wolfcrier
RossWilliam
Monkey
so you think he is scummy because he said mith was scummy, what about me, I thought GS was scummy and he turned out to be town.and refresh my memory where was your vote day 1?RossWilliam wrote:he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.
His reason voting GS was overabundance IMHO, seems fake.Monkey wrote:You lied earlier, what makes you think you'll be believed now?Greasy Spot wrote:I AM THE JESTER!!
Vote: Greasy Spot, b/c:
1. He lied
2. He requested it, and
3. I think that there's more then enough material that been covered here on the 1st day.
That places Greasy Spot at L-2 btw. Keeping him around for endgame just isn't very appealing to me atm, and if he really is the jester then that's one less party to compete for 1st place with.
What's fake about it? I didn't make any of that up.Holy wrote:His reason voting GS was overabundance IMHO, seems fake.Monkey wrote:You lied earlier, what makes you think you'll be believed now?Greasy Spot wrote:I AM THE JESTER!!
Vote: Greasy Spot, b/c:
1. He lied
2. He requested it, and
3. I think that there's more then enough material that been covered here on the 1st day.
That places Greasy Spot at L-2 btw. Keeping him around for endgame just isn't very appealing to me atm, and if he really is the jester then that's one less party to compete for 1st place with.Vote: Monkey.
Scum usually doesn't notice they're being scummy.RossWilliam wrote:I didn't vote for a reason. I'd understand these attacks if I voted for him off the bat. I want to see how he responds to the new votes on him as well. Can we at least wait til that happens before we get this RW bandwagon going? I'm honestly very suprised by this, I wasn't aware I was apparently being so scummy
Sarc claimed he agrees with Pooky for now. Not that just that is a good reason, but it's definitely not claiming for no reason at all. You are misrepresenting him and you sound frantic about this wagon while trying hard to not offend anybody else into voting you.RossWilliam wrote:Sarcasto, I don't like that one bit. You hammered GS, which I can't and won't condemn in and of itself, but now you're voting for me while actually admitting that you don't even really have a reason. You just fully owned up to jumping on a bandwagon for no good reason.
FoS: Sarcasto
and please don't write this off as OMGUS because it is anything but. You're getting yourself a bad track record my very oppurtunistic friend
If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.
Certainly enough to earn my vote.RossWilliam wrote:he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.