Countdown of the Illuminati GAME OVER

Flameaxe · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:28 pm

Confirm.

Flameaxe · Post Post #45 (isolation #1) » Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:01 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:Try again...

Who might kill Kilroy?

vote: Flameaxe

Why would I kill Kilroy...I've played with him like twice on scumchat...

Flameaxe · Post Post #163 (isolation #2) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:30 pm

dahill1 wrote:you have to take into consideration practically everyone on this page
and also you have to think if this is true as well vv

Miztef wrote:I believe the SK would realize this and attempt not to post around the time of the kill. I believe evidence like this is too WIFOM to find the serial killer. Players not connected with confirmed mafia and masons are the best bet.

BM? Is that you in thar?

Flameaxe · Post Post #170 (isolation #3) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:45 pm

armlx wrote:Battlemage was infamous for posting comments on posts before the quotes he commented on, as in your previous post.

I'm going with Flameaxe on this one, based on Miz's point about SK not posting, the fact that Kilroy died N1 and as DGB put it "he would kill him". And he posted nothing after the kilroy thing yesterday = 0 connections.

Vote Flameaxe

And what did DGB back that up with? Nothing. I asked her to do it, and she never followed through. Hell, she never even outright claimed that she believed I would. You even asked if I had that many vendettas, and got no response.

Funny enough, I did post about the Kilroy thing. Might I ask why you feel the need to follow a baseless accusation?

Vote: Armlx

Flameaxe · Post Post #176 (isolation #4) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:02 pm

armlx wrote:Wow, 3 posts while I was working out who was SK.

Dahill, as Miz stated, scum would probably just killing spree at that point.

Flameaxe:

Its hard to follow through on an "A would kill B" argument. Its also hard for DGB to follow through on arguments in general.

You call that an argument? That is a statement. If she actually backed it up, it would have been an argument.

Flameaxe · Post Post #226 (isolation #5) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:09 pm

Flameaxe has been V/LA. Sorry for the whole no content thing, but an irish pub doesn't give much content production, especially this weekend.

I'm catching up tomorrow.

Flameaxe · Post Post #228 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:44 pm

All those posts are me saying V/LA except this game, where I actually made posts. I don't buy your evidence.

Flameaxe · Post Post #280 (isolation #7) » Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:19 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I feel safe enough to bet my life that DG is an anti-town role.
Not just this game.

I agree.

Flameaxe · Post Post #288 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:34 pm

Vote: DGB

Flameaxe · Post Post #529 (isolation #9) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:27 am

dahill1 wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I refuse to lynch the following players:

Guardian
Max
Miztef
Samruc
explanation plz?

it seems like the attention is off of samruc and i'd probably vote for DG if needed..but have we forgotten about flameaxe?
just saying..

Why does a loss off attention on Samruc affect your vote...

Flameaxe · Post Post #533 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:25 am

dahill1 wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
dahill1 wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I refuse to lynch the following players:

Guardian
Max
Miztef
Samruc
explanation plz?

it seems like the attention is off of samruc and i'd probably vote for DG if needed..but have we forgotten about flameaxe?
just saying..
Why does a loss off attention on Samruc affect your vote...
it doesn't really affect my vote, persay, i would still gladly vote for him but it's just that if no one else does then it's a pointless vote, and we need our votes to be used for justice! (that everyone agrees on)

Do you think he is scum, or don't you? You can't just feel he is worthy of a vote because other people agree. Shit doesn't work like that.

Flameaxe · Post Post #567 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:10 am

Vote: DG