Thespival Mafia (Denouement)

[wolfcrier]

./confirm

[wolfcrier]

(Hey sorry I haven't posted yet, I've been grounded but I read everything soo)

[wolfcrier]

(Hey I can finally get on) after reading this whole thing Mith seems very scummy but I am reluctent to vote..

[wolfcrier]

Oh and no I am NOT the jester...unfortunatly

[wolfcrier]

His logic seems off and I might of missed something in the ten pages I missed so i'm simply waiting for more information that I can put together

[wolfcrier]

ok my bad the post started blending together and it was GREASY SPOT who is being hypocritical and illogical therefore

Vote: Greasy Spot

[wolfcrier]

Have you read any posts GS and yes I know what hypocritical means why would I say it if I didn't know what it ment. Lets get this day over with.

[wolfcrier]

so I am really lost vote count please?

[wolfcrier]

Well that certaintly was a waste of time reading that explanation just to find out you are going to vote an innocent person... It seems like that happens to me in every game here and on the grey lambrith (possible sister site?). Considering I haven't said anything particularly scummy why vote me? Oh and congrats Monkey.

[wolfcrier]

Its actualy a logical fallacy and I'm ashamed upon using it. So I apologize on my appeal to pity.

[wolfcrier]

wolfcrier, my vote is on you for a few reasons. Here are a few:

1.)

You call mith "very scummy" while at the same time tacitly agreeing to his plan by claiming to not be the Jester.

2.)

You claim that mith's "logic was off" without referring to the logic of other players who agreed with mith.

3.)

The main reason is your Post 273. Earlier you claimed you were "reluctant to vote" (Post 231), yet you seem fine putting the

ninth

vote on Greasy Spot after you had thought mith was "very scummy". You call Greasy Spot both "hypocritical" and "illogical" without explaining how either of those two characterizations apply to Greasy Spot.

4.)

You follow up that post with Post 313, still without explaining how hypocritical (much less illogical) applies to Greasy Spot, and additionally wanting us to "get the day over with".

~~~~~

Some questions for you:

A.)

Why were you "reluctant" to vote earlier, and now you want the day to be over quickly?

B.)

If you believed mith's "logic was off", how would Greasy Spot disagreeing be "illogical"?

C.)

Why have you not explained how you believe Greasy Spot to be both hypocritical and illogical? Additionally,

how

has Greasy Spot been both hypocritical and illogical?

D.)

Has your opinion on the matter changed now that it has been made clear the Jester plan was a trap?

E.)

Did you realize your vote was the ninth vote on Greasy Spot?

A. I was reluctant because I was afraid I missed something before reading everything and yes because 18 pages over one day makes me think that this day will never end.

B. If you are going to use that as evidence.. read all my posts because I I mistook the names because I tried reading all the post at once and the names sorta mixed together.

C. For instance post 94 "The rules don't say anything about the Jestor losing from a nightkill. The rules state he wins if he doesn't get Lynched the first day. That's it. Nothing else.

And any place other than winning is losing." Thats generally not true use some logic.

D. No not particularly considering I have no doubt the GS is NOT the jester.

E. I realized that I was one of many who voted for him/her but I didn't really keep track.

Hope that clears things up

WC

[wolfcrier]

Masons are town, unless otherwise stated.

Scum

wolfcrier
RossWilliam
Monkey

Vote: wolfcrier

.

Besides the fact that I said mith was scummy WHICH I CORRECTED why am I up there?

Hallelujah, Amen?

vote: wolfcrier

Is this strictly bandwagon or do you have your own theorys on me? If you do please exaserbate (not sure on spelling)

I actually don't really know. Sheepish answer, I know. But it would feel iffy voting him before he even posted in the new day.

Wow. What kinda crap is that?

VOTE: RossWilliam

[wolfcrier]

It would be nice if some people could answer my questions

[wolfcrier]

It would be nice if some people could answer my questions

It would be nice if you stopped being scum. But I suppose we both know that's not going to happen.

I've answered the questions you have posed that I wish to answer at the moment; why don't you try doing some scum-hunting instead of sitting there complaining?

With out questions being answered and without random voting it is near to impossible to scum-hunt.

It seems as if my two most pro-town players would be BM and PJ. Both have given extensive research for who they think are mafia. My two pro-mafia would be Ross-after his feeble attempt to get me lynched and hasdfas-for putting in no imput what so ever on why he thinks I, or anyone else for that matter, is scum except for religious praise.

[wolfcrier]

I'm suprised the jester hasn't claimed I think Ross has either a. maybe a horrible newb mistake and is scum or b. he wants people to vote him now for some reason but I don't think he is the jester.

[wolfcrier]

So I'm new to this so... Why can hasdgfas only say two words a post? Also as to CB why on earth would I be supporting the votes on RW if I were to be in cahoots with him?

[wolfcrier]

up nvm disregard that question!

[wolfcrier]

well in my defence hasdgfas /PJ I would like you to notice this post I made

ok my bad the post started blending together and it was GREASY SPOT who is being hypocritical and illogical therefore Vote: Greasy Spot

Seeing as though I've said five times to reread that post and none of you had..... this probably won't change your minds but whatever, I contributed.

[wolfcrier]

Well if you all feel that way can you please vote me so I can stop checking in to see that two people have the guts to vote me while no one else is willing to take action. It seems pretty anti-town for you all to stick with RW after all this and not vote me after SO much logic pj and hasdgfas (or however its spelled) has made against me.