This might actually be good if the replacement is nice and active. I wanted to get a better read on Tweet's slot and the new player might have a good perspective on the events so far.
Sorry Tweet. Hope to play with you again sometime!
In the timeless words of a great and revered man: "Blow it out your ass."
A hydra of Rift Adrift, Oil Tycoons and Trust Fund. "In the Oil Rift we Trust."
So we all just gonna wait on Tweet's replacement and Gamma to liven things up then?
I'm okay with that. I don't have anything to say that I haven't said before.
In the timeless words of a great and revered man: "Blow it out your ass."
A hydra of Rift Adrift, Oil Tycoons and Trust Fund. "In the Oil Rift we Trust."
In post 24, CommKnight wrote:Then you have behavioural analysis. FBI, RCMP and other federal police forces around the world have a branch that does this in real life to catch real killers. Now obviously there's much difference between that and this, but the subject is the same. If someone claims a role but is not acting in quite a way that that role would typically act, then they can be analyzed and called out upon it. By having zero claims D1, you have nothing to analyze, nothing to look for. Then there's the reaction to said claim. How do people treat the claim? Who believes it? Why? How do they treat the claimed person the next day?
this guys is such a tryhard
Cloud is such a clown....prob a town clown, but clown none-the-less - IAI
hey king trasncend, we played like 3 games together onsite and its the first time i fliped town with you, dont expect me to be as easy i used to be and no thx i will read
Cloud is such a clown....prob a town clown, but clown none-the-less - IAI
In post 35, implosion wrote:The Comm vote looks somewhat awkward/opportunistic simply by virtue of only happening after mine, yet having reasoning that was already available when Kain made post 13. 17 jumps to conclusions, accusing Comm of refusing to take his vote off and tunneling pretty shortly after the vote on Transcend. It looks like jumping on the easy target
Considering its rvs, early on i dont think its relevant to analyse stuff like that, votes are meant to put pressure and get answers not to lynch
In post 46, Transcend wrote:Comm: even if i got ran up to L-1, i wouldn't claim there. The idea is to give scum as little info as possible because they already know everyone's alignment. So a claim from me isn't gonna help especially if I'm a very important role and being ran up for no reason.
Still tr comm and i find implosion's vote there opportunistic.
I don't know why he stopped why he started, when he did, and on who he did.
VOTE: implosion
not a good read imo
In post 48, Transcend wrote:Also i don't like 36. I think this could be scum!implo discrediting my correct town read.
thats a better reason
In post 53, Stormcloud wrote:So glad it looks like this game will be active, at least.
NAI is currently how I'm reading CommKnight's views on claiming/RVS.
Scum, even scum unfamiliar with site meta, wouldn't be that transparent about wanting claims on a site that generally encourages claims only at L-1 or with intent to hammer. I think it's more of a culture difference than a scum claim atm.
Both KT and implosion jumped on CK pretty quickly. Possible town motivations include interacting with CK to try and figure out his alignment and hopefully teaching him when claims usually happen. Possible scum motivations include earning town points for saying how bad it is to claim early.
I actually like that implosion took his vote off CK - I feel scum could have pushed on an inexperienced player there as a somewhat easy target, although perhaps it would have been a bit transparent that that was what he was doing. I like his explanation for the initial vote switch to CK.
I like KT's emotion, I don't like his quick jump to CK's wagon. Want to see more of those interactions though, it looks like everyone kinda left that discussion for work/bed and hasn't returned to respond yet.
From a single post? I know it's only a lean, but could you maybe explain that a little more so I can understand? Unless there's reasoning you want to keep back for a bit.
Gamma's contributions so far have been an RVS vote, a joke about Town of Salem, and a conversation about another game with implosion. I don't see anything AI there, but I'd like to see more game-related stuff from him. There's been plenty to comment on, and clearly he was online for a least a little bit. It's enough for me to swap away from my RVS vote for now.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
I had a mirroring tell @ bolded, i think storm had a great read on com but then drifted away from newbie paranoia and whatnot.
I would also like to point out that normally im being refered as either Cloud or CK, both of those poses problem in this game so please call me kicker.
@pan yea LYBH is great, one of my fav album
Cloud is such a clown....prob a town clown, but clown none-the-less - IAI
In post 794, Transcend wrote:Because tweet was town af and the wagon that began to form on her was scummy af. Her role doesn't change when someone else takes over her slot.
its not what i implied, i implied that i wouldnt be sheeping you because i didnt read you, not the other way around
Cloud is such a clown....prob a town clown, but clown none-the-less - IAI