In post 566, TwoFace wrote:no this was me going through your iso on my phone and couldn't really find anything other than a throw away question.
but it was just for the misa part
In post 566, TwoFace wrote:Fine you don't like my reasonings, but i am not the only one voting you.
and i've addressed ALL of those votes in ISO 44(you), 32(as well as previous debates in the early game), 38(misa), 42(Eric)
In post 566, TwoFace wrote:You have both masons voting you, yet you aren't trying to sway them to move their vote.
1) Lil Uzi has been on me for the entire game - this is a fact.
No I don't really care about Lil Uzi atm because I don't think he's looking at the entire game. It's very ironic that in the same post that he thinks I'm "blindly tunneling" he's so blind that he can't see that the two people that he thinks are scum are me and the person that I want to lynch the most atm. Does that sound really weird or something????
2) Misa has only recently joined my wagon and has not said anything about the actual reasons in my post, just got to the point where I said one thing where it might be a
tad
bit insulting since it's very ironic that Misa would vote me out of the blue. Like I said in my last post, if there's anyone on my wagon who - without the premise of a mason claim - I would vote right now, it would be Misa.
3) Eric - do I really need to say more?
My wagon is not full of 100% scumreads, that's why I'm not lynched yet. It's because most of the town realizes there's something dumb going on.
In post 566, TwoFace wrote:so why no push to lynch ari? Or at least pressure Ari? You voted uzi (mason) and Creeps (lynchbait)
Are you saying that because Creeps is a supposed easy lynch that he's town?
Because I can tell you this is not an easy lynch.
Ari was page 1ish material. That's not the same thing and it wasn't scummy. It was clearly for reaction purposes. Do you see him talking about it after Page 5 or 10? I don't even need to check his ISO for that.
TF wrote:Feels like you had something legitimate against ari yet did nothing with it (see this is the kind of thing i am scum reading you for)
That's nice. You had a feeling? I've been writing so much that you had a feeling about what I said rather than looking on what I actually said? This is why I'm pretty annoyed. This wagon is very much feeling oriented rather than fact.
are we looking at the same post? here's what Ari did in that post:
1) Admission that the PR stuff in his first post caused a shitstorm (i.e. reactionary)
2) Actually using that post to get some reads, more specifically asking FJ about the post
3) Agreement on the mutually exclusive criteria (not very relevant now)
1 and 2 are more sort of not really relevant now while 3 is very much not so.
In post 566, TwoFace wrote:Hell even a halfway decent scum player could put something together.
Yeah, and a scummy player could make the most pro-town argument and still be scum. I guess it really just doesn't matter...
In post 566, TwoFace wrote:Neither you or tvd pushed Ari at all despite both of you agreeing that him talking about the PR thing doesn't seem town motivated.
plz quote here's what I actually said:
1) (Iso 0) i usually don't like to focus on softcrumbs on d1 - more of a useful tool on d4 if ari claims VT and is like "just a prank bro, i was deflecting
:):):):):)"
2) (Iso 3) im sorry i don't want to suck your ego off about your softcrumb that's stupid
i really haven't talked at lengths about this - i have talked at lengths about the meta argument, which I think you are confusing with the PR argument. that is scummy, the PR stuff isn't. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me.