Mini Normal 1888 - TwoFace Mafia - Game Over

[TwoFace]

Vote count 1.09

mozamis - Barleycorn, gerryoat, Eddie Cane, DogWatch (L-3)

FireScreamer - Transcend (L-6)
Shadow_Step- FireScreamer (L-6)
Dogwatch - Shadow_step (L-6)
Transcend - NorskaBlue (L-6)
aronagrundy - Frankjaeger (L-6)
Keyser Soze - Aronagrundy (L-6)
Gerryoat - momo


Not Voting: Keyser Söze, mozamis

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2017-03-06 16:51:40)

Mod Note - Pants98 was replaced by momo and currently seeking a replacement for NorskaBlue

[momo]

I am not really feeling the pressure on fire. Will not have him lynched unless people give me good reasons.

[momo]

After further review of everyone on this thread

VOTE: Mozamis

[momo]

I still think we should keep an eye on GerryGoat.

[Barleycorn]

momo how many games of forum mafia have you played?

[momo]

I have played many on a site called EpicMafia. Just switched here.

[Barleycorn]

Who believes this hardclaim. Just think he is trying to draw attention of himself.
Don't think he has done any scum reading himself, just asks what others think: is ready to lynch anyone.

For me, this means that as scum, he knows who is scum. If he thinks he can lynch anyone from town with the support of others, he will go for it.

what motivation does scum have to draw attention to themselves?

why do you say gerry has done no scum reading? see 139, 195, and in 445 he scumreads the person you're voting. i wonder if you said he just asks other people who to lynch because of a single post of his (336).

emphasis on the town claim as like, a serious gameplay item, and the wording of "For me, this means that as scum, he knows who is scum," makes me feel worried about momoslot.

[Barleycorn]

I am not really feeling the pressure on fire. Will not have him lynched unless people give me good reasons.

what about it do you not like?

[Eddie Cane]

After further review of everyone on this thread

VOTE: Mozamis

Why.

[Transcend]

VOTE: moz

L1

[Transcend]

UNVOTE:

Nvm 9th vote count and the vc looks like THAT

[Barleycorn]

btw i'm stalling on reading keyser. will it suffice everyone to say that i don't want to lynch him today and will devote more time to my own read of him later?

[Transcend]

I have played many on a site called EpicMafia. Just switched here.

What's your account there?

[Eddie Cane]

vote gerryoats

he looks even more useless than when he was a mason. and at least then he did sometimes make the effort. no effort at all so far.
coasting scum or useless town?
either way, not a bad day 1 lynch.

:/

[TwoFace]

Selynee replaces NorskaBlue

[Keyser Söze]

Gerry since beetlejuice:

Tone - good
Content - bad


Re-read Shadow's ISO:

Lost town feels there.
Looking back, his push on DogWatch was bad.

Reading Mozamus ISO next.

[FrankJaeger]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: moz

Moz or aro idc

[mozamis]

Wanted to put these thoughts down before i get too caught up in the thread. But thinking about my wagon earlier.
Pretty sure Barley and Gerry are town.
And both their votes i think make sense from their POV. Or at least they have a reason, anyway. Barley on and off has been on me since RVS. And I annoyed Gerry by saying he was useless. So he is OMGUsing. He's wrong, but i understand his vote.
I cant remember why Eddie voted me, but i'm fairly sure there was no good reason.
But Dog's vote was the stand out scummy post.
"Oh,I'll sheep then". Effectively no reason given. Complete bullshit. And she has given my wagon REAL momentum now.
So TL;DR Barley, Gerry town.
Eddie pos scum.
Dog likely scum.

VOTE DOGWATCH

[mozamis]

Moz or aro idc

This is bad. You're putting me near lynch (L-1?) and you're basically saying you dont care who gets lymched between me and aru (also likely town).
Shit attitude.

[Eddie Cane]

UNVOTE:

VOTE: frank

[mozamis]

After further review of everyone on this thread

VOTE: Mozamis

and what the fuck is this?

There is either a lot of scum on my wagon or people just dont really give a shit.
Its ANOTHER VOTE without a reason.
Come on people, start playing properly.

[mozamis]

What kind of response is that? If the votes are wrong, defend.

It was very lat elast night, i went to bed. I am now defending myself.
But more importantly, your vote on me is very scummy, and you know that. Barley is widely town read, so you are just sheeping him, blending in. But actually, no reason at all for voting me.

[mozamis]

I just skimmed your ISO and really don't see much defense on your part at all whenever suspicion was raised. It's like you want to fly under the radar and hope everyone finds someone else to vote for.

This is bullshit. Before this wagon on me, there hadnt been any real suspicion on me. So i had nothing to answer to.

[Barleycorn]

i don't like momo.

i would do momo wagon.

[Eddie Cane]

VOTE: fire

(Insert reasoning here)

Fos Eddie as well.

Not sure if arona is town or scum yet

VOTE: eddie cane

His case on shadow seems opportunistic. And he basically just repeats what others have said.

Why is starting a wagon on someone at 0 votes opportunistic?

If someone has pointed out the logical flaws in someone's posts and you agree with it, why shouldn't you vote them?

I don't believe that logical flaws are necessarily scummy. Being inconsistent over a period of time is, repeatedly using bad logic is, but not just one instance. And he hasn't even responded yet.

But at the same time this early in the game it's fine to go off of them imo. That's just my thought process.

W/r/t eddie, it's opportunistic in the sense that he's using your logic (@eddie, i'll quote in a sec) to give the appearance of acting town.

oh, and fire's responses look town. he seems measured and questioning his attackers in a "i dont care, i'm innocent" kinda way.
time to stop voting fire.

What do you make of his 180 on dog?

This is kinda scummy.

UNVOTE: fire

VOTE: Transcend

he slipped

? Iso shows nothing

Moza maybe scum.

Prolly going to vote moz when i have time to iso, and eloquate(is that a word)

Prob day off 2mar
Real quick tho-
Thinking aro is scum now. His recent posts are anti town

atleast

Nothings changed with moz

Trans is null wtf with the votes tho

Keyser is prob town, and i don't get why he's being antagonized

Dog looking town.

Other players i need to go over.

Also there is way to much arguing about semantics.

VOTE: aro

UNVOTE:
VOTE: moz

Moz or aro idc

putting moz to l-1 with both very minimal reasoning and without even saying it was l-1. cool.

so, going over the iso: rvs vote, random fos, says a player may or may not be scum (lol), quotes followed with a non-committal sr, rvs unvote, replies to a random Gerry quip, says another person may be scum, "prevote" (idk the word for this), finally a post that at least says something commital kind of, and then putting moz to l-1 with no warning.

this is awful. particularly the moz vote and stuff like 137 and 142. non-committal comments like that don't even contribute to the thread; newsflash, popping in and saying someome being scum is a possibility does not help discussion. I'm happy with my vote here.