BLueSS wrote:Is the roll of players who are eliminated revealed or not?
Another attempt to say "Hey! I don't know how things work around here!"
I find this totally unconvincing. If this is an honest question, BLueSS can't have read a single game on this forum, which I simply don't believe. I think this is an overplaying of the newbie card and is scummy. Vote stays.
The case on BlueSS comes down to whether he IS a newbie or PLAYING one. I think he is one, and I think you also know that it's a pretty common variation to keep the identity of dead people secret (Although certainly not a popular one on this site, although it has been tried....). I think you're pushing him too hard, and I'm tempted to vote YOU...
BLueSS knows enough about mafiascum.net to sign up for a newbie game. The question is: has he read a single newbie game? Or even glanced at one? I think that the overwhelming probability is that he has at least glanced at a newbie game. In which case he would know that roles are revealed on death in newbie games. In which case his question is dishonest.
Mr Stoofer wrote:BLueSS knows enough about mafiascum.net to sign up for a newbie game. The question is: has he read a single newbie game? Or even glanced at one?
Yes, I read half of one, but didn't go as far as to assume *every* game reveals the identities.
Outside this site, every game I've read/hosted has
Avabob wrote:I think it's funny that atticus jumped on me in post 58 for not voting because I would be the victim of suspicion. Yet he was the only one not voting
I admit i didn't see that, but I also didn't jump you. I said you're going to have to. Sorry, I explain things out of context, bad habit.Nonetheless, it is funny.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
Here are my suspicions on each one with votes.
-rikdangerous: He posted saying he'd get back with his analysis, but he hasn't yet. Sounds like he's waiting to hear back from his other mafia teammate before saying anything. Highly suspicious, since it wouldn't take this long to follow up a "get back to you in a bit" post. (Post 67)
-inHimshallibe: Has been gone for two days. Besides that nothing else.
-Atticus: Doesn't seem like a threat to me. Only Avabob thinks so it seems.
-Avabob: Keeps putting a lot of blame that Atticus is trying to hurt the town. True or not, we'll find out.
-rikdangerous: He posted saying he'd get back with his analysis, but he hasn't yet. Sounds like he's waiting to hear back from his other mafia teammate before saying anything. Highly suspicious, since it wouldn't take this long to follow up a "get back to you in a bit" post. (Post 67)
And for rik if he
is
waiting forhis partner to post we should single out who hasn't, or at least you should, to follow up your suspicion.That makes...InHim.I think he will make use of your theory of
So how many times have you all played in games where people say "Oh I've been away all week doing "X" and now I'm back - here's my vote now!" ?
Why didn't you compile your own suspicions for public use? Highly suspicious, since it wouldn't take this long to figure that out...
Vote:BlueSS
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
Atticus post 86 has sent my scumdar into overdrive.
Unvote Avabob; vote: Atticus
. I think Atticus is an excellent lynch for today. I'm persuaded that he is liklely scum, and even even if he isn't, we'll have plenty of info for tomorrow.
Erm, SpeedyKQ, I'm not sayin' anything except that, should you really be giving your opinions in a game? And that's not supposed to be game related, but you shouldn't be helping us.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
Here's the deal: I'm still not on reliable access, but I've found a place I can actually log on to the site from. My participation will be sporadic, and late (CST) - please bear with me as I await the valiant ITS people to solve my problems.
That being said, I'll be back on later tonight. I just don't have the time now.
Day will dawn once I find a replacement for rikdangerous. Sorry for the delay, but there is only one mafia left and I don't want players to be able to figure out rik's guilt or innocense based on whether a kill happens while he is inactive.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
