Does "Elevator Pitch" has a different meaning in U.K. Like "Your idea sounds interesting" means "Your idea sucks"In post 1924, Realeo wrote:Ah. So it's a case of bad word choice then. You shouldn't say the word Elevator Pitch since the connotation of "Elevator Pitch" is tell everything in short time (ie. "Tell me your startup idea in 30 seconds".) You should have said "Is there anything new or update about your read)
No case can be made, because there is no possible scum motivation in anything I've posted.In post 1896, Superhans wrote:Lol I can see scum motivation in this post. Threatening Dunnstral for making a case on you. Id like to see you to go ahead and tell meIn post 1889, davesaz wrote: [...]
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt instead of power lynching you. I suggest you use that opportunity to up your game.howyou'd power lynch Dunnstral.
In post 1842, Superhans wrote:A N Y O N E not scumreading either TB or Desperado?
In post 1893, Superhans wrote:@Realo,
Do you think TB's chronic lack of content and originality is necessarily scum? What else do you base your scum read on?
I'm confused. You think TB is scum but you want others to explain why?In post 1914, Superhans wrote:Well if u want to lynch TB, pitch it to me.In post 1901, Realeo wrote:Out of topic. Superhans. Why you asked for an elevator pitch? I am still flustered.
No it's exactly the same meaning as the US. I wanted an elevator pitch, E.g. Desperado to be like I want to lynch TB for x, y and z.In post 1925, Realeo wrote:Does "Elevator Pitch" has a different meaning in U.K. Like "Your idea sounds interesting" means "Your idea sucks"In post 1924, Realeo wrote:Ah. So it's a case of bad word choice then. You shouldn't say the word Elevator Pitch since the connotation of "Elevator Pitch" is tell everything in short time (ie. "Tell me your startup idea in 30 seconds".) You should have said "Is there anything new or update about your read)
Serious question. I find UK's culture confusing.
Then why did you you say you'd give Dunnstral the benefit of the doubt instead of power lynching when there was no way to lynch Dunnstral anyway?In post 1926, davesaz wrote:No case can be made, because there is no possible scum motivation in anything I've posted.In post 1896, Superhans wrote:Lol I can see scum motivation in this post. Threatening Dunnstral for making a case on you. Id like to see you to go ahead and tell meIn post 1889, davesaz wrote: [...]
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt instead of power lynching you. I suggest you use that opportunity to up your game.howyou'd power lynch Dunnstral.
Study.In post 1933, Realeo wrote:SH, I think either you are bad at estimating someone's patience oryou are a really really really patient person in real lifeWhat do you for living?
You must be one of a heck curious student.In post 1935, Superhans wrote:Study.In post 1933, Realeo wrote:SH, I think either you are bad at estimating someone's patience oryou are a really really really patient person in real lifeWhat do you for living?
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Interesting comment now that we know that scum chose a power. Do you think that dunnstral as scum would pick a power after claiming to have won this setup having chosen no powers prior?In post 11, Dunnstral wrote:I've played this setup before and the scum team chose no powers and town got bodyguard and tracker and lost
good thing I wasn't town
You are the person that I am implying when I said, "Townreading without considering the interaction of day 3." I guess I am not good at making sarcasm.In post 1937, nydushermain wrote:Also, I still think that TB is most likely town due to the day 1.
I would consider it NAI, to be fair. Too speculative. He has a meta of capable of doing literally anything as scum...and town.In post 1938, nydushermain wrote:Interesting comment now that we know that scum chose a power. Do you think that dunnstral as scum would pick a power after claiming to have won this setup having chosen no powers prior?In post 11, Dunnstral wrote:I've played this setup before and the scum team chose no powers and town got bodyguard and tracker and lost
good thing I wasn't town
In the future, if realeo ever does become considered potential scum, I think the world of realeo + dunnstral is dead just because of this. I don't think scum!dunnstral would be confused enough to ask this question. I think he'd just be super duper happy that his scum partner got not goon checked.In post 929, Dunnstral wrote:Wait, so goon cop gets a "not goon" result on:
Bulletproof
Role Cop
Jack of All Trades
?
The last time we used this logic, a roleblocker is lynched.In post 1941, nydushermain wrote:In the future, if realeo ever does become considered potential scum, I think the world of realeo + dunnstral is dead just because of this. I don't think scum!dunnstral would be confused enough to ask this question. I think he'd just be super duper happy that his scum partner got not goon checked.In post 929, Dunnstral wrote:Wait, so goon cop gets a "not goon" result on:
Bulletproof
Role Cop
Jack of All Trades
?
In post 1375, Dunnstral wrote:To be honest, I'm not sure how much I buy kop's claim, this is also the second time today my lynch target has claimed a power role to avoid being lynched so I'm a bit more skeptical
Still, I guess night kills will resolve this as well? So:
VOTE: Davesaz
I missed this the first time but I'd like to note that you can't possibly believe that night kills would resolve itself because what if gamma was town and kop was scum? What if gamma was town and kop was town? No matter what, if I were scum, I'd target the cop first OR IC if I wanted to cast suspicion on the claims. Regardless, kop is never death # 1 unless kop is town and gamma is scum which I think we were all in agreement that the latter was very unlikely to be the case. How do you decide in post 1459: "actually, now that there are mass claims, kop is scum again" when you thought that in 1375 that you should just wait for night actions to resolve the PR claims? Odd train of logic to me.In post 1459, Dunnstral wrote:Actually, I've got thoughts now:
VOTE: Kop
Think gamma having claimed first so not being able to say he blocked there is a pretty good theory, this looks more like scum fakeclaiming with a lowish amount of prs
Not sure where these thoughts come from, looks like trying to confuse people with his iso rather than figuring things out...In post 1312, Kop wrote:VOTE: Davesaz
I don't think Dunstrall is scum on my wagon, regfan is confirmed town, if I had to choose scum on that wagon, Davesaz, Desperado or Superhans, it's within those 3.
@Kop why don't you think I'd be scum on your wagon? Why is it between Davesaz, Desperado, Superhans?
Followup question, can you link the game of STD? I couldn't find it in your past threads.In post 1942, Realeo wrote:The last time we used this logic, a roleblocker is lynched.In post 1941, nydushermain wrote:In the future, if realeo ever does become considered potential scum, I think the world of realeo + dunnstral is dead just because of this. I don't think scum!dunnstral would be confused enough to ask this question. I think he'd just be super duper happy that his scum partner got not goon checked.In post 929, Dunnstral wrote:Wait, so goon cop gets a "not goon" result on:
Bulletproof
Role Cop
Jack of All Trades
?
@Dunnstral: When is your last game of STD?
No. No. You're a short term person.In post 1944, nydushermain wrote:The logic used to lynch kop was one in which we assumed that scum would take 0 powers or many many powers, not just 1 because I personally couldn't see why scum would stop at 1 when combinations of powers seem so much stronger. It had nothing to do with "these 2 can't be partners."
May you explain why? I think I would agree, but for different reason.In post 1945, nydushermain wrote:I don't have the posts saved to prove it but I feel like anyone reading the ISOs can probably say that superhans and dunnstral are unlikely to be partners
Not true because he said that in his previous game, the PRs were trackers and bodyguard. I've already assessed that possibility. I believe his confusion is genuine regardless of his alignment. Still sticking to [1] and won't progress to [2] because of what I said above.In post 1946, Realeo wrote:No. No. You're a short term person.In post 1944, nydushermain wrote:The logic used to lynch kop was one in which we assumed that scum would take 0 powers or many many powers, not just 1 because I personally couldn't see why scum would stop at 1 when combinations of powers seem so much stronger. It had nothing to do with "these 2 can't be partners."
If you use the logic that [1] scum!Dunn won't say "Phew" so scum!Dunn + scum!Realeo is impossible.
the next step would be
[2] Dunn said "phew" but he had knowledge of this game from previous play, therefore is lying scum for being confused.
I just want to prevent us from getting to [2]. The first step to avoid [2] is to avoid [1]
It's just their back and forth towards each other. To be honest, I didn't care for how dunnstral reacted to superhans but it was the quotes that dunnstral made OF superhans that made me think it was less likely. The way that superhans was trying to discredit the reads that dunnstral made, and the way he's talking as if dunnstral was caught scum, etc. just made me feel like they weren't a likely pair. I'm not 100% ruling out the possibility because I don't think either of them voted on each other at opportune moments but still.In post 1947, Realeo wrote:May you explain why? I think I would agree, but for different reason.In post 1945, nydushermain wrote:I don't have the posts saved to prove it but I feel like anyone reading the ISOs can probably say that superhans and dunnstral are unlikely to be partners