Mini 574: Portal Mafia: HUGE SUCCESS

[Akonas]

/confirm

I love you, weighted companion cube!

[Akonas]

Essentially, players rolenames are public, but they have absolutely NO bearing on what role or alignment. Don't even try it.

Vote: Flameaxe

. GlaDoS still can't be a good guy.

[Akonas]

Vote: Machiavellian-Mafia

. I can only hope this is the fourth vote on you.

[Akonas]

again, I agree with incognito on all fronts.

[snip]

on the other hand though, his content is negligible, although not as bad as sir tornado's, whose I agree again is going a bad way of play.

So, you agree with everything he said but he didn't say anything, and then you don't say anything new in return?

@Your Worst Nightmare: I am so very confused, did you or did you not have a second account?

Why do you care so much? Does it really matter?

FoS: Miztef

---

Flameaxe seems very reactionary.
Machiavellian-Mafia's posting bothers me a bit; he's pushing the fourth-vote-is-scum-and-everything-now-is-purposeful thing too much. But I'll save some complaints until he gets back.

[Akonas]

About YWN, I care if he has an alt account or not because it seemed he was trying to hide something. Playing mind games and screwing with the town is not my idea of good town play. Clarifying his muddy position was important to understand if he is purposefully causing disruption, or just kidding around. For me, his posts are causing purposeful confusion, and are not just light-hearted jokes.

Muddy position... on what? Whether he is an alt or not? I don't see why you care. I see wanting to know but I don't see how it matters, really.

Flameaxe seems to be posting short one-liners that don't contribute much. However, he has made a few good points. And a lot of people are posting mostly one-liners.

I'd like to hear from Sir Tornado. If you're uninspired, then inspire us.

[Akonas]

[snip]
Sorry for attempting to prove a point. I wasn't aware that was impossible.

Explain.