and by that you mean:In post 373, beeboy wrote: I am not getting the warm and fuzzy feeling I felt when I read his earlier posts.
I normally don't reply to really bad reads on me because I am lazy but this is the point where I started town reading Cakez.In post 126, beeboy wrote:Luna pro tip you can't read Cakez and Cakez is town posting.
Confirming that this post is the truth.In post 380, pisskop wrote:Beeboy is my mason buddy. too
I have no idea what this meansIn post 381, pisskop wrote:VOTE: cakez
I should probably stop joking around before people start to vote me for it, right cakez?
I didnt like the way you pitted me and pisskop against each other in one of your posts when you said one of us has to be scum.
This is probably a true claim. I don't see any scum motivation for ever mentioning this, especially since it's so easily verifiable in the future.In post 34, pieguyn wrote:I am claiming backup innocent child.this is not a joke or a gambit or whatever, this is a serious claim. the specific function of the role is that if an IC dies and has not used their ability, I'll inherit it (meaning, I don't get anything if an IC dies after they reveal). why am I claiming?
1. I expect that this setup is a huge clusterfuck, and probably role madness, and I want at least some setup-related info on the table early. moreover, I don't mind outing my role since it is not, in fact, a confirmed-town role and besides that it doesn't do anything at all. I don't really have anything specific in mind for where it's possible to go from here, before anyone asks, I just see absolutely no reason it's worth it to not claim.
2. I preempt that if I was to claim this later, people would go "lol nup fake role". to avoid stupid shenanigans, I would rather get it out of the way now.
also,
vote: Aeronaut
So... do you think it's a fake claim or are you just throwing shade at this post?In post 64, Gamma Emerald wrote:UmIn post 34, pieguyn wrote:I am claiming backup innocent child.this is not a joke or a gambit or whatever, this is a serious claim. the specific function of the role is that if an IC dies and has not used their ability, I'll inherit it (meaning, I don't get anything if an IC dies after they reveal). why am I claiming?
1. I expect that this setup is a huge clusterfuck, and probably role madness, and I want at least some setup-related info on the table early. moreover, I don't mind outing my role since it is not, in fact, a confirmed-town role and besides that it doesn't do anything at all. I don't really have anything specific in mind for where it's possible to go from here, before anyone asks, I just see absolutely no reason it's worth it to not claim.
2. I preempt that if I was to claim this later, people would go "lol nup fake role". to avoid stupid shenanigans, I would rather get it out of the way now.
also,
vote: Aeronaut
I've heard this was fakeclaimed in Wake's RM game
I don't understand what the point of this post was.In post 72, Gamma Emerald wrote:"Do I know these people?"
pieguyn: Seen them
Varsoon: Played with them
Luna Fox: Seen them
Gamma Emerald: Me!
Nahdia: Kinda
Wisdom: Played with them, but they don't think I know them still
drealmerz7: Kinda
SirCakez: Played with them
Aeronaut: Played with them
beeboy: Seen them
Dwlee99: Barely seen them
pisskop: Eh
mhsmith0: Kinda
How does this one game where Beeboy is scum make him look this townie to you? Your townread on Beeboy is weird, and for the wrong reasons.In post 73, mhsmith0 wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
This is beeboy as scum. IIRC it's his only scum game so far on MS. it's old so not 100% but MUCH different tone and feel to his posts. Beeboy sounds here like he usually does. Therefore probably just town.
In post 83, SirCakez wrote:In post 22, beeboy wrote:Oh btw me, Nahdia, Cakez and Dwlee are an official town block
VOTE: Luna fox
Both these posts (especially the second one) sounds like someone making excuses for not scum hunting. Why did Luna and then Pisskop look noteworthy to you at this point?In post 98, SirCakez wrote:My problem right now is like almost everyone who's posted has posted something townie, but they can't all be town
And I highly doubt all of the scum are just in the people doing nothing
so
P-edit: actually
VOTE: pisskop
My opening was fantastic and funny.In post 100, mhsmith0 wrote:Aero thoughts? His opening has kinda sucked too IMO.In post 95, pisskop wrote:Vote gamma with me.
Well I feel like at least Pie was questioning her and I feel like a few other people, so I don't understand why you feel like she's slipping past everyone else.In post 109, Gamma Emerald wrote:One that's slipping past everyone else
Misrep, I'm a lurker fuck all the time
Those votes are literally just as RVS as yours was. What are you talking about?In post 152, drealmerz7 wrote:woah owah owah woawhhahahhh
what happened?!?!
okay, from the top!
I vote pieguyn, someone I don't even know, because it's RVS and game is named for him so I figure, hey, a tribute RVS vote!
In #17 I replied to #13 without having read 14-16, and then was gone until now when I came back and read 14 onward...
and
15, 16, 18, woah woah woah, scummy and scummier!!
I took it as a joke. Can you tell me why that would be scummy to youand then right after the most scummy pieguyn vote comes:
causing me to VOTE THEM RIGHT NOW OMGIn post 19, beeboy wrote:Also as a side note on one hand I am incredibly happy with my role pm this game on the other hand I am 99% sure no one will actually believe me when I have to claim.....
So yeah just mentioning this now.
VOTE: beeboy
and I continue on...
beeboy suggests townbloc ppls - scummy
What posts indicate that?I'm reading beeboy and smith as possible buddies as of the top of page 4...
In #144 you said you're town reading pie. What changed? because when you were town reading her, it was still right after the claim.In post 174, drealmerz7 wrote:everything, on so many levels - it reeks to high heaven, as they say, makes the belly churrrrrrnIn post 159, Luna Fox wrote:What dont you like about beeboy's soft?In post 152, drealmerz7 wrote:causing me to VOTE THEM RIGHT NOW OMG
to find the words...ummmm....
First of all inherently softclaiming at this point is a bad move. But I don't read it as town at all. Yes, he could be happy that he is VT, and for some reason saying no one is going to believe, but, regardless of any of that, I read it that he means to disclose that he has a role of somesort (but why would you do that as town?) - and THEN goes on to set the precedent of no one believing it when he HAS to claim. The wording itself reeks " when I have to claim" instead of "if I have to claim" - to me little things like that are often (not always, but very often) scum-dications.
I don't know if I'm being clear. It's so blazingly scummy to me. I'll try to put it better if that doesn't suffice.
Firebringer?
Hahahah Wis can be townIn post 239, Wisdom wrote:i iso'd aero
This feels really forced to me. Varsoon, are you scum?In post 231, Varsoon wrote:Nahdia dropping an unexplained vote my direction after Dwlee okay's the wagon is something I can look over, like, "Okay, hm. Sure. Maybe there's something going on there."
But Beefboy sheeping after I call out the Aero sheep? Poor form.
Notably, Drealz didn't even answer me yet despite replying in thread twice, and you'd think someone so giddy would care to say something when directly addressed.
VOTE: Drealz
Stop talking about things that aren't thing game.
Oh please. Wisdom clearly isn't trying in that post, which is NAI at best. You insisting that he's "Cherry picking ISO's" makes it sound like he read more than one player in-depth and ignored everyone else, when in reality he read my two shitposts and voted me, probably because i've made two shitpostsIn post 255, Gamma Emerald wrote:Ya the fact he won't read anything except for ISOs of cherry-picked people is a no-no
Wis ya fucked up
VOTE: Wisdom
How?In post 265, drealmerz7 wrote:scum's incentive is to sew doubt, confusion, fear, mistrust, contention, frustration so that town demoralizes and self-destructs in a shitstorm of awfulnessIn post 251, beeboy wrote:I just don't see the scum incentive what Wisdom is doing.
It probably is too early to read him right now but /shrug
is he doing that? he seems to be trying!
I was town reading Dwlee. What looks scum to you?
I don't understand how that portion of what Drealz is doing is AI. Like, you're focusing on the fact that he's barf-posting every thought and feeling, but what's the scum motive in that? Like, he's giving stances, so that doesn't make sense.In post 276, Varsoon wrote:@Cakez: I had to see an answer before laying a vote down. Sometimes, shitty scum is just shitty scum.
Look at this. Drealmerz has shit up over half the pages so far with discussion that's tertiary to the game at hand.
When asked to get back on point, he doesn't at all, skirting quickly around a question about his alignment, directly, here and now, as if it were an awkward thing to engage with.
Then, when called out on that, he quickly goes into attack mode against a slot he had no previous qualms with.
Curious, no?
Looks like you're just blowing smoke and making the thread a pain in the ass for people to read.In post 235, drealmerz7 wrote:I actually only saw it when I went back over (missed a few posts actually) and read, and was like "mehh" to answering itIn post 231, Varsoon wrote: Notably, Drealz didn't even answer me yet despite replying in thread twice, and you'd think someone so giddy would care to say something when directly addressed.
VOTE: Drealz
Stop talking about things that aren't thing game.
I mean...really? Looks like you're just fishing to make shit up too.
Insisting on discussion that's only tertiary doesn't help in the slightest. You want to go have a mafia discussion thread? Don't do it here.
Focusing on the game is hardly 'making shit up', and the 'too' there comes of as a rhetorical slip--either you're using it in addition to you considering my previous question something to not answer, which is admission that you'd rather discuss these tangential topics than the nature of your own alignment, or you're using 'too' to imply that someone else is making shit up, which, in this case, would be you.
Now, please, I eagerly await your half-cocked rebuttal.
