In post 1100, Regfan wrote:@Gamma
- I would appreciate you unvoting in that case, especially given I just replaced in a few hours ago. Plus we're not lynching TB today, I'll go into that later though.
I think Han's question about Gammas scum meta in
Post 44 shows a town thought process behind it, I also like his posts directed to MariaR in the early game. I think SH's question in
Post 286 is more likely to come from town albeit this is a weak point. I don't necessarily agree with SH's logic in
Post 549 but I can follow the thought process behind it. I think SH's attitude around deadline D1 in ~
Post 660 comes across as town. The progression behind SHs
Post 806 an
Post 812 is very questionable especially considering his prior stance on the night kills being WIFOM. I like his analysis of Dave in
Post 970 but dislike the TB vote inside
Post 989. I think him bringing up Dunns prior scum game inside this setup in
Post 1024 and asking him to explain how he thinks his play has changed in
Post 1025 is a decent town tell but his follow up of "Just fucking with you" is underwhelming. I have a weak town read on him all up but would like to actually see some more content from him today.
@SH - Can you run me through a few things please; 1) What specifically what made you change your stance on AH/TB "Never being scum together" to currently having TB as your current strongest scum read. Please don't refer to Desperados case when answering this, I want your exact thought process because
Post 1056 has some real questionable logic involved in it. 2) Can you explain the change from you stating that Ssbms death was WIFOM inside
Post 767 to proceeding to vote Gamma for Ssbm inside
Post 812 since that's a fairly weird flip to make. Would also love any other reads you have at the moment with some reasoning attached.
806 <- Do you not agree that Desperado is transparent? I guess I have placed a significant level of faith into his argument that ThinkBig is scum (first appearing in
776). I'm assuming that you do not think that this theory is likely to be correct, as
a) You haven't Town Read Desperado
b) You don't want to push the Lynch of ThinkBig
From my perspective Desperado's case on ThinkBig is very very convincing.
812 Previously I had tried to discourage (Realo I think?) from over-reading into the NK, saying it leads to WIFOM brain fuckeroo. However, when voting Gamma, I wasn't saying that I was voting Gamma BECAUSE of the death of SSBM, I was saying that I was continuing her push onto Gamma, not accusing Gamma of NKing her.
The value of Dunnstrals previous game is negligible. I also doubted that her answer was going to be that helpful, as she played as Traitor, so it wouldn't even be directly applicable to this game. Bringing in behavior from previous games would only convulate this game. When I asked her question, I honestly did not care about her play in the previous game. I didn't even bother to check to make sure what she had said was even true. I used the introduction of her previous game as an act of intimidation, and I wanted to see if I could provoke anger out of her.
In post 608, Superhans wrote:I know one thing for sure, that is ThinkBig and Antihuman AREN'T scum together.
ThinkBig and AntiHuman were engaged in a fight to the death. AntiHuman was fighting from the jaws of death under intense pressure. He was pushing ThinkBig very very hard. I doubted that two scum would want to fight so hard, even by bussing standards, since AntiHuman was actually producing some fairly valid scum claims on ThinkBig (undermining his logic).
However,
Looking back on it, you can see that their relationship was more nuanced:
If it was a S v T fight to the death then why did ThinkBig back off halfway through the fight to go after Dunnstral?