Charloux (3): rb, Road Kamelot, culted
karnos (2): GuiltyLion, Lemons
GuiltyLion (2): BTD6_maker, karnos
not voting (1): ArcAngel9, Charloux
7 days till deadline.
Sometimes it's you bud.In post 174, Charloux wrote:Im not frustrated, im pissed off.
Here are my demands or ill become a pseudo lyncher/jester
1) rb takes this game seriously, uses his brain and does something that has value.
2)rk explaines her read on me and apologizes for spitting in my face when i asked her earlier.
@culted: why is me scumreading somebody who is gutvoting me scummy? Why is it scummy for me to be open with my thought process?
That's a pretty boring angle to push. You can read the post you just quoted.In post 199, GuiltyLion wrote:I kinda think Charloux is town tbh, like can someone who is scumreading the "fake" frustration break down for me why it's fake and not genuine?
karnos is still scum. It's frustrating that he's gonna just post one-liners like 179, ignore everything else going on, and you all are letting him off the hook for it.
culted's kinda making me paranoid too, like the stuff he's been saying as of my last post is pro-town and makes complete sense but it's really on the pulse about what's going on, like he's being extremely diligent to pay attention to what people are saying and he's really perceptive of the general threads of conversation. I want to push on this:Why exactly do you think Charloux is scum? Is it something more than "not voting a scumread"?In post 158, culted wrote:Naked votes aren't always scummy. Unless you're one of those robots who scumreads things irregardless of context then more power to ya.
That's also a terrible excuse to not vote a scumread.
VOTE: Charloux
In post 203, GuiltyLion wrote:like are you both seriously asking me to just explain why I'm town? What use is that to either of you? How is that a helpful question?
How are you exactly reading BTD's push on you here? Hard to tell.In post 205, GuiltyLion wrote: omg the semantics
That's a lot of words for an OMGUS read.In post 216, GuiltyLion wrote:Also, this post in general is not at all town motivated. I will flip green. If karnos is town he is literally chaining mislynches. Only scum has incentive to be so bullheaded in their push that they wager their own lynch on it. If karnos were town I would expect him to be a little more uncertain. like I keep saying, I still don't understand why he thinks I'm scum, and he constantly refuses to answer.
Holy shit yeah, Charloux has all these players he finds scummy but isnt even voting.In post 226, culted wrote:Sometimes it's you bud.In post 174, Charloux wrote:Im not frustrated, im pissed off.
Here are my demands or ill become a pseudo lyncher/jester
1) rb takes this game seriously, uses his brain and does something that has value.
2)rk explaines her read on me and apologizes for spitting in my face when i asked her earlier.
@culted: why is me scumreading somebody who is gutvoting me scummy? Why is it scummy for me to be open with my thought process?
How could anyone think that you're scummy for scumreading someone. I wanted you to go into why you thought the naked vote was scummy not throw me some obvious bs about you wanting to hammer if their wagon got to L-1.
Then you get cheeky with me about asking filler questions like, why should I want to work with you if you're not gonna try and work with me and I ask again; if you have scumreads why aren't you voting for them?
This is a good question.In post 233, rb wrote:Charlohx why are you NOT voting one of your SRs?
No vote from you either. I think "later today" is already passed (although, India, funny timezone). I haven't played with ArcAngel but this seems like some really lurky play so far. Not calling her scummy just yet, but consider this a nudge to be more active please.In post 230, ArcAngel9 wrote:7 days to deadline. We still have enough time.
I ll get my thoughts up later today.
Why are you being snarky here instead of clarifying? I read the post I quoted, it still doesn't make sense to me. Do you have more behind your Charloux scumread beyond "he's not voting his scumreads"? Or is that it?In post 227, culted wrote:That's a pretty boring angle to push. You can read the post you just quoted.
Sure - 36, 41, 74, 145 and 171 taken together, 208.In post 227, culted wrote:Also, can you show me some examples of RK sorting the game?
honestly BTD just makes me exhausted when I read his posts, dude's a brick wall and it seems like he's trying his damnedest to ignore the point of what I say and reframe the argument into something stupid. I'm not sure if he's scum or if he's just doing it unintentionallyIn post 228, culted wrote:How are you exactly reading BTD's push on you here? Hard to tell.
I don't buy this and neither should you. You can't understand him being upset, why not ask him about it? Why is it suspicious that he hasn't voted, why is that something that scum is more likely to do than town? Especially since other people have been asking him about it and voting him for it already.In post 235, Lemons wrote:Charloux's frustration seems forced to me. I can't understand how someone would get this upset over a day 1 L-2, to the point of self voting. It's also suspicious that he hasn't voted for anyone he finds scummy, as others have pointed out.
I was mostly referring to karnos instead of you in that section. See these quotes from karnos:In post 236, BTD6_maker wrote:Also, your next posts are just as bad. "Everything I've done and why it can only come from scum and not town". This is serious misrep. I did not hold you as obvscum or even a moderate to strong scumread. In fact, I held you as nullscum. In that case, why would I be convinced that everything you did can only be from scum and not Town?
In post 85, karnos wrote:Nope. I said it *might* have been a play error.In post 82, GuiltyLion wrote: and you conceded it was a "play error"., so it's a fair trade.But luckily you revealed your alignment by jumping on as only scum would
I do want to know, BTD6 - why aren't you holding these claims up to the same level of scrutiny as you took on my "obvtown" remark? karnos is calling me scum and depending on his alignment he will naturally have different thought patterns as to why he is making that claim. My point is that his statements are more worth diving into, especially given that you're voting me already.In post 209, karnos wrote:My proposal: we lynch guilty lion. If he is town, he should be okay with being lynched because his flip will validate his argument and theoretically town could lynch me in retaliation..Except that won't happen because he is going to flip red
I hate to answer for someone else, but your question is so illogical it demands a response.In post 245, GuiltyLion wrote:I was mostly referring to karnos instead of you in that section. See these quotes from karnos:In post 236, BTD6_maker wrote:Also, your next posts are just as bad. "Everything I've done and why it can only come from scum and not town". This is serious misrep. I did not hold you as obvscum or even a moderate to strong scumread. In fact, I held you as nullscum. In that case, why would I be convinced that everything you did can only be from scum and not Town?
In post 85, karnos wrote:Nope. I said it *might* have been a play error.In post 82, GuiltyLion wrote: and you conceded it was a "play error"., so it's a fair trade.But luckily you revealed your alignment by jumping on as only scum wouldI do want to know, BTD6 - why aren't you holding these claims up to the same level of scrutiny as you took on my "obvtown" remark? karnos is calling me scum and depending on his alignment he will naturally have different thought patterns as to why he is making that claim. My point is that his statements are more worth diving into, especially given that you're voting me already.In post 209, karnos wrote:My proposal: we lynch guilty lion. If he is town, he should be okay with being lynched because his flip will validate his argument and theoretically town could lynch me in retaliation..Except that won't happen because he is going to flip red