Thats for cult mafia
Erg0, us aussies need to stick together.
Only that I was town in UD mafia. I'll try to find it. My killIncognito wrote:Oman, could you provide links to these previous games you're citing, namely the location of the thread in Urban Dead Mafia where you tried this stunt before? Is citing these previous games actually of relevance to this game?
Please link or quote where I said this. No, seriously. What you infer from my posts is not my fault.Matt wrote:I got the impression that Oman wanted the wagon on Erg0 to get bigger than the 3 votes it had, and I'm not comfortable with doing that just to get a random wagon going.
BM's Mystery Mafia. Rather than try to get a wagon going on you we NKed you (now watch Erg0 get NKed and the WIFOM be thrown onto me). You're a tough one to argue against unless you ARE scum.Erg0 wrote:I'm going to go ahead and assume that Oman knows me well enough by now to know that trying to start a serious bandwagon on me without any real evidence wouldn't work.
Thats why I'm a better mafia-hunter than you. I got you talking didn't I? Case closed.Matt wrote:but I don't think trying to make a random bandwagon is the best way to do it. It certainly wouldn't be the first thing I'd try.
This is probably the first ever TG post where I've agreed.TrustGossip wrote:The day you take Adel at utter face value is the day you hang up your scumhunting hat for good.
Cause they both worked? Seriously, this bandwagon kicked off a ton already.Xyl wrote:You could start pointless arguments about the meaning of words, or you could fake-daykill random players.
UndergroundAdel wrote:don't knock my mini-normal algorithm -- it is pretty good.
There was no need, there was no better wagon, and it was nowhere near a lynch.Jitsu wrote:I was waiting for Oman and/or Guardian to jump off or admit it was a random wagon.
Does anyone have a meta on guardian for this?Jistu wrote:Instead of really addressing the points against him or simply stating he was trying to get reactions (the normal response to being called on pushing a random wagon), he retaliated against Opie and I and, and he did seem just a little evasive with his answers. Was
I was pretty sure (knowing ErgZero as I do) that he wouldn't claim even if he had it.Jistu wrote:However, I still don't like Oman's attempted fish related to Erg0's vig ability
I disagree.Adel wrote:communicates to his scum buddies that he is apt to chase the later votes on any wagon
And I love it. Erg0's actually gotten pretty good at nailing my scum playstyle. He gets meErg0 wrote:One thing to bear in mind, for those who aren't aware, is that Oman and I have played together alot. And I mean a lot. I don't think that there's been a time since the middle of last year that we haven't been in at least one game together.
Told ya.Erg0 wrote:when he asked me whether I really had a dayvig I expect that he knew that I wouldn't confirm or deny it. I believe that it was just a setup for him to try and add some credibility to his own faked dayvig.
Did you just call a random bandwagon "uncoventional"....?TrustGossip wrote:Or do you sympathize with a compatriot that uses unconventional tactics to coerce reactions and ideally scum slipups?
Its also wrong...but thats just fact.Matt_S wrote: I'm presenting my opinion, which is discussion.
Oh dear God! Let me present you with an option:TrustGossip wrote:Constantly talking about what people might do or what they used to do is only clouding what is actually going on in this CURRENT GAME. Continuously meta-ing is just looking like you're padding your post count!
We need to have rules. When I'm in the game, you stop posting. Like, take your fingers off the keys. You lose at mafia.TrustGossip wrote:Wouldn't scum be more meticulous if they were to reach out their heads so far?
I don't know if I WIFOMed myself but I felt I just had to say it.
Yup, this is one of the best parts of Adel's case.Incognito wrote:I think you hit it on the nose when you state that he seems to be overreaching by extending his suspicions from Guardian and then trickling those same suspicions down onto the other two people who were on the wagon
We all screw up sometimes, I wouldn't be suprised if he was trying to do that.Incognito wrote:Secondly, I can't help but get the feeling that you're trying to wipe your hands clean of your earlier actions.
Gotta hate it, eh?TrustGossip wrote:Also, the early game is too egotistical and needlessly confusing due to gambiters for me to really weigh in.
Go go Verbosity! Watch me say an equivilant thing to you, in less pretentious words: You both blow and suck at the same time.TrustGossip wrote:Are you intentionally stupid? Or are you grossly transparent in your agendas?
That must happen a lot to you...I wonder what the common factor is.....?TrustGossip wrote:I only whip out the bitch claws when someone is severely retarded.
Lets play a game, its called who can be the worst at mafia.TrustGossip wrote:I'm upset that you don't know how to read.
I wanted to let other people know that you don't know how to read so they wouldn't take things you said at face value.
Because, you know...
You can't read.
I'm sorry, didn't we have a rule?TrustGossip wrote:(I was a bit overemotional, and it was a bit uncharacteristic. I apologize for the undue tone I used. It was heavyhanded and I do not want to hurt anyone's feelings for a game).
Eh, missed that.Adel wrote:@oman do you still feel that Jitsu is pro-town? He was so good as town in our last game together, and I buy him as town so far in this game, that I want to defend him. Care to join me?
I still stand by it, except I thought the wagon was bigger than 3. So I must say that 1 scum or maybe none.Incognito wrote:Oman, this post is disgusting and it reminds me very strongly of what opie was receiving some flak for in Adel's case when he was casting some suspicion towards Guardian and then trickling that suspicion down onto the other two people on the Erg0 mini-wagon. At the time of this post, Jitsu had accumulated three votes: one from Erg0 (a person who you previously labeled as "seeming very pro-town"), one from Patrick (a person whom you have yet to voice any suspicions about), and one from Guardian (a person whom I believe is scum but who you have yet to comment on especially in relation to my case against him).Oman. in post 372, wrote:Eh, missed that.Adel wrote:@oman do you still feel that Jitsu is pro-town? He was so good as town in our last game together, and I buy him as town so far in this game, that I want to defend him. Care to join me?
Well, I would be happy to help you. I feel that Jitsu is flailing a bit, but I do not believe him to be scum / he should not be lynched yet. I should go through looking at the cases on him. I'd be willing to be there is at least 1 or 2 scum on him right now.
So I ask you, which of these three people do you believe fall into this category of "1 or 2 scum"? Also, why do you believe this to be the case?
Huge FoS: Oman
If there is an agreement. Well, there is almost an agreement on Opie, so we've already fullfiled this condition. Also, I see no reason that another agreement with be any more likely to hit scum.Erg0 wrote:There's nearly a week until deadline and activity is high, we have plenty of time to swing another lynch if there's agreement.
WEEEEELLLLLLL SHIT! If you know who the scum are to force a claim from them WHY DON'T WE JUST LYNCH THEM! The problem is that claiming is a double-edged sword, if we hit scum, well that could work, (unless they claim cop and there is none so they get away with it etc.) but we have just as much chance hitting town (more chance, acutally). To make a claim a good thing for the town, we need to know who the scum are. So if we knew who the scum were to force them to claim, then we wouldn't need to, we could jsut lynch them.Erg0 wrote: A second claim won't harm us if it's a forced claim from scum.
I'm sure people are just worried about you hitting them.Erg0 wrote:If nobody's comfortable hammering then nobody should.
We don't have time (IMO) to form a wagon BETTER than Opiewagon or, to be more factual, more likely of assiting the town to find scum (including the wagonee being scum (as opie is))Erg0 wrote:What I'm saying is that "we don't have time to form another wagon" is not a valid argument for hammering opie, or for pressuring others to do so. Both Adel and Guardian have tried to present opie's lynch as a foregone conclusion, which it isn't.
Let me play Devil's Advocate here and say, okay, Opie is lynched and OpieErg0 wrote:In my eyes, another wagon would be more likely to hit scum simply because I don't like this one.
Why should your thoughts on who is scum be more valid then ours? I think we need to review what claiming is for. To me, claiming is to make sure the town isn't going to lynch a powerrole. Claiming is not a scumhunting tool, because counter-claiming outs your powerrole anyway. Claiming isErg0 wrote: If I think that someone else is scum then I see no harm in getting a claim from them, regardless of how many players have claimed previously.
Thats a fair concern, but i think lynching scum gives it the weight it needs.Erg0 wrote:Generally, I am concerned that the current arguments in favour of hammering opie seem to boil down to "that wasn't a bad day 1, let's kill the guy with the most votes and get on with things".
If there is anyone on ANY wagon who doesn't want someone to be lynched at this point, they shouldn't be on the wagon at all. I think anytime a player is at -1 and has claimed they pretty much have a free pass to hammer, no-one has unvoted.Erg0 wrote:They've basically been given a free pass to do so by those on the wagon, which is seriously not helpful.
I will review these.Erg0 wrote:Xyl and ChaosOmega have already been allowed to get away with majorly wagonny votes on opie
I get a strong town read off you if its any consolation. Though Opie's alignment will show me something about you.erg0 wrote:Bottom line, I don't like this wagon and I definitely don't like the attempts to gift wrap it for the last voter.
Not in that context.Erg0 wrote:Are you trying to say that there is no such thing as fishing on day 1?
I was going after the action of asking for more claims rather than Matt_S himself on that.Erg0 wrote: note that Oman and Guardian both quickly rebuked Matt_S for his erroneous comment about wanting more claims, which I feel is inconsistent with their recent actions
Actually, I saw it as a cop claim, which is why I said it couldn't be fishing.Erg0 wrote:1. "Do you know one of them to be town?" is blatant fishing for a mason claim, since we didn't have a night 0 and I couldn't have an investigation result.
WOW WHAT A CO-INCIDENCE THEN!Erg0 wrote:I take it you don't believe Matt's claim that he didn't see my vote at the bottom of the last page?
Erg0 wrote:Me neither (obviously), but I thought it was interesting that both of the players that I opposed lynching yesterday are now dead. Obviously opie was a communal decision, but I doubt that it was a coincidence that Guardian was killed last night (unless he was giving off power role tells that I missed).
I agree entirely.Jitsu wrote:I say we put ChaosOmega on the back burner for the moment and revisit him later today.
No case is ever water tight. As town, we do the best we can. Overall, it was the best we had.Incognito wrote:You placed your vote on opie despite the fact that you conceded that Adel's case on opie wasn't water-tight.
I was looking at the votecount at the time. I meant first as in L-5. The "first" vote. Kind of like the third vote, no matter what actually number it is, if there are two people on before you, its the third vote.Incognito wrote:Yes, you became "the first" vote on opie because both Adel and Xylthixlm (the two people who voted for opie prior to you) had unvoted but the fact that you would even mention that seems odd.
I can't believe you thought you'd get away with that. You didn't quote my erg0 situation or anything, you just quoted my 1 liners.Incog wrote:if you were town, even if you felt like your vote on opie was completely warranted you probably should have commented on the other developments that were going on.
I'll do this later.Incog wrote:1) Can you please review these "wagonny votes" mentioned previously by Erg0 and provide your thoughts about them?
2) Can you please finally respond to my question that I only asked what three or four times in the thread?
3) Can you please explain why you agreed with a case that wasn't water-tight and why you didn't feel the need to comment on everything else that was going on in the thread throughout Day 1?
1) Can you please review these "wagonny votes" mentioned previously by Erg0 and provide your thoughts about them?
2) Can you please finally respond to my question that I only asked what three or four times in the thread?
3) Can you please explain why you agreed with a case that wasn't water-tight and why you didn't feel the need to comment on everything else that was going on in the thread throughout Day 1?
I know him to be a bastard <3 Samuel!Patrick wrote:does anyone know whether vollkan is a bastard mod type of guy?
As I said earlier in the day: I was afraid of letting opie-scum get away after going after someone else.Jitsu wrote:So if you were voting Opie because you trusted Adel, why did you keep your vote on Opie the whole time even though Adel jumped on and off the Opie wagon several times near the end of the day? Given Adel's tendency to get on a wagon early and stay there for the duration, didn't you find it just a little odd that she changed votes several times?
Are you still getting a town read off of Adel now?
Whats wrong with this?Incog wrote:By making this statement, you're now in effect making judgments about Oman's alignment based on Adel's actions towards Oman and you're not basing your opinion about Oman's play in complete isolation separate from Adel's gunning.