So, in your opinion, town would never attempt to keep mafia in the dark?Archaist wrote:Making votes on "secret information" is something only the Mafia can do in reality, as only they have any extra info about who is Town and who is Scum when starting the game.
Yes, but you didn't vote togorckat wrote:@Archaist: Why soupfly? I voted neko without giving reasons first.
There is a difference between keeping some information from the Mafia and completely failing to give any reasons, actually trying to dissuade people from asking you to do so as soupfly just did. If you say that people can vote without reasons under the pretext of "keeping information from the Mafia" then you are possibly excusing baseless votes, as anytime someone wants to vote without reason they can just cover it up by saying they are hiding some information. There has to be a balance between keeping information to yourself and giving justifications for your votes.MeMe wrote:So, in your opinion, town would never attempt to keep mafia in the dark?
Yeah, but you didn't fulfill your promise:SirWario wrote:Sikario8 wrote:SirWario wrote:Mcstab hasn't even posted in this game for two weeks. I think some serious prods/replacements are necessary.
Mod, prod deathguise, Mcstab, ridethebomb, selande, and sikario8MOD: Prod SirWario, I think he's hiding
I posted yesterday, thank you.
BTW, Sammich, nice analysis...I'm afraid to see what you'll find when you check me out...SirWario wrote:This game has just exited the random voting stage and your accusing me of not contributing anything. You just said your self the actvity is depressing. Your rant about your playstyle was absolutely unnecessary and brings attention away from our pertinent discussion. It also tries to give you a free pass for later scummy behavior on the excuse that it's simply your "playing style" and you do it as town and scum.
I'm sorry my contribution does not amount to your startling 1 response pressure vote. Now that I believe we are officially out of random stage,I will strive to present more activity to satiate the popular demand.
...andSirWario wrote:Sikario8 wrote:.
RTB, MeMe, gorkat, soupfly, Wario, what do you think of my voting sammich?
If you gave some reasoning, then maybe I would take some time to think about it. In my opinion we're past the random voting and all votes placed should have at least some explanation.
FOS:SikarioGive us something useful.
in time i will explain my reason for voting.Archaist wrote:Could you give an explanation for you vote, soupfly? Don't think you can dissuade questioning just by saying it's getting old... after what, only 7 pages? Making votes on "secret information" is something only the Mafia can do in reality, as only they have any extra info about who is Town and who is Scum when starting the game. In his last post (#153), neko2086 made some perfectly reasonable statements, what about that post makes him worthy of a vote? You voted neko2086 for "pressure," which you lifted after only 1 post, and now you vote him again. Rapidly voting and unvoting without wanting to give any explanation sounds very scummy to me.Vote: soupfly
If you read my post #157, you would know that answer.MeMe wrote:and soupfly specified that he saw something after the last post. Did you check that last post and come up empty? Or did you vote soupfly without bothering to see if you might agree with him?
If that is indeed the post that made soupfly vote neko, then I am coming up empty for reasons. For now my vote will stay, but that might change depending on any later explanations from soupfly. I just don't see anything in neko's post 153, which was his last post before soupfly voted him again.Archaist wrote:In his last post (#153), neko2086 made some perfectly reasonable statements, what about that post makes him worthy of a vote?
It does make sense. SW's saying that he's posting and posting when the only time he posted was to tell me to shut up until further notice.neko2086 wrote:Maybe someday I'll know why people vote for me. Hey, if you want me to address something, just let me know, ok?
And I still like my vote where it is. Sikario's post in 163 makes no sense at all, and the omgusy vote here doesn't help anything.
I'd be surprised you'd evenSirWario wrote:Sikario8 wrote:
How'd you like a...
unvote
VOTE: SIRWARIO
??? I'm really not following your logic here.
Sikario8 wrote:For my first insightful point, I would like to state, declare rather, that souply is scum - it says so right above his avatar. I'd also like to say that this is not my best reasoning; however, it must suffice for the time being.
Sikario8 wrote:While I support your use of a vote as a catalyst, I don't believe this should be excersized so freely. I do agree with your 21-question technique, though, if the questioned chooses to answer (which I'm trying to do). I've been busy; however, when I checked in, I saw that no one had contributed crap and so I put in a quick post to imply my being alive and semi-well and went on about my business.
I would like to FOS MeMe and RTB for circular reason. We're never going to kill any mafia if we can't get organized. I actually believe it'd be more constructive if every individual were to vote for whom they thought was scum.
Vote Sammich(In case you hadn't noticed, he hasscum)right under his avatar!
You really don't appreciate being called out, do you? But your postSirWario wrote:Sikario8 wrote:For my first insightful point, I would like to state, declare rather, that souply is scum - it says so right above his avatar. I'd also like to say that this is not my best reasoning; however, it must suffice for the time being.
Are you freaking kidding me, Sikario?! I 've Posted absolutely nothing, coming from you thats really funny. You made this comment well after we left the random phase and have yet to make a feasible case against anyone.
Sikario8 wrote:While I support your use of a vote as a catalyst, I don't believe this should be excersized so freely. I do agree with your 21-question technique, though, if the questioned chooses to answer (which I'm trying to do). I've been busy; however, when I checked in, I saw that no one had contributed crap and so I put in a quick post to imply my being alive and semi-well and went on about my business.
I would like to FOS MeMe and RTB for circular reason. We're never going to kill any mafia if we can't get organized. I actually believe it'd be more constructive if every individual were to vote for whom they thought was scum.
Vote Sammich(In case you hadn't noticed, he hasscum)right under his avatar!
The text in bold is the onlyactual useful thingyou have postedall game. You say that a vote should not be used as a catalyst so freely, yet you vote Sammich with no reason other than a joke. You also say that later that you wouldn't remove it because it could breed discussion.
I've never told you to shut up either.Major FOS:Sikario
Sorry, I took this as IMPLICATION: Shut up, Sik, and let someone smarter talk for a change.SirWario wrote:Sikario8 wrote:.
RTB, MeMe, gorkat, soupfly, Wario, what do you think of my voting sammich?
If you gave some reasoning, then maybe I would take some time to think about it. In my opinion we're past the random voting and all votes placed should have at least some explanation.
FOS:SikarioGive us something useful.
That would be very extreme, replacing out just to avoid getting pressured.neko wrote:On the other hand, he could be asking to replace out as a convenient excuse to avoid this sort of pressure, but, that seems unlikely.
