In post 11, Andrius wrote:So question.
If nominations are through that form, do SECONDs even matter anymore? Are they needed?
As a judge, multiple nominations are points in favor of a nominee for me. I'd like to see more nominations overall. If 2 or 3 nominations per nominee were the norm instead of 1, I think that would make judging a lot easier for some of the judges. (that also means giving very specific reasons to back your nomination and not just saying 'they deserved it obviously')In post 13, mastina wrote:While not needed, a second submission of the same nomination offers support for that candidate for the judges--a second opinion which elaborates on the first, gives a different perspective, and lets the judges know it wasn't just one person who thought this; at least another also supported the idea. So while not needed...if you actually believe in your nomination, if you actually want them to win, then seconding is a Very Good Idea.