Wow just realized that Mikeydaman never posted day one so the list for day two goes as follows:
SensFan
Erratus Apathos
killa seven
sykedoc/Ration
MightyFireball
Awesome Pants
xXfoxXx
I am also leaving out Ration from consideration at this stage for my previously mentioned reasons. I will put xXFoxXx in as ruling out two people might be a bit dangerous and I am happier with Rations innocence at this satge than xXfoxXx.
Day 2
Post 95 EA comments on the doc protecting with a smiley face. This is apparently a minor scum tell. An immediate vote on Llam.
-On day one after me saying I would likely investigate Llam EA said this
Erratus Apathos wrote:It isnt a good idea to let scum know who you're investgating. if they know you're investigating a townie they could nk him denying you the investigation Or worse they might have framer
I replied with "I guess I get to choose the investigation all on my ownsome."
Now I am taking this to mean that EA presumed I would not investigate my previously mention investigation target for fear of that being the nk choice.
So if he was scum he would know Llam to be innocent know I was suspicious of him but presumed I didn't investigate him and saw he was mentioned in Occults list. Also he mentioned no suspicion on Llam day one. So to come out with a vote first post day one is wierd.
Post 102 EA does not like the idea of ruling out a GF, he also does not like the idea about pressuming ration innocent. If scum and both these palyers are innocent then yes scum would be worried about narrowing down suspects. He also votes for someone who hasn't posted in the game. Perhaps an easy target and having a innocent cop investigation result on his suspect makes it hard for him to push that any further.
Post 106 killa seven gives EA a weak fos for vote hoping and a second hammer.
-I read scum love to FoS there partners and I think that very possible here. Scum don't want to build a great case on their partners so a FoS is a lot more common, also it is a very weak FoS.
Post 110 EA says he believes Llam not the GF but not to rule it out. He also defends himself from the weak FoS.
Post 114 killa seven defends his FoS even more weakly.
Post 117 AP somehow believes that a no lynch would give the scum a better chance of hitting doc.
Post 125 AP seems to be slightly pussing for a lynch over a no lynch an also seems to be directing me towards "base your investigations around any info we have", "rather than doing it systematically or randomly". Well basing it on info would favour scum as they could pick me investigation target based on the same info. Also this gives scum the chance to make someone look suspicious to try and get me to investigate them.
Post 160 AP seems to be throwing a lot of suspicion on skyedoc but no vote. "your comment makes sense if you are indeed scum" after having said investigations should be done with info this could be an attemt to try and get the investigation onto an innocent. Also I belive we were at a possible no lynch decession for the end of the day.
Post 163 SF an exaggeration to try and say rations actions should be held accountable to skyedoc.
Post 190 fox - I can sort of see his point about including one scum in his list and that scum being the least suspicious.
Post 191 EA votes fox for the above post.
Post 193 AP I agree with his analysis
Going back to 190
xXfoxXx wrote:What I think has happened, is that Occult has likely named one of his scum buddies, and selected the rest as town. If he selected which scum to name carefully, and was able to choose who was most likely going to be lynched first out of the group, then Scum gets a strong position.
Post 194
xXfoxXx wrote:We can lynch who we decide is the most scummy from that list, and have Vamp inspect the other.
From the mention of occult putting names in a list of two townies and a scum with the townies being the more likely to be lynched before the scum then lynching the most scummy looking is kinda playing the game xXfoxXx believes Occult was playing.
Post 206 avin claim Town Detective.
Post 208 killa seven seem very ken about believing avin with "untill a coutercalim" and votes Guppy.
Post 218 killa seven in response to my questioning him about believing avin untill a counter claim
killa seven wrote:i mean a claim from one of the scum guys, sycdoc or prof.
I dont buy this at all you said counterclaim then try to change it to a claim from the suspects. Anyway what sort of claim from ration or skyedoc would change your mind about the genuiness of avins claim?
223 killa seven claims there is most likey 2 anti town groups. This is very hard to believ because of the lack of nk but from scums point of view it would make sense to try and present this to the town. Also I find it strange how quickly killa has accepted two cop claims in a 2 player game. Maybe he knew both were genuine.
Scum would know avin to be paranoid or insane so they would not be threatened by him.
End of day 2
Suspicions on killa seven, AP and EA
