In post 2209, Cerberus v666 wrote:@FA if someone is targeted by multiple kills, how do you determine which flavor to show?
In post 2277, Cerberus v666 wrote:FA I spammed to let you put the VC at a page top and you didn't put it there!
Excuse me, but that means you know someone's alignment. I assume you're talking about Vifam. You have not been confirmed as Town. I actually have you & MathBlade as suspects.In post 2106, PJ. wrote:I seriously think we should lynch mirhawk today, he seems scummiest of the 3 neighbors who's alignment I do not know. I think getting the scum out of the neighborhood should be the highest priority. I feel that kraska was scummy or whatever, but I feel that at best this is a town with backwards priority on a testable claim.
Didn't Nero claim to be Masons with Kraska?In post 2108, Expedience wrote:I don't have strong reads in the neighborhood, I think it would be safest to leave it for later when we can lynch RachMarie or Nero now. Some of the neighbors are going to get picked off later, narrowing the pool.
Diamond, did you manage to roll Town this game? Wow.In post 2126, DiamondSentinel wrote:Oh hi naked vote. My name is WHAT THE SERIOUS FUCK IS GOING ON IN YOUR MIND! USE YOUR WORDS DAMMIT. I WANT TO KNOW
but seriously. Stop with the naked votes, please. They just show that you have no interest in actually playing.
Oh, to any lurkers, if you have less content than PV, I humbly suggest that you slap yourself, then get on your keyboard, and actually make content. Because that is unacceptable. (sorry PV, but you know it's true. You do have a tendency to compulsively lurk)
People are idiots that play terribadly.In post 2138, Skrub wrote: Are you not reading the thread or something? You know why people are voting for Kraska, right? Because we think an informant in the pt told her Vifam was gonna check her and they killed vifam. Kraska is as suspicous as everyone in the pt. I don't understand why you would make a post like this
I was kinda bleary-eyed.In post 2176, Mirhawk wrote:UGH. Klingoncelts posts between 2001 and 2006 are all terrible.
Are you reading the game?
and so begins EXPs attempt to pit me and Cakes against one another.In post 2127, Expedience wrote:Nero is making terrible posts related to you but he isn't calling you scum.
Okay, FA's last post clears up the kill flavor for me.In post 2285, PJ. wrote:I'm implying I know my own alignment, also if we're saying kraska claim checks out, then there is no scum in the neighborhood. That's what the info of 1 kill checks out. It's gone from "only lynch someone in the neighborhood" to "don't lynch anyone in the neighborhood."
I'm leaning towards expedience but honestly I have to reprocess the entire game because of the amount of misinformation people were working on for the last few pages.
Facts:
Kraska is both not in the neighborhood and has claimed 2 shot pgo.
Vifam was hit with 1 kill and it was presumably kraska
This is terrible.
He's scum following a louder player.In post 2291, Nero Cain wrote:Today I'm pushing Exp and AM, both of who he is scumreading. So like, is he scum that thinks I'm pushing the other scum team or what?
Except if he's scum he's going to keep our attention and discussion in the wrong places. Just because he's acting protown doesn't mean we should lynch him.In post 2243, Cerberus v666 wrote:*nods*In post 2240, The Ascended Masters wrote:To add to this, there seems to be an argument that kraska is claiming PGO to cover for neighborhood buddies (at least this is the only argument that makes any shred of sense to me), but this obviously doesn't hold once kraska flips anything but PGO. The claim doesn't explain Vifam death in a satisfactory way that doesn't incriminate kraska and it doesn't extend her lifespan. Not claiming it immediately is not really questionable considering join date.In post 2221, Cerberus v666 wrote:The ONLY thing about kraska that's questiobable is not claiming pgo D1, BUT....why thr hell would they claim it now if they're scum? How does that help them?
By the way, this is the reason why those of you trying to get nacho lynched early are being dumb.
Even if he's scum, he's scum who makes fucking sense and will act in a pro town fashion and figure shit out. Especially so if this is multiball(as it likely is)
And if he's not scum, then you just fucked up majorly.
Detective Vedith at it againIn post 2290, Vedith wrote:This is terrible.
So far we have Diamond and Cakez as scum.
Easy game easy money.
Multiball or third party, yeahIn post 2291, Nero Cain wrote:but its Cakez so how do you tell the difference?
Like I know its really weird. Like on d1 my main push was on Drixx whom Cakez also had as scum yet my posts/reads were terrible so he kinda contradicts himself there. Today I'm pushing Exp and AM, both of who he is scumreading. So like, is he scum that thinks I'm pushing the other scum team or what?
Except I had these reads before Nero did kekVedith wrote:He's scum following a louder player.In post 2291, Nero Cain wrote:Today I'm pushing Exp and AM, both of who he is scumreading. So like, is he scum that thinks I'm pushing the other scum team or what?
Thanks, I'm putting in over time!In post 2293, SirCakez wrote:Detective Vedith at it again
I didn't like the House wagon post-replace out; entirely a gut read, but one that I was willing to stand behind Day 1.In post 2250, Cerberus v666 wrote:TAM, please explain the shift from Rach to MoZ, and why both of those were better than the wagons thst existed prior to them.
