In post 1324, RayFrost wrote:"My opponents are bad, so my opinion about how this should work, ceteris paribus, is correct" isn't really a good argument.
I'm at around the halfway mark of players. I find that people tend to underestimate him at my ELO, so if you are low down he is strong to climb with.
In post 1324, RayFrost wrote:"My opponents are bad, so my opinion about how this should work, ceteris paribus, is correct" isn't really a good argument.
I'm at around the halfway mark of players. I find that people tend to underestimate him at my ELO, so if you are low down he is strong to climb with.
This type of problem is still prevalent up through high-platinum at least.
In post 1324, RayFrost wrote:"My opponents are bad, so my opinion about how this should work, ceteris paribus, is correct" isn't really a good argument.
If your argument stems from the premise that your opponents are bad then the vast majority of the time it's valid until you're at a high enough elo that you won't be listening to internet arguments anyway
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Uh, yes. Annie is easier than darius, isn't pressured into snowballing early, and scales fantastically all while being safe. There's more I can go into, if you please.
"Animorpherv1's posts are so powerful that prolonged exposure may cause vertigo, nausea, acute tinnitus, and in rare cases, death." - vonflare
Uh, yes. Annie is easier than darius, isn't pressured into snowballing early, and scales fantastically all while being safe. There's more I can go into, if you please.
I'm not saying annie is a bad champion to pick at lower elo. I'm not really going to argue about this cause it just seems like a waste of time.
Annie isn't the kind of champ that tilts your lane opponent, and thats a super important factor imo
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1324, RayFrost wrote:"My opponents are bad, so my opinion about how this should work, ceteris paribus, is correct" isn't really a good argument.
If your argument stems from the premise that your opponents are bad then the vast majority of the time it's valid until you're at a high enough elo that you won't be listening to internet arguments anyway
I dislike arguments based on people being "bad" because, for the most part, we are roughly equal to the people we are paired up against (assuming we belong in our elos). So, our opponents, relatively speaking, are not bad. They're average.
Ani: Dwlee was talking about top lane champions. You aren't really correcting him. And the whole thing of it is silly, anyway.
Also, low elo stomp champions include
. Honestly. It's the player, not the champion, that stomps.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Just to clarify, I don't actually think you mistyped leblanc. It was just a humorous way of saying that I think leblanc is a better midlaner against bronze players.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Just to clarify, I don't actually think you mistyped leblanc. It was just a humorous way of saying that I think leblanc is a better midlaner against bronze players.
Just to clarify, I don't actually think you mistyped leblanc. It was just a humorous way of saying that I think leblanc is a better midlaner against bronze players.
I'll admit it. I kek'd reading this.
Last edited by Nosferatu on Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It's because Leblanc has better mobility. Being able to crush your lane, then go to other lanes and help them - this is what averts feeding from other lanes.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.