Mini 555 --- LDF Mafia -- Game Over!
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
mafiascum.net Forum Index -> Site Ideas -> In this thread, we learn about the bansKorts wrote:
sorry, I may be thick, but I just don't understand the bolded part.Thanatos wrote:SO I get to play MGS mafia,AND Ryan gets the Hammer?What a great 5 minutes this has been. Re-reading begins now.
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:14 pm Post subject: 115mith wrote:ryan has been banned.-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Well not everyone knows it apparently.Korts wrote:
I found this little gem while rereading.Super God King wrote:Vote:Korts
His name just screams metal gear solid villainEveryoneknows MGS villains are Foxhound protagonists. Trying to lynch the good guys, you sneaky son of a mother!
Do not know why you had to say this out loud though , might have helped us catch scum later on who didn't know the flavor that well.
This at least means that SGK isn't one of the main antagonists of MGS since if he was , he would have realized the villains were the heroes.-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
I cant see why you all do not believe the claim just because its Vanilla .. If we assume there are only few pro town power roles in the game - I think they'd go more to the others in the foxhound team than the colonel i.e Given a choice between Liquid snake and Colonel Roy Chambell , who would you choose to give a power role to?-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
I would like an explanation of your reasons for believing so ..UA wrote:Except that....Solid Snake would be scum for reasons that if I have to point out, I will just lose my mind.
Roy Campbell is scum guys. Stop unvoting.
Can you name who you think are the better lynches right now?lovo14 wrote:yes im vanila and not heaps useful but there are better lynches-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
UltimaAvalon wrote:Background info on Colonel Roy Campbell for those who don't know. He was the leader of FOXHOUND until he retired, and Liquid Snake took over as leader. He then came out of retirement during the Shadow Moses operation to assist Solid Snake.
I would have believed you were town had you claimed anything besides Vanilla, because there was a time he was part of FOXHOUND. Unfortunately for you, you didn't. Please die, scum
No i've read until end of year two - and Although shadow moses visit is a story arc - they also spend most of their time in the HQ ..UA wrote:Durrrr cus they're at Shadow Moses in the comic uh durrrrrr
The Members of FOXHOUND according to the comic
Sample Comic-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
2 Reasons:
a) I had read other lovo games and he didn't get this flustered while being attacked upon in them - thereby a 'I can't believe you guys are voting me for this reason' type reaction
b) I thought UA had some inside information which he didn't want to share with us from his own role.
UA wrote:I'm not unvoting until lovo is dead.UA wrote:Except that....Solid Snake would be scum for reasons that if I have to point out, I will just lose my mind.
Roy Campbell is scum guys. Stop unvoting.-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
As promised ...
Andycyca 57 :Why reply for lovo here?
Sly 73 :Votes MBF here - No reason
Noted that both Thrantos and eljcko have semi defended sly here by saying it was a random vote in 75 and 76
hasdgfas 78:A very weak FOS on Thanatos. Distancing ?
Korts in 88 echoes my above sentiment
Sly in 92 and eljcko in 97 both debunk Thanatos's argument to defend hasdafas
Sly in 112 is a massive backtrack. It's fine you have history but i think you just used that here to get out of a tight corner for trying to start a wagon on MBF
Thanatos actual first content post (till now it was ryan) pings my scum dar - " I'd vote him, but I don't want to Bandwagon."
eljcko 122 :Defends Sly's backtracking
I'd like the bolded part explained please ..eljcko in 126 wrote: I just did a re-read and the only new thing that struck me was ryan flipping out at hasdaskjdhflk about the day 1 myth crap.I doubt that has any tells on him as role, but there is not anything else that I haven't touched on in my other post. This game needs more action IMO. Start talking (typing)!!!!!
He was right hereAndycyca in 138 wrote:I sense at least one scum in the {cow, ooba, korts} set
Sly in 160 :Lol . I'm not sure if this was a joke
I hate how you keep bringing up things from outside the game to justify your actions here . i.e 'I was in a game with MBF' , 'I was in a recent conversation about color coded messages'
Sly in 163 :
Also ..
way to be a hypocriteSly wrote:If this is the case, why don't you start trying to play THIS game now and leave our discussions and biases from the other game in the other game? It would only be fair to the others to do so.
172 :lovo now diverts attention with his post about i stay out of day 1
Both Jdodge and eljcko vote lovo . The attention shifts from Sly
181 :Andycyca responds to the previous page instead of focusing on lovo which is good.
eljcko 239 :Role Speculation does not help
JDogde's 280 :Comparing player profiles to what i've got so far
Agree with Sly. Disagree strongly with Korts and UA.
Agree with Andy being town
Sly 289 , 291 , 298 , 301:Don't try to pull a lovo again with us .
My Analysis..
Town
~~~~
Korts
UA
Andy
Neutral
~~~~~~~
Jdodge
Thanatos
eljcko
Llyod
Scum
~~~~~~
SlySly
vote : SlySly-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Jdodge had them at the top of his people to kill list. Thats what i disagreed with and thats why i have them in my town listEl wrote:Now my question back is, after disagreeing strongly about UA and korts, why do you have them on your town list? You say nothing else about them in your analysis.
Half claims do not work . I think its better you claim your role nameSly wrote:Unfortunately, I wasted my investigatory skill on MBF last night, who turned up town and dead. Take this however you want to as I will not elaborate.
Please read post 242 (it's also down below on this post)El wrote:Solid point on ooba, still hasn't explained the hammer vote yet.
Buddying up? When i re-read i thought sly was scum and the people in neutral i wasn't sure about either way.Korts wrote:First, his only suspect is slysly, who has taken quite some flak the last couple pages, and is the most voted person of the month. The rest of the people on his list are either neutral or town, and the way I see it, he might be buddying up to these people.
Your post 88 was similar to the same thoughts i had when i read 78 ..Korts wrote:
Sorry, but I don't see where you said it before me. I'm not echoing you.ooba wrote:hasdgfas 78: A very weak FOS on Thanatos. Distancing ?
Korts in 88 echoes my above sentiment
Neither. I was commenting on the fact that everyone seemed to think Roy chambell could not be vanilla.Korts wrote:
Saving and buddying up to lovo, who he knows to be innocent? Or wanting brownie points after the lovo lynch?ooba, post 197 wrote: I cant see why you all do not believe the claim just because its Vanilla .. If we assume there are only few pro town power roles in the game - I think they'd go more to the others in the foxhound team than the colonel i.e Given a choice between Liquid snake and Colonel Roy Chambell , who would you choose to give a power role to?
There are a few possibilities which come to mind : UA could have been Roy chambell, UA could have had flavor information in his role PM which indicated which roles were probably scum. For the bolded , i never thought UA was bussing or setting lovo up , i thought he was sure lovo was scum from some info he had ..Korts wrote:
Point a) is nothing incriminating. Point b: what inside information would that be, Day 1? If you thoughtooba, post 242 wrote:a) I had read other lovo games and he didn't get this flustered while being attacked upon in them - thereby a 'I can't believe you guys are voting me for this reason' type reaction
b) I thought UA had some inside information which he didn't want to share with us from his own role.UA was bussing lovo or deliberately setting up a townie lynch, why didn't you vote him instead of lovo?
No i didn't - would like to hear your reasons for the same ..Jdodge wrote:Unvote, vote: ooba
Bet you didn't see that coming, did you?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And this is in response to the hammer .. A lot of you think it was scummy to hammer without presenting any case when i did .. What is the use of presenting a case against someone - It is so that they can respond to it and probably try to justify why your attack was wrong. On the other hand , once you hammer , its over - they cannot respond to it and it becomes useless. So posting a case with a hammer vote doesn't fulfill any purpose IMO ..-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Let me try to rephrase what i said .. I essentially did the re-read in serial order ..Korts wrote:
But you didn't tell us this thought. Actually, I don't know what point this is meant to be, either.ooba wrote: Your post 88 was similar to the same thoughts i had when i read 78
When i read post 78 - this was the note i made:
"hasdgfas 78: A very weak FOS on Thanatos. Distancing ?"
And when i read 88 - i saw you had the same opinion about 78. Hence the note:
"Korts in 88 echoes my above sentiment"
There is a difference between saying somebody is neutral and somebody is town - if i had put all other 7 players as town and sly as scum , then that is buddying up. Here i'm just not sure about the others - its not a case of not wanting to step on other people's toes by saying 'ok i think he is scummy'.Korts wrote:But the point is still that your list of suspicions boils down to one suspect, and it's the obvious suspect. Everyone else is in the neutral or the town, which, in spite of your explanation, gives me the feeling, as I said before, of you buddying up to these people.
The reasoning can be given the next day instead of with the hammer vote if players deem it suspicious enough.Sly wrote:
The hammer is the one vote that needs the most reason. The reason is not for the guy that just got hammered but for the remaining players. If you can't see the logic in this, up yours!!!Korts wrote: I personally think there's logic in there. I mean, if the guy's already hammered, why ask any more questions of him? On the other hand, it doesn't hurt to state your reasons, sure. But that's a null tell, for me.
The only valid argument against what i do is that it might draw investigative night actions towards myself which would better be directed at scum. However that ties into the Meta of viewing a hammer vote with no reasons as suspicious.
And P.S : I Repeat , Soft claims serve no purpose whatsoever..-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Well i've answered everything that has been thrown at me - if you have anything in particular which you'd like me to respond to , state it ..Andycyca wrote:I said WE need to keep things going. "we" includes me as well (I'm aware I haven't contributed lately) I insinuated "we" need to keep posting.
I voted you because I find two people rather scummy today: ooba and you. My case on you has been cited (essentially, my 21st post). I didn't vote ooba because I don't like putting him at L-1without proper defense from himself.-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Sly , i think i've got what you're referring to?
And right now , i'll be lynched at deadline according to deadline rules .. Heres what you have posted against me :
a) Korts - "The fact that you are having only one person in the scum list tells me you are trying to buddy up with the others" - When i did my re-read, i found Sly's actions extremely suspect. I really did not get such strong vibes from anybody else , hence putting them into the neutral category.
b) Sly - It's my hammer without a reason and my later defending of it which you think is scummy. I believe that it is something for Mafia discussion - I believe the following post explains my reasoning best :
c) Jdodge - You still haven't posted a case on me..ooba wrote:What is the use of presenting a case against someone - It is so that they can respond to it and probably try to justify why your attack was wrong. On the other hand , once you hammer , its over - they cannot respond to it and it becomes useless.
I do not think Sly's the play for today.Unvote
I will go re-read the game and get back with my thoughts on who is..-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.