Brandi (4) - Espeonage, antiximo, Fate, broomhead
Fakegod (3) - fugitive, Parama, NavyCherub
Parama (3) - Inflatealepie, DocPotter, Brandi
Not Voting (2) - fakegod, Zang
I never stated this. Please don't put words in my mouth.Parama wrote: Being anti-meta = scumtell? Lol.
Parama wrote:Lol, I'm giving my stance on meta. I already told people not to use it, and I gave my reasons why.
Notice the eyeroll emoticon. Lol it's definitely a sign of being serious
First it was town, now it is "likely town." Make up your mind. I'm sure you see a townie is the majority of us. Scum.Parama wrote: Or I feel a need to call someone likely town due to their attitude and timing of their post. I get good vibes from Espeonage's post there and I get good logic from his following ones. Issues there? I'm just callin' 'em as I see 'em, and I see a townie.
K. That makes even less sense.Parama wrote:Whoops, I was accusing you of buddying with me, not Doc.
I tend to see a lot of serious votes in the RVS. Sometimes not everyone makes themselves clear. I'll admit I was being slow for not recognizing the sarcasm to begin with though.Parama wrote:Why you would bother to ask if someone was being serious about their vote during in RVS is a type of overreaction that can be used as a link later.
And catching scum. People with mafia roles don't stop being scum for RVS, they are scum the entire game.Parama wrote: I think you're overanalyzing RVS posts.
Parama wrote: ...
NO. JUST NO. YOU ARE TAKING EVERYTHING I SAY TOO SERIOUSLY.
THERE IS THIS THING CALLED HUMOR. I USE IT ON OCCASION. THERE IS THIS THING CALLED SARCASM. I USE IT OFTEN. YOU DON'T SEEM TO BE ABLE TO TELL THE DIFFERENT BETWEEN A SERIOUS POST AND A NON-SERIOUS POST.
I would not have minded if you didn't claim to be so against buddying and then buddy others yourself. How can you say being friendly to another player isn't buddying? That's exactly what buddying is.Parama wrote: Calling this buddying is a massive misrep considering that the intention was to keep a friendly atmosphere which you seem so intent on crushing.
Parama wrote: Lol, the problem is that I wasn't buddying.
Parama wrote: Lol, the problem is that I wasn't buddying.
Parama wrote: Lol, the problem is that I wasn't buddying.
WIFOM. You can't prove you weren't feigning either. It appears to me you were, especially since you weren't actually being helpful.Parama wrote: Implying that I really did feign helpfulness, which is something you can't prove because it's wrong.
Who is taking things too seriously now? Obviously the percentage is just to put emphasis on how scummy I think most of your posts are. Obviously I don't have any exact numbers in my head.Brandi wrote:If you can point out 16 scummy posts I've made out of 17 posts total (rounding up here), go for it.
If you want to bring percentages that you cannot objectively prove into the game, go for it.
So you got a town vibe from a random vote where the only thing he said was "OMGUS" and voted for me?Parama wrote:Or I feel a need to call someone likely town due to their attitude and timing of their post. I get good vibes from Espeonage's post there and I get good logic from his following ones. Issues there? I'm just callin' 'em as I see 'em, and I see a townie.
Zang wrote:So you got a town vibe from a random vote where the only thing he said was "OMGUS" and voted for me?Parama wrote:Or I feel a need to call someone likely town due to their attitude and timing of their post. I get good vibes from Espeonage's post there and I get good logic from his following ones. Issues there? I'm just callin' 'em as I see 'em, and I see a townie.
Parama wrote:Yup.
Parama wrote:I think you're overanalyzing RVS posts.
The amount of time the game has been going =/= the amount of content posted. This game has had alot of content really quickly, and just about everyone else has some thoughts so far.Zang wrote:well, I don't really see enough to call anyone scum yet. Day 1 just started yesterday and the last person to post just posted less than an hour ago.
I suppose you and I don't have the same definition of "eager." I thought you meant that you thought she was scummy for being eager to scumhunt, not being eager to overreact.broomhead wrote:Ahh, being an eager beaver and overreacting or "having emotions all across the board" are two very similar things (don't worry Brandi, I'll come back to you). They walk the same fine line.
There's a difference between "not feeling good" and "scum." If I thought you were definitely scum, I would say that.Antiximo wrote:But you're not feeling good about me am i right?
I guess we disagree on this point, then, but I simply don't feel comfortable with him dying yet.Brandi wrote:I wouldn't know what is usual for him, and I don't really care at this point.
Over-analyzing is overreacting. Over-analyzing is bad because it causes you to defend statements that don't mean much in the end. For example, his "buddying" with Fate. Come on. The only reason you're calling him out for that is because he called you out.Brandi wrote:I'm not sure where you get this over-reacting idea- Perhaps you haven't read my posts thoroughly. If anything, I am over-analyzing- which there is nothing wrong with that. Parama is being scummy, I pointed out his scumminess. It doesn't have much to do with his over confidence as much as it has to do with his hypocrisy.
Getting a "town vibe" is completely different from attacking someone relentlessly over game-start banter.Brandi wrote:Parama wrote:Yup.Parama wrote:I think you're overanalyzing RVS posts.
Getting a "town vibe" is completely different from attacking someone relentlessly over game-start banter. If I were on the computer when the game started, I would have said something about Fugitive being definitely town because he's never scum, a post about loving Pie, and a snarky comment toward Parama. Would you have been pursuing me about all of these?Brandi wrote:Parama wrote:Yup.Parama wrote:I think you're overanalyzing RVS posts.
No, it's not. Sometimes over analyzing catches scum and that is what I'm trying to do. Obviously I am not 100% in my accusations. I wouldn't want a lynch this early either, but stating early suspiciouns and reasonings for such- no matter how small is not a bad thing.NavyCherub wrote: Over-analyzing is overreacting. Over-analyzing is bad because it causes you to defend statements that don't mean much in the end. For example, his "buddying" with Fate. Come on. The only reason you're calling him out for that is because he called you out.
You're right, it's worse. He didn't just get a town vibe. He pointed to a random vote and said "TOWN." and then LATER ON called it a vibe.Getting a "town vibe" is completely different from attacking someone relentlessly over game-start banter.
If you had said that it would have been obvious you were joking. I may have missed some early sarcasm- but everything you listed there would have made it very obvious.If I were on the computer when the game started, I would have said something about Fugitive being definitely town because he's never scum, a post about loving Pie, and a snarky comment toward Parama. Would you have been pursuing me about all of these?
ANSWER MEEEEEEEEEEZang wrote:ok, I just don't see how you can get a town vine from five letters.Parama wrote:Yup.