Open 671: Greater Idea - OVER

-Grey- · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:07 pm

Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

VOTE: culted

-Grey- · Post Post #10 (isolation #1) » Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:02 pm

G'day, mate.

-Grey- · Post Post #18 (isolation #2) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:37 am

In post 15, bangthemafia wrote:
In post 8, -Grey- wrote:Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

VOTE: culted
WTF.

If you are a town, you have exposed not 1 but 3 power roles. Also you hav indicated that there are only 1 extra lover and only 1 extra mason assuming that mason PT and lovers PM will tell the list of all members.

So @Radiant and @Not_Mafia, if you are town and know Grey is lying, expose him.

On the contrary, since there are multuple factions likely, each faction would be more interested to take out others before taking out townies. So scums are likely to claim citizens quite early. For now i hav eyes on you.

And for using a possible genuine reason as an excuse to make the RVS sound more like a serious vote,

VOTE: RadiantCowbells

So you scold me for roleclaiming on the grounds that it outs three (presumably town) power roles... in a role madness game, no less... then illustrate why my claim doesn't prove alignment at all

in the same post.

VOTE: bangthemafia

-Grey- · Post Post #19 (isolation #3) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:39 am

I'm neither Masons with RC nor Lovers with NM, btw.

Thanks for the latitude, fellas.

-Grey- · Post Post #23 (isolation #4) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:07 pm

In post 22, davesaz wrote:
In post 19, -Grey- wrote:I'm neither Masons with RC nor Lovers with NM, btw.

Thanks for the latitude, fellas.
What you posted was patently impossible given the setup. I was interested to see who might bite on it though.

Wrong!

Mason Lover is on the list of possible roles.

-Grey- · Post Post #24 (isolation #5) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:49 pm

-Grey- · Post Post #25 (isolation #6) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:49 pm

-Grey- · Post Post #29 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:03 pm

See the pretty girl in that mirror there:
Who can that attractive girl be?
Such a pretty face,
Such a pretty dress,
Such a pretty smile,
Such a pretty me!

-Grey- · Post Post #30 (isolation #8) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:13 pm

In post 26, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: kop Who turns down the chance to turn into a talking tree stump?

Gotta be honest, I'd have jumped at the opportunity to be a tree stump.

Would have been troll central up in hyur.

-Grey- · Post Post #37 (isolation #9) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:15 am

If you're softing what I think you're softing, you had a shitty choice.

-Grey- · Post Post #39 (isolation #10) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:24 am

In post 38, Charloux wrote:If there is a werewolf faction and he/they win then we are the ones who made a shitty choice Grey.

Neh. I dislike playing scum. If I have the option to play town, I choose it.

-Grey- · Post Post #40 (isolation #11) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:34 am

I'd legit like to see a bangthemafia wagon.

The way he raged at me for my claim and then put out a flaccid RC vote, he was hoping to spark a wagon on me but didn't want the blowback of doing it himself.

-Grey- · Post Post #41 (isolation #12) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:39 am

Vax had already made a wtf post at me, so he knew there was a fuse to light.

We need more bang votes.

-Grey- · Post Post #44 (isolation #13) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:48 am

In post 42, Spade_Ace wrote:Hey Charloux. Nice to see you again.

@grey I don't think it was shitty. I like being surprised.

My choice was pretty Wild....
.
.
.
wait for it.
.
.
.
... card.
It was wildcard. The only role whose revealation has zero impact.

You didn't choose last. RC did. The game started shortly after RC joined us.

Also, Wild Card is an incredibly unsurprising role, because you get to choose from all the other discards, which I don't think you did.

I think you're a lying scumfuck. Today is your lucky day though, because I want your buddy first.

-Grey- · Post Post #47 (isolation #14) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:54 am

@mod: Would discards have been publicly revealed prior to the WildCard choosing their role? Once a new role is chosen, is the Wild Card shown as the player's discard?

-Grey- · Post Post #48 (isolation #15) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:55 am

In post 46, Spade_Ace wrote:@grey go read wiki.

VOTE: Grey

For fake scumhunting.

Lol OMGUS is lol.

-Grey- · Post Post #49 (isolation #16) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:56 am

In post 45, Not_Mafia wrote:Grey's bang push is shitty, bang is clearly just new. RC Grey = Scum

Where's your vote, sport?

-Grey- · Post Post #50 (isolation #17) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:58 am

Also? Wild Card is TWO WORDS.

Which you'd have known if it was in your role pm.

-Grey- · Post Post #52 (isolation #18) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:59 am

Two Scum busted in two pages.

This game gonna be easy peasy.

-Grey- · Post Post #57 (isolation #19) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:04 am

In post 54, Aristodog wrote:Discards are revealed before a wild card is in effect.

@

mod

:

Would the game start prior to ALL role PM's being finalized?

-Grey- · Post Post #59 (isolation #20) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:06 am

In post 58, Vaxkiller wrote:
In post 56, Spade_Ace wrote:I didn't understand. Can you explain. I discarded 'alien prober'. Kept 'wildcard'.
lol, oh wait, maybe he is lying.

YA THINK?!

-Grey- · Post Post #63 (isolation #21) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:12 am

Wild Card is not a claim. It's an interim role that is lost before the game starts.

The chosen role is the claim.

You just thought Wild Card sounded cool because you obviously like cards (just look at your avatar), and lied.

-Grey- · Post Post #66 (isolation #22) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:15 am

In post 64, Spade_Ace wrote:Ohh for heaven's sake. Don't be so stupid. I said the role I 'kept'. Go read my msgs you dumbfucks. Where the hell did I say my current role is wildcard.

You still think it's one word!

-Grey- · Post Post #68 (isolation #23) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:22 am

Still waiting on the answer to post 57.

If the mod says no, you can eat rope.

-Grey- · Post Post #73 (isolation #24) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:01 am

@mod

: Does the player with a wild card choose their role from the discards

like the wiki states,

or do you randomly assign a role from the discards?

-Grey- · Post Post #75 (isolation #25) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:03 am

In post 72, Spade_Ace wrote:Again I dare you both to try and get me lynched today

The answers to 57 & 73 could very well be your downfall.

For telling me to read the wiki, you sure didn't seem to do your homework before you fakeclaimed.

-Grey- · Post Post #88 (isolation #26) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:39 am

In post 83, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 49, -Grey- wrote:
In post 45, Not_Mafia wrote:Grey's bang push is shitty, bang is clearly just new. RC Grey = Scum
Where's your vote, sport?
On RC

Why waste it on him when you could support my Lynch easier?

-Grey- · Post Post #89 (isolation #27) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:40 am

In post 85, davesaz wrote:
In post 8, -Grey- wrote:Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

Interested in hearing what you expected to find out from doing this.

Find scum. Which I did.

Do try and read the game.

-Grey- · Post Post #90 (isolation #28) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:41 am

In post 86, davesaz wrote:While the table is cool, I miss the ability to copy/paste, so here's the playerlist as of now. If I can remember to iso myself then this will help, otherwise perhaps not...

alban
bangthemafia
Charloux
culted
davesaz
-Grey-
Kop
Not_Mafia
RadiantCowbells replaced KainTepes
Secret Agent Jin
Spade_Ace
Vaxkiller replaced DiamondSentinel

Probably the slowest starting game I've seen in a while. What's up with that?

In post 85, davesaz wrote:Interested in hearing what you expected to find out from doing this.

-Grey- · Post Post #94 (isolation #29) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:51 pm

In post 91, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 88, -Grey- wrote:
In post 83, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 49, -Grey- wrote:
In post 45, Not_Mafia wrote:Grey's bang push is shitty, bang is clearly just new. RC Grey = Scum
Where's your vote, sport?
On RC
Why waste it on him when you could support my Lynch easier?
You can't just take the easy way out in life

Why not?

I'm obviously the one that is willing to interact with you, so why waste time parking your vote on someone that is evading you when you can actually be more productive by coming after me?

-Grey- · Post Post #96 (isolation #30) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:55 pm

In post 95, davesaz wrote:
In post 90, -Grey- wrote:
In post 85, davesaz wrote:Interested in hearing what you expected to find out from doing this.
I expected to elicit comments which had more content than merely quoting the question.

How did you think it was going to catch scum? I don't see much AI coming from it.

And yet, it did.

-Grey- · Post Post #97 (isolation #31) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:56 pm

In post 92, RadiantCowbells wrote:Oh.

I think NM is lyncher on me.

If he's a lyncher, we can just ignore him.

We need to find scum, not impotent third party.

-Grey- · Post Post #99 (isolation #32) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 12:57 pm

In post 98, davesaz wrote:Pedit: I don't see it, care to elaborate?

Read. The. Game.

-Grey- · Post Post #101 (isolation #33) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:00 pm

Not my problem.

-Grey- · Post Post #103 (isolation #34) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:01 pm

-Grey- · Post Post #104 (isolation #35) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:05 pm

In post 102, davesaz wrote:VOTE: -Grey

In post 85, davesaz wrote:Interested in hearing what you expected to find out from doing this.

-Grey- · Post Post #107 (isolation #36) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:17 pm

In post 105, davesaz wrote:I suppose a pleasant conversation where people actually answer questions and discuss their point of view is too much to ask.

Right.

And people that refuse to repeat themselves MUST be scum, amirite?

-Grey- · Post Post #110 (isolation #37) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:20 pm

In post 108, davesaz wrote:There's a huge difference between repeating and explaining. You haven't explained anything.

No. There's no difference at all.

You just refuse to address where I did.

-Grey- · Post Post #112 (isolation #38) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:21 pm

In post 106, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 97, -Grey- wrote:
In post 92, RadiantCowbells wrote:Oh.

I think NM is lyncher on me.
If he's a lyncher, we can just ignore him.

We need to find scum, not impotent third party.
Counteroffer:

He's blatantly acting like 3p lyncher on me in order to mask the fact that he's actually scum and lead us to that point of view.

If he's 3rd party he's a non-town and a valuable lynch anyway. let's get rid of him.

The thing is, if he's a lyncher with a scum target, lynching you would be win/win.

I'd rather sort my read on you than lynch a TP simply for being TP.

-Grey- · Post Post #113 (isolation #39) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:22 pm

In post 111, davesaz wrote:I do not see an explanation.
I never lie about something like that.
Even if you think you did, I don't see it.

In post 101, -Grey- wrote:Not my problem.

-Grey- · Post Post #117 (isolation #40) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:25 pm

In post 114, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am town though so

Well shit man, why didn't you say so in the first place?!

-Grey- · Post Post #118 (isolation #41) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:26 pm

In post 115, davesaz wrote:Let's just lynch Grey.

Sorry about your luck, I'm not getting lynched.

-Grey- · Post Post #121 (isolation #42) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:28 pm

In post 119, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 117, -Grey- wrote:
In post 114, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am town though so
Well shit man, why didn't you say so in the first place?!
I was busy talking about other people's alignments. Don't worry I got you covered now fam.

We ride together.
We die together.
Bad boys for life.

VOTE: Not_Mafia

-Grey- · Post Post #124 (isolation #43) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:39 pm

In post 123, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 121, -Grey- wrote:
In post 119, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 117, -Grey- wrote:
In post 114, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am town though so
Well shit man, why didn't you say so in the first place?!
I was busy talking about other people's alignments. Don't worry I got you covered now fam.
We ride together.
We die together.
Bad boys for life.

VOTE: Not_Mafia
Cool thanks for the partner claim

You should have figured that out when I claimed Masons with him.

I'm the Martin Lawrence to his Will Smith.

-Grey- · Post Post #127 (isolation #44) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:42 pm

In post 125, davesaz wrote:
In post 118, -Grey- wrote:
In post 115, davesaz wrote:Let's just lynch Grey.
Sorry about your luck, I'm not getting lynched.
Start acting town, and maybe you won't need to be.
The additional rolefishing is noted, and rejected.

WHAT'S YOUR ROLE BRO?!

WHAT'S YOUR ROLE?!

-Grey- · Post Post #141 (isolation #45) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:09 pm

In post 139, Not_Mafia wrote:I'll forgive you if you put Grey to L-1 for me

You're not even voting me.

-Grey- · Post Post #144 (isolation #46) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:11 pm

In post 142, Not_Mafia wrote:Your point being?

If you think I'm scum, GIMME DAT VOTE

-Grey- · Post Post #151 (isolation #47) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:29 pm

Fushing fief!

-Grey- · Post Post #158 (isolation #48) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:19 pm

In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?

He's my top scumread.

Notice that nobody else seems to care about the answer, either? Maybe I'm wrong. *shrug*

-Grey- · Post Post #162 (isolation #49) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:49 pm

In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?

Why are you asking this question when bang hasn't even POSTED since my vote?

-Grey- · Post Post #163 (isolation #50) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:49 pm

In post 161, Charloux wrote:Got ninjad. @grey ^

That goes for you too.

-Grey- · Post Post #165 (isolation #51) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:24 pm

In post 164, alban wrote:
In post 162, -Grey- wrote:
In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?
Why are you asking this question when bang hasn't even POSTED since my vote?
That's a circular argument. He is more likely to answer if you ask him something.
I don't think this is very important, so i will back off. But i think you should follow up with him.
I am more interested in knowing about your motivation behind your first post.

You don't know the definition of circulation argument.

You asked why I wasn't pushing for answers when the dude hasn't even HAD A CHANCE to show he was ignoring my vote in the first place.

Your question was bullshit.

-Grey- · Post Post #166 (isolation #52) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:24 pm

Circular* fu autocorrect.

-Grey- · Post Post #168 (isolation #53) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:02 pm

OH NOEZ!

MY GRAND SCHEME HAS BEEN DISCOVERED AND THUS FOILED!

-Grey- · Post Post #169 (isolation #54) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:31 pm

In post 167, alban wrote:Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?

Enlighten us as to the threat that exists for town due to my first post.

Is the number or identity of confirmed town compromised? No.
Is the number or identity of lovers (and thus prime targets for night kills) compromised? No.
Did I attempt to keep the fakeclaim after it had served its purpose and provided me a suspect? No.

Tell us, alban. Tell us all about my dastardly plan to further a scum wincon with my first post!

-Grey- · Post Post #171 (isolation #55) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:38 pm

In post 170, alban wrote:
In post 36, Spade_Ace wrote:Nope. My role isn't less powerful. The revelation has zero impact.

It's a single word. The first part has something to do with where cowboys are found in movies. The second part has something to do with my profile pic.
Theatrical. I wonder why.

In post 169, -Grey- wrote:
In post 167, alban wrote:Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?
Enlighten us as to the threat that exists for town due to my first post.

Is the number or identity of confirmed town compromised? No.
Is the number or identity of lovers (and thus prime targets for night kills) compromised? No.
Did I attempt to keep the fakeclaim after it had served its purpose and provided me a suspect? No.

Tell us, alban. Tell us all about my dastardly plan to further a scum wincon with my first post!

-Grey- · Post Post #173 (isolation #56) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:44 pm

In post 172, alban wrote:
In post 42, Spade_Ace wrote:Hey Charloux. Nice to see you again.

@grey I don't think it was shitty. I like being surprised.

My choice was pretty Wild....
.
.
.
wait for it.
.
.
.
... card.
It was wildcard. The only role whose revealation has zero impact.
This is so not you. The style I mean. I haven't read your games here to know if this is adapted specifically for ms. But all this drama is not you.

In post 169, -Grey- wrote:
In post 167, alban wrote:Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?
Enlighten us as to the threat that exists for town due to my first post.

Is the number or identity of confirmed town compromised? No.
Is the number or identity of lovers (and thus prime targets for night kills) compromised? No.
Did I attempt to keep the fakeclaim after it had served its purpose and provided me a suspect? No.

Tell us, alban. Tell us all about my dastardly plan to further a scum wincon with my first post!

-Grey- · Post Post #175 (isolation #57) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:50 pm

I didn't answer at all.

I asked questions you can't answer, so you're running away.

-Grey- · Post Post #176 (isolation #58) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:51 pm

Lynch pool: {bang, alban}

-Grey- · Post Post #177 (isolation #59) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:07 pm

As far as suspicion due to mechanics, I do wonder why RC would turn down being a Parrot.

-Grey- · Post Post #179 (isolation #60) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:31 pm

In post 178, alban wrote:
In post 175, -Grey- wrote:I didn't answer at all.

I asked questions you can't answer, so you're running away.
What did you ask me?

You accused me of having an ulterior motive, so I asked you to tell us what exactly my first post did too further a scum agenda.

You couldn't answer that, so you backpedaled.

-Grey- · Post Post #181 (isolation #61) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 7:40 pm

Not an answer, that was an evasion.

-Grey- · Post Post #186 (isolation #62) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 8:37 pm

In post 185, Spade_Ace wrote:UNVOTE: Grey

You put that back!

-Grey- · Post Post #207 (isolation #63) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 12:44 am

In post 206, Spade_Ace wrote:Yeah. I did OMGUS. So?

Did grey day ever mention that he is not suspecting me anymore?

Indirectly via absence of suspicion in my reads.

-Grey- · Post Post #210 (isolation #64) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 12:47 am

Motherfucker, I'll votepark you out of spite of you don't shut the fuck up.

-Grey- · Post Post #217 (isolation #65) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:02 am

Aw shit, looks like we have a little pansy ass up in hyurrrrrrr.

-Grey- · Post Post #219 (isolation #66) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am

In post 213, alban wrote:
In post 210, -Grey- wrote:Motherfucker, I'll votepark you out of spite of you don't shut the fuck up.
Is this how they vent anger in where to come from?
Stop swearing. I am serious.
VOTE: Grey

So in your little worldview, scum tries to win by being assholes and pissing people off, right?

Voting me for any other excuse than thinking I am scum is basically admitting to playing to a scum wincon, so I'm sure you'll find some way to call me scum because I used a dirty word.

Let's hear it.

-Grey- · Post Post #220 (isolation #67) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:07 am

In post 218, Spade_Ace wrote:Grey, stop it. You are not going to achieve anything by pissing everyone off.

Fuck that. This moron wants to call me scum because I have a dirty mouth, I'm going to show him how fucked up that assumption is.

-Grey- · Post Post #221 (isolation #68) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:12 am

Funny part is, I was having a good time and bullshitting in post 210.

alban wants to go all juvenile, I'm pissed off and saying shit just to make a point now.

-Grey- · Post Post #224 (isolation #69) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:42 am

In post 223, alban wrote:
In post 219, -Grey- wrote:
In post 213, alban wrote:
In post 210, -Grey- wrote:Motherfucker, I'll votepark you out of spite of you don't shut the fuck up.
Is this how they vent anger in where to come from?
Stop swearing. I am serious.
VOTE: Grey
So in your little worldview, scum tries to win by being assholes and pissing people off, right?

Voting me for any other excuse than thinking I am scum is basically admitting to playing to a scum wincon, so I'm sure you'll find some way to call me scum because I used a dirty word.

Let's hear it.
You have already heard it in 199 and 212. Your melodrama (considered effort and improvement by some) rings fake.
Much before I took objection to your language.

Puh-leez.

You've been dying for any excuse to vote me since I forced you to walk it back in the first place.

-Grey- · Post Post #225 (isolation #70) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:49 am

No, you're never gonna get it (not this time)
Never ever gonna get it (my lynch)
No, you're never gonna get it (never had a chance to make me swing)
Never ever gonna get it

Doesn't matter what you do or what you say
You can't lynch me, no way
Maybe next time you'll give the town a little respect
So you won't be hearing us say, No way

Never gonna get it, never gonna get it
Never gonna get it, never gonna get it
Never gonna get it, never gonna get it
Never gonna get it (whoa-whoa-whoa-whoa)
Never gonna get it, never gonna get it
Never gonna get it, never gonna get it
Never gonna get it, never gonna get it
Never gonna get it, never get it

-Grey- · Post Post #236 (isolation #71) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:26 am

In post 228, bangthemafia wrote:Game suddenly seems to have picked up. Will read in sometime and respond page by page

Hey, welcome back!

VOTE: bangthemafia

How about responding to post 40?

-Grey- · Post Post #237 (isolation #72) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:27 am

In post 234, Spade_Ace wrote:
In post 158, -Grey- wrote:
In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?
He's my top scumread.

Notice that nobody else seems to care about the answer, either? Maybe I'm wrong. *shrug*
If he is your top scum read, why is your vote on NM?

Empty slots don't feel shit.

-Grey- · Post Post #240 (isolation #73) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:30 am

In post 239, bangthemafia wrote:When did i say its NAI in my post? I just said that why would town claim so early and expose other townies too. Having said this, I dont really think its AI. But my point is that I haf not voiced that in my post and you dont know me so how did you conclude that?

BECAUSE YOU VOTED THE DUDE I CLAIMED TO BE MASONS WITH, GENIUS

-Grey- · Post Post #241 (isolation #74) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:31 am

In post 239, bangthemafia wrote:So you lied. I am very much tempted to follow "Lynch all liars" strategy.

I dare you.

I fucking dare you.

In fact, I'll say you don't have the balls to do it.

-Grey- · Post Post #244 (isolation #75) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:37 am

As if he can do anything else...

-Grey- · Post Post #273 (isolation #76) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:06 am

In post 265, bangthemafia wrote:I "raged" at you coz I thought you were seriously claiming. I RVSed RC coz I thought you could actually be an idiot townie claiming in RVS.

So you thought I was seriously claiming... which is I was, that also meant RC was a mason... bit you voted RC, who you thought was a mason because of my claim... which proves that you obviously did not beloved my claim to be outing town pr's

-Grey- · Post Post #275 (isolation #77) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:09 am

In post 273, -Grey- wrote:
In post 265, bangthemafia wrote:I "raged" at you coz I thought you were seriously claiming. I RVSed RC coz I thought you could actually be an idiot townie claiming in RVS.
So you thought I was seriously claiming... which if I was, that also meant RC was a mason... but you voted RC, who you thought was a mason because of my claim... which proves that you obviously did not believe my claim to be outing town pr's

Edit.

-Grey- · Post Post #287 (isolation #78) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:28 am

In post 277, bangthemafia wrote:So believing your claim didn't mean believing they were towns.

Ta-da!

My point exactly. All your bluster about me making assumptions was bullshit because my deductions, as you yourself admitted,

were correct

!

Who's. Yo. Daddy?!

-Grey- · Post Post #289 (isolation #79) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:30 am

In post 281, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 30, -Grey- wrote:
In post 26, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: kop Who turns down the chance to turn into a talking tree stump?
Gotta be honest, I'd have jumped at the opportunity to be a tree stump.

Would have been troll central up in hyur.
oh glod

glod lolmighty.

-Grey- · Post Post #299 (isolation #80) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:50 am

In post 296, bangthemafia wrote:I said if u r town u hav exposed 3 PRs- not necessarily town.

Who the fuck cares if I exposed scum PR's, you squirming scumfuck?

-Grey- · Post Post #303 (isolation #81) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:54 am

In post 301, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 299, -Grey- wrote:
In post 296, bangthemafia wrote:I said if u r town u hav exposed 3 PRs- not necessarily town.
Who the fuck cares if I exposed scum PR's, you squirming scumfuck?
Outting lovers is bad because it opens a route to MASSIVE body counts early in the game.

Look at the fucking inconsistencies in bang's bullshit.

Do you seriously think he makes that page 1 rage post because I exposed three PR's that don't indicate alignment?

Fuck no. That makes no sense. He was posturing to make me look bad for risking town power, and had to walk that shit back because I called him out on it.

-Grey- · Post Post #307 (isolation #82) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:07 am

In post 306, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 177, -Grey- wrote:As far as suspicion due to mechanics, I do wonder why RC would turn down being a Parrot.
Looks like my opening monologue was needless

No harm in sharing theory.

-Grey- · Post Post #311 (isolation #83) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:21 am

In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 210, -Grey- wrote:Motherfucker, I'll votepark you out of spite of you don't shut the fuck up.
yeah this feels like tvt

That was a tongue in cheek post.

-Grey- · Post Post #314 (isolation #84) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:26 am

In post 312, Gamma Emerald wrote:tbh the best song for town hunting down scum with fervor is Headstrong by Trapt.

You'll understand one day.

-Grey- · Post Post #317 (isolation #85) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:33 am

In post 316, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 256, Spade_Ace wrote:
In post 246, alban wrote:Why is it more fun to be a trivial town?
You are right. Not trivial town but trivial 3rd party roles like jester and lyncher, that don't threaten town wincon might be fun and challenging to play than having a potent town role.
unless their win ends the game

They don't though.

-Grey- · Post Post #322 (isolation #86) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:16 pm

Who is this Gap chap and why do you townread him?

-Grey- · Post Post #324 (isolation #87) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:19 pm

I know, I was just being snarky.

-Grey- · Post Post #325 (isolation #88) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:21 pm

Gamma, how familiar are you with RC's play?

-Grey- · Post Post #327 (isolation #89) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:25 pm

In post 326, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not super familiar (all ongoing) but regardless of meta, RC's actions are
extremely
scummy.

Do you think a cunning manipulator gets caught out on a superficial scumread on d1?

-Grey- · Post Post #330 (isolation #90) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:30 pm

Fair enough.

-Grey- · Post Post #333 (isolation #91) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 2:24 pm

In post 298, Gamma Emerald wrote:Fun fact: last time Grey claimed masons with someone he was scum with them (Titus in Smackdown, and I know Titus claimed it but he didn't refute it).

How am I supposed to fakeclaim Masons in the future if you're going around tracking my shenanigans?!

-Grey- · Post Post #343 (isolation #92) » Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:53 pm

In post 341, bangthemafia wrote:Null to scum lean- Culted, RC

Explain these, please.

-Grey- · Post Post #371 (isolation #93) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:34 am

I'm actually a Mason Doctor, and my partner is Gamma Emerald.

-Grey- · Post Post #380 (isolation #94) » Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:44 am

In post 376, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay that makes sense

No it doesn't.

He was bitching at me for not pressuring a slot that hadn't even posted since my vote on them.

He's full of shit.

-Grey- · Post Post #405 (isolation #95) » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:14 am

In post 395, Spade_Ace wrote:VOTE: Aban
wish i could vote Bang as well.

Bff's 5evr

-Grey- · Post Post #410 (isolation #96) » Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:00 pm

In post 409, davesaz wrote:Generally, too much speculation on what discards might mean is bad. It is better to have your opinion and act on it, than it is to discuss openly and in depth.

That's good advice.

VOTE: davesaz

-Grey- · Post Post #413 (isolation #97) » Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:11 pm

In post 412, davesaz wrote:You really want to help scum know who to kill first, go ahead and run me up.

Right, because that post didn't tell them anything at all.

-Grey- · Post Post #429 (isolation #98) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:07 pm

I could lynch RC.

-Grey- · Post Post #430 (isolation #99) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:08 pm

I'd actually prefer if he got dayvigged though.

-Grey- · Post Post #432 (isolation #100) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:11 pm

Mafia dayvig sounds pretty badass.

This is Greater though. Not Greatest.

-Grey- · Post Post #434 (isolation #101) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:12 pm

Huh.

How about that shit.

-Grey- · Post Post #435 (isolation #102) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:16 pm

Charloux, I won't vote you for the rest of the day if you shoot RC and he flips scum.

If you shoot him and he flips town, I'll dayvig you right back.

Deal?

-Grey- · Post Post #440 (isolation #103) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:37 pm

Oh snap.

-Grey- · Post Post #443 (isolation #104) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:39 pm

Charloux is looking pretty town to me.

-Grey- · Post Post #446 (isolation #105) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:44 pm

I think I'm just going to chainsaw anybody that is silly enough to push Charloux over his shot.

-Grey- · Post Post #448 (isolation #106) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:45 pm

In post 447, RadiantCowbells wrote:Grey/Charloux probably scumbuddies then. Charloux dies today and lynch anyone who tries to prevent it from happening.

Oh noes, is it that obvious?!

-Grey- · Post Post #450 (isolation #107) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:47 pm

You aren't confirmed town.

Even when you are, I have zero faith in your reads any more.

-Grey- · Post Post #453 (isolation #108) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:49 pm

Charloux isn't getting lynched.

I don't care what you flip. It's a point of principle now.

-Grey- · Post Post #455 (isolation #109) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:51 pm

In post 454, RadiantCowbells wrote:Make it a point of principle but you're just forcing town to mislynch you to get to the scumlynch that they actually need.

Wrong again!

This town couldn't lynch me if you offered to PayPal everyone to vote me.

-Grey- · Post Post #457 (isolation #110) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:52 pm

Why do you think I'm clowning?

I'm fucking untouchable.

-Grey- · Post Post #459 (isolation #111) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:54 pm

Hey err'body, I'm Scum!

Lynch me today and I'll give up the entire scumteam after I'm hammered.

One time offer!

-Grey- · Post Post #463 (isolation #112) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:57 pm

If these jokers want to Lynch Charloux, they'll have to lynch me first.

But they can't.

So, too bad for you.

-Grey- · Post Post #464 (isolation #113) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:58 pm

In post 462, RadiantCowbells wrote:NM is also scum of some sort but I don't expect town to win so I'm not going to bother with that. I'm just going to make sure that Charloux gets lynched.

So if mafia isn't going to win, and town isn't going to win..
who's going to win?

-Grey- · Post Post #467 (isolation #114) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:00 pm

In post 466, RadiantCowbells wrote:Werewolves, aliens, goo, third party.

Which one?

-Grey- · Post Post #468 (isolation #115) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:01 pm

You're sure kicking and screaming a lot for a guy that wanted out of this game, btw.

-Grey- · Post Post #470 (isolation #116) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:06 pm

You're seriously a cop?

Fucking lol.

Okay, Charloux can hang if you actually flip cop.

-Grey- · Post Post #477 (isolation #117) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:19 pm

In post 473, Not_Mafia wrote:He's not a cop

What does he get out of lying about it?

It's not like he's trying to dodge a hammer.

-Grey- · Post Post #478 (isolation #118) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:20 pm

In post 475, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 473, Not_Mafia wrote:He's not a cop
^^^still scum or jester. Grey, if you have a dayvig and are actually on town's side then you should dayvig this.

Nah, I'm not a dayvig.

If I was, I'd have shot NM a while back.

-Grey- · Post Post #484 (isolation #119) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:04 pm

VOTE: Charloux

Yeah, this gotta die.

-Grey- · Post Post #486 (isolation #120) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:12 pm

In post 485, Spade_Ace wrote:VOTE: Charloux
If he is scum why did Charloux choose RC as his kill? No faction has daychat right?

RC discarded Parrot.

That meant he either kept a scum role or more powerful town role.

Make sense now?

-Grey- · Post Post #488 (isolation #121) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:26 pm

In post 479, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 477, -Grey- wrote:
In post 473, Not_Mafia wrote:He's not a cop
What does he get out of lying about it?

It's not like he's trying to dodge a hammer.
Shot could be fake still, also trolling

This can be shot too.

Saying RC was trolling when his claim made perfect sense. He's not good enough for the noose. He needs a bullet.

-Grey- · Post Post #491 (isolation #122) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:31 pm

In post 490, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: Grey

#chainlynching

False.

I don't want you lynched. You need to be vigged.

-Grey- · Post Post #494 (isolation #123) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:36 pm

In post 492, Not_Mafia wrote:Oh well then you must be town

Glad you figured it out, Chester the Jester.

-Grey- · Post Post #496 (isolation #124) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:45 pm

^ Notice he didn't deny his role!

Aha!

-Grey- · Post Post #497 (isolation #125) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:49 pm

Anyway NM, you should just vote Charloux.

When he flips scum, mafia will NK me and you'll get what you want.

-Grey- · Post Post #502 (isolation #126) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 2:01 am

Not buying the bullshit, Charloux.

There was zero town motive in shooting RC without trying to figure out if he might actually be useful.

"Wah I'm gonna shoot you for scumreading me and not telling me why" is a free pass to the graveyard.

-Grey- · Post Post #505 (isolation #127) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 2:23 am

In post 503, Charloux wrote:I asked a normal question and he refused. Ofc I wouldn't want to go back on my word when I don't like to lie

You shot him 12 hours after 417.

No excuse for that.

You didn't want him to answer anything at all. You just wanted an excuse to kill a powerful town PR.

-Grey- · Post Post #508 (isolation #128) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 3:37 pm

In post 507, Gamma Emerald wrote:think you lynched charles

Nah, he's L-1.

-Grey- · Post Post #512 (isolation #129) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 3:44 pm

Nope. Charloux earned this rope.

-Grey- · Post Post #514 (isolation #130) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 3:50 pm

In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: not mafia
discredit rc, why

Nobody cares. Try again tomorrow.

Don't even bother answering, NM.

-Grey- · Post Post #517 (isolation #131) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:03 pm

In post 516, Gamma Emerald wrote:you really think this course of action is wise grey
i won't let u off if nm flips scum

Well we can discuss my alignment or his all you want d2.

Today, Charloux meets his maker.

-Grey- · Post Post #518 (isolation #132) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:27 pm

In post 506, Charloux wrote:
Im not persuading you to not lynch me
; I just want to set things up because you got me dead to rights.
The game turned silent thus boring so I decided to shoot a powerful pr. The reason for 417 was to justify my shot, because I knew RC wouldnt answer anything. Thats half the reason I targeted him over anybody else that did something. Ofc if he answered it for some reason I think I would find a new excuse to shoot him.

There's what that post really says.

-Grey- · Post Post #519 (isolation #133) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:31 pm

In post 501, Charloux wrote:No regrets over killing him. RC deserved to be shot. For future refference I don't do phony... whatever it's called.

No regrets over killing the flipped cop that was shot for no justifiable reason in the first place.

There is no other lynch today.

-Grey- · Post Post #522 (isolation #134) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:48 pm

In post 483, Aristodog wrote:
With 11 Alive, it takes 6 to lynch

In post 484, -Grey- wrote:VOTE: Charloux

Yeah, this gotta die.

In post 485, Spade_Ace wrote:VOTE: Charloux
If he is scum why did Charloux choose RC as his kill? No faction has daychat right?

In post 498, Vaxkiller wrote:Wow

VOTE: Charloux

In post 499, Kop wrote:VOTE: charloux

In post 500, bangthemafia wrote:
In post 485, Spade_Ace wrote:VOTE: Charloux
If he is scum why did Charloux choose RC as his kill? No faction has daychat right?
Fake ignorance!!??? But I will deal with you tomorrow. For today-
VOTE: Charloux

-Grey- · Post Post #524 (isolation #135) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 5:31 pm

In post 523, Vaxkiller wrote:dat double space ace vote!

There's five votes on Charloux not counting the quoted one, obviously.

-Grey- · Post Post #527 (isolation #136) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 7:30 pm

Hammer away.

-Grey- · Post Post #533 (isolation #137) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 7:44 pm

In post 529, alban wrote:Charl is known to carry out such stunts as scum. He did that in our last game as scum partners, and I think he is generally trying to take boldness as scum to another level. Playing in a way that's so obviously scummy that people will clear your slot. Plus, his earlier statement about not bothering about who between rc and nm is lynchec was scummy too.
But I still wanna hear more from him. Why of what he did. He always makes cryptic posts. So don't hammer rn.

TL;DR> Charl could totally be scum but I don't want him lynched.

Welcome to my Scum pile.

-Grey- · Post Post #540 (isolation #138) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:10 am

VOTE: Dave

-Grey- · Post Post #542 (isolation #139) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:25 am

In post 541, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Not Mafia

Bad vote is bad. Lowell found scum, lynch Dave.

-Grey- · Post Post #543 (isolation #140) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:26 am

Not really a bad vote tbh.

-Grey- · Post Post #545 (isolation #141) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:28 am

-Grey- · Post Post #548 (isolation #142) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:30 am

In post 547, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you think my vote is bad or not

Not really, brief memory lapse.

-Grey- · Post Post #551 (isolation #143) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:35 am

In post 530, Lowell wrote:No one kill dave tonight please. He's my guy for tomorrow.

-Grey- · Post Post #555 (isolation #144) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:43 am

In post 439, Charloux wrote:
KILL: RC

You can't even answer a basic question RC...

In post 473, Not_Mafia wrote:He's not a cop

I could see scum!NM making 473 before the dayvig shot, to try and sell the kill... but what does he gain by saying it

after

the shot?

-Grey- · Post Post #556 (isolation #145) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:45 am

Also, would scum!NM really tire themselves to a town kill that hard?

-Grey- · Post Post #557 (isolation #146) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:45 am

-Grey- · Post Post #561 (isolation #147) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:40 am

In post 560, Spade_Ace wrote:Saw ur vote. So not even going to bother reading ur post.

Guess I don't need to say anything either if you're not going to read it anyway.

VOTE: Spade_Ace

-Grey- · Post Post #565 (isolation #148) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:58 am

In post 564, Gamma Emerald wrote:Bang's logic looks like scum trying to set up a lynch based on their own playstyle

Didn't even read the post. I voted Spade for his reaction to it, lol.

-Grey- · Post Post #569 (isolation #149) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:46 am

In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:lynches I want rn
dave (warmed up to this once I saw the reasoning)
NM
bang

If Dave died due to bloodhound, don't you think there would have been a second kill?

-Grey- · Post Post #571 (isolation #150) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:56 am

Derp, I was thinking of Hider.

-Grey- · Post Post #573 (isolation #151) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:57 am

So yeah...

VOTE: Dave

This can die.

-Grey- · Post Post #574 (isolation #152) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:57 am

In post 572, Gamma Emerald wrote:Does that mean you still suspect dave

Fuck size give me thirty seconds.

-Grey- · Post Post #576 (isolation #153) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:03 am

In post 549, Spade_Ace wrote:@grey is Dave more scummier than Bang? I prefer a bang or alban lynch?
@gamma NM had a good reason to vote for rc

You'd have had better luck trying to get me to vote alban after his behavior around the Charloux wagon.

I don't trust my early d1 reads but alban really scummed it up at the end.

I also don't really trust anyone whose scumreads mirror my own because that never really happens.

-Grey- · Post Post #578 (isolation #154) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:14 am

In post 577, Vaxkiller wrote:Whos mirroring your scum reads?

In post 176, -Grey- wrote:Lynch pool: {bang, alban}

In post 549, Spade_Ace wrote:@grey is Dave more scummier than Bang? I prefer a bang or alban lynch?

-Grey- · Post Post #581 (isolation #155) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:17 am

In post 579, Spade_Ace wrote:I have been scumread on day1, 5/6 games i have played here on MS. My style is just scummy. I find it convenient that alban and bang, guys who know the way i play, using my playstyle as a reason to suspect me. They did the exact same thing in a previous game and tried to get me lynched.

The reason am sheeping you is cos ur reasoning for your reads are good. Charloux and Dave

My vote on you was just a troll vote, btw.

I do get paranoid over people who have the same reads I do, though.

-Grey- · Post Post #582 (isolation #156) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:23 am

In post 575, Gamma Emerald wrote:Grey
spade
vax
that's the dave wagon rn

I approve of the wagon composition so far.

I'm also fairly sure Charloux was bussed. He didn't even try to defend himself, he knew he was toast.

-Grey- · Post Post #583 (isolation #157) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:25 am

That... actually suggests bang is scum.

Cool.

And alban being scum off the wagon makes sense too.

I can lynch either of {Dave, bang, alban}

-Grey- · Post Post #585 (isolation #158) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:51 am

I was actually prepared to give Charloux the benefit of the doubt and consider him a derp vig if he had actually put up a fight against his wagon.

Laying down and taking the lynch was just caught scum resignation. I'm sure he has at least one buddy on the wagon.

Hell, maybe two.

-Grey- · Post Post #586 (isolation #159) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:57 am

In post 584, Vaxkiller wrote:I get dave and bang, but alban leans town for me.

Talk to me.

-Grey- · Post Post #590 (isolation #160) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 7:12 am

In post 529, alban wrote:
Charl is known to carry out such stunts as scum. He did that in our last game as scum partners, and I think he is generally trying to take boldness as scum to another level. Playing in a way that's so obviously scummy that people will clear your slot. Plus, his earlier statement about not bothering about who between rc and nm is lynchec was scummy too.

But I still wanna hear more from him. Why of what he did. He always makes cryptic posts. So don't hammer rn.

These two paragraphs do not make sense together.

Alban starts off his post all about how Charl is very likely scum, then ends it wanting to give him opportunity to escape his fate.

-Grey- · Post Post #592 (isolation #161) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 7:55 am

In post 520, davesaz wrote:That's a heck of an event to catch up to. Facepalm / told you so moment, on reading too much into discards.
RC gave a pretty decent PR tell. I don't see a town vig being willing to risk that kind of shot so early on such thin reasoning. I think Charloux is scum - it would not be policy for me.
I don't know the VC so don't know if the L-1 is accurate. Willing to hammer.

Why the hesitation to vote a scumread?

-Grey- · Post Post #593 (isolation #162) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:00 am

Also, you disappeared after I pointed out the five votes, and didn't pop back in today.

That's convenient.

-Grey- · Post Post #595 (isolation #163) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:02 am

In post 593, -Grey- wrote:Also, you disappeared after I pointed out the five votes, and didn't pop back in until today.

That's convenient.

EBWOP

-Grey- · Post Post #597 (isolation #164) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:26 am

The hammer flipping bloodhound puts you in quite the pickle, here.

If he had flipped pretty much anything else, I'd call his NK an indication that you're town because you could have pushed him today if you were scum.

But he was a high priority nk, so there goes that theory.

-Grey- · Post Post #599 (isolation #165) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:00 am

In post 598, davesaz wrote:It's obviously a frame given his parting words. Though it should be so transparently a frame that nobody should buy it.
But at a much higher level than this, think a little bit about what I've said all game and realize that town is much better off if you take me permanently off the table.

If you're taken permanently off the table, you also become a high priority nk.

I would think a valuable role would want to be suspected but not heavily wagoned, to keep scum hoping they might be a future mislynch.

-Grey- · Post Post #601 (isolation #166) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:17 am

In post 600, Vaxkiller wrote:I'm also worried about Kop lurking. He was pretty silent (with the exception of his vote) after the RC flip too, and with a massive 6 posts, I cant get a read.

He's my second guess for bussing scum.

-Grey- · Post Post #602 (isolation #167) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:19 am

In post 600, Vaxkiller wrote:aaaaaand now I have the same reads as you as well.

Too many people agreeing with too many of my reads.

There some strange shit going on.

-Grey- · Post Post #603 (isolation #168) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:23 am

In post 600, Vaxkiller wrote:I liked his thought process in his posts

Give examples of what specifically you liked and why, please.

-Grey- · Post Post #607 (isolation #169) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:49 pm

In post 605, Vaxkiller wrote:
In post 602, -Grey- wrote:Too many people agreeing with too many of my reads.
I have a post restriction to post like you.

I can't imagine anyone not replacing out in that position.

-Grey- · Post Post #609 (isolation #170) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:53 pm

Would someone please be so kind as to post a reads list so I can be all lazy and copy/reorder it?

-Grey- · Post Post #610 (isolation #171) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:37 pm

In post 559, bangthemafia wrote:@Grey, I think Dave is being setup. In 530 Lowell has very unambiguously nominated Dave for day 2 lynch. Which scum would so blatantly get associated with such a nightkill?

Scum that stands to be outed with a guilty result from an investigative role that softed his target the day before.

"Scum would never" is shittastic, lazy thinking that empowers scum to do the most blatantly scummy things.

-Grey- · Post Post #611 (isolation #172) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:43 pm

In post 591, davesaz wrote:You won't be lynching me.

Posts like these mean nothing in role madness games.

Since pretty much everybody is a power role of one faction or another, yes we may very well be lynching you if you don't pull your head out of your ass and find sum.

-Grey- · Post Post #612 (isolation #173) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:43 pm

scum*

-Grey- · Post Post #614 (isolation #174) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:49 pm

{Vaxkiller, Spade Ace}
{Gamma Emerald}
{Not Mafia}
{bangthemafia, Kop}
{davesaz, alban}

That's about where I am ATM. I don't care at all for dave's attitude of entitlement when he has not done a thing to earn it. It looks like scum posturing.

-Grey- · Post Post #615 (isolation #175) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:50 pm

In post 613, Gamma Emerald wrote:This game is not role madness. There is the possibility of VTs.

I don't live in " theoretically possible" land. I live in reality land.

In reality land, people will choose scum over VT.

-Grey- · Post Post #617 (isolation #176) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:03 pm

I think...

Actually...

Yeah...

I'm gonna sheep Gamma today.

VOTE: bangthemafia

-Grey- · Post Post #622 (isolation #177) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:15 pm

In post 619, bangthemafia wrote:Maybe. But why and how would scum presume that Lowell was an investigative role. He just said Dave was his guy for day 2. That could just mean he wanted keep Dave for lynching on day 2 and focus on Charl day 1. Thats exactly what I thought about Spade. I found him scummy but wanted to lynch Charl first.

It's scum's job to find investigative roles. "My guy for d2" raised all kinds of PR flags for me because it implies acting on results, and I'm town. So I know scum had him pegged.

-Grey- · Post Post #623 (isolation #178) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:18 pm

In post 619, bangthemafia wrote:Can you just think of and post reasons why you are voting for me. If you dont, I have nothing more to say or defend.

Who is scum? Who is town? Reads list, please.

I'm seeing some effort put in on defending yourself, but I'm not seeing any interest from you on solving the game.

-Grey- · Post Post #624 (isolation #179) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:26 pm

{Vaxkiller, Spade Ace}
{Gamma Emerald}
{Not Mafia, bangthemafia}
{Kop}
{davesaz, alban}[/quote]

VOTE: alban

Did some reviewing of bang's ISO after his recent posts.

He can live for now.

-Grey- · Post Post #625 (isolation #180) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:26 pm

In post 624, -Grey- wrote:{Vaxkiller, Spade Ace}
{Gamma Emerald}
{Not Mafia, bangthemafia}
{Kop}
{davesaz, alban}

VOTE: alban

Did some reviewing of bang's ISO after his recent posts.

He can live for now.

Edit.

-Grey- · Post Post #627 (isolation #181) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:59 pm

In post 626, alban wrote:Pedit: You are an idiot, Grey.

This implies a townread, which does not mesh with your reads list.

I'm only an idiot if I'm town. If I'm voting you as scum, I'm pushing an agenda.

-Grey- · Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:44 pm

We have us a dipole, folks.

I am pretty sure that one of Spade/alban is scum, and alban has convinced me to lynch Spade first to resolve it.

VOTE: Spade_Ace

And alban, I'll address your post shortly. For now I'll just point out that not agreeing with somebody's play does not make them a VI. Just because you don't know wtf I'm doing doesn't mean I don't.

-Grey- · Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:53 pm

In post 628, alban wrote:Your scumhunt is appearing only selectively 'correct'.

Everyone is afflicted by this little thing called 'bias'. Even you. Yes, yes. I know. It can be a shock to learn that one is not born a Vulcan.

I'm not the only one that is 'selectively affronting'. Every single player weighs the actions of others and chooses which ones are worth addressing and which ones aren't.

By your own admission, there are others not questioning me. Are all of them scum, too? So, that is a bullshit reason to scumlean someone.

-Grey- · Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:55 pm

In post 628, alban wrote:To summarise my case on you (and by association on Spade):

Shit like this is unnecessary and only serves to alienate you in my reads.

Preflip associations are terrible.

-Grey- · Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:57 pm

In post 628, alban wrote:On day 1, I asked you a question. You evaded it multiple times. You got back to me only after I voted for you. You didn't even bother to answer.

Was the question one I deemed to be stupid? If so, that's probably why.

-Grey- · Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:58 pm

In post 628, alban wrote:2. 533: Towards the end of day 1, I made a comment of a few lines. Your response? TL;DR.

I summarized your post and pointed out why it looks scummy as hell.

So?

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:01 am

In post 628, alban wrote:3. On day 2, 559, 619: Bang has already asked you a question multiple times, and you haven't even bothered to answer.

Embedding questions to me in walls is an excellent way to ensure that they're ignored.

Wall posts are a bitch to work with on my phone, so 99% of the time I don't bother because it's not worth the hassle and only results in selective quoting and creating a post storm in response. Like this.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:04 am

In post 628, alban wrote:4. 565: You didn't read Bang's
post
. But you voted for Spade for not reading Bang's post 561. And on top of everything, you are declaring that as if that bravado is something that only a townie can project.

Fixed.

Bang's post was his case on Spade. Spade ignoring a case on himself struck me as scummy, yes.

And I make no assumptions about other people's playstyle. You are simply slinging shade about that.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:07 am

In post 628, alban wrote:- He votes for me in 395. Read his reason. Coz I am suspecting you and I didn't give links to the posts.

To be perfectly honest, 199 & 212 were a couple streaming piles of shit.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:11 am

In post 628, alban wrote:- He doesn't say anything for next 90 posts. Resurfaces in 485 in which he votes for Charl. No questions asked, no clarifications sought. Is it a coincidence that this is immediately after your vote on Charl in 484?

Stuff like this is why I changed my mind about Space, FTR.

Once you mentioned this, I checked Spades' history and noticed that he had in fact been active on the site between the two posts, which suggested that he was strategically not participating in the thread.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:13 am

In post 628, alban wrote:Another thing. He votes first. And then he asks a question. If he is not sure, he should wait for the answer. If he is sure, he shouldn't feel the need to ask the question. My guess, he is keeping a door open to escape the wagon in case it doesn't reach majority.

That's just reaching. Well, mainly the

last

sentence is reaching.

Spade pretty much locked himself in on the wagon when he replied to my response to his question.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:15 am

In post 628, alban wrote:- His next post is on day 2, an innocuous question in 549. Directed to you.

Why do you consider his question innocuous when he's advocating a lynch on you and your townread?

Do you know what innocuous means? Because your use of the word suggests you don't.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:18 am

In post 628, alban wrote:By this time, this must be clear to you that he is trying desperately to buddy you. You vote for Dave in 540. Spade shheps you in 553.

Cooperative players are much easier to work with than assholes that sling shade and look for excuses to lynch me.

You don't like me working with Spade? Maybe you should stop making excuses to consider me scum because that sure as hell doesn't make me want to work with you.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:22 am

In post 628, alban wrote:That's on him. Forget that. If someone sheeps you like that, you should question them back.

I'll work with whomever is willing to work with me when I have players trying to push their own agenda against me.

I will not sit back and be targeted for a mislynch by a scumread.

-Grey- · Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:31 am

In post 628, alban wrote:And yet I have put you in the null zone coz I think there's a possibility that you could be a VI.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=69444 - died n1 because I softed cop to draw the NK. I was a VT.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=69550 - took a widely scumread slot and turned it into obvtown for a scum sweep

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=69517 - fake countered a scum fakeclaim and ate the NK, allowing the real cop to get her results.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=69704 - even though I was run up on d1, I caught two scum before I died n2.

So, you can take that VI ad hom and fucking shove it. I'd you want something from me, try a little courtesy. It'll go a hell of a lot farther.

-Grey- · Post Post #649 (isolation #196) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:20 am

In post 646, Spade_Ace wrote:@grey if you had checked the 'place on the site' where i was active between the two posts, you will realise how much more imp it was that i participated there.

If this game isn't worth your time, replace out.

Selective activity is scummy.

-Grey- · Post Post #650 (isolation #197) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:24 am

In post 645, alban wrote:Leaving aside the content of your posts,

Ignore anything you want in order to justify your self-righteousness.

-Grey- · Post Post #651 (isolation #198) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:25 am

In post 645, alban wrote:Everyone knows that I tried it with you

That's a flat out lie.

You've been angling to justify a scumread on me from the beginning.

-Grey- · Post Post #652 (isolation #199) » Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:29 am

In post 647, Spade_Ace wrote:What was it that alban said, that made you change your read on me, from top townread to top scumread.

I'm convinced that one of you are scum.

Alban, as shit as his posts are, looks the townier of the two of you. Which I really dislike admitting, btw.