Not to this extent, no.In post 624, TwoFace wrote:You just described about 1/4 of the registered players on the site.In post 622, Aristophanes wrote:sure, that could be town" then you've played with some pretty useless townies.
You honestly haven't played with anyone like that before?
lolIn post 304, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Creeps, filler is NAI. Please unvote.In post 288, Creeps20 wrote:UNVOTE: EricIn post 277, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Mafiascum is life.
VOTE: Uzi
Useless posts. Constantly. I really haven't seen much content
I play the same way. Guilty until proven innocent prevents a scum who manages to become lock town from winning.In post 336, Aristophanes wrote:Lack of trust is as bad as too much trust. Caution is required for proper play, but this goes a bit far man! Link, town has to work together and form trust networks to win! Trusting nobody is arguably antitown.In post 332, Creeps20 wrote:Never do. Ever. I once doubted a proven jailor claim on TOS. I don't trust.In post 321, Aristophanes wrote:VOTE: Gemerald
(Yes, I do this just to bug you)
I dislike the immediate demand for a partner claim. That is not good play and benefits scum.
Creeps, why are you not buying the claim?
Why the vote on Eric?
Pretty much.In post 628, TwoFace wrote:What's the end game for creeps if he's scum? He's basically setting himself up to be lynched. You really think scum decided to be completely useless and hope town lets him get away with it? Really?
YupIn post 628, TwoFace wrote:What's the end game for creeps if he's scum? He's basically setting himself up to be lynched. You really think scum decided to be completely useless and hope town lets him get away with it? Really?
kk just happened to start a wagon, nbd - im kind of done with this if you're just going to call my stuff garbage rather than actually debate with meIn post 572, TwoFace wrote:let's be honest here. you didn't really put much work in your uzi scum read imo. your reasons for scum reading him were fairly weak, just like your reasons for voting creeps.
your reason for keeping creeps alive is that he is TOO bad to be doing good at his role which is LITERALLY exactly what he would WANT if he was doing EXACTLY what you're saying!!! like i don't agree with what you're saying and I can see this!!!In post 628, TwoFace wrote:He's basically setting himself up to be lynched. You really think scum decided to be completely useless and hope town lets him get away with it? Really?
At this point I would be happy to be scum but at this stage it can get you living till the end. Pretty good as either alignment.In post 628, TwoFace wrote:What's the end game for creeps if he's scum? He's basically setting himself up to be lynched. You really think scum decided to be completely useless and hope town lets him get away with it? Really?
WTF does this post even mean!?In post 635, Creeps20 wrote:At this point I would be happy to be scum but at this stage it can get you living till the end. Pretty good as either alignment.In post 628, TwoFace wrote:What's the end game for creeps if he's scum? He's basically setting himself up to be lynched. You really think scum decided to be completely useless and hope town lets him get away with it? Really?
for now
his post was not screaming mafia, it was screaming newb lynchbait.In post 341, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:Digging this out. Why did you think you needed to ask only a particular someone a question which answer is obvious?In post 29, TheseViolentDelights wrote:Why do you feel the need to participate in RVS?In post 28, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Nothing happened. I'm just participating in RVS.
I didnt see a good reason to vote him.
What was wrong about his analysis? Voting someone with a baseless accusation. Probably not a thing town will do.In post 125, Eric Rasputin wrote:His activity in page 2 and 3 .... He is ubiquitous, not too active but active enough .. That is scummy behaviour ... His analysis seems off, his analysis is not backed with proof ...In post 124, TwiszTed wrote:Don't be lazy. Gut is based on something. What is it?In post 123, Eric Rasputin wrote:Reading through the chat and based on my gut, I have a feeling its Uzi ... Although I have no evidence to support it ...
My next bet on Mafia would be Gamma and Twizted(you) .. Well, lets see how the game pans out ...
Im hosting a dethy on another forum and thats taking up most of my time ... Sorry if I was not active before
This post is screaming mafia. It's like trying to show he can claim if he needs to. And he says he has 7 years mafia experience and yet doesn't know when to claim. I bet it was an attempt to show himself as a claimable town.In post 150, Eric Rasputin wrote:Question: Can we role claim ?Actually, TwoFace has been defending and backing Eric up. May we know the reason? and i saw no scum-intending posts of Misa whatsoever.In post 210, TwoFace wrote:Not sure why you even would think that's the reason. I voted you cause I think your vote on Eric is garbage. Your reason for voting him is garbage and I disagree that him wanting to rush the day is a scumtell. Looks like going after an easy target which I feel is more likely to come from town. Some of Eric's posts aren't great but nothing looks like they have scummy intentions. Yours on the other hand do to me.In post 207, MisaTange wrote:why
if you're sort of angleshooting (bc im posting on a different game), this is really not the timeHe had 1 or 2 such posts in the recent pages. And Why will you vote for a single fluff post? You yourself used to fluff a lot in SC Forums as town. You should know that town can fluff as well.In post 288, Creeps20 wrote:UNVOTE: EricIn post 277, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Mafiascum is life.
VOTE: Uzi
Useless posts. Constantly. I really haven't seen much content
This is a straight push for a claim. Why pressure him more? for a claim?In post 309, Gamma Emerald wrote:I would rather vote this rn than remain on a stupid RVS vote I'm not pushing.
VOTE: LUVAn attempt to discredit the claim?In post 320, Creeps20 wrote:UNVOTE: Uzi
While I don't buy this claim I won't risk it. Not yet at least
VOTE: Eric
Back to this
I feel like Ari is town (Excluding claimed town). Cant say about others. And These are my top suspects:
Eric (For voting with a baseless accusation)
Creeps (For stated reasons)
Gamma (For pushing a claim)
TwoFace (There's no reason a town will try to defend someone D1 exept if they are scum and know he is town to get on the good side or defending a scum-bud and when the scum flips, Say "If was scum, Will i buddy a maf so early?" Maybe I'm overthinking abut it but I may be very right.)
to reply to this and a post later: OMGUS is not a scum tell, its just something some players will do and is overall NAI. I OMGUS when I'm town being scum read a fair bit because oh my god they do suck :^)In post 376, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:Actually I asked for the reason and assumed the reasons you will have.In post 343, TwoFace wrote:I'm confused. You quoted my reason yet asked me for my reason. Why?In post 341, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:Actually, TwoFace has been defending and backing Eric up. May we know the reason? and i saw no scum-intending posts of Misa whatsoever.
Have you ever seen Eric play? His posts are no where near the townie post. He says he has 7 year mafia experience but has he come up with any good thing to get him as town? You'll only know he is town if you are scum or you have played with him before. Noone defends someone unless he has some good posts spot on. Now, I'm thinking you are trying to get on a good side of Eric. You are scum either way. How are you so damn sure it will be a mislynch? Give me reasons how/why Eric is town.In post 344, TwoFace wrote:so why rule out the possibility that I think Eric is town and I'm defending him cause that's what you do for town reads? You seem like an experienced player so leaving that out of your possible scenarios is odd.In post 341, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:TwoFace (There's no reason a town will try to defend someone D1 exept if they are scum and know he is town to get on the good side or defending a scum-bud and when the scum flips, Say "If was scum, Will i buddy a maf so early?" Maybe I'm overthinking abut it but I may be very right.)
Eric as I said earlier is an easy target. I fee like he's going to be a mislynch. I'm going to try and prevent mislynches if I can.
You'll be a mislynch if you wont defend any accusations on you. By saying "I am town not mafia" wont reduce any sus on you. If you really have 7 years maf experience, Defend properly and Contribute at least something.In post 345, Eric Rasputin wrote:You guys must like me lol. I am town and not mafia is all I have to say ... You guys asked me for my reason as to voting for Uzi and I told it and suddenly I'm the guilty one? Go learn to analyse and then play this game ... I will be a mislynch, I assure you ...
This is dumb? How was that dumb? I expected more from you, really.In post 347, TwoFace wrote:this is dumb, i expected more from youIn post 346, havingfitz wrote:Eric....pretend you are scum. Would you expect that saying you are town is all it took to remove suspicions towards you?
How many gams have you played, TwoFace? Your OMGUS is pretty suspicious at this moment.In post 352, TwoFace wrote:Early stat theory stuff is null since that was the conversation going on - to say otherwise is scum motivated imo unless you can explain how staying active in the conversation is bad which nobody can cause it's not.In post 349, havingfitz wrote:TwoFace: Very active(good). Early stat theory fluff (~bad).
Shades mason (bad). Misreps (bad) Ted and gets into tiff. Naked
Misa/mason vote (bad). Defensive of Eric (ffr). Says vote on Misa is
gut (Post 262) despite having just given
several reasons for voting her (bad).
Reiterates vote on Misa doesn't have a lot of merit.
General snarkiness. = Scum lean.
Shade mason? Where? - pretty sure I didn't so possible misrep here
I certainly didn't misrep ted. Misrep in your part
Naked votes aren't bad - you should know better than that
Defending a town read one who's most likely lynch bait - protown.
Vote on gut but gave reasons is somehow bad? No because gut is usually able to be explained by pointing to things. If you were a newb I could see you making this mistake but you aren't a newb
My vote on misa was good imo, reiterating it isn't bad
Snarkiness - this is non ai, especially since it's my personality
So fitz is probably scum. Too many non ai or non truths being twisted into appearing bad. No way an experienced town player comes to this conclusion.
VOTE: fitz
Because he voted you, He isnt town? Straight OMGUSing.In post 353, TwoFace wrote:There's no way he's town. It's obvious Eric is town. vote fitz with meIn post 351, Hiraki wrote:havingfitz im v disappointed that you could give eric a scum lean
i thought you would agree with my mindset
And you might say i am defending Fitz right now but i always defend someone who is being OMGUS'ed. OMGUS is no good for town. It only ends up having two townies under the radar or a scum putting a town under the radar.
you go from suspecting someone and lynching another person immediately to trusting their townie read and them themselves with no transitioning post? really?In post 383, ScumDeersAreVeryTasty wrote:Actually Now i feel TwoFace and Eric both are town. I mis-interpreted few things, i guess.
My Current sus list:
Creeps
Gamma
Others are null for now.
ThisIn post 642, Joshz wrote:because his flip gives us almost nothing to go off of.
You are. But that seems to be the norm this game.In post 615, TwoFace wrote:My apologies fitz, didn't mean to make an incorrect assumption about your reason for voting IO. Looking over this quote again it seemed transparent to me why you were voting
him, but if you are saying i am incorrect, I guess I am...
?????????????In post 619, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:the reason you gave for choosing not to didn't make sense considering what part of Day 1 it is
In post 614, havingfitz wrote:I stated my town reads on Hiraki and TVD at the top of page 8 in only my 2nd post of the game and less than 24 hours from the start of the game.
In post 619, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:You have two basically confirmed masons, wanting to know how you came to your gut reads to determine if they're genuine and not fake
buuuuut ffs and whatever. I will look over HIraki and TVD and point out what led to my page 8 town reads on them. Should be able to later today.In post 614, havingfitz wrote:to go back over the first 7 pages of this game to reassess why at that point in the game Hiraki and TVD came across as town to me (above and beyond or in justification of gut) seems like a pointless exercise.
Thanks for the effort. No surprise really. Iirc correctly your suspicions were sheeping TF's crap case. Iirc.In post 622, Aristophanes wrote:Fitz I know I scumread and I can't remember why, nor can I be bothered to check atm. I'll vote there if I have to.
TF has yet to make a good argument. But I'm sure you would townread him for defending Eric. Kind of like OMGYA.In post 630, Joshz wrote:twoface makes good arguments against fitz + i like him defending eric whos town
What Ari said (amazingly).In post 635, Creeps20 wrote:At this point I would be happy to be scum but at this stage it can get you living till the end. Pretty good as either alignment.
I really don't feel the case for today regardless, so not a big deal atm.In post 644, havingfitz wrote:Thanks for the effort. No surprise really. Iirc correctly your suspicions were sheeping TF's crap case. Iirc.
