Mini 117:Marvel Superheroes Game Over

Caveman · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Tue Jul 13, 2004 5:05 pm

However, he was

ONLINE

during the time in question(according to Phoebus)!
He should definitely explain how that happened.

mneme · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:32 am

I know that I tend to have semi-limited access during some periods (ie, phone only, or like when I was running my mini (should run another game at some point) from Mexico using an internet cafe).

I'd like an explaination from Phoebus, though.

Phoebus · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 4:44 am

What explanation?

mneme · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:15 am

It's been aledged that you claimed "limited access" but were online during the named period.

KingEnigma · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:21 am

Phoebus, was the one that said YANQUSH was online when Yanqush was on limited access, so we would need an explaination for that.

But again, this could be a misunderstanding and have nothing to do with relevant information to the game.

mneme · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:03 am

Ok, my bad, and I agree that this likely has nothing to do with the game.

ISO · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 8:49 am

KingEnigma-1(mneme)
Phoebus-1(Toodle)
Yanqush-5(Mr_Gnome_It_All, Quailman,Draqon Phoenix,Phoebus,caveman)
Caveman-1(Yanqush)

6 votes to lynch

mneme · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:11 am

Yangquish?

Last wishes?
Information that will tell us not to lynch you?
Explaination for the whole "lurking" complaint?

Yanqush · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:53 am

Well, if you are going to lynch me, at least don't lynch me on that account of being here while on limited access, since I was back on Sunday (morning, if you really want to know), and did check but did not post... and if you read the limited access thread, I did say I am back sunday.... Which is not while I had NO internet access as some try to say....

I am happy to be accuse of lurking, since I didn't contribute any significant thing, but you can't say that I lied about being away while I am not, thats just not fair.....

Caveman, why do I need to explain why I am online when Phoebus stated that I was?, Its the truth, I was online, catching up with what happened in the last 3 days, but didn't feel the need to immediately jump out and say I am here, since it was just a lurker bandwagon, and I was geniunely away......

And in case some of you wonder, I live in New Zealand which is some 16-20 hours ahead of the US.... so its no wonder that when I say sunday, some of you will still be Saturday.

And no, I am not going to claim, since thats just going to be detrimental to the town should I survive this baseless lynch...

Toodle · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:00 am

Caveman and Phoebus

almost

seem to be working as a team to get rid of Yanqush.

They both pointed out that Yanqush was online but didn't post. I think we've all done that, right?

Caveman · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:04 am

Yanqush wrote:Caveman, why do I need to explain why I am online when Phoebus stated that I was?, Its the truth, I was online, catching up with what happened in the last 3 days, but didn't feel the need to immediately jump out and say I am here, since it was just a lurker bandwagon, and I was geniunely away......

No, you see, when you say you are away, that means you cannot check nor respond. You could do both, and you chose to not respond.

So I would say that you were

not

genuinely away. That is why you must explain.

Phoebus · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:07 am

Toodle wrote:Caveman and Phoebus
almost
seem to be working as a team to get rid of Yanqush.

Hah!

Toodle wrote:They both pointed out that Yanqush was online but didn't post. I think we've all done that, right?

And have you done that when you've had 3 votes on you? The 'out of town' excuse is acceptable especially since he

did

post in LA thread but if I came back from vacation to find a bandwagon on me, I'd atleast pop in to ask everyone to hang on to their socks till I got my things in order at home. Wouldn't you?

Yanqush · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:28 pm

No, you see, when you say you are away, that means you cannot check nor respond. You could do both, and you chose to not respond.

Now either you didn't read my message, or you don't understand it, because I said I WAS back when Phoebus said I was online, which I was, an maybe its a mistake that I didn't respond right away, but when you only sleep 3 hours a night on a trip, the first thing a normal person think off is sleep, and I just thought I'll be good and check the thread, and in the end I get accuse of lying.......

So I would say that you were not genuinely away. That is why you must explain.

I am not even going to try, since I feel I don't need to. I felt insulted at the way you say I play the game and that you say I lie so I can lurk. What kind of crap logic is that???

mneme · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:44 am

Caveman wrote:No, you see, when you say you are away, that means you cannot check nor respond. You could do both, and you chose to not respond.

So I would say that you were
not
genuinely away. That is why you must explain.

I don't think he needs to explain anything. He was away, he came back -- it's not scummy to ignore a 3 vote bandwagon, just a sign of -actually- having limited access (far more scummy is to lurk until you are voted, and then only become active enough to shift attention away from you).

Your hounding, on the other hand, would seem to have no excuse.

vote: Caveman

Caveman · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Fri Jul 16, 2004 10:00 am

My hounding (as you call it) is nothing more than me asking repeatedly that he answer my question. All I'm looking for is a response explaining why he chose not to answer to the bandwagon that was developing on him.

I am not calling him a liar. And I am not saying that he said he was going to be away, but was actually there. I am saying that he did not respond even though he could have. And I want to know why he made that decision.

Yanqush · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:08 am

Human nature (wanting to sleep mainly....) Reading is one thing, writing a coherent reply is another, and I thought that by resting before replying its to the benefit of everyone.

lulu muumuu · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:39 pm

just to avoid any kind of this thing happening to me, i have notified the mod of my limited access at the moment, and i will ask for a replacement if i think my circumstances will a hinderance to the game.

and just to add some input, doesn't limited access mean, you know, limited access? i'm claiming limited access, but i'm here-- but it probably won't be as often as i would like.

i'm not defending yanqush, mind you... just trying to save my own butt. but no vote from me.

i'm going to re-read a few times and see if i find anything interesting.

Quailman · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Mon Jul 19, 2004 2:52 am

I am back from my week-long absence and will try to sort out this hoohah over Yanqush's posting pattern later. In the meantime, I will let you all know that I will be out for another week begiinning this Saturday. It's the last of my vacation for a long time.

Quailman · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:05 pm

Hello? Is this game still going on?

I see no reason to change my vote at present. Where is everybody?

Yanqush · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:45 pm

I don't know... certainly not here.....

And certainly most of everyone have checked this thread at one time or another....
Why havn't they made a response?.... does that mean everyone should be one away from lynch?..... strange logic if you ask me.

Toodle · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Wed Jul 21, 2004 2:53 am

What's to say? My vote is where I think it should be.

Maybe a deadline would help?

Mr_Gnome_It_All · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Wed Jul 21, 2004 4:12 am

And my vote is where I think everyone's should be.

Whould someone PLEASE just vote Yanqush and get this day over with??

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:13 am

My vote remains at Yanqush.

KingEnigma · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:51 am

This will probably be contrived as being scummy, but I promise this is only to get the game moving along.

Vote: Yanqush

ISO · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:02 pm

You all look around, making sure everything is in check, but you cannot help but notice that Yanqush is missing. Suddenly, a scream rings through the sky, and Yanqush lands, a deep red liquid staining his metal casing. "Unit Yanqush Here, Flesh allies. Unit just...recharging." he says, but you are still suspect. You all advance slowly, and suddenly he flips out. "Unit kills living compontents!" he screams firing lasers beams wildly. Too bad he didn't notice that he fired right into a skyscraper right behind him. While the rest of you escape, in his blind rage he doesn't notice until it crashes down. Aftrer digging out his disabled body, you discover a special type of wiring scheme indicating you are dealing with none other then Dr.Doom's reprogrammed Ultron.

Ultron-Ultron is a powerful Robot who is a member of the Minions of Doom. He is a robot, so the virus didn't affect his memory of who is friend or foe.- You are a Minion of Doom, and you and the other Minions of Doom may communicate at night.Once per night,You and the other Minions of Doom get to nightkill a player at night.You and the Minions of Doom may communicate with one another at night. However, Dr. Doom decides who does the killing.-Evil

It is night, once again.