In post 69, Spiffeh wrote:Bold votes probably wasn't a great term but the point still stands!
In post 42, BananaCucho wrote:In post 38, Spiffeh wrote:VOTE: BananaCucho
Feels the need to respond to every vote, like he's a little insecure about the fact that he's getting votes?
BTW this is technically false since I didn't respond to the broken charmander vote
I have read the thread twice and can't for the life of me figure out what you're referring to here.
VOTE: Spiffeh
If you've read the thread twice, you know that my last post requires more than this from you in response. Don't just ignore my post and say your point stands.
BananaCucho wrote:
Do I really need to explain it more? He scolds us and says "let's play mafia already" and I say "yeah, okay" and "start playing" by voting him
Feels pretty self explanatory I don't get what you don't understand.
Yeah, bad wagon here.
Salamence20 wrote:In post 87, tn5421 wrote:So are you saying that having any reason whatsoever discludes any vote ever from being rvs, despite the reason being obviously silly?
No, what sala has to say at this point in the game is not important in the slightest.
Actually it does.
Truth.