Mini 427 - Clue Mafia 1 - Game Over, Who Won!?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

unvote, vote:ectomancer

for writing off a wagon just b/c BM is always scummy.

[Ectomancer]

Exactly. Except that leaving a vote on someone when a wagon gets to that point because they werent voting anyone previously is scummy.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Need anything, pm me!

[al_kohaulec]

Vote Count!

[Jack]

Deadline for tomorrow.

[chaotic_diablo]

Always. But it really doesn't matter whether or not the explanation is logical... most people, including myself, go on intuition quite a lot. Anyway. Sure, provide your explanation

You're the top candidate because nobody else is.

The wagon on MBL went pretty quickly. However, I also find it pretty much justified so I'm not sure how to approach it. It's scummy, but then we did need something to move things along.

The anacalogan or whatever thing is strange. I'll don't really think it's worth going deeper into it.

[Ectomancer]

vote Jack

Time to instigate some action here.

[Ectomancer]

EBWOP

accuse Jack

[BillyTwilight]

I think we need to decide how we are going to play all of these games at once. Theoretically, we should play them all as individual games, but I am not sure that the psychology of the game will allow that. Here is the basic question: should we allow information from each of the game threads to affect one another. Should we allow quoting in one game from the next, and vice versa. Again, I think from theoretical standpoint we should play each individually, but I don't think that this works well considering the human element. Specifically, we can be sure that scum in each game will be using all three threads in deciding their night kills, and I think that town roles with night actions will do the same. I think we give an advantage to the scum in all the games if we don't allow cross-threading, so to speak. For instance, BM has already claimed town in all three games, but he said he didn't have the same town role. I think scum in each game would weigh that kind of statement into who their night kill will be.

The problem with this is of course that gambler's fallacies will probably arise. I would like to know what all the players feel about this, and if we should establish ground rules on what, if any, inter-game actions should be allowed and how to handle them.

[Jack]

I think we should place our replies randomly without saying which thread we were responding to and then everyone can try and guess.

[chaotic_diablo]

I support cross-threading. If I wanted to play three individual games, I would have signed up for three individual games. The fact that the game exists as it is is an opportunity we should take advantage of.

[Ectomancer]

I support cross-threading. If I wanted to play three individual games, I would have signed up for three individual games. The fact that the game exists as it is is an opportunity we should take advantage of.

QFT

[Ancalagon]

Unaccuse, Accuse: Jack

[Jack]

I support cross-threading. If I wanted to play three individual games, I would have signed up for three individual games. The fact that the game exists as it is is an opportunity we should take advantage of.

OK.

unaccuse, accuse:CD

for actions in other games.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Who's off their rocker?:

Jack

- (dahen, Cogito Ergo Sum, DragonsofSummer, Ectomancer, Ancalagon)

Ancalagon

- (al_kohaulec, Battle Mage)

The Central Scrutinizer

- (chaotic_diablo, Battle Mage)

Cogito Ergo sum

- (MrBuddyLee)

MrBuddyLee

- (BillyTwilight)

Ectomancer

- (The Central Scrutinizer)

chaotic_diablo

- (Jack)

12 alive, 7 to lynch! Lurkers have been prodded.

[Ectomancer]

I support cross-threading. If I wanted to play three individual games, I would have signed up for three individual games. The fact that the game exists as it is is an opportunity we should take advantage of.

OK.

unaccuse, accuse:CD

for actions in other games.

Which actions specifically?

[MrBuddyLee]

vote: Ectomancer

for looking like a puppetmaster in this game.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Dude, you have no idea how much I want to speedlynch Jack in simultaneous games. I might lol myself to death.

Someone unaccuse him before I get home from work or I may not be able to help myself.

[Jack]

I support cross-threading. If I wanted to play three individual games, I would have signed up for three individual games. The fact that the game exists as it is is an opportunity we should take advantage of.

OK.

unaccuse, accuse:CD

for actions in other games.

Which actions specifically?

I mentioned the actions in another game.

[Ancalagon]

MrBuddyLee hasn't said much.

I can't wait till we get off of random voting and we get to real pressure.

[dahen]

Prodded. I lost my notes in the crash and has since preferred looking at other games. Now I'm back, though.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Stupid 7 to lynch... someone vote Jack so I can hammah.

Go now!

[Hammah Dont Hurt Em]

unaccuse, Accuse: Jack

Let's see where this takes us. Jack insta-claimed when he was close to a lynch in Game 3; he hasn't been nearly so forthcoming here.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

NICE

unaccuse, accuse: Jack

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Wait, are you even in this game?