In post 550, Cooperative Sheep wrote: I don't understand the purpose of my wagon.
For instance I noticed a lack of "Grendel is scum comments".
That'd suggest that my wagon is supposed to be for pressure. Whats off though is that given that there are other players out that that have garnered actual suspicion my wagon just seems like... an excuse? The very same people on my wagon have proclaimed other players as scummy, but opted to pressure vote me instead. So, why are ppl so afraid to vote their scum reads?
I seem to recall Kiser being the only one actually suspicious of my slot. I don't recall the same for the rest. :/
Not to mention that there has been zero resistance to my wagon.
The purpose for your wagon would be pressure and to see what happens - also, it's not like I town read you, and I do town read someone voting you. Is it really that strange of a wagon to you? This feels like a very normal strategy and not something surprising or unusual.
I agree there has been very little resistance to your wagon - I'm not sure I care to come all the way along the primrose path you'd like to have laid out in that regard, especially with your choice of the other hot topic wagon option for your vote, but I do agree with the statement.
[/quote]
Calling me garrulous was... gratuitous
I think pressure wagons aren’t all there made out to be. When the majority has no logic and/or reason behind their vote the wagoned person knows they aren’t going to be lynched. Or if they were lynched then it was done in poor taste.
I was originally interested in Gerry before RC vs Gerry occurred. I generally like to have open reasoning out for critiques before voting. Saying that i voted my counter wagon, _just_ because it was my counter wagon is unfair. Also people had reservations about Gerry, and i probably could have done as well pushing Ruath instead.
In post 517, Grendel wrote: In post 412, Cooperative Sheep wrote:
In post 407, Vifam wrote:If I had to put money on it Id say RC is town, I dont wanna lynch Gerry or RC today tho
Why do you not want to lynch Gerry? He seems a perfectly fine lynch option.
I don't really see the Keyser love, but neither do I have an issue with the play from that slot so...I
kinda tend to expect him to be town
and at least one of the fanboi's to be scum sheeping him.
I see RC as town.
I'd be happy to lynch Gerry.
I also am not overly fond of Alisae or Vifam and would consider them secondary scum reads at this stage.
I don't share the Rauth dislike, he's a clear newb so pointing out a newbtown or newbscum issue with him is a bit like telling me grass is green. IIoA ahoy!
In the spirit of the purpose of this alt;
Vote: Grendel
Gives piece meal statements about Gerry being a good wagon then votes Grendel b/c, " lol, Its my flavor"
Has a null read on Keyser. Which means that Sheep is sheeping a null read, while ignoring a wagon started by a town read (RC) on a slot he thinks is a good lynch (Gerry).
Huh.
Bolded something you might have missed - hope that helps.
With the revelation that I stated a town read on Keyser - how does that affect/not affect your stance as softly presented here?
Prefacing it with “I Don’t get the strong town reads”, along with the usage of both “Kinda tend”, made me think the “town read” was weak enough to assume that he was null. You hamming it up to be a strong town read looks like an exaggeration. Did you go on to reference Seyser as more then kinda sorta town read before I made the above posts?
In post 522, Grendel wrote:Sheep's vote was the turning point for my wagon's pick up.
Yay/Nay?
Yay - it's not even a question, it was the obvious tip point. Now, from that observation, what conclusion do you draw?
Well you were in my scum reads weren’t you?
I thought you were scum trying move attention away from Gerry!scum. Trying to get a new wagon up before people started viewing Gerry as suspicious and voting him, vs when they were just verbalising that Gerry was sort of scummy.
In post 525, Grendel wrote:
I really dislike how they keep batting about their potential scum reads, meanwhile voting somebody who isn't even mentioned as a tertiary scum read.
It doesn't make any sense.
Why doesn't it make sense? I am unaware of having a pre defined meta of aggro tunnel on Day 1, so exploring other lynch options seems perfectly reasonable.
If I had said 'I suspect Grendel because my strongest town read is voting him, so I'll sheep' would that have abolished your stated issue? (because...well, I kinda did say exactly that) and if it doesn't abolish your issue, why not?
No, you did not make clear that you preferred Keyser over RC. I was sure that RC was the stronger read between the two, and why i thought it was scummy for you to sheep the one that looked like a null read. IF it was clear that you had Keyser as your top town read then I would have not have been as critical of you.