favor.

What I don't like is that OpposedForce is going to be lynched apparently because there is no one better and that he suspects Crazy, who has said some pretty suspicious things throughout the game.

More reading while I look back to see who else appears scummy.

[armlx]

What I don't like is that OpposedForce is going to be lynched apparently because there is no one better and that he suspects Crazy, who has said some pretty suspicious things throughout the game.

This is true.

[Erratus Apathos]

Just over half the town voting with less than three days to deadline? Unless you replaced in recently, you've had way more than enough time to decide who you want to see lynched.

FoS: sekinj, DarlaBlueEyes, Cephrir, WaltWishbone

Double FoS: Harvey Pew/cerebus3, kloud1516/Alabaska J

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm going on a trip tomorrow, no access for about a week 'till next Saturday/Sunday. I apologize in advance and hope you don't replace me in my abscense.

[Darox]

Alabaska J/kloud *

dybeck

*:

[Darox]

/facepalm

In other news, Darox is unable to tell the difference between preview and submit.

I am about to write up something on Alabaska and kloud. Please hold.

[Battle Mage]

@armlx - great. you've gone from irrelevant content to no content. nice.

Agreed. Is it policy lynch time yet?

Vote: Armlx

BM

*PS: Hope he doesn't turn out to be my Lover. rofl!

speaking of policy lynches, if you don't stop spamming up this game and corrupting the signal:noise ratio I will get you lynched. I burned off some of my townie cred so that newbie-townies would stop following my opinions and start thinking critically about the game, but I know that I have enough cred left to get you lynched.

You have a mature playstyle: use it.

You do realise that if you use your alleged 'cred' to get me lynched, you will no longer have said 'cred' for future games. If you think i'm worth it, then i'm truly flattered, and far be it from me to question your motives.

BM

[Battle Mage]

Adel, would you mind if I referenced that post in future games when this scenario pops up again?

Sure. Sometimes BM needs a leash.

You should both know better. Anyone making references to ongoing games will be taken to the highest court of all!

....


The Mod's!

BM

[Battle Mage]

Vote: Darox

Who the hell previews their posts after 1 line? And how long is this analysis taking you?

I call bs.

My read will commence shortly.

BM

[Knight of Cydonia]

...You're kidding me, right? You're voting him because he accidentally mis-submitted? Grasping, much?

[Battle Mage]

...You're kidding me, right? You're voting him because he accidentally mis-submitted? Grasping, much?

No. Try reading my post, rather than completely misinterpreting me. I'm voting him because:

A. I'm unsure why somebody would care enough about how their post looks to preview it after 1 line.
B. He did not provide any analysis, despite his claim that he was preparing one.

Do you not think that is enough reasoning for a vote from somebody who has only read 2 pages of the game (the first and the last)?

BM

[Knight of Cydonia]

A) He might not be particualrly good at BBcode, and was trying it out.
B) Um, hai thar. This is real life calling. Some of us do stuff in it, y'know?

Your single reason for a vote isn't something scummy, it's a null-tell, and it's stretching heavily.

[Battle Mage]

A) He might not be particualrly good at BBcode, and was trying it out.

He might. But there again, he MIGHT be making an extra special effort to make his posts look good because he is scum.

B) Um, hai thar. This is real life calling. Some of us do stuff in it, y'know?

Your single reason for a vote isn't something scummy, it's a null-tell, and it's stretching heavily.

Why are you so scared of letting people answer for themselves?
It's not like we have loads of time to kill. We have a deadline in 72 hours, in case you hadn't noticed. Real life can damn well wait!

BM

[Harvey Pew]

Vote: Alabaska J

[Knight of Cydonia]

BM: there are plenty of better lynches today. If you want to persue Darox, go for it, but it may end up being a wasted vote, today at least.

[Battle Mage]

BM: there are plenty of better lynches today. If you want to persue Darox, go for it, but it may end up being a wasted vote, today at least.

It's a perfectly acceptable vote for the moment. Maybe if you stop arguing the toss, i can start reading, and then get a better impression of the game?

BM

[Darox]

Kloud/Dybeck:

Dybeck

doesn't get involved at all at the start except to oppose any claim. Responds negatively to Crazy questioning his reasons for opposing it.

Proceeds to not post for five days.

No mention of either the Crazy or Ice wagons except that he would vote Crazy because of Crazy's self vote.

Mod makes the point that Dybeck has requested for replacement on Aug 10.

Votes SSF for his attack on icemanE for using "I think he's scum." Continues to ignore anything else happening in the game. Gets a FoS from iceman here and does respond to it, but seems more interested in showing that his actions were not scummy, rather than showing that SSF deserved a vote.

Manages a heroic three posts on Aug 10, almost half of his total number of posts in the game so far. Seems strange after he had just requested replacement.

Reminds the mod that he wishes to be replaced Aug 12.

Comes out with a statement that the town is lazy and is tunneling in, but provides no alternatives to an iceman/firestarter lynch.
Follows up on this by saying that the town should delay the lynch. Seems to be trying to break up the iceman lynch without causing a stir. Furthers attempts to break down the iceman lynch by encouraging people to get off it and look in other directions, as well as requesting that it be delayed and the deadline extended to help accommodate this.

After an epic 6 posts since asking a second time for replacement, amounting again to nearly half of his total posts in the game, he is then replaced by kloud.

---

Kloud

posts a paraphrased version of lover daytalk, then does nothing as he reads up on the thread.

Then proceeds to drop a huge case on pwnz. Picks on him for low posting when he is hardly the worst offender, and all in all doesn't really have that strong a case on him. Basically criticizes him for "Bloodthirstiness" and buddying with iceman for his calling of crazy/farside pair. Then after all that, does nothing further than put two FoS's on pwnz, stating he wants to look at some other people before placing a vote. Seems unusual that he decided to post this in-depth analysis but had not decided who he thought was most worthy of a vote. Seemingly picks pwnz out at random because of this.

Following this goes on to say that he has plans to drop similar cases on other lurkers. Doesn't seem to have any real suspicions on people, but rather is picking an easy group of people, 'lurkers', and writing up cases against them.

---

As for Alabaska J, I can't see too much of note within his posts except after kloud replaces in, where he criticizes kloud for posting his case on pwnz, saying 'we should have talked this over'. Why would you need to discuss before releasing your suspicions on a person? Trying to keep your buddy in line so he doesn't incriminate the pair of you?

Vote: Kloud1516