Nobody else is really hitting my scumdar right now. C'mon lurkers, start pingin'! I'm sure all of you scummy mcscummersons have lots of good tells-- let 'em, out.
Mafia 71: The Corsican Syndicate - Game over!
-
-
mcpaltp Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 288
- Joined: October 5, 2007
Both waar and WR?'s logic make sense to me. I don't like the WIFOM "joke" of Lazy's and CKD's overraction also seems scummy to me. I'm sort of getting a busing vibe, so I think I'll put a vote on Lazy as he seems incrementally scummier to me.
##Vote:Lazy
Nobody else is really hitting my scumdar right now. C'mon lurkers, start pingin'! I'm sure all of you scummy mcscummersons have lots of good tells-- let 'em, out.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I never said I was half way anywhere.waar wrote:Okay halfway to a lynch is hardly a big deal, you still need a whole nother 5 votes for the lynch.
A townie would react calm. Your reply to his jokevote gave me the impression that you were nervous about something. Nervousness is often-times a sign of guilt.curiouskarmadog wrote: I will even humor you further, if I did overreact, how does that =scum?
still confused here, how did I over react?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
cicero Oratoreador
- Oratoreador
- Oratoreador
- Posts: 3328
- Joined: July 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
mcpaltp wrote:Both waar and WR?'s logic make sense to me. I don't like the WIFOM "joke" of Lazy's and CKD's overraction also seems scummy to me. I'm sort of getting a busing vibe, so I think I'll put a vote on Lazy as he seems incrementally scummier to me.
##Vote:Lazy
Nobody else is really hitting my scumdar right now. C'mon lurkers, start pingin'! I'm sure all of you scummy mcscummersons have lots of good tells-- let 'em, out.
Unvote Lazy
I haven't thought about this game yet. My random vote ain't sitting on that there wagon until I have.
And no one is lurking yet. The game hasn't gone on long enough. These day ones go on a looooong time. And clearly there's a sub-group in here of people who already know each other and may even be talking to each other on Ventrilo. Most of us were probably just waiting for the din to settle down a bit. That's what I was doing. I can't get in on in-jokes when I'm not in. Know what I'm sayin'?
But I'm encouraged by the quick turn the game has taken towards real investigation. I'm just not going to leave my random vote on someone who is under real suspicion.-
-
Garnasha Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: September 22, 2007
- Location: Nijmegen, the Netherlands, +1 GMT
-
-
Garnasha Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: September 22, 2007
- Location: Nijmegen, the Netherlands, +1 GMT
-
-
Garnasha Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: September 22, 2007
- Location: Nijmegen, the Netherlands, +1 GMT
-
-
Garnasha Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: September 22, 2007
- Location: Nijmegen, the Netherlands, +1 GMT
-
-
waar Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: June 28, 2007
-
-
Lazy Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 37
- Joined: September 25, 2007
- Location: Finland
How exactly can you get a "busing vibe" from a first day jokevote?mcpaltp wrote:Both waar and WR?'s logic make sense to me. I don't like the WIFOM "joke" of Lazy's and CKD's overraction also seems scummy to me. I'm sort of getting a busing vibe, so I think I'll put a vote on Lazy as he seems incrementally scummier to me.
-------------------
OK, clearly I made a mistake by playing too loose and not making sure to put huge [JOKE] tags on everything I posted.
I have become a fine scapegoat for the scum to try and get lynched from now on.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
now we are getting somewhere.waar wrote:
That wasn't directed towards you, it was directed towards WomensRightscuriouskarmadog wrote:I never said I was half way anywhere.
The first post I quoted when I voted for you is where you over reactedcuriouskarmadog wrote:still confused here, how did I over react?
Who is "you" in that sentence which was directed toward Womensright?waar wrote:Okay halfway to a lynch is hardly a big deal, you still need a whole nother 5 votes for the lynch.
still not answering the question...please example to me HOW I over reacted. Quoting my reply doesnt explain HOW I over reactted..NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
waar Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: June 28, 2007
"You" would be just anybody in the game.curiouskarmadog wrote:Who is "you" in that sentence which was directed toward Womensright?
Okay this is the post I was talking about:curiouskarmadog wrote:still not answering the question...please example to me HOW I over reacted. Quoting my reply doesnt explain HOW I over reactted..
You replied to an obvious joke with a very serious reply, pointing out to Battle Mage exactly why his reasoning sucked, while at the same time also explaining his joke. You were very quick to get defensive about something that was meant to be taken in jest. Thus, you are over reacting.curiouskarmadog wrote:
now that just hurts BM...Battle Mage wrote:Vote: CKD
bandwagon much?
I placed a second vote on Lazy...you place the second vote on me...you say I am bandwagoning...
I say you are (fill in the blank), the circle begins a new?
are we going to start bumping heads again?-
-
mcpaltp Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 288
- Joined: October 5, 2007
Outside comunication about game events is verboten. I'm not talking about thegame eventsoutside of this thread, and I'm sure the rest aren't either.
And why not call out the lurkers? I see no reason to wait until the deadline to lynch someone if they are scum. Discussion is all well and good, but so is a game not taking weeks to finish.
Just sayin'-
-
waar Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: June 28, 2007
-
-
mcpaltp Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 288
- Joined: October 5, 2007
waar, I was replying to this post.cicero wrote:
*snip*
And no one is lurking yet. The game hasn't gone on long enough. These day ones go on a looooong time. And clearly there's a sub-group in here of people who already know each other and may even be talking to each other on Ventrilo. Most of us were probably just waiting for the din to settle down a bit. That's what I was doing. I can't get in on in-jokes when I'm not in. Know what I'm sayin'?
But I'm encouraged by the quick turn the game has taken towards real investigation. I'm just not going to leave my random vote on someone who is under real suspicion.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
LOL, My very serious reply was "now that just hurts BM?", "the circle begins a new" and "are we going to start bumping heads again?"waar wrote:
Okay this is the post I was talking about:curiouskarmadog wrote:still not answering the question...please example to me HOW I over reacted. Quoting my reply doesnt explain HOW I over reactted..
You replied to an obvious joke with a very serious reply, pointing out to Battle Mage exactly why his reasoning sucked, while at the same time also explaining his joke. You were very quick to get defensive about something that was meant to be taken in jest. Thus, you are over reacting.curiouskarmadog wrote:
now that just hurts BM...Battle Mage wrote:Vote: CKD
bandwagon much?
I placed a second vote on Lazy...you place the second vote on me...you say I am bandwagoning...
I say you are (fill in the blank), the circle begins a new?
are we going to start bumping heads again?
that was serious?..and from that post you got that I was nervious and I felt guilty?
How far are you willingly to push and back this vote?
Also, I never said his reasoning sucked? Did you think it sucked?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
cicero Oratoreador
- Oratoreador
- Oratoreador
- Posts: 3328
- Joined: July 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
To clarify - I wasn't suggesting you were talking about game events outside the thread. Just that you were all sitting in vent enjoying yourselves and this was part of it. Which would make you want to post more. For you time is real time.mcpaltp wrote:Outside comunication about game events is verboten. I'm not talking about thegame eventsoutside of this thread, and I'm sure the rest aren't either.
And why not call out the lurkers? I see no reason to wait until the deadline to lynch someone if they are scum. Discussion is all well and good, but so is a game not taking weeks to finish.
Just sayin'
- I looooove hunting lurkers. Love it. I lift up their dirty little rocks and I poke them with big sharp sticks while I shine my megawatt flashlights in there eyes. My point was just to let you know that the pace on this site seems a bit slower than you seem used to. It's a brand new game so the game hasnt gone on long enough for there to be real lurky lurkers. But hell poke wherever you want. See you got a response from me. So it worked!-
-
waar Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: June 28, 2007
-
-
mcpaltp Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 288
- Joined: October 5, 2007
I'm cool with jokevotes, but joking by posting nothing whle jumping on a bandwagon is maybe a little scummy, yeah? It's basically a joke that can only be proven by WIFOM, which I think makes for a suspicous joke.Lazy wrote:
How exactly can you get a "busing vibe" from a first day jokevote?
-------------------
OK, clearly I made a mistake by playing too loose and not making sure to put huge [JOKE] tags on everything I posted.
I have become a fine scapegoat for the scum to try and get lynched from now on.
To clarify the busing statement, I kind of felt like both Lazy and CKD were pinging my scumdar, so I felt like busing might be a possibility with both of you seeming scummy, but with Lazy voting for CKD. a better way to put this would to just say that both of you seem scummy.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
where? if I get anything from that, I was calling him a hypocrite..waar wrote:
Yes you did:curiouskarmadog wrote:I never said his reasoning sucked? Did you think it sucked?
curiouskarmadog wrote:I placed a second vote on Lazy...you place the second vote on me...you say I am bandwagoning...
again, did you think it sucked?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
waar Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: June 28, 2007
Ugh why argue semantics? The quote I posted was one where you explained why you didn't agree with his argument. Hence, why you thought it sucked.curiouskarmadog wrote: where? if I get anything from that, I was calling him a hypocrite..
If I thought it was a serious argument then yes I would agree that placing a vote on someone because they placed a 2nd vote on somebody else in a 19 player game is a shitty argument. However he was joking.curiouskarmadog wrote:again, did you think it sucked?-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
because you are putting words in my mouth that I didnt say.waar wrote:
Ugh why argue semantics? The quote I posted was one where you explained why you didn't agree with his argument. Hence, why you thought it sucked.curiouskarmadog wrote: where? if I get anything from that, I was calling him a hypocrite..
If I thought it was a serious argument then yes I would agree that placing a vote on someone because they placed a 2nd vote on somebody else in a 19 player game is a shitty argument. However he was joking.curiouskarmadog wrote:again, did you think it sucked?
You are also indicating that I over reacted, but fail explain how I over reacted...you think BM was "joking" (with a vote) yet I was "serious" (with a non vote question post) and over reactted..
unvote vote waar
you have yet to explain to me how my post was an over reaction or serious (when it was obviously a joke)...you are willingly to keep backing and aggressively pushing this vote, when you are obviously in the wrong...NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
50 pounds of bread Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 23
- Joined: July 16, 2007
-
-
waar Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: June 28, 2007
I explained:curiouskarmadog wrote: You are also indicating that I over reacted, but fail explain how I over reacted...you think BM was "joking" (with a vote) yet I was "serious" (with a non vote question post) and over reactted..
waar wrote: You replied to an obvious joke with a very serious reply, pointing out to Battle Mage exactly why his reasoning sucked, while at the same time also explaining his joke. You were very quick to get defensive about something that was meant to be taken in jest. Thus, you are over reacting.-
-
50 pounds of bread Townie
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.