Hold on are we out of RVS already in Page 2!?
Dammit.
And I'll look at people more closely later.
Realised that it was horribly phrased, so EBWOPIn post 39, XnadrojX wrote:What gamma did looks more like seeing the post, and feeling like continuing the discussion. That said, I don't think that stating that that was scummy deserves mykonian a instant lynch, so I'm just going to hold my vote until we gain more solid evidence
In post 59, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah
I'm going to expand on my experience with XnadrojX
We played a chat game where I pushed his mislynch as town
Now he is mad at me
That's all irrelevant to the game we are playing now, let's move on yeas?In post 62, Joshz wrote:XnadrojX weren't you subbed in for that smogon mafia game for like a day before I (as scum) won? Or was that someone else
I'm going to entertain this then get back to the game:In post 149, Gamma Emerald wrote:RQS Time!
1) What roles do you like? What roles do you not like?
2) What is a behavior you would lynch if the person who did it was a null read?
3) Who, if town, would you trust with your vote?
My answers:
1) I like Jailkeeper for its multiple uses. Don't like Bus Drivers or Ascetics.
2) I don't like people being inconsiderate.
3) MariaR or kraska, maybe EP or myko
In post 155, Gamma Emerald wrote:Question 3 is meant as a "who do you think is good at finding scum" question
In post 312, Joshz wrote:Scummy read post imoIn post 301, XnadrojX wrote:Uh ok, sorry for posting less than I wished to in the past few days,gonna post a little more soon.
As for my reads, on the scum side Gerryoat had weird reactions to votes on him, but I can't really find anyone else particularly scummy (bar Transcend trolling)
On the nullish side, Gamma and My go here their arguments look more to me like drunk Town v another drunk Town.
On the Town side, I think gigabyteTroubadour has been Townish since he subbed in. I also think I would trust MariaR when it comes down to it.
As for the rest, they're mostly very slight reads that I feel will easily sway and therefore will not post here
Gamma I'm pretty sure you aren't the only one who was waiting to see if I followed through and if you were I'm disappointed in everyone else. At everyone else, this ingenious plan is not explicitly townie
How does it "not commit to anything", I cut out a few people, but I did list what I felt were the strongest of my reads.In post 318, Joshz wrote:I never liked ps mafia fwiw I've only played it like twice I don't like the environment and id much rather tos for fast games
On topic: his read post doesn't really commit to anything. Nothing of substance either. Idling and then coming back with that is not great.
My read on Gerry isn't for the idle. Look at how he responds to everything that happens to him. He has an "idgaf" attitude that I don't like, I would say I'm pretty commited to him.In post 433, Joshz wrote:You read 5 people. Called it a drunk TvT which is huh, and your only scum read is the idler which is an easy copout without annoying anyone or starting anyrhing. Your only two town reads are "townish" and "I think", generally separating yourself from responsibility. It's not an awful post but it's definitely not greatIn post 301, XnadrojX wrote:Uh ok, sorry for posting less than I wished to in the past few days,gonna post a little more soon.
As for my reads, on the scum side Gerryoat had weird reactions to votes on him, but I can't really find anyone else particularly scummy (bar Transcend trolling)
On the nullish side, Gamma and My go here their arguments look more to me like drunk Town v another drunk Town.
On the Town side, I think gigabyteTroubadour has been Townish since he subbed in. I also think I would trust MariaR when it comes down to it.
As for the rest, they're mostly very slight reads that I feel will easily sway and therefore will not post here
Why could I not be a day 1 lynch if I'm scum?In post 516, MTD wrote:I presumed you hadnt read up yet because with the posts i made so far your question does not really make sense at all.In post 514, gerryoat wrote:Sure thing, friend. But, in the meantime, could you please answer?In post 512, MTD wrote:I'd be happy if you could try to bundle some of your thoughts into single posts i think.
In post 506, gerryoat wrote:MTD can you explain the scumread on him besides the argument things? I really don't see how causing arguments is scummy in itself as it can show partner or non partner reads.
I never based my read on him starting arguments, the one post now where i even mentioned those was in reply to people defending him.
I also never said he started arguments, i said that he tried to devolve the arguments i started into meaningless semantics.
So idk, maybe just read my posts next time?
I originally voted Josh because he gave me his reasoning which was why I voted him in the first place.In post 593, mykonian wrote:yeah, I see.In post 556, XnadrojX wrote:VOTE: MTD
Briefly skimming thru the thread, this is the person I feel most comfortable on
Even on PS! it's called Jailkeeper.In post 616, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:oh woah
yeah that's the tos jailer oops
i assumed he was talking about PS! roles sorry
I don't even know what I did. I kinda suck at Mafia(working on improving rn) so uhhh I'm not meaning to lurk or anything. Just trying not to fluff too much.In post 743, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:He has it set up so no matter who we lynch he gets off scott free and that bothers me
I see your opinions on me have fluctuated again.In post 822, Joshz wrote:Jordan is not contributing at all and has bad content. I agree completely and it annoys me too. But like I said, I don't think that's from being scum.
And walls doesn't neccasarily give him lynch-immunity or conftown (although I do TR giga)In post 816, Transcend wrote:you get lynch immunity today because of all those walls
but holy fuck
those reads.... what....
I'm working on itIn post 817, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:i think people wouldn't townread him for genuinity/tone because he'd just straight up shitpost as scum, while here he's shitposting because his genuine attempts at solving the game are shit... but genuine.
EBWOPIn post 1091, XnadrojX wrote:Spoiler:
a lot of the stuff *between* here contains a lot of fluff and a either a lack of effort or just horrible language
Scuse me you cant demand to kick me out when I'm technically playing.In post 1250, Joshz wrote:Am I allowed to request a sub for him?He's technically met his prods but like he hasn't even had real content at ANY point during the game, and even his "game progressing posts" have been bad. He is different from idlers like kraska and RK because at least they have content at some point. Jordan has done nothing period and we'd benefit much more from a more active player.
Alternatively not opposed to jordan seeing this and posting more in the slightest but I don't expect it.
Edited. Let's not talk about outside games, and if you have any issues you can discuss with me via PM.
- Mod
Actually I understand I have been unproductive in this game. But we shouldn't waste a mislynch like that, I would much prefer being vigged. My vote is still on MTDIn post 1487, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:we're only like 1 or 2 days into the day so i don't think she really has to worry about saving her derrière just yet :/