Oh, just answer the question. How is being a wanker pro-town. Stop being a jerk, and answer the question. Josh has an excuse: he's scum. You're just being vile for the kicks. Is 2080 a blatant lie or isn't it. Where is the benefit in rudely not answering me.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
Obviously it's not a blatant lie because in 2079 I even directed you to where you're can find my arguments against fitz.
But you don't seem too interested in looking for those. You'd rather just pretend they didn't exsist for some reason. Not sure what that reason is but it certainly isn't a protown reason.
Guys Empking just scum slipped lmao! Get this: he confused two post #s. A townie would need to pay much more attention, but a scum can just active lurk and coast the game which he is clearly doing. Any townie would know the correct post numbers, it's a scumtell he confused them!
In post 1980, Empking wrote:Got to Two's revote. Its meh, the fact it comes after Gamma says he thinks Having looked scummy is a slight point in his favour.
Obviously it's not a blatant lie because in 2079 I even directed you to where you're can find my arguments against fitz.
But you don't seem too interested in looking for those. You'd rather just pretend they didn't exsist for some reason. Not sure what that reason is but it certainly isn't a protown reason.
Your arguments sucked. Hence why - despite everyone Having having down as scummy - it never got any real traction. Stalling out at a minor three votes. The only reasonable defence is whether they're sincere.
P-edit: Not being able to find things that do not exist is not lazy. If I say something doesn't exist, and you say it does. Then the response to asking for evidence should not be "Find it yourself."
P-p-edit: Josh, tell your buddy that you were being high-larariously sarcastic (feel free to do it in the scum thread); not as highly riots - autocorrect still worked - as Gamma's posts though.
P-p-p-edit: Tisnt a lie. Josh called it a blatant lie. Have you not been paying attention to his posts?
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
????
"Am I right in thinking that its another: "You think I'm scum, you must be scum"?
I think you're scum, so I must be scum. That's what's happening. I scum read vedith the entire game, you don't get other come in the thread scum read me and say I'm scumreading you for scumreading me. It is the opposite that happened. Your high-larious scum tells are funny tho.
Now why are we having this pointless circular discussion when the thread is waiting for the masons to comment on this? Apologies in advance for killing discussion.
P-edit: No we were disputing the existence of decent arguments against Having. I freely acknowledged the existence of the garbage, unconvincing arguments early on. It was part of why I called distancing.
The second post where you admitted not scum hunting despite the fact that you can't possibly believe I'm the last scum even if you were town is probably NAI.
In post 2109, Joshz wrote:????
"Am I right in thinking that its another: "You think I'm scum, you must be scum"?
I think you're scum, so I must be scum. That's what's happening. I scum read vedith the entire game, you don't get other come in the thread scum read me and say I'm scumreading you for scumreading me. It is the opposite that happened. Your high-larious scum tells are funny tho.
Now why are we having this pointless circular discussion when the thread is waiting for the masons to comment on this? Apologies in advance for killing discussion.
I didn't say anything of the sort. I asked a question. In addition the post I was replying to clearly implied - in a rigorous logical way - that you were not scum reading my slot immediately before my calling you a scum read. However, regardless of that "back to red" bit, I was asking a question and had not finished reading the thread - 1980 begins with me saying that I had got to Two's second vote on Having - and thus calling it a lie of any sort is obviously garbage.
Asking a question about why we're continuing discussing it while pretending like we should cease discussion is obviously disingenuous. Is obviously a scum move. But if they're willing to ignore everything else. Then I can't be bothered.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
Emp a lot of your logic is you either misrepping things or just outright lying and trying to twist it to your advantage and the way things keep progressing I'm leaning towards the ladder
You should give a reads list before someone omes and gives intent on you
The longer you stare at something the more out of focus it becomes
In post 2115, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Emp a lot of your logic is you either misrepping things or just outright lying and trying to twist it to your advantage and the way things keep progressing I'm leaning towards the ladder
You should give a reads list before someone omes and gives intent on you
I've given my reads very clearly. Very recently. They haven't changed.
Quote a lie. Do you think 1980 is a lie?
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
In post 2115, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Emp a lot of your logic is you either misrepping things or just outright lying and trying to twist it to your advantage and the way things keep progressing I'm leaning towards the ladder
You should give a reads list before someone omes and gives intent on you
I've given my reads very clearly. Very recently. They haven't changed.
Quote a lie. Do you think 1980 is a lie?
Before I answer
Have you read this whole game.
The longer you stare at something the more out of focus it becomes
I haven't played for a year. Is a bolded "Intent to hammer" a part of the site discourse with associated obligations? (If it does then Luv can you answer quite quickly since I need to go to bed quite soon its past midnight here.)
P-edit: Yes,
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
It's generally to alert everyone that he's planning on hammering and they should get any last thoughts in / any final arguments on the lynch. It is also when people typically claim but it's safe to assume you're claiming vt so not really relevant here.