Mini 1877: Spyro the Dragon (Game Over)

ProHawk · Post Post #125 (isolation #0) » Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:59 am

Holy F - When did this game start?

ProHawk · Post Post #127 (isolation #1) » Fri Feb 03, 2017 3:05 am

In post 27, Elsa and Anna wrote:Rc starts a lot of games accusing someone to be their scum partner to find a scum like you - attacking back

Can you point to a game where this has happened? - Specifically where scum attacked RC for starting the game in a similar manner.

ProHawk · Post Post #148 (isolation #2) » Fri Feb 03, 2017 4:13 am

In post 130, Elsa and Anna wrote:why does verifying that meta matter actually?

I want to know if this is real, or just a knee-jerk reaction to "RC does this all the time". - This I do not doubt.

What I doubt is that RC was town doing this while scum - specifically scum attacked her for it.

ProHawk · Post Post #164 (isolation #3) » Fri Feb 03, 2017 4:38 am

In post 86, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:It's like sometimes I can sit back and realize and admit I might be wrong about something

Is this what you are doing? Admiting that you were/are wrong?

ProHawk · Post Post #284 (isolation #4) » Sat Feb 04, 2017 6:56 am

Super duper behind, will dedicate time tonight.

ProHawk · Post Post #657 (isolation #5) » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:12 am

lol, what kind of analysis could you do on me? I haven't even hardly been playing.

ProHawk · Post Post #661 (isolation #6) » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:22 am

In post 580, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:
In post 125, ProHawk wrote:Holy F - When did this game start?
Anyone want to tell me the reason why this post was worth making? Especially considering a PM about day start was given. Also with the daystart PM being only 8 hours difference from when he made his post to when the PM was sent.

The post reads as useless and fake given the conditions that it was made under.

In post 127, ProHawk wrote:
In post 27, Elsa and Anna wrote:Rc starts a lot of games accusing someone to be their scum partner to find a scum like you - attacking back
Can you point to a game where this has happened? - Specifically where scum attacked RC for starting the game in a similar manner.

In post 148, ProHawk wrote:
In post 130, Elsa and Anna wrote:why does verifying that meta matter actually?
I want to know if this is real, or just a knee-jerk reaction to "RC does this all the time". - This I do not doubt.

What I doubt is that RC was town doing this while scum - specifically scum attacked her for it.
These two questions, I'm actually at a loss as for why he asked them because he didn't do anything with the questions. He asked the questions to just ask something.

In post 164, ProHawk wrote:
In post 86, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:It's like sometimes I can sit back and realize and admit I might be wrong about something
Is this what you are doing? Admiting that you were/are wrong?
This furthers what I just said above. This question is not one that is used to see if something is AI. It did nothing and again, it's a question that looks fake, one that you would say to fake being productive.

In post 284, ProHawk wrote:Super duper behind, will dedicate time tonight.
The beloved catch up posters. TwoFace in mini nor-1862, played catch up, Large Normal 200, Wraith played catch up, etc.

My memory still serves me blank from a town catch up poster. Catch up posting is really an excuse to lurk the thread, judge the opinion of the crowd and spit out ideas that have been hashed out so people agree with "your reads" when really you fake them based off of what they like.

First post because this game has an inordinate amount of activity. Wasn't asking literally when the game started, more a comment of the level of activity.

I haven't had time to do anything with the few posts I have made. Been busy.

Your analysis that catch-up posting is wrong. If you dont freaking have time to read the game because of people who have more time to play than others, what the hell are you supposed to do?

ProHawk · Post Post #667 (isolation #7) » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:28 am

In post 660, eagerSnake wrote:"You have no evidence against me" is basically what he just said - a thing scum say after they think they have made sure there is no evidence against them.

No, what I said is that I haven't DONE anything to be able to read me. I haven't even had time to formulate ANY reads short of a few early on gut reads which I haven't even expressed or shared. You on the other hand seem to be scraping for the lowest hanging fruit and trying to mud-sling it into the noose.

P-Edit: I have read up to maybe page 6? 7?

ProHawk · Post Post #668 (isolation #8) » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:29 am

In post 666, RagingSpammers wrote:Well one thing you're not supposed to do is get super denfensive and hide behind the same excuse.
VOTE: ProHawk
-Ali

Oh you mean the truth?

What response were you expecting from me? And how is that being super defensive?

ProHawk · Post Post #672 (isolation #9) » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:36 am

I'm more than happy to interact.

Asked questions to figure out the hydra of RC. Wasn't too impressed with their responses to you and thought they had a decent chance of being scum. Like I said, haven't had time to read the thread and I don't think I am going to make it through 27 pages... I didn't sign up to play a large game.

P-Edit: Well pretty simple is that I am town so I know he is wrong and eventually you will too.

Second if you want to go find evidence, go look in any completed large game with a ton of activity.

ProHawk · Post Post #677 (isolation #10) » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:46 am

mmmm sorry guys, I don't usually replace out of games, but I really don't have time for this level of activity and I can see that my lack of time will be a huge stumbling block for most of the highly active players here, so I am going to request to be replaced.

@MOD Please replace me due to IRL not having enough time to dedicate to this game