Open 661: Pick Your Poison [Game Over]

-Grey- · Post Post #894 (isolation #0) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 1:43 pm

In post 893, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello Grey, any thought you have on the game yet?

Yeah. I'm town, and I can see now why Leo wasn't too concerned about his wagon.

I'm not getting lynched.

So far, Titus, LQ, and Gamma are town. I can lynch TB, SS, and possibly tojam2.

Of those three, I prefer to

VOTE: SnarkySnowman

-Grey- · Post Post #896 (isolation #1) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 1:47 pm

In post 895, Gamma Emerald wrote:Can you expand on that?

Can you clarify your request?

-Grey- · Post Post #899 (isolation #2) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 1:49 pm

In post 898, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 897, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 895, Gamma Emerald wrote:Can you expand on that?
Scum hunting the new slot. these two are not teamed.
As Scum.

That's the obvious inference, considering Masons are not a possibility.

-Grey- · Post Post #901 (isolation #3) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 1:53 pm

In post 900, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is SS scummy?

Are you seriously asking that question?

Tell me you're not seriously asking that question.

-Grey- · Post Post #903 (isolation #4) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:00 pm

Snarky had been active lurking like a motherfucker, keeping their head down and posting just enough to avoid proud dodges,

until a solid wagon formed on a target they could support.

Now all of a sudden Snarky actually participates.

Also,

In post 278, SnarkySnowman wrote:Pretty sure there's lots of TvT in there.

Claims a lot of TvT, but not giving any actual reads.

In post 390, SnarkySnowman wrote:Cheesy reads like playstyle more than scummy, a lot of it is nai to me

I was hard scumreading Cheesy at this point because I felt he wasn't being genuine in his play. Snarky's read on the other hand looks like he has outside knowledge that Cheesy is town.

-Grey- · Post Post #905 (isolation #5) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:02 pm

In post 904, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay I can see that, but he plays active lurking in most games.

Then why the activity all of a sudden?

-Grey- · Post Post #909 (isolation #6) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:08 pm

In post 907, Gamma Emerald wrote:He has about 1 exchange each day he posts.

Except for the sixteenth, where he made four posts in one day.

-Grey- · Post Post #911 (isolation #7) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:10 pm

In post 910, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 909, -Grey- wrote:
In post 907, Gamma Emerald wrote:He has about 1 exchange each day he posts.
Except for the sixteenth, where he made four posts in one day.
On one topic.

False. Two.

-Grey- · Post Post #913 (isolation #8) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:13 pm

In post 912, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 909, -Grey- wrote:
In post 907, Gamma Emerald wrote:He has about 1 exchange each day he posts.
Except for the sixteenth, where he made four posts in one day.
Checking his ISO, he also made 4 posts on the 11th.

Was the Realeo wagon established on the 11th? If so, my point remains. If not, I concede it.

-Grey- · Post Post #915 (isolation #9) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:14 pm

In post 914, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 911, -Grey- wrote:
In post 910, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 909, -Grey- wrote:
In post 907, Gamma Emerald wrote:He has about 1 exchange each day he posts.
Except for the sixteenth, where he made four posts in one day.
On one topic.
False. Two.
His existence is what I see.

Keep reading.

-Grey- · Post Post #917 (isolation #10) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:17 pm

In post 858, SnarkySnowman wrote:
In post 855, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 853, SnarkySnowman wrote:
In post 846, culted wrote:
In post 767, SnarkySnowman wrote:Titus, Realeo is almost confirmed scum, please comment on that
The fuck snarky is in this game?
For a while now, yeah.
I find this fishy of Culted honestly.
Why?

He's questioning the suspicion LQ has of culted.

While that suspicion is based on the interaction around Snarky's existence, questioning that suspicion is in itself a separate topic.

-Grey- · Post Post #918 (isolation #11) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:21 pm

Realeo wagon didn't exist on the 11th.

-Grey- · Post Post #919 (isolation #12) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:22 pm

If I can get a sensible reads list from Snarky, I'll move on.

-Grey- · Post Post #921 (isolation #13) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:26 pm

In post 920, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 919, -Grey- wrote:If I can get a sensible reads list from Snarky, I'll move on.
WRONG!

pardoning a player for doing X action when it can be faked, is a really poor way to play.

Hanging onto poor logic when it has been shown to be incorrect is an even worse way to play.

-Grey- · Post Post #923 (isolation #14) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:39 pm

In post 922, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 921, -Grey- wrote:
In post 920, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 919, -Grey- wrote:If I can get a sensible reads list from Snarky, I'll move on.
WRONG!

pardoning a player for doing X action when it can be faked, is a really poor way to play.
Hanging onto poor logic when it has been shown to be incorrect is an even worse way to play.
Not necessarily. It could mean the method of logic is not accepted and that is all.

You're not making any sense.

I made an assertion that was proven wrong. I adjusted my read based on new evidence and asked for a reads list to hold the player to in order to move my vote.

Had I insisted that my read was correct despite being proven wrong, I'd have justifiably been accused of tunneling.

-Grey- · Post Post #925 (isolation #15) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:47 pm

In post 924, LicketyQuickety wrote:You thinking SS is going to provide a reads list? LOL

If he wants my vote to move, yes. I still have a case on him besides the sudden activity issue that he needs to address, and providing reads does that.

In post 924, LicketyQuickety wrote:And here I thought we were talking in generalities. You can get lynched.

Not this game. I'm fated to be NKed.

-Grey- · Post Post #929 (isolation #16) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:01 pm

We have less than three days to settle on a lynch. Let's move on from me so we can find scum, shall we?

I'm a confirmable PR. That is all I'm claiming today. You will get more from me next game day.

Now find another player to lynch.

-Grey- · Post Post #930 (isolation #17) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:34 pm

In post 887, tojam2 wrote:Read list:
Town
Vedith's Slot (sry replacement)
aroma
Bunch of nulls
Realeo's slot
Vax
Scum

So Vax is scummier, but you're voting me because...?

(Hint: This is me inviting you to vote your scummiest read)

-Grey- · Post Post #931 (isolation #18) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:39 pm

ThinkBig, are you scumreading Cheesy?

-Grey- · Post Post #933 (isolation #19) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:43 pm

In post 729, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 728, aronagrundy wrote:
In post 725, aronagrundy wrote:Right, they said the argument could be either TvT or TvS, but their most recent post seems to discount the possibility of TvT.
Just based on the ISO of the two, I lean more towards svt than tvt. In the event real flips town (which I would be surprised) then the next most probable scenario is Vedith/cheesy. The interaction between cheesy and Vedith seemed like scum buddies trying to distance.

Since you'd be surprised if I flip town, and suspect my slot's interaction with Vedith is SvT, that tells me that you townread Vedith.

This doesn't jibe with your assertion that Vedith and Cheesy look like distancing scum. If you honestly felt that way, you'd be voting one of them and calling me town.

VOTE: ThinkBig

-Grey- · Post Post #935 (isolation #20) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:48 pm

In post 934, LicketyQuickety wrote:

Use your words.

-Grey- · Post Post #943 (isolation #21) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:24 pm

In post 941, Formerfish wrote:Hi guys. What should I know before I start my read through?

Read fast, time is short.

I'm not being lynched today, so don't bother getting invested in the Realeo/Vedith interactions because Vedith/Titus is town and I'm either dead tonight or confirmed PR tomorrow.

-Grey- · Post Post #950 (isolation #22) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:29 pm

In post 946, Formerfish wrote:Nah, I stepped away from the game man. I flew to close to the sun and I crashed.

The guy you're replacing was really town, do try not to fuck that up.

-Grey- · Post Post #952 (isolation #23) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:37 pm

In post 933, -Grey- wrote:
In post 729, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 728, aronagrundy wrote:
In post 725, aronagrundy wrote:Right, they said the argument could be either TvT or TvS, but their most recent post seems to discount the possibility of TvT.
Just based on the ISO of the two, I lean more towards svt than tvt. In the event real flips town (which I would be surprised) then the next most probable scenario is Vedith/cheesy. The interaction between cheesy and Vedith seemed like scum buddies trying to distance.
Since you'd be surprised if I flip town, and suspect my slot's interaction with Vedith is SvT, that tells me that you townread Vedith.

This doesn't jibe with your assertion that Vedith and Cheesy look like distancing scum. If you honestly felt that way, you'd be voting one of them and calling me town.

VOTE: ThinkBig

Logical inconsistencies are indicative of fabricated reads.

More ThinkBig votes, please.

-Grey- · Post Post #954 (isolation #24) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:41 pm

In post 953, LicketyQuickety wrote: That is complete and utter bullshit!

I was wondering when you'd get around to clarifying your previous response to my case.

Do go on, explain how it's bullshit. I'm all ears.

-Grey- · Post Post #957 (isolation #25) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:49 pm

In post 956, Vaxkiller wrote:What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.

-Grey- · Post Post #964 (isolation #26) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:54 pm

Nothing in that post compels me to recalibrate my read on ThinkBig.

His convoluted logic doesn't come from a town mindset, it comes from scum trying to sound town.

-Grey- · Post Post #967 (isolation #27) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:56 pm

In post 961, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 957, -Grey- wrote:
In post 956, Vaxkiller wrote:What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.
Are you Mason buddies?

Sure.

PyP is an open setup that includes Masons as a possibility and that's exactly what Titus and I are after our predecessors spent the whole day at war with each other.

That totally makes sense.

-Grey- · Post Post #969 (isolation #28) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:56 pm

In post 966, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 964, -Grey- wrote:Nothing in that post compels me to recalibrate my read on ThinkBig.

His convoluted logic doesn't come from a town mindset, it comes from scum trying to sound town.
Then why didn't you say THAT in the first place?

I did.

-Grey- · Post Post #971 (isolation #29) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:59 pm

In post 970, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 967, -Grey- wrote:
In post 961, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 957, -Grey- wrote:
In post 956, Vaxkiller wrote:What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.
Are you Mason buddies?
Sure.

PyP is an open setup that includes Masons as a possibility and that's exactly what Titus and I are after our predecessors spent the whole day at war with each other.

That totally makes sense.
TIL Grey has no sense of humor.

Til Gamma understands sarcasm.

-Grey- · Post Post #991 (isolation #30) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:34 pm

In post 982, aronagrundy wrote:Oh btw,

VOTE: thinkbig

He insists that there has to be scum in vedith/realeo/cheezy but barely interacts with the replacements for the first two despite continuing to say that one of them is scum. Would also be ok with culted or tojam.

He also calls me scum while saying Vedith/Cheesy interaction is Scum/Scum and Vedith/Realeo(me) interaction is Scum/Town or Town/Town

In no world ever does that come from town.

-Grey- · Post Post #1002 (isolation #31) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:46 pm

In post 996, LicketyQuickety wrote:Well, I think day one is the ONLY day to push a mislynch.

Interesting.

-Grey- · Post Post #1007 (isolation #32) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:57 pm

In post 1004, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1002, -Grey- wrote:
In post 996, LicketyQuickety wrote:Well, I think day one is the ONLY day to push a mislynch.
Interesting.
Push it, push it real good.

We'll chat d2, I'm not interested in distracting from TB today.

In post 1004, LicketyQuickety wrote:

Finally, this game gets some flavor!

-Grey- · Post Post #1028 (isolation #33) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:17 pm

In post 1026, LicketyQuickety wrote:*Sigh*

I want to PL SnarkySnowman...

You mean mislynch, right? Because what you said a while back.

-Grey- · Post Post #1031 (isolation #34) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:22 pm

In post 1030, LicketyQuickety wrote:What are good reasons to keep him in the game?

If he's town, his life helps town maintain the majority.

That's all the reason we need to only lynch scum.

-Grey- · Post Post #1032 (isolation #35) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:24 pm

In post 1025, Formerfish wrote:Townish: Culted, Vax

Where do these come from?

-Grey- · Post Post #1037 (isolation #36) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:28 pm

In post 1034, Formerfish wrote:Culted reminds me of myself as new town. I saw dragons when there were only windmills and charged towards them with reckless abandon. I was wrong a shit ton to, so I'm not going to hold a few reads we disagree on.

This is bad and you should feel bad.

-Grey- · Post Post #1040 (isolation #37) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:32 pm

In post 1038, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1034, Formerfish wrote:Culted reminds me of myself as new town. I saw dragons when there were only windmills and charged towards them with reckless abandon. I was wrong a shit ton to, so I'm not going to hold a few reads we disagree on.
Im not going to hold those reads against her. How the fuck did I not finish a sentence?

I knew where that sentence was going and it's irrelevant.

Your knowledge is not their knowledge. Your experience is not theirs.

There is no legitimate comparison between your play because you have no idea of her background or state of mind and don't know how she operates.

You are filling in blanks with assumptions based on your own experiences, and that's bad. And you should feel bad.

-Grey- · Post Post #1043 (isolation #38) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:40 pm

In post 1042, Formerfish wrote:If you don't, then do you think I'm scum for town reading her?

I haven't decided yet, that's what I'm mulling over.

In post 1042, Formerfish wrote:If you don't think I'm scum and you don't think shes scum then what's the point of calling out why I have a townish read on her?

Understanding the basis behind a read is part of scumhunting. I'm sure you know that, so what's with the unnecessary questions?

-Grey- · Post Post #1046 (isolation #39) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:51 pm

I'm leaning more towards pocketed than scum, thanks largely to Aero.

-Grey- · Post Post #1048 (isolation #40) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:58 pm

In post 1047, Formerfish wrote:Pocketed?

You're seeing what you want to see and forming an opinion based on that.

-Grey- · Post Post #1050 (isolation #41) » Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:09 pm

In post 1049, Formerfish wrote:Fair enough, one of my biggest weaknesses is confbias, which seems like the same thing.

Yeah that's the word I was looking for.

It's late. Don't judge me.

-Grey- · Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:09 pm

In post 1054, LicketyQuickety wrote:I have a Scum read on Gray.

Doesn't matter until d2.

Even bringing it up today is anti-town.

-Grey- · Post Post #1079 (isolation #43) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 9:10 am

Leave Gamma alone, he's town.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:31 am

In post 793, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm going after Tojam if Real (slot) flips Town.

Why would you go after tojam specifically upon my flip?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:35 am

In post 1093, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1092, -Grey- wrote:
In post 793, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm going after Tojam if Real (slot) flips Town.
Why would you go after tojam specifically upon my flip?
I can't remember exactly, but I think it was because he voted your slot.

If you can't even remember why you would go after someone the following day today, then I have to doubt the veracity of your remark.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:37 am

In post 1095, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1094, ThinkBig wrote:I'm on the train headed home. Since I am at L2, I am going to go ahead and claim: I am the 1-shot cop.
We have time, there is no need for a CC yet (if there is one).

I'll expand on that... DO NOT CC AT ALL TODAY PERIOD.

Wait for a result and CC tomorrow.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:38 am

In post 1097, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1096, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1093, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1092, -Grey- wrote:
In post 793, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm going after Tojam if Real (slot) flips Town.
Why would you go after tojam specifically upon my flip?
I can't remember exactly, but I think it was because he voted your slot.
If you can't even remember why you would go after someone the following day today, then I have to doubt the veracity of your remark.
The more important question is why is this being dragged up now rather than earlier.

That's rather obvious. I missed it earlier and Gamma brought it back up

VOTE: LQ

My scumread on you has been building and I'm pretty happy lynching here today.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:00 am

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1100, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1097, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1096, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1093, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1092, -Grey- wrote:
In post 793, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm going after Tojam if Real (slot) flips Town.
Why would you go after tojam specifically upon my flip?
I can't remember exactly, but I think it was because he voted your slot.
If you can't even remember why you would go after someone the following day today, then I have to doubt the veracity of your remark.
The more important question is why is this being dragged up now rather than earlier.
That's rather obvious. I missed it earlier and Gamma brought it back up

VOTE: LQ

My scumread on you has been building and I'm pretty happy lynching here today.
Reasons, k?

I knew you were going to ask that!

In post 120, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why would I want my Scum read to know why I am Scumreading them?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:03 am

In post 1104, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1103, -Grey- wrote:
LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1100, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1097, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1096, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1093, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1092, -Grey- wrote:
In post 793, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm going after Tojam if Real (slot) flips Town.
Why would you go after tojam specifically upon my flip?
I can't remember exactly, but I think it was because he voted your slot.
If you can't even remember why you would go after someone the following day today, then I have to doubt the veracity of your remark.
The more important question is why is this being dragged up now rather than earlier.
That's rather obvious. I missed it earlier and Gamma brought it back up

VOTE: LQ

My scumread on you has been building and I'm pretty happy lynching here today.
Reasons, k?
I knew you were going to ask that!

In post 120, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why would I want my Scum read to know why I am Scumreading them?
What is your point here, darling?

Why would I want my scumread to know why I'm scumreading them?

If it's acceptable logic for you to use, then it's certainly town thinking for others to say as well.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:04 am

In post 1105, Gamma Emerald wrote:@LQ: He's being cheeky.
VOTE: LQ

^ This guy gets it.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:11 am

In post 1109, Gamma Emerald wrote:What???

Google ENTJ, bud. It's actually kinda funny.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:13 am

LQ, who's scum?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:21 am

In post 1113, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1111, -Grey- wrote:LQ, who's scum?
Not sure. There are a lot of underplaying decent players in this game. Some sly characters here.

Comments like this is why you're scum.

I'd you thought there were underplaying decent characters, you'd be pissed at them for not playing optimally.

Instead, you are saying they are playing very well (Sly characters) yet "underplaying".

You're teaching for what you think town wants to hear and stumbling over yourself.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:21 am

reaching*

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:21 am

In post 1114, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1113, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1111, -Grey- wrote:LQ, who's scum?
Not sure. There are a lot of underplaying decent players in this game. Some sly characters here.
Comments like this is why you're scum.

If you thought there were underplaying decent characters, you'd be pissed at them for not playing optimally.

Instead, you are saying they are playing very well (Sly characters) yet "underplaying".

You're reaching for what you think town wants to hear and stumbling over yourself.

Edit.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:24 am

In post 1117, LicketyQuickety wrote:Nice accusation. Clearly you will not be NKed if I am lynched.

Instead of addressing my concerns, you deflect and cast shade.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:25 am

In post 1118, Titus wrote:Grey, what letters do you think I am?

I am not a psychologist, nor am I familiar enough with you as a person to hazard a guess.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:31 am

In post 1118, Titus wrote:Grey, what letters do you think I am?

First guess would be ENTP.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:32 am

In post 1122, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1121, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1118, Titus wrote:Grey, what letters do you think I am?
I am not a psychologist, nor am I familiar enough with you as a person to hazard a guess.
Wow, and you seem pretty sure I am Scum without knowing shit about how I play.

Straw man.

Keep showing us your alignment, bud.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:36 am

In post 1108, LicketyQuickety wrote:ENTJ confirmed.

If you were somewhat close, I might respect your opinion more about these personality tests and their relevance, but you're way off the mark.

I'm INFJ.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:44 am

In post 1127, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1125, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1108, LicketyQuickety wrote:ENTJ confirmed.
If you were somewhat close, I might respect your opinion more about these personality tests and their relevance, but you're way off the mark.

I'm INFJ.
Yeah, see the thing is... a lot of people lie about their type. People using INFJ is the type used most often. And ENTJs are notorious for giving me a hard time. In fact, I've never met one I get along with which is the complete opposite of INFJs.

Damn, you got me. I lied about my personality type because I care what a bunch of anonymous people on the internet think of me.

Drat. Foiled again!

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:57 am

In post 1132, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1064, ThinkBig wrote:
v/la for today

I'll respond to the case against me when I get back. Should be back by 10 pm est
If being at l-2 was the basis for his claim, why wasn't the claim made here then? If he were a mislynch waiting to happen with scum off the wagon he wouldnt have wanted to leave such an opportunity for a l-1 and a hammer while he was away. I guess he was never really scared of the l-2 vote, but he wanted to act like he was.

Doesn't matter, he's not being lynched today.

If he's town, scum will kill either him or me. Whomever scum doesn't kill gets sorted tomorrow.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:06 pm

In post 1137, LicketyQuickety wrote:If you lynch me and I turn out to be Town, you are not getting NKed.

That presumes a townflip and discounts my claim.

Do I buy the TB claim? Not really. I have strong reason not to. But I'm not interested in pursuing it until tomorrow.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:10 pm

My other claim, silly.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:13 pm

TB, should I let you live today?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:17 pm

In post 1145, Formerfish wrote:beating around the bush

Heh heh

Heh heh heh

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:21 pm

In post 1150, Gamma Emerald wrote:Grey has said things that are suicide as scum.

They're suicide as town, too.

Just saying.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:25 pm

In post 1154, Formerfish wrote:Is this for in case your lynch goes through your buddies will know not to kill Grey to drive us nuts with WIFOM?

I sure hope so, lol.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:34 pm

In post 1162, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1149, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1145, Formerfish wrote:beating around the bush
Heh heh

Heh heh heh
I was going to go with pussyfooting, but I didn't want to run the risk of offending anyones delicate sensibilities.

It's one word, not two.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:37 pm

IME, scum tends to be more careful about vote placement than town anyway, so that's null.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:42 pm

In post 1167, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1165, -Grey- wrote:IME, scum tends to be more careful about vote placement than town anyway, so that's null.
That's true to a point, but its not a hard rule. Scum can make use of confusion and lack of vc's to place some shitty votes that we then have to analyze to death to figure out if he was stupid, or scum.

Hence null instead of town indicative.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:52 pm

In post 1171, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1166, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1161, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1157, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1134, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1132, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1064, ThinkBig wrote:
v/la for today

I'll respond to the case against me when I get back. Should be back by 10 pm est
If being at l-2 was the basis for his claim, why wasn't the claim made here then? If he were a mislynch waiting to happen with scum off the wagon he wouldnt have wanted to leave such an opportunity for a l-1 and a hammer while he was away. I guess he was never really scared of the l-2 vote, but he wanted to act like he was.
Good point. I have half a mind to think there is not even a 1-shot cop in the game actually.
What gives you that idea? I have an idea of what you are going to say, but I want you to say it.
Its a trade. If TB is Scum, then they can trade a confirmed Town for a living Mafia. It also muddles the field for late game.
What? Who becomes the confirmed town in this situation?
IDK, it could be anyone really, but it has to make sense. Like "I investigated [player X] for Y reason(s)."

All of this is d2 talk and your interest in casting shade on claimed confirmable PR's before they have a chance to confirm themselves is also highly scum-indicative.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:57 pm

In post 1175, Formerfish wrote:How is Thinks claim confirmable?

If he claims a guilty, lynch the guilty and he's confirmed when they flip.

If he claims an inno, lynch TB (he's VT anyway) and the inno is confirmed town when he flips cop.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:59 pm

In post 1176, Gamma Emerald wrote:tbh, I suggest him as a JK target if there is one.

Shut your mouth, boy!

You leave me be at night.

-Grey- · Post Post #1187 (isolation #75) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:04 pm

In post 1184, ThinkBig wrote:Ah sorry. I misread that as much more likely.

@grey, why would you lynch me if I get an innocent result? The Mafia will just NK my innocent result barring any protective roles and leave the town without any conf!townies unless there's an IC.

Don't get any grand ideas about your claim keeping you alive.

I'm still debating on whether it should get you to d2.

-Grey- · Post Post #1188 (isolation #76) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:05 pm

In post 1186, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1179, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1176, Gamma Emerald wrote:tbh, I suggest him as a JK target if there is one.
Shut your mouth, boy!

You leave me be at night.
Seems weird not to have an exclamation point in the second sentence.

Omg your desperation to shade me is delicious.

-Grey- · Post Post #1199 (isolation #77) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:19 pm

I do not for half a second buy TB's claim and it's driving me up a wall trying to figure out why he would claim cop on d1.

It's certainly not a strategy that will get him far as scum, so I'm thinking he might be trying to draw heat from me since he was about to die anyway, which would be decent of him to do, although fake-claiming to do so is bad.

It's this question about his alignment that has me wanting to keep him alive for one night.

-Grey- · Post Post #1203 (isolation #78) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:23 pm

Save the slapfight for later and lynch LQ.

-Grey- · Post Post #1216 (isolation #79) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:49 pm

In post 1210, Formerfish wrote:Not getting lynched today: Fish, Grey, Cheesy, Titus, Vax, Think, and culted.

People who i could lynch Gamma, Lickety, and nn30.

The others I don't care enough about yet.

Have I asked you why Vax?

I'm not really out for their head, but I don't see town there either.

-Grey- · Post Post #1217 (isolation #80) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:49 pm

In post 1215, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1214, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm joking around. Your reads don't seem that bad tbqh

Welcome to Gamma.

-Grey- · Post Post #1222 (isolation #81) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:55 pm

In post 1218, Formerfish wrote:Do you have a case youd like to present?

In post 1216, -Grey- wrote:I'm not really out for their head

Not interested in distracting from my chosen lynch du jour.

-Grey- · Post Post #1223 (isolation #82) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:55 pm

In post 1220, LicketyQuickety wrote:If a lurker is actually Cop, now's the time to claim.

Keep on scumposting bruh.

-Grey- · Post Post #1245 (isolation #83) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:24 pm

In post 1244, SnarkySnowman wrote:Town {Cheesy,
LQ
, Titus, Formerfish}

No interest in the fact your hard townread is being wagoned this close to deadline?

-Grey- · Post Post #1254 (isolation #84) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:36 pm

In post 1248, SnarkySnowman wrote:What LQ said. Also, no interest in the fact that you're a hard scumread, Grey?

You've not given me any reason to be interested really, and my lifespan is short enough that I don't need to care about your frivolous fakery.

-Grey- · Post Post #1255 (isolation #85) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:39 pm

In post 1251, culted wrote:Uhm, how about you defending tb but also not believing his claim and wanting to out roles.

I defended TB and I know for a fact he's lying about his claim.

Am I scum?

-Grey- · Post Post #1260 (isolation #86) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:45 pm

^ See? Told you guys SS was scum.

His push is scummy as shit on d1. That's d2 push material and anyone with an actual town mindset knows this.

I have literally played to shorten my lifespan. No scum would do this, especially on d1.

In no scenario ever do I get within a mile of LyLo, but Snarky is bleeding vag about me being scum... why, exactly?

Because I did something that will cause me to die anyway!

-Grey- · Post Post #1266 (isolation #87) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:49 pm

In post 1261, culted wrote:pedit; Snarky that vote makes like zero sense.

He's trying to get town to do his dirty work for him and he's too impatient to wait for d2 because I'll be confirmed then.

-Grey- · Post Post #1270 (isolation #88) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:03 pm

In post 1269, Formerfish wrote:So you want the real cop, if there is one, to cc the fake claim, so we lynch the fake claim and the real cop gets nked n1? What the fuck is this shit?

He doesn't want the real cop to get their results before countering.

That's obviously town thinking. Right?

-Grey- · Post Post #1272 (isolation #89) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:07 pm

In post 1271, LicketyQuickety wrote:Would you rather have an un CCed claim live for longer than they should? Its a 1-shot bro.

All the more reason to get that result before countering, bro.

-Grey- · Post Post #1274 (isolation #90) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:10 pm

In post 1273, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1272, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1271, LicketyQuickety wrote:Would you rather have an un CCed claim live for longer than they should? Its a 1-shot bro.
All the more reason to get that result before countering, bro.
I'd rather take a confirmed Scum than a random peek.

No need to make the choice by waiting for d2. Die, scum.

-Grey- · Post Post #1278 (isolation #91) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:12 pm

Scum advocating for the real cop to out themselves on d1 before theya use their shot is an attempt to deny information to town.

LQ is blatant scum that needs to die.

-Grey- · Post Post #1287 (isolation #92) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:22 pm

Snarky, I'm coming for you tonight.

Do have a single malt ready.

-Grey- · Post Post #1295 (isolation #93) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:27 pm

In post 1289, SnarkySnowman wrote:
In post 1266, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1261, culted wrote:pedit; Snarky that vote makes like zero sense.
He's trying to get town to do his dirty work for him and he's too impatient to wait for d2 because I'll be confirmed then.
Okay look

If you're the 1-shot cop, claim, and counterclaim, have a clear case of "one is scum, one is town". One town for one scum is a good trade, and is an acceptable way to use it. On the other hand, your reaction to his claim and how you've talked about it since does not scream "I want to counterclaim this".

YES I AGREE WITH LQ, a cop should CC. It's not bad play.

No, that's suboptimal.

Claiming d2 after results prevents scum from negating the benefit gained by countering today.

If I counter TB, he dies today and I die tonight.

If I wait for d2, he dies d2 and I die n2, BUT WE HAVE A GUILTY OR INNOCENT RESULT TOO!

This isn't rocket surgery.

-Grey- · Post Post #1298 (isolation #94) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:30 pm

In post 1291, SnarkySnowman wrote:
In post 1287, -Grey- wrote:Snarky, I'm coming for you tonight.

Do have a single malt ready.
Case please, not "snarky is scum because they think my play was shitty"

I said tonight, killer. Not today.

-Grey- · Post Post #1304 (isolation #95) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:33 pm

In post 1300, SnarkySnowman wrote:Fair enough. The logic behind that was directed at you though; you've already claimed a PR, you likely will not live tonight if you're town.

Do you really think I'm more likely to be killed over a cop claim that you actually believe?

-Grey- · Post Post #1306 (isolation #96) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:36 pm

In post 1300, SnarkySnowman wrote:Fair enough. The logic behind that was directed at you though; you've already claimed a PR, you likely will not live tonight if you're town.

^ If Snarky thought I was Scum faking a PR, no way would he think I'd be killed tonight instead of the claimed cop.

He. Is. Scum.

-Grey- · Post Post #1310 (isolation #97) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:40 pm

In no scenario ever do I not win a CC against TB.

It costs town valuable information to lynch him today, because I won't be able to use my role tonight.

If scum shoots me tonight, what do you think happens to TB tomorrow anyway?

-Grey- · Post Post #1316 (isolation #98) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:47 pm

In post 1312, Titus wrote:Hey Grey, I know who the cop is and it's not TB. I got your message. You got mine?

VOTE: TB

Lets just say subtlety is not a strongsuit the real cop employs well.

Time to read for detail.

Look, I was trying to save this play for d2, but if you insist I'll do it now.

I counterclaim ThinkBig

VOTE: ThinkBig

-Grey- · Post Post #1322 (isolation #99) » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:53 pm

In post 1319, LicketyQuickety wrote:@Mod, my vote should be on Gamma, not Titus.

Your vote should be on ThinkBig.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:59 pm

Dance dance revolution

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:02 pm

In post 1333, Titus wrote:No one hammer until Grey and I sync up.

I like him. He may get a lifetime moon pass.

You march to the beat of a different drum. The funny thing is that I hear the same one.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:17 pm

In post 1187, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1184, ThinkBig wrote:Ah sorry. I misread that as much more likely.

@grey, why would you lynch me if I get an innocent result? The Mafia will just NK my innocent result barring any protective roles and leave the town without any conf!townies unless there's an IC.
Don't get any grand ideas about your claim keeping you alive.

I'm still debating on whether it should get you to d2.

This should have told everybody that I was debating a CC.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:23 pm

In post 1349, Titus wrote:If Grey feels better, he can fill you in.

I want to fly like an eagle... to the sea.
Fly like an eagle, let my spirit carry me.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:26 pm

In post 1359, Titus wrote:
In post 1357, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1355, Titus wrote:Hahahaha.
<3

It means a lot to me that you can make this comment while eating.
<3 u 2

Grey, darling, reads for the road to discuss?

One of SS or LQ are likely scum, but not both.

LQ's push of SS wasn't necessary for distancing.

Pretty sure FF is town. You're the little townie that could.

Gamma is probtown.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:13 pm

In post 1206, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1199, -Grey- wrote:I do not for half a second buy TB's claim and it's driving me up a wall trying to figure out why he would claim cop on d1.

It's certainly not a strategy that will get him far as scum, so I'm thinking he might be trying to draw heat from me since he was about to die anyway, which would be decent of him to do, although fake-claiming to do so is bad.

It's this question about his alignment that has me wanting to keep him alive for one night.
Detective, you are speculating too much.

LQ, why do you hint that you are picking up on my crumbing here, but not vote either ThinkBig or me after I make my counterclaim official?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:20 pm

In post 1054, LicketyQuickety wrote:I have a Scum read on Gray.

Nut up and vote me of this is still true.

Otherwise, vote ThinkBig.

Stop waiting to see if your scum buddy can be saved before committing yourself.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:25 pm

In post 1380, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1378, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1054, LicketyQuickety wrote:I have a Scum read on Gray.
Nut up and vote me of this is still true.

Otherwise, vote ThinkBig.

Stop waiting to see if your scum buddy can be saved before committing yourself.
You are horrible at interpreting my posts. That's not actually that unusual, but what is unusual is that you are so sure of it. It reminds me of someone indeed.

Get off the damned fence.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:25 pm

In post 1381, Titus wrote:I meant vote with Grey.

Damn typos. Omfg.

If he voted me, at least it would be taking a stand.

He's a coward.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:27 pm

In post 1383, LicketyQuickety wrote:2) to see if there is a third Cop claim.

So you belligerence I'm cop over TB, but not over a possible third claim?

Vote TB until that third claim happens then.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:28 pm

In post 1387, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1383, LicketyQuickety wrote:2) to see if there is a third Cop claim.
So you believe I'm cop over TB, but not over a possible third claim?

Vote TB until that third claim happens then.

Edit.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:30 pm

In post 1385, Titus wrote:Enticing should do the trick. He wants me to townread him. We want his vote on ThinkBig.

Win win.

Right, like you're going to talk him into bussing.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:33 pm

In post 1395, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1393, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1385, Titus wrote:Enticing should do the trick. He wants me to townread him. We want his vote on ThinkBig.

Win win.
Right, like you're going to talk him into bussing.
Uhg. Stop, you don't know how I play.

Be a man and make a choice then.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:34 pm

Oh noez, so many claims!

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:36 pm

FF, it's your turn next k?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:38 pm

In post 1404, ThinkBig wrote:Come on LQ. I think big, but even I'm not naive enough to think there will be a third claim.

Revoke your claim, you've done more harm than good.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:39 pm

I tried. Lynch him.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:45 pm

Hammer gets d2 lynch immunity.

Or a cop check.

Which means the same thing but better.

Whichever.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:48 pm

In post 1424, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1422, Formerfish wrote:Lickety, have you played with Titus before?
Lots. Possibly (?) more than I have played with anyone else?

Don't you want me to check you so I stop pushing you and actually clear you instead?

Hammer this wagon and get me off your back forever!

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:51 pm

In post 1429, ThinkBig wrote:Too bad I was town. Now tomorrow, lynch the actual scum.

If that's true, you are going on my avoid list for that hammer.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:53 pm

In post 1433, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1430, Titus wrote:Yeah, you are not the cop. A cop never self hammers here.
You know, he is pretty green (not meaning alignment necessarily).

He's been in plenty of games to know that hammer was atrocious.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:55 pm

In post 1437, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1432, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1429, ThinkBig wrote:Too bad I was town. Now tomorrow, lynch the actual scum.
If that's true, you are going on my avoid list for that hammer.
Why's that? Once I flip, it proves that you're scum.

Your alignment is not indicative of mine.

You faked a cop claim. Regardless of your intentions, it was bad not to walk it back when given the opportunity.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:00 pm

In post 1441, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1439, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1437, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1432, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1429, ThinkBig wrote:Too bad I was town. Now tomorrow, lynch the actual scum.
If that's true, you are going on my avoid list for that hammer.
Why's that? Once I flip, it proves that you're scum.
Your alignment is not indicative of mine.

You faked a cop claim. Regardless of your intentions, it was bad not to walk it back when given the opportunity.
yup, exactly why I didn't want to hammer.

That's bullshit dude, my post has nothing to do with the hammer and everything to do with his fakeclaim.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:01 pm

In post 1443, Formerfish wrote:I know he doesn't show as logged in, but anyone shoot the mod a message?

That's the first thing scum does after self-hammer, to limit twilight.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:04 pm

In post 1449, Titus wrote:Grey, let's quickly break down everyone else. I will not have your brain tomorrow.

Let's suppose LQ town and LQ scum.

I haven't interacted much with those I haven't already provided reads on.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:06 pm

LQ I do hope your welcome mat is out tonight.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:07 pm

In post 1455, Titus wrote:
In post 1452, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1449, Titus wrote:Grey, let's quickly break down everyone else. I will not have your brain tomorrow.

Let's suppose LQ town and LQ scum.
I haven't interacted much with those I haven't already provided reads on.
Intellectual grudge match.

SS Cheesy FF town let's gooooo

LQ scum = SS town
LQ town = SS scum

FF town period. Full stop.
Cheesy... Gun to my head.... Town.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:10 pm

In post 1462, Titus wrote:
In post 1460, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1455, Titus wrote:
In post 1452, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1449, Titus wrote:Grey, let's quickly break down everyone else. I will not have your brain tomorrow.

Let's suppose LQ town and LQ scum.
I haven't interacted much with those I haven't already provided reads on.
Intellectual grudge match.

SS Cheesy FF town let's gooooo
LQ scum = SS town
LQ town = SS scum

FF town period. Full stop.
Cheesy... Gun to my head.... Town.
Why the dichotomy.

Because I think SS is Scum, but I don't see him being scum with LQ.

Already touched on this earlier.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:13 pm

In post 1468, Titus wrote:
In post 1465, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1462, Titus wrote:
In post 1460, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1455, Titus wrote:
In post 1452, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1449, Titus wrote:Grey, let's quickly break down everyone else. I will not have your brain tomorrow.

Let's suppose LQ town and LQ scum.
I haven't interacted much with those I haven't already provided reads on.
Intellectual grudge match.

SS Cheesy FF town let's gooooo
LQ scum = SS town
LQ town = SS scum

FF town period. Full stop.
Cheesy... Gun to my head.... Town.
Why the dichotomy.
Because I think SS is Scum, but I don't see him being scum with LQ.

Already touched on this earlier.
I got SS as town. We got issues there.

As long as lq flips scum we don't have issues.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:14 pm

In post 1470, Titus wrote:I think toejam is good 4 scum.

I could get on board with that.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:18 pm

In post 1476, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1474, aronagrundy wrote:jfc

who the fuck claimed cop here
I claimed first and Gerry CC'd.

After Gerry CC'ed, I did.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:19 pm

In post 1478, Titus wrote:I think nn30 would be the last

He's tricksy, that one is.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:24 pm

In post 1481, Titus wrote:Wait Gerry CCed too?

Yep, broke site rules and posted in this thread as a non-player just to call shenanigans on TB.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:25 pm

^ that is sarcasm

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:27 pm

In post 1485, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1482, Formerfish wrote:Did you guys know that having to constantly clear your throat could be a sign of acid reflux, and is treatable by doctor? Man google is amazing.
LOL.

Forced.

Obvscum.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:31 pm

I know.

Crazy, right?

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:32 pm

It's complete lunarcy.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:37 pm

In post 1495, Titus wrote:
In post 1491, -Grey- wrote:It's complete lunarcy.
Love your sig Grey.

<<< is a lawyer.

Have you ever seen the movie Seeking Justice?

I think you might like it.

The hungry rabbit jumps.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:38 pm

In post 1496, ThinkBig wrote:This was my first time playing scum.

If you're going to play townie after the hammer to WIFOM, commit!

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:40 pm

In post 1503, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1500, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1496, ThinkBig wrote:This was my first time playing scum.
Hey, guess what? Playing as Scum is about getting X amount of Townies lynched. Remember that.
That is true. And partially why I claimed cop. It prevents there from being too many confirmed townies.

You sure got me there.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:42 pm

In post 1508, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1503, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1500, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1496, ThinkBig wrote:This was my first time playing scum.
Hey, guess what? Playing as Scum is about getting X amount of Townies lynched. Remember that.
That is true. And partially why I claimed cop. It prevents there from being too many confirmed townies.
I think this soft clears me. Anyone else think so?

Oh hell no lol.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:45 pm

In post 1511, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1510, Titus wrote:
In post 1507, ThinkBig wrote:I'd never pull the stunts I did here if I were town. If I actually was town, I'd almost recommend a PL against me
You have a decent mentor/instincts. Daychat and you would be better.
Yeah. If only we had daychat, I think I could have survived longer.

You'd have survived longer by claiming a role that wasn't actually in the game.

That would have carried you until massclaim, and maybe a lynch after.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:46 pm

In post 1513, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1509, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1508, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1503, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1500, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1496, ThinkBig wrote:This was my first time playing scum.
Hey, guess what? Playing as Scum is about getting X amount of Townies lynched. Remember that.
That is true. And partially why I claimed cop. It prevents there from being too many confirmed townies.
I think this soft clears me. Anyone else think so?
Oh hell no lol.
You know, I think now would be a good time to tell us if you were just pulling a gambit or not.

No way do I have the balls to fake counter a cop claim in an open setup.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:48 pm

In post 1518, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 1515, -Grey- wrote:
In post 1511, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1510, Titus wrote:
In post 1507, ThinkBig wrote:I'd never pull the stunts I did here if I were town. If I actually was town, I'd almost recommend a PL against me
You have a decent mentor/instincts. Daychat and you would be better.
Yeah. If only we had daychat, I think I could have survived longer.
You'd have survived longer by claiming a role that wasn't actually in the game.

That would have carried you until massclaim, and maybe a lynch after.
Playing for survival is really quite weak play IMHO.

Playing for survival is what scum does.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:52 pm

In post 1523, ThinkBig wrote:IMO, the only person that should play to survive is the survivor and the SK.

I hope your team shares that sentiment.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:02 pm

In post 1531, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1529, Formerfish wrote:I was hoping to see a flip here before I had to go, but it looks like that isn't coming quickly...
I'm flipping town like I originally said I was

If you tell us who your buddies are, I'll unhammer you.

For true.

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:04 pm

Drat. Foiled again!

UNVOTE:

-Grey- · Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:10 pm

*staring into the abyss that is nightfall, the fearless lawman places his right hand on the butt of his gun and begins running down the alley, shouting...*

LEEEEEEEROOOOOOOOY!

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:37 am

Lol@culled in scum PT: we got fisted

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:38 am

Culted*

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:40 am

Titus, that was amazing play, hinting for me to CC ThinkBig.

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:41 am

In post 2006, ThinkBig wrote:Thanks to toejam for vigging formerfish!

Thanks for changing off your original n1 kill!

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:42 am

TB, you have zero grounds to gloat, lol.

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:44 am

In post 2010, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 2009, -Grey- wrote:TB, you have zero grounds to gloat, lol.
Lol. I know

LQ totally should have been killed N1. More WIFOM on D2.

Precisely. Titus would have probably gotten a little paranoid about the fakeclaim living.

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:46 am

In post 2012, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 2011, -Grey- wrote:
In post 2010, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 2009, -Grey- wrote:TB, you have zero grounds to gloat, lol.
Lol. I know

LQ totally should have been killed N1. More WIFOM on D2.
Precisely. Titus would have probably gotten a little paranoid about the fakeclaim living.
He may have claimed and got you lynched.

She. And that's why you should have killed LQ.

-Grey- · Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:33 am

In post 2017, tojam2 wrote:Also "What was the vigilante thinking?" FF was opportunistic as hell while nn wasn't posting and then nn flipped town, who else could I go for, bearing in mind he was a read, not a conftown.

Who cares? You redeemed yourself in the end.

Good play, brosef.

-Grey- · Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:51 pm

In post 2028, Gamma Emerald wrote:I JUST KNEW GREY HAD TO BE NKED EVENTUALLY

I don't think Titus would have let me continue playing cop d2, especially with her target dead.

-Grey- · Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:02 pm

In post 2030, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2028, Gamma Emerald wrote:btw I TOLD CULTED LQ WAS THE BETTER KILL
I JUST KNEW GREY HAD TO BE NKED EVENTUALLY
What? Why was I the better kill? TBH I think I have only been NK N1 like once? Twice?

Because you were the target for the cop check.

Kill the cop clear, neutralizes the cop.

-Grey- · Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:53 pm

In post 2032, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2031, -Grey- wrote:
In post 2030, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 2028, Gamma Emerald wrote:btw I TOLD CULTED LQ WAS THE BETTER KILL
I JUST KNEW GREY HAD TO BE NKED EVENTUALLY
What? Why was I the better kill? TBH I think I have only been NK N1 like once? Twice?
Because you were the target for the cop check.

Kill the cop clear, neutralizes the cop.
I forgot if you said you were going to investigate me. Still, Scum isn't too smart for actually believing your claim. I mean I even laid it all out that you pretty much had to be Scum or VT..

Pretty sure that not only did I claim you, but Titus also confirmed it.

-Grey- · Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:59 pm

In post 1457, -Grey- wrote:LQ I do hope your welcome mat is out tonight.

In post 1461, Titus wrote:
In post 1459, LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't have a welcome mat because no one ever seems to visit.
Perhaps you should invite me for vodka drinks tonight?

Yup!

-Grey- · Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:02 pm

In post 815, Titus wrote:
Daycop: LickedyQuickety

In post 817, Titus wrote:I got a result.

Sucm.

Oh look. Town!Titus being all omniscient.

In post 1628, Titus wrote:Ok, now that we got some drama...time to out my result.

LQ is town.