I do understand your case. I am intentionally being the
devil advocate
.
Here's why:
I have 2 people voting at ThinkBig. I have 3 people showing interest voting ThinkBig.
You have 2 people townreading ThinkBig.
Given the current consensus, you need a better case than "regfan is providing a narrative and since the narrative is fitting, it should be good, right?"
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
It's not a case of "The narrative fits", ignore the interaction analysis if you like since frankly that's mostly for my own benefit.
Instead look at the reasoning I have for Dunn being scum based on his own play, his play today does not resemble town or someone scumhunting at all. Based on how he's playing today he'd have to have a strong scum read on Dave, if that's the case the reasoning behind his scum read would be solid and very noticeable, that's not the case. He's attacking why some people are town reading Dave (And that's fine and all) but he's not stating why he's scum. He agreed with SH's dumbtell today making him very likely town but then when the suggestion of Dunnstral being scum came up he very quickly threw out SH's name instead, this again does not make much sense as town. He's shown no real effort to discern SH's and Desperados alignment. He's ruled out TB for a singular reason and ignored other reasons put forward for him being scum until I point this out and then suddenly woop he has TB as potential scum now. He's made little comments about Nydus at all. Where's his scumhunting today? It doesn't exist, dudes just scum. I really need you to notice this and join me here.
In post 2327, Regfan wrote:I really need you to notice this and join me here.
You need to start attacking my case at ThinkBig then.
I gave you a pass once. I can't give you a pass twice.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
In post 2328, Realeo wrote:You need to start attacking my case at ThinkBig then.
I agree with a lot of your TB case re; his recent play? I think the manner he handled SH's ISO was scummy, I think his activity elsewhere in comparison to here is a scum-tell, I think the manner of him jumping in to vote major wagons is a scum-tell? I don't disagree with you on any of this and I actually did you the service of stepping back, reasessing and reanalysing his play and I can see him as scum? I merely think the case against Dunnstral is stronger. I've gone into great detail about why already.
Let me explain why your case @ Dunnstral is weaker in a 1/2 of hour. I need to get a water. Making wall of post during fever is no easy job.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
In post 2331, Realeo wrote:Let me explain why your case @ Dunnstral is weaker in a 1/2 of hour. I need to get a water. Making wall of post during fever is no easy job.
I don't mind waiting until tomorrow when you're feeling better. I'm heading to bed in ~20 minutes anyway so no rush.
In post 2320, Realeo wrote:@Dunnstal: Can we have your case at Daveaz as scum?
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Yeah, more I think about it the more I'd prefer you to wait ~24 hours and make your explanation post then Realeo. I know what I'm like with a fever and unless you're superman I can't imagine that you'd do whatever point you want to make the justice that it probably deserves. Plus I only want to have this conversation once with you so it's best to have it be when you're at 100%. Also it'd be good for others to come in and state their opinions beforehand anyway.
Well I've already given my opinion, I believe, @regfan. Maybe you're expecting me to reference posts T.T I'm not sure but I believe that dunnstral and desperado is a very possible scum team. I think that TB's interactions with AH (or the other way around actually) can push TB to final 3 at the least. Also...
I'll swap to desperado regfan if you wantttttt *starry eyed*. This is my preferred, fyi. I think desperado has a higher chance of landing scum, or more cases of being scum partners IMO with other people.
In post 2322, Regfan wrote:if he really believed Dave was as scum as he made him out to be inside his posts we'd be able to see exactly where he's getting the read from, we can't.
How come this isn't cause for concern with people's reads on tb, but only for me?
