this part of this post seems off to me-In post 497, shaddowez wrote: culted is probably my strongest town read, for multiple reasons. I could be totally off on my first reason, but I don't think scum!Vedith would have replaced out like he did. His tunnel on Shaz seems to be legitimately trying to get motivation and reasoning, and unless this is Scum theater, I don't see this as SvS. (Still trying to decide if I think it's SvT or TvT though).Lastly, the fact he's willing to ask if he's just dumbtunneling or not isn't something I see town doing.
can you break it down a little more for me shad? what is the 1st reason that you think you could be totally off on for your TR on culted? why don't you think scum!vedith would replace out like he did?
and another reason you're TRing him is because he's tunneling shaz, you say scum theater and so you must be scum-reading shaz (why?) , but then you go on with your parenthetical side-statment and...
it just stinks of ...stink! (you're still trying to decide though!) ? really off!
and the underlined part, I couldn't find the dumbtunnel comment - who made it? can you link it? in fact, when you do a little catchup like this and refer to things that stimulate your thoughts, can you link them too? it makes following your thoughts easier
I'm guessing you mean shaz is you who mean since you "don't see town asking that" ? and in your paragraph culted is your TR who you agree with because of how they're going after shaz (which isn't scum theater...parenthsis...), but, okay so, why don't you see town asking if they're dumbtunneling?
and then
wait, so, now you're not reading shaz as scummy as jason?In post 497, shaddowez wrote: My other scum lean right now is Jason, he seems to be trying to hide behind the source material. Shaz is doing the same thing, but the key difference to me is how they acted in regard to the amulet once that came into play.
I'm really confused, and I know I'm not like "with it" as everyone else, but, am I missing something?
this is scum mentality THROUGH AND THROUGH as I see itIn post 510, Persivul wrote:Feel free to point those out. As I see it, if he's mislynched:In post 506, kuror0 wrote:I also don't like how he only show show situations where Pine was scum to promote his lynch neglecting completely the town Pine mislynch consequences.
- we lost a townie who made himself an easy mislynch target by claiming for no reason and in a contradictory manner
- we get better info than from another mislynch, as the people on his item wagon now look better
So tell me what I'm missing.
"if he's mislynched" rather than "if he's a mislynch" - things like that really stick out to me and I think are important in analyzing as scumslips
don't tell him how to playIn post 512, Persivul wrote:1. You could have held off on the vote until you had time to post the case. Naked votes frequently cause suspicion. This is nothing new.In post 511, JasonWazza wrote:I have a case, it's mostly just me procrastinating to typing it up.
2. If it's a good case I'll think better of you.
plenty of ppl cast votes without giving their cases immediately
sure, ask about it if you want, see what response you get then, but, now you're just making something out of nothing, he's explained himself
okay there's my stuff from my re-read (there was more in the beginning but I wanted to stay more current and pointed)
all the way to the top of page 22 - posting this, getting food, and catching the rest of the way up
