Mini 517: Tree Stump Mafia: Game Over
- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Ditto...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Well I for one would gladly stump myself instead of being lynched. (I would love not being able to be NKed! )
My biggest issue with this plan is that we need to set some limit to the number of stumps allowed. I mean if 5 townies stump themselves day one we pretty much have a lylo situation right there. and if 6 townies stump we lose.
So I was thinking 2-3 stumps max day one with a different standard day 2,3,4, etc...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Vote: Korlash
Neither have something good nor something bad happen to you Quagmire!It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Well personally I have mixed feelings. I agree that he woudl probably know if he was mafia because of the mafia can talk to each other before the game thing. But that does not mean he doesn't know he is mafia and still chooses to ply this way. So for that I don't want to fully jump onto him as a candidate.
On the other hand Adele is not the play today so he loses points for lying. I see the point of losing him today instead of a more helpful townie. The big point there is, we still have a higher chance of losing two townies and then beginning day 2 without anything to go on for anyone else. So it is still a bad move to lynch him on page 3. no matter how bad he is playing.
So FoS:d3sisted, PookyTheMagicalBear, Mastermind of Sin, and Adele
While I do not hold it against you for wanting him dead (I admit I do too) I don't like how quick you want to kill someone off. Especially a person who has said he will not stump.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I'm not against wanting an anti-ton person dead, I'm against wanting anyone dead on page 3.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
How did you get find scum from what I said? In fact, a 3 page day is in no way helping to find scum.. in fact it is helping to not find scum at all!Mastermind of Sin wrote:
It is never too soon to find scum.Korlash wrote:I'm not against wanting an anti-ton person dead, I'm against wanting anyone dead on page 3.
FoS: MoS...
And I am voting for Korlash because he is very suspicious! He keeps stealing my stuff, the jerk...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
And I don't... I am beginning to feel this game is not going to be fun in anyway. We will sit here for a while arguing about how it's best to kill someone like Quagmire then let him live, while I will argue it's better to wait until a good 8 pages or so has gone by before doing that, then you will come back "I don;t want to put up with 8 pages of his crap!", and he will chime in "Vote adele vote adele blah blah blah" and so on and so forth...
Mod, is it at all possible to replace Quagmire? You can clearly see he is not going to actually play the game and I see no point in continuing a game with players like that.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
No no no no no.. you misunderstand me...
If you lynch Quagmire now we start day two off just as day one started with three people (most likely dead) and out of those at least one of them will be a towny, with the other two as very likely townie. So saying its ok to begin day two with every single person unknown means you don't have the town's best interests in mind MoS. You say you found a scum? Good, go find another one moron.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
So in other words.. you want to limit the NKings... yet... want to start the game off with two town dead anyways, which means less stumps, which means.. your going against your own plan, which means... Your kinda full of BS I think.
I agree with you that Quagmire is a hindrance who should be dealt with (Eventually) given time he may damage himself more, or even start playing who knows, I also agree we should stump instead of lynch.
So, heres the deal, keep your vote on Quagmire. If other townies feel he needs to go, they can lynch him. I, and I hope you, will use this time to scum hunt and gain some info we can use day two.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I don't... But I know there is a higher chance he is town then he is mafia. And a pretty equal chance he is power role town and vanilla town. But you have made it clear you do not care if he is town or mafia, you just want him dead. So why do you suddenly care if he is town?It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Wow... i totally got the Trimvetra que and this game mixed up somehow... Right... Scratch that one off... >.> <.<PTMB wrote:We don't have any power roles.
And while this is true, the only real lynch worthy evidence against him would be trying to entice a lynch with no basis. yet the only reasons I tend to see people actually stating is him not looking at his role. Neither of these, or even both together, should call for a lynch this early. (Page three) I just think, as bad a player he is this game, the rest of you seem to be just as equally bad... Although I do admit this game has special circumstances...Adele wrote:Do you mean, in general? Because when we play the game we intuitively use bayesian probabilities to adjust the likelihood up or down. As in: given that X is acting so scummy, he's more probably scum.
In short, I firmly believe in the phrase "Short days are bad for town" and by going after Quagmire with the intent of a lynch, means you are going against that.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
well I guess you cannot find him scummy or... the opposite of scummy. What woudl that be? Towny? Pro-Town? Not scummy? Anyways, Seems it would in a sense be neither. As he said so himself, he wanted to look at the game in a neutral way. I admit it's still a poor basis fro a lynch but it is in no way a benefit for the town. Maybe for him personally as to his outlook, but to us it is just a hindrance and annoying.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
So what, your some sort of special player who should be allowed to live today even though you are refusing to do either of the two things the town is asking you to? I mean I can be stubborn myself, but what your doing is just plain stupid. How hard is it to see your "strategy" is not benefiting the town in anyway.Quagmire wrote:until i've become a "normal" player.
Also how is this buying time? I mean we are pushing for a lynch in a game that is specifically made to keep day one going. It's kinda the opposite of buying time!It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Yeah go ahead and stump. I would not be surprised if you got lynched... a little annoyed yes... But not surprised at all...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
You noticed that too did you? [/sarcasm]It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I'm already bored of this game... And I see no reason to not stumpwhether you have looked at your role pm or not.
Worst case scenario I am wrong and tomorrow I will have to stump. Big deal.Unvote:, Vote: Quagmire
I am not convinced he is mafia, but I am convinced leaving him alive will not help us find the real scum. So I am willing to sacrifice two townies so that we can all stop being retarded and actually play tomorrow...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Ok seeing as how I know it is coming...Vote: Korlash
His "hammer post" seems to indicate to me that he in fact knew Quagmire was scum and was trying to make himself look like the hero day 2!It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Please I still hold to my "I would rather stump today then have yesterday keep going what with how retarded every single person in this thread is."Korlash wrote:Ok seeing as how I know it is coming...Vote: Korlash
His "hammer post" seems to indicate to me that he in fact knew Quagmire was scum and was trying to make himself look like the hero day 2!
Plain and simple, we got F***ing lucky... I won't deny that. I am still firmly against what just happened, so all of you stop being F***ing retards and play this God Damn game right.
I'm not going to defend my hammer because it was a plain dumb move. I only did it because I was pissed at all of you.
I feel like a reread is in order, I am going to focus my main attack on those who supported Quag first. I will move on to those who started that unnecessary lynch a bit later in the week. As far as I see it whether you were on his wagon or not it doesn't prove anything. The wagon was started and ended for a very shitty reason so everyone on it has just as much chance of being scum trying to distance.
JDodge and scotmany12 are my two top picks at this moment. I'll make my case in the morning. Until then my vote stands because I feel I deserved to be stumped for being such a dumb ass town and hammering that wagon. Fucking idiot Quag... Fucking lucky town I say...
Do you honestly think a scum would be that stupid... wait... This is the game with Quagmire in it.. never mind... Ok so another angle... Do you honestly think I am as stupid as Quagmire? Show me one good reason why any scum would pull such an obviously suspicious hammer before you even think about using this as a case against me. (that last statement was directed at everyone, not you JD. I do not feel this was an attack on me. In fact, Because you are one of my top picks, I feel you are trying to buddy up to me because you know I am not going to have a lot of friends today. Thanks for the support, but stop it. Thanks.)JDodge wrote:I agree that Korlash's hammer is odd, but I'm not entirely sold on his being scum yet.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
And where did I say that? I just think lynch someone on the basis of them not looking a their role is kinda dumb.Mastermind of Sin wrote:Korlash, do youreallythink Quag didn't look at his role pm? If so, I have this bridge I'd like to sell you.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Still going to work up a case here sometime I promise. For now a quick check in.. and address the only real issues involving me.. Lets see... Surprising how most people just ignore my post... Seems odd...
More or less... 1) I see no reason to replace out of a very heavily towny run game just because I don't like the people in it. I want a win in my column here. And this game has the odds for that happening. To me a simple blow to "my side" seemed fair considering half of you would get it through your skulls to stop being stupid.Adele wrote:Suggest that if it's all that painful for you, you request replacement rather than self-destruct and harm your side.
...
You're against what you just did?
...
For what? Playing "retardedly"? I didn't think a whole lot of your play yesterday, actually; you flip-flopped a lot, much like you're doing now.
...
That's your defence? That's practically the definition of one of the forms of wifom.
...
That argument it, to my view, so unsound that there was no use in posting it at all.
2) Yeah... Can you not see that in my post where I.. I don't know.. Voted myself because of what I just did. Your a real smart one aren't you...
3) Define and give examples of "Flip-Flopped." The only thing I would classify as "Flip-Flopping" was my actual vote on Quag. Other then that I feel I have done no "flip-flopping" at all.
4) Already told you I will not defend what I did... Move on or vote me your choice.
5) It made me feel better... Worst case scenario I have to stump and big deal to that... We are already one up... woo...
Yeah I would definitely want a better partner if I ever got stuck with him thats for sure =Dadele wrote:Korlash: Didn't want to lynch quag because quag wouldn't stump, so there'd be a night (also, didn't want a quicklynch). Requested replace on quag ("possibly trying to swap in a bad partner for a good one?" lol). Eventually just got sick of him. Seemed to be a lot of contradictions, and flip-flopping.
But seriously can you define and point out my "a lot." please. I see one... that is not a lot...
Shouldn't it be a "fact" not opinion if you have the Role PM?Adele wrote:Adele 0%. (But that last one's just my opinion )It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
A) looking at his role does not mean he is scum... The way he was acting was weird yes... Suspicious yes... Proof of scum... In retrospect yes... but at the time I ranked this at no...MoS wrote:See, that's just the thing. If you believed he *had* looked at his role, that means he is scum. Therefore, he should be lynched. By saying that you think it's dumb to lynch someone for not looking at their role, you are saying you believed he had not looked at his role.
B) My feelings on his role pm read/not read in no way effected my opinion of lynching him based on whether or not he admits to looking at his pm... I mean... Come on... The only upside I saw to your guy's argument was the fact he refused to stump. If not for that I don't think I could have brought myself to hammer him...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Dude... Even I am waiting until I get to L-2 or something... You need like 6 people to support "Your lynch" not the... what... 3-4 you had...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Also how many stumps can we have before it turns to LYLO? 3 more? Hmm... 12 players.. minus 3... thats 9... 2 mafia... 7 townies... nope... 3 stumps loses the game... so only two more stumps... huh... Did I count right?It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Wow... That was... *shakes head* man that was funny...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
well I am going to get my stuff up as soon as I can find time.. Hopefully tomorrow seeing as how I get the weekend off. I am very concerned with having to go back and wade through all that crap from yesterday just to point out my case.. But it is coming... But yeah, I know I am kinda useless so far this game... Gimmie time..Adele wrote: no, I see what you did there - you treated the "7 townies" as "7 man, 2 scum"; like a newbie (sans power roles). Here's how it is, assuming all townies stump and no scum do. If 5 more townies stump before any more scum die, we lose. Interestingly, we don't get a softer safety net once one scum dies, since that gain is mitigated by an NK. For example, if we stump 3 townies then catch scum, D3 will open with 1 scum and 3 town; usually classic nolynch debate territory but because of the nature of this game, we'll have 2 shots, so at least a 50-50 chance.
No I totally for some reason thought 4 town and 2 mafia was a win for them... Man I am stupid aren't I? At least sometimes.. >.> <.<
Ok with 5 stumps left I am not as worried as I was before if I am forced to stump.. whew! Man I wondered why the numbers didn't add up!
[quote="Someone.. I forget who..." The fact that both of them have been fairly active posters, and yet not done much scumhunting at all concerns me greatly.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Dangit... Fixed:
No I totally for some reason thought 4 town and 2 mafia was a win for them... Man I am stupid aren't I? At least sometimes.. >.> <.<Adele wrote: no, I see what you did there - you treated the "7 townies" as "7 man, 2 scum"; like a newbie (sans power roles). Here's how it is, assuming all townies stump and no scum do. If 5 more townies stump before any more scum die, we lose. Interestingly, we don't get a softer safety net once one scum dies, since that gain is mitigated by an NK. For example, if we stump 3 townies then catch scum, D3 will open with 1 scum and 3 town; usually classic nolynch debate territory but because of the nature of this game, we'll have 2 shots, so at least a 50-50 chance.
Ok with 5 stumps left I am not as worried as I was before if I am forced to stump.. whew! Man I wondered why the numbers didn't add up!
well I am going to get my stuff up as soon as I can find time.. Hopefully tomorrow seeing as how I get the weekend off. I am very concerned with having to go back and wade through all that crap from yesterday just to point out my case.. But it is coming... But yeah, I know I am kinda useless so far this game... Gimmie time..Aimee wrote: The fact that both of them have been fairly active posters, and yet not done much scumhunting at all concerns me greatly.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
How do you think I will react? I mean it's one vote... Nothing to bat an eyelash at...Mith wrote:Vote: Korlash for now. I want to see how he reacts, and the hammer/self-vote combo meal is upsetting the gut.
MMM... hammer/self vote combo meal... do we get fries or a baked potato with it? Cause perhaps that is what is upsetting your gut... Bad fast food... Icky!
On that note I finally have a day off so I will reread (Sighs) the thread and see where I stand on things... Not looking forward to it... but alas... it must be done...
Seriously what size drink? Can you super size it? How much does it cost? shake or soda only???
McMafias! We put the Paranoia in your Diarrhea! =DIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Alright I have finally finished... In an effort to appear less cluttered i will post a player by player rendering in the order I find them most scummy... I will try to organize the posts accordingly but I do feel i may have a few mistakes. I will do my best to make sure every quote is right and make sure they are in an ok order...
Also I will right now give you my scum list:
1) Scotmany- 100% sure is scum.
2) JDodge- 99% sure is scum
3) MoS& Adele- only scum if JD and Scot both turn out town, very unlikely
4) Desisted- Also very unlikely but I cannot overlook the new stuff that has been said.
5) Mith- Mostly because Blapa was a bit... suspicious...
The rest I more or less think are townishy...
Vote:Scotmanymy case against him is next.. so expect it in about 5 min.. I just need to organize my notes into one post...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Scotmany:
Post 12:
Clearly this post could be a big deal. Seeing as how he turned out scum this could be him *stupidly and not so subtly* talking to his buddies. While I find it very unlikely he would do that, you get into a WIFOM that that would be what he wanted us to think! He could also be Distancing himself from both MoS and Adele here. Overall, I use this post to narrow down my suspect ranges. Jdodge, Scotmany, Adele, and Mos. Not a very solid case, but definitely a starting point.Quagmire wrote:hey jdodge, scotmany:
instead of bandwagoning and trying to lynch mos, do you want to go for adele instead? she's really stupid and recent events show that she would be just as worthwile a "principle lynching" as mos...
p.s. i have not looked at my role, nor do i plan to throughout the course of this game
Post 28:
No reasons, chalk it up to a random vote if you will but either way you look at it he did exactly what Quag told him too.Scotmany wrote:Vote: adele
Post 101:
QFT… Opportunistic can be turned around too much… it is a very flimsy piece of evidence or reason to vote…Silver wrote:But turning that on me is not the way to go. I actually think that you are being opportunistic at my mistake.
Post 104:
He never said “the whole time.” This is the second time you are more or less putting words in his mouth to further your case… Too much of that and yoru case will more or less fall apart in my eyes… Secondly, not looking at his post makes him “Not town” and “Not scum” both at one… and anyone “not town” should be killed immediately. End of story… case closed! (One truth prevails… XD)Scotmany wrote: And now you are trying to say you found him scummy the whole time? Judging by my posts, you seem to believe that quag never looked at his pm. THEN HOW THE HELL DO YOU FIND HIM SCUMMY AT ALL? How do you judge his actions as scummy if you believe that he doesn't even know what his role is?
Post 110:
Whenever a town makes a mistake they too call it a mistake… I agree that automatically accepting what everyone says as the truth can hurt, but the same can be said for totally disregarding it too. Also isn’t advocating his lynch and finding him scummy both the exact thing? How is that a contradiction? Secondly, wanting to lynch a neutral is the same as wanting to lynch a “Not town.” Keep arguing neutrality is a safety zone and it will come back and bite you.Scotmany wrote: Yet you were still advocating his lynch before hand. You can't change that. And then when I question on it, you say you found him scummy. I already pointed out how that contradicts you. In reality, you could not find him scummy, as you believed he never looked at his role. Thus you wanted to lynch a neutral basically.
And whenever scum slip off, they call it a mistake. So yeah, you can call it a mistake all you like. Thats not going to change my opinion.
Bapa Bail, I am a little confused. I don't quite understand how my attack is unwarranted. I saw a slip up, and I'm going with it. I'm trying to hunt scum, how is that unwarranted?
Post 114:
As much as I like metaing, unless the game you mentioned involved town suicide and limited nights it is unhelpful… And again I say, lynching a neutral is the same as lynching a “Not town.” Or a third party if you will… They are not pro town and thus are a very good lynch candidate…Scotmany wrote:Yeah but I'm not really twisting his words. It clearly looked like he believed quag to not have looked at his role. And now he is trying to say what he did before does not matter at all. He wanted to lynch a neutral. That was his only reasoning.
Also, jdodge always does this. If you think its enough, then that is fine, but in a recent game he was like this during day 1 and he turned out to be the doc.
Also, can you answer my question?
Post 117:
And you have yet to explain why it matters so much… The way you are defending him either means you believe him to be town enough to protect him, or you have a grudge against Silver. Seeing as how both of them have been proven town/scum no matter which choice I pick, you end up scum… So… Explain why he is worth defending if you have no proof he is town…Scot wrote: Not buying it silver. And you have still yet to explain how you considered him scummy when you believed that he never looked at his role.
Post 122+123
Seriously you sound like a broken record… And a very anti-town record at that… Glad it has been broken… scum records usually suck… >.> <.< (Got sidetracked here… )Scot wrote: You called him scummy. How do you find someone scummy when you believe that they have never looked at there role? Also, I have yet to see you bring up a case against me and jdodge. Seemed like you were blindly calling us scum so that you can call quag scummy.
…SilverPhoenix wrote: Vote: Quagmire
I can't take it anymore. I'd rather kill you now then have to deal with your horrible play. It's not just that you are acting scummy, you are just playing horribly. I would rather someone inactive than someone who refuses to play correctly.
There you go. You said he was acting scummy right there.
He never said he didn’t think Quag was scum… Stop trying to make it seem like he did… Stop trying to “create” evidence against him. And stop assuming Quag is town. You claimed you believed him to have looked at his PM, yet you do not find the fact he is lying to be scummy at all? Hello? Are you a dumb town, or a stupid scum? Either way I hope you die today…
Post 127:
*Smiles*Scot wrote:Because you looked opportunistic to me silver. You didn't provide any reasoning of you own, but of others. And both of those that you mention make you scummy. First you want to lynch someone basely on the fact that they "aren't playing the game"(in your words). Then when I bring it up against you, you say you found him scummy. Too bad you already admitted to believing quag. Then you try to say that me and jdodge are scum for defending him.If quag ever turns up scum, then you have a case, but until then, you really don't.
Post 152:
Probably one of the most scummy posts I have read this game…Scot wrote: I already told you silver. It was predetermined. I never intended for it to get adele lynched. It was a joke. And I am still happy with my vote.
I can understand why you people are disappointed with quag, but you all seem to believe that he is lying. Or at least some of you do. I think you guys are just casting your votes blindly. If quag does not know his role, then we should ignore him for today. Starting the next day we can focus on him. I also personally do not see scum trying to pull what he is doing. I believe that this is a waste of a lynch.
First off: Predetermined, mafia talk before game starts, Quag said to vote Adele… Not adding up good for you…
Scond: You too have admitted you thought he was lying… see below:
Third: You say we should ignore him for today… Thus you only want us to look at him after we have entered and passed a night phase.. and thus you are clearly against the stump to prevent night thing…Below wrote: Post 116:
Post 118:Silver wrote: Why, do you believe he looked at his role?scot wrote: Yes I do, and judging by your posts, you did to.
Fourth: By doing the above, you also want to get as many townies to stump as possible before focusing on real scum.
Fifth: Apparently Scum can and will do this. And as his partner you will die as well.
Post 155:
I find you agreeing with him a lot actually… (Ok not literally agreeing a lot.. but more or less You two share similar views most of the time…)Scot wrote:I find myself agreeing with Jdodge on this, more so with Max than with d3sisted.
Post 185:
Pre-emptive strike to use against me tomorrow? Trying to set me up as the Scapegoat? Could explain why I was left alive… Then again.. with 9 people to choose… I didn’t have that great a chance anyways…Scot wrote: You just admitted to hammering someone who you don't believe to be mafia. Way to go.
Post 206:
… Second most scummy post from you… Of course we should attack the people who defended quag you nut… Do you not get the idea of a partnership? And Opportunism? Like how you and JD are both oprotunising the fact that D3sisted went after you? And how you are opprotunising Quag’s lynch as a reason to focus on the real town and not you two scum? Stop using OPPROTUNITY AS A REASON FOR A VOTE/LYNCH! IT IS NOT REAL EVIDENCE! EVER!!!!!Scot wrote: No Adele, I was not using wifom. I was expressing my opinion. I did not see any scum trying to pull what quag did, and I still don't. Korlash used wifom, I did not. You should not be focusing on me and jdodge, but on the ones who have been extremely oppurtunistic, such as desisted, sp, and max, as well as korlash, who basically admitted to lynching someone he did not think was scum.
I'm going to Vote: d3sisted. His first post today is him voting for jdodge and fosing me. He doesn't even consider anything else, but attacks the two people who were against the quag lynch(I still am, town got lucky). He did not do much day 1, and due to the fact he didn't even seem to consider any other possibilities than me and jdodge being scum, I find him one of, if not the most, scummiest people right now.
Post 208:
It more or less is… Kinda, OMGUS cause you killed my partner! That sort of thing. You know how scum are! (Well I don’t but I’m sure you do )Scot wrote: That's your only defense? To call it an OMGUS when it clearly isn't? Alright then, you just made me pretty sure that you are scum.
Post 214:
Ok you “semi-attacked” him yesterday for “Not believing he checked his role” and here you say he did believe it… which is it?Scot wrote: You admitted to believing him yesterday silver. What made you change from believing quag did not look at his role pm to being split down the middle?
Post 234:
1) Probably more of the fact you two defended him a lot.Scot wrote:SilverPhoenix wrote: I implore the town to seriously consider the possibility that scotmany and/or JDodge are scum. Reasons:
1. Initial action w/ Quag
2. NK choice being Pooky who singled them out
3. Focusing on an easy lynch for both days (me)
4. General distancing of questions (as Adele said)
If you want quotes, ask and you will receive.
Yeah quotes would be nice. To bad there isn't really any quotes.
1. If you are talking about the early bw on adele, ever heard of joke voting? And if this is the case, why are you not singling out mith, because bp also was on that bandwagon.
2. Too bad pooky did not mention either one of me or jdodge at all.
3. Sorry that your play was scummy. Also, if you noticed I went after desisted first today besides you.
4. Where? Adele said quag was distancing from questions, not us.
Make sure you get your facts right before you bring up an attack against someone.
2) No shit… Perfect reason to kill him off. (Good player, very pro town, does nto implicate you. Good job pointing that one out. More or less shows you already knew it and were ready to make it a case to not come after you.)
3) Doesn’t change the fact you still go after him and yet clearly miss all of JD’s scummy acts… No offense but I cannot see why the two of you have not considered each other… only further makes me feel yoru partners.
4) Doesn’t change the fact I have yet to see you two come up with any really good reasons/answers to any questions you may or may not have been asked. And before we delve to far into what I mean by that I will tell you. I mean you give no INITIAL content for anything you do. You just seem to vote, or attack people for no reasons and only give them if asked specifically.
Make sure you get actual facts before you attack anyone…
Post 236:
CPONTRADICTION to your post 118! Liar, hypocrite, and scum. Die Die Die! Burn in hell and Die! Etc…etc…etc… You had better be today’s lynch or stump or I will be very pissed off at this town (AGAIN??? How many times can I get pissed off at the same town? o.O )Scot wrote: I already told you I did not believe scum would do what he did. This is not wifom, this is my opinion. Secondly, it is something I would not put pass quag. I still believe that he did not look at his role pm.
Post 260:
You think JD is the easy lynch? This is the first time you have ever mentioned that… Also Quag was not an “easy lynch” in yoru mind yesterday was he. Another BS case against D3sisted. You keep digging that hole your in deeper and deeper don’t you scum.Scot wrote: I'm pretty confident in desisted being scum. I would be voting for him even if jdodge was not.(I was the first to do so before silver stumped himself). He comes right out today and votes for jdodge without even considering anything, then when I vote for him he calls it an omgus. He is just going for the easy lynch. He did that yesterday, and he is trying to do that today with jdodge.
Post 264:
Lurking is a very overused term… And stooping to using that as your main claim against him seems… Well BS…scot wrote: Also, he lurked through most of day 1. When questioned about it, he said he has pushed for the lynch of quag the whole day, when he only made about 5 posts. I do not see him providing any substantial information. He is not only opportunistic, but unhelpful as well.
Post 269:
… are you shitting me? He just admitted to confirming things with a known scum and his partner BEFORE THE DAY STARTED! HELLO??!?!?!?!?! THAT IS WHAT MAFIA DID BEFORE THE GAME STARTED! TALKED TO EACH OTHER! HOW IS HE NOT LYNCHED YET?Scot wrote: Nice omgus. You are not confirmed town. Silver was scummy as hell. Adele is not confirmed town. Um, me, quag, and jdodge decided this before the game even started. If you are going to use this against me, you should seriously reconsider what is viable evidence.
Same post:
Uh.. he like unvoted… then revoted.. so he did not ride anything.. he was more or less iffy…Scot wrote: You rode this bandwagon.
Same Post:
As much as I hate to agree with a known scum I have to say I do here. D3sisted has been of no help this game other then to be an additional vote to help lynch the scum. I wish he would be a bit more helpful occasionally and not just once or twice the entire game…Scot wrote:
You question me for scumhunting? I was scumhunting, just look at me question silver. And if you are going to say that me thinking silver was scum, then you also have to look at jdodge and mith. I don't see any scumhunting from you. You let others question quag. I actually don't recall you once posing a question to quag. You might have been the first on the wagon, but you did not push it, or hunt for scum at all.
Post 273:
Interesting.. While you two seem to agree on everything almost… You still feel he is not innocent.. while you never seem to comment on anything he says… interesting…Scot wrote: Mith-No. I do not think anyone is innocent at this point. But I am pretty sure that desisted is scum.
Post 282:
I doubt you can meta anyone this game unless you find another game so “town oriented”… This game seems unique in that fact.. But I have not been around this site that long… I think you need a game that lets the town keep nights to minimum, game without power roles, and game where scum are at such a huge disadvantage to correctly meta anyone here…Scot wrote: EBWOP: I also find it ridiculous that because I didn't think you were a confused townie you think I am scum. When I see someone scummy, unless I can meta them, then I assume that they are scummy, not that they are a confused member of the town. Maybe if we played before, and you played like this before, and were a townie, then I would consider it. But unless that happens, I'm going to attack someone who I think is scummy, instead of letting them off the hook.
Ok I pretty much have a huge long list on word in order of post count so I may have missed something... that is more or less everything I have gathered on scot.. Enough I feel to outline my vote on him... JD's list up soon...
Oh damn.. I have to fix every single dang post because the word " marks are different from the ones used int he quotes.. *sigh* this adds another 30 min of work... Ok not that much.. but a lot more work at least.. anyways... On to JD...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
JDodge:
Post 12:
Clearly this post could be a big deal. Seeing as how he turned out scum this could be him *stupidly and not so subtly* talking to his buddies. While I find it very unlikely he would do that, you get into a WIFOM that that would be what he wanted us to think! He could also be Distancing himself from both MoS and Adele here. Overall, I use this post to narrow down my suspect ranges. Jdodge, Scotmany, Adele, and Mos. Not a very solid case, but definitely a starting point.Quagmire wrote:hey jdodge, scotmany:
instead of bandwagoning and trying to lynch mos, do you want to go for adele instead? she's really stupid and recent events show that she would be just as worthwile a "principle lynching" as mos...
p.s. i have not looked at my role, nor do i plan to throughout the course of this game
Post 33:
No reasons, chalk it up to a random vote if you will but either way you look at it he did exactly what Quag told him too.JDodge wrote: vote: Adele
Post 70:
In response to Silver’s post:JDodge wrote: Hi scum
Unvote, vote: SilverPhoenix
“I can't take it anymore. I'd rather kill you now then have to deal with your horrible play. It's not just that you are acting scummy, you are just playing horribly. I would rather someone inactive than someone who refuses to play correctly.”
Seeing as how I felt the same way when I voted him I cannot justify this vote… However I like his unvote from Adele… so.. half and half.. He gave no real reasons though… So… slightly more on the scum side I think…
Post 86:
A) It gets rid of a person creating unneeded hinderances to the town.JDodge wrote: You assume I have nothing. I actually find it rather odd that you're trying to cast my vote off as nothing, and saying that everyone else should do the same.
SilverPhoenix wrote:
Vote: Quagmire
I can't take it anymore. I'd rather kill you now then have to deal with your horrible play. It's not just that you are acting scummy, you are just playing horribly. I would rather someone inactive than someone who refuses to play correctly.
Here you essentially say that you just want him lynched regardless of his alignment; how is that in any way good for the town?
B) He is more or less the most obviously suspicious person at the time
C) He keeps disobeying orders that he is givenby a majority of the town
D) It is a lot better then wanting someone lynched on a basis of nothing.. which is about all you have had this entire game… (So far XD)
Same Post:
You had no reason to vote Adele… so this makes no sense whatsoever… stop replying with nothing and get to a point scum…JDodge wrote:SilverPhoenix wrote:
I am mainly annoyed by telling everyone who to vote for. You set your target as Adele since before the game even started, and then you use OMGUS for your target tomorrow. Just horrible.....
And here you assume OMGUS and not the same reasoning behind the votes for Adele. Guess which would probably seem scummier to people?
Same post:
No, but staying in “early random mode” long after everyone else has moved on makes you seem either moronic or scummy. Neither of which will keep you alive for long.JDodge wrote:Is playing unseriously a scumtell?
Post 90:
If a scum is playing town he should be lynched ASAP! Because if he continues to look protown for too long people may be less inclined to lynch him later. For this reason, the longer a “town looking” scum stays alive, the harder it gets to kill him.JDodge wrote:
If a scum is playing town he must never be lynched.
Your willingness to off someone simply for playing neutral is rather odd. Being unreadable =/= being scum.
And no one should play neutral. You should in fact PLAY TOWN no matter what side you are on. (see above point) Both town and mafia players alike benefit from appearing “Pro-town” and so to play neutral is idiotic. So being unreadable = being dangerous. And being dangerous and NOT STUMPING = scum. As proven already. Or that’s my take on it. You being scum of course makes you semi biased right? :p
Same post:
No what do you see? Seriously I stared at it for like 3 minutes and cannot see what yoru talking about.. or more… not talking about… STOP IT! I would not be surprised if I hammered you for the exact same reasons I did Quag.. You annoy, confuse, and piss me off at the same time…JDodge wrote:SilverPhoenix wrote:
Look, you guys seemed to obviously have some prior discussion before this game started about who to target, since Quagmire told you and scotmany to vote for Adele and you guys did obediently.JDodge wrote:
Is playing unseriously a scumtell?And now you are defending someone whose alignment you don't even know? That seems like scum trying to shut up a dumb-ass scum partner to me.
Everyone, please read the bolded partvery carefully. Can you see what I see?
Post 91: ~FIXED~
So now you are trying to put words in Silver’s mouth? Either way I look at it is still seems scum… Trying to fix something you knew you slipped up on doesn’t change the fact you said it. Plus fixing it into something worse just… you know… Tips the scales further right?JDodge wrote:JDodge wrote: So, if a scum is playing town he must never be lynched?
now that that's fixed
Post 101:
QFT… Opportunistic can be turned around too much… it is a very flimsy piece of evidence or reason to vote…Silver wrote:But turning that on me is not the way to go. I actually think that you are being opportunistic at my mistake.
Post 105:
Yeah… It is so pro-town to tell someone to keep up the blatant lies and false evidence against a towny…JDodge wrote: go scot go
Post 154:
You could argue that you jumping on their “Less vocalness” as opportunism too. You could argue Me attacking you for this is Opportunism. You could argue going outside and getting a tan to be opportunism. You could argue any dang thing in mafia as opportunism. It is a flimsy, weak, and a last ditch effort for you to save your partner that failed.JDodge wrote: This Quagwagon reeks of opportunism from some of its less vocal members like d3sisted and Max.
Post 169:
Hate to say it but I totally agreed with you here… Still… The mere fact we do have to lynch the scum means we do HAVE to come to a lynch at some point….JDodge wrote: i find it ironic how in trying to prevent unnecessary deaths we're rushing someone to the gallows
Post 172:
And he does! Kinda badly… Yeah… more or less… I think he said “It’s hypocritical to lynch a scum for being anti-town!” Nice… Chalk all this up to another scum point towards you…JDodge wrote: It's hypocritical. Let's prevent people from refusing to prevent a lynch by lynching them!
Post 174:
You keep trying to get us off of Quag (Who is now proven scum) and so I only see you as his partner. Plain and simple… You should probably stump now to prevent all the time we will waste of our lives lynching you…JDodge wrote: Personally I suggest we actually scumhunt for a while and find an alternative to Quag - for now. We can always come back to Quag tomorrow or later today if nothing else pans out.
The whole case on Quag is that he's supposedly scum for not wanting to stump, when (from his position, having not opened his role PM yet) is indeed the second most optimal play besides opening your role PM when you are near lynch to see whether you should stump or not. Furthermore, you have no real basis to say he is scum - just basis to call for his head. I see no point to lynching someone without any reason to think said person is scum since it's contrary to the town goal of eliminating mislynches.
Pot 180:
Because you and Scot tend to agree on most things I almost want to say you are contradicting Him here! He clearly said D3sisted is not opportunistic because he voted first… Yet here you use that as your only reason. I think you just don’t want the lynch because you do not want to lose yoru scum partner day one! Sad day for you scum isn’t it… (Literally XD)JDodge wrote: Unvote, vote: d3sisted
The Quagmire wagon is driven by two things IMO - a so-called "policy lynch" which is hypocritical but not necessarily scummy, and the opportunists like d3sisted and Max who just want a lynch so they can make use of one of their very few possible nightkill attempts. I'm willing to bet SP is the third scum, too, but the case on d3sisted compels me.
Post 182:
He is refusing to lynch. So there is actual suspicion he is scum. Missing such a big point is kinda hard for me to ignore here… All I see is you trying desperately to save his life… While it would have been a lot better to just vote him yourself… Sad say indeed…JDodge wrote:d3sisted wrote: I think the opportunist here is you, JDodge.
The only reason you would be so sure that Quagmire is town, is if you're scum. Building upon that, you're making this pre-emptive strike so as to setup tomorrow's mislynch after this one goes down.
No, I'm not sure that he's town or scum. I'm sure that there is no actual suspicion of Quagmire being scum aside from the people who now think that he has read his role PM, which I have yet to see any evidence substantiating. And I think you believe the same thing and are trying to push the lynch while staying as below-the-radar as possible.
Post 203:
If you honestly believe you can get away with saying not reading yoru role pm is an excuse for anything I think Mafia is the wrong game for you… Try Tic-tac-toe… or like… Checkers… They seem to be about your IQ level…JDodge wrote:Please, refresh my memory; what was the case for Quag being scum thatcannot be explained by him not reading his role PM?
Post 209:
Only real point I want to tlak about is your Number 2, there is no best play for not reading your role PM cause that is a very stupid thing to do (or not do if you want) So yeah… Stop trying to make it seem like not reading your Role pm is a good thing…JD wrote: 1. You're fingering him for bandwagoning randomly early in the game?
2. Is the best play if you haven't read your role PM
3. Examples please
4. His lynch was not smart, it was lucky.
5. Being an arse =/= being scum
I don't like that last sentence, either. Something about "accept you were wrong" feels off.
Vote: SilverPhoenix
Also I find it odd you talk about all these pints Adele made and yet vote for Silver… Weird… Only wanting to vote for townies others have already voted eh?
Post 211:
Nope… outline again why you wanted us to lynch a towny please…JD wrote: Adele doesn't seem like scum, you do. I'm pretty sure I outlined why yesterday.
Post 215:
Take your own advice here…JD wrote: You're making the claims, it's your job to prove them
Post 253:
No it isn’t. Besides the fact you have no reason to vote for D3sisted, you are clearly the second best choice for today’s lynch. Strike out I say…JD wrote:d3sisted wrote:
Horribly early stump, but I'm glad at least someone sees what I see.
Vote jdodoge
This is not OMOGUS in any way
Post 257:
… And they are??? Come on.. even bad scum can make up reasons… Although Really bad scum like you apparently can’t…JD wrote: my reasons have changed somewhat
Post 259:
Absolutely no pro town reason for this… So thus, not being pro town, I want you dead…JD wrote: Eventually, but for now I want to see more before I disclose said reasons.
Post 272:
Seeing as how you two agree with each other on almost everything this seems fishy. Also I think your lying. Also… You two are scum anyways… So… Die…JD wrote: No. I could go either way.
General feeling, mostly is my reasoning.
Ok thats about it on him... I would like to iterate here that I kinda became a little bias against both JD and Scot this game and some of my attacks became a bit to personal and I deeply apologize for them. I will outline my stupid MoS/Adele partnership idea next...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Ok the MoS & Adele Theory!!!! (Beware the following is ridiculous and in no way the most likely chance of being what is going on. I only brig it up because I kept seeing things that strengthened the case. Also if JD and Scot both do somehow come up town I feel this is a very likely scenario!!!!)
Post 45:
Post 49:MoS wrote: That sounds like a bullshit argument to me, Quag. If you're not looking at your role, you should play assuming that you are protown, since you have a better probability of getting that role. Therefore, your best play from not knowing your role is quite clearly to stump yourself when the time comes. The fact that you are fighting against it and trying to play it into an established persona and the "I don't give a shit" schtick makes me think that you are scum trying to slide by. I don't buy it.
Unvote, Vote: Quagmire
Bussing and distancing aside I tend to think both MoS’s and Adele’s jumping to vote Quag kinda puts them in a town light… But you never can count anything out right… I still think this “could” be a very very good distancing plan they came up with… But the chance of that seems very little.Adele wrote: He claims he hasn't read his role and uses this as an excuse to act anti-town. "My scummy behaviour isn't actually scummy because of this third factor that you cannot verify!"
Am I missing something here?
vote: Quagmire
Post 56:
As much I as want to not believe in a partnership between them I find it funny mentioning how she would be all for a Quag lynch yet unvoted just the same…adele wrote: If we let people off being lynched because they refuse to treestump, refusing to stump will become the dominant strategy for town and scum alike. However, I agree that a quicklynch is a Bad Thing (tm).
I was stunned to have four votes on me at the end of page 2, and didn't pay much attention to how many votes were on quag. So, for now:
Unvote
however, I won't support antitown play by inaction. If quag won't retract or agree to play a solidly protown game (you know, post "ok, I checked and guess what? I'm a tree! Shocker, no?" so we can get on with the game we're here to play) then I support his lynching.
Post 64:
Seeing as how much Quag kept fighting more or less to get himself killed I am beginning to see the MoS, Adele, and Quag trio more and more. A good plan that could have very easily been thought of by MoS and Quag. While I like others more, if this turns out to be the case I am going to probably do a little jig… 9 times out of 10 I’m wrong though… No dance for me…Quag wrote: I swear to god I have not looked at my role.
although mos you seem very scummy; i'm glad we're lynching you tomorrow because you're really stupid and bloodthirsty and worthless
but adele is today's target fo'sho'
Post 75:
You seem pretty sure he is scum on page 3. I find that very hard to believe. While his actions were suspicious and he did end up being scum I feel the only way you can justify a short day on the basis “I know he is scum” or however you want to put it means you are his partner trying an early bussing.MoS wrote:...hello, logic please? When you find scum, you vote to lynch them. It doesn't matter if it's the first fucking page. You don't just sit around and say "hmm, we need another 8 pages before we can lynch this scum we found!" That's not how the game works. Quagmire is acting like scum, so I'm going to vote for him. Just because he slipped up trying to find a way to act blatantly scummy and get away with it on Page 1, does not mean that we can't lynch him.
Post 150:
Kinda dumb to wait if you ask me… he has more or less said 50 times he will not stump.. waiting 24 hours is kinda dumb… and could be seen as fence sitting (Not the right word I think) between being with his lynch to throw suspicion off you day two, while still being able to roll with someone else’s lynch should you be bale to save your partner… (Not a lot of scum stuff to go on you here… I have to use what I find XD Nothing personal you know..)Adele wrote: And, in case it's not obvious, I'm ready to vote for you. Hell, I've been ready to vote for you for several pages now. One last chance: Stump. Now. I'll be dropping my vote in 24 hours.
Post 218:
Jumping on a town bandwagon for no reasons what so ever… ????MoS wrote: Oh, and Vote: SilverPhoenix
As you can see I have very little to support this theory and so I do not intend to push it too hard.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
D3sisted: (apologize for any name misspellings)
Post 22:
I bring this post up because I know I will have to focus on Desisted at some point. I just find it odd he would say “Don’t noone lynch anyone!” and then be a part of the Quag wagon… Not saying this is scummy… Cause it really isn’t… Just odd how fast people’s opinions can change…d3sisted wrote:Sounds like an excellent plan. And those who refuse to stump, we lynch. Furthermore, by having more players stumped instead of lynched/NKed, we have unbiased viewpoints coming from confirmed townies.
Understandably, anyone who objects this plan will be seen as obvscum, so by unanimous vote, this plan will take effect as of the start of the game.
Don't noone lynch anyone!
Post 171:
Fair enough question. Hope he answers it…D3sisted wrote: I find it odd how you insist on defending him in this manner.
Please. Tell us how our case/judgment is flawed.
(shit.. this shoulda went in the JD case... ><)
Post 286:
Ok.. because I do not see you as the most likely scum I accept this and do not feel like any further comment is needed...D3sisted wrote: About "the hand", I had meant to unvote him in that post as well. Then in my "why haven't we lynched Quagmire yet?" post, I realized I made this error, so it was not necessary to put a vote back on him.
As for the unvote, I figured there might be a slim chance that he honestly hadn't checked his PM, so I gave him the chance to do so and subsequently stump. There was also Adele threatening to hammer in 24 hours, which I believed was insufficient, hence my unvote. Call it wishy-washy or whatever, but as JDodge had pointed out, it's really quite hypocritical that we are lynching when our main strategy is to prevent lynches.
Mith/Blapanext...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Mith/ Bapa Bail:
Post 18:
Joke or not Also a starting point for this guy…Bapa Bail wrote:I like Quagmire's strategy hehe, though I have no idea who these other spooky people are.
Post 20:
This was in response to Silver’s post:Bapa Bail wrote:That actually sounds like a good plan! I'm in.
“Other than that, I suppose your strategy would work. Just hope the town doesn't choose many tree targets that end up killing themselves.”
I can see it as either:
A) He likes the too many tree targets killing themselves part or
B) He just pretty much contradicted his previous post by agreeing with a plan he agreed with Quagmire about not doing.
Neither of which are good points.
Post 30:
So he admits he liked this one. Still a contradiction to his post 18. But a more or less town oriented contradiction. Could chalk his post up to a “joke.”Bapa Bail wrote:I prefer the other idea, where someone is at lynch -2, and two other people not voting much say "stump"
Post 35:
… Ok this time he went back to his anti-town approach.. His contradictions are beginning to piss me off… Jokes or not… This was the 4th vote on the Adele bandwagon and whether or not she was ever in danger this behavior cannot go unnoticed.Bapa Bail wrote: vote: Adele
Go quagmire!
Post: 108:
Trying to stay on everyone’s good side… seems like a very very likely town move… Not wanting to stand out yet trying to see everyone in a good light… weak, but a possibility. Could also been seen as a scum trying to gain friends/buddy up… of course two of the people he has talked about have each been proven to be on opposite sides which means I am more likely to believe it was a scared town move.Bapa Bail wrote:SilverPhoenix and Quagmire seem both pro-town to me. I have felt like I can't stand someone annoying (in this case for him, Quagmire). Quagmire just seems like someone who wants to start a fire, and burn everyone, not literally of course.
That's about all I see atm.
Scot's post confuses me, because his attack seems too unwarranted, his tone that is.
JDodge has not said anything meaningful, just a few one liners, like GO SCOT GO etc. Yeah he needs to be stumped so he'll be unbiased, if he's town that is. =)
Post 109:
He refuses to stump, and refuses to look at his pm EVEN AFTER A MAJORITY OF THE TOWN HAS TOLD HIM TOO. Whether he has a goal or point is irrelevant.. you do not disobey the town consensus and expect not to get hounded for it. It is far better to lie in this case then to continue on the path he was. Town or scum even…Bapa Bail wrote: I really don't see how claiming to not have read a pm is harmful to the town (referring to Quaggy)?
We could just assume he is scumhunting, and let him attack whoever whenever during the day? It seems like a logical approach, but I don't know why he said so... Unless he seems to be scummy for another reason that's clear, then I don't see any reason why we should push.
Also Not reading PM means he is not looking at the game as a pro-town player and thus cannot HELP the town in anyway… the only difference in looking at the game pro-town and neutral is that you have no goal as neutral and thus cannot focus on scum hunting… You more or less “Player hunt” at all times, Argumentative both as a good thing and a bad thing. I refuse to get into it any more then I have because it wastes my time…
Post 112:
Oh he has posted significant things, mostly significant reasons to lynch him… But those are still very much significant things… All in all I agree with the vote… seems a town act…Bapa Bail wrote: I'm going to unvote, vote JDodge
He's posted nothing of any significance throughout the whole game.
Post 133:
Damn it… Replacements suck… And Mith is a good player… *sighs*Thok wrote: Mith replaces Bapa Bail.
Post 135:
Where did you get “27%”? Random number?Mith wrote: On one hand, we can probably do better than what amounts to a random lynch (well, slightly better than random, since there's some non-zero chance he's looked at his PM and is scum). Moreso in this game than others, because if we go another direction, we're going to either have a scum lynched or a stumping (which is obviously strictly better than lynching a townie). On the other hand, if he's going to act like this, I'd rather get him out of the way now if we're going to kill him at all, and the 27% chance of him being scum is far too high for me to consider just ignoring him all game and hoping he's innocent.
Other then that I agree with your feelings here and so I cannot dispute you for anything…
Post 146:
Oh good… Nice point there… I believe one of his big reasons to not stump was that he would be hurting his team if he were mafia and yet he did not consider he would be hurting his team as town if he did not stump… Only further proves (in my mind) he is a good lynch…Mith wrote: Quag, I understand that you are saying you haven't opened your role. And I understand that until you do so, I will be pushing for your lynch. And I understand that you getting lynched, or being forced to stump, will hurt whichever team you happen to be on.
I believe that's five.
Post 271:
Interesting how they had never mentioned this before no?Mith wrote: scotmany12, do you believe JDodge is innocent? Why or why not?
JDodge, do you believe scotmany12 is innocent? Why or why not?
(Shit this needed to be in both JD's and Scot's list... Damn it...)
Post 284:
Huh… I think I missed that on D3sisted.. Nice.. But seeing as how I have so much more on scot and JD I feel I don’t have to run with it.Mith wrote: scotmany12, do you feel there is any chance d3sisted and JDodge could be scum together? As near as I can tell, most of your case against d3sisted seems to be based on his "opportunistic" voting, yet Quagmire came up scum, and obviously if JDodge were scum as well we couldn't call that "opportunistic" either. I am having a bit of trouble making sense of your case unless it hinges on the assumption that JDodge is innocent. But now you're saying you don't think anyone is innocent.
Reading through d3sisted's posts from yesterday, there are a few little things that are off - for example, he votes, and then makes a post giving Quag the "Hand", apparently not realizing he had voted already; I tend to believe scum are more likely to forget where they put their vote. And the "unvote to prevent a self-lynch" is a bit off. That's hardly conclusive though, and the case presented at the moment pretty much sucks.
So, scotmany12, would you post a clear summary of what the hell you are actually accusing him of?
JDodge, post your reasons. I am entirely with Adele on this one.
Vote: Korlash for now. I want to see how he reacts, and the hammer/self-vote combo meal is upsetting the gut.
Also You should be giving that speech to JD as well… And even reiterating D3sisted’s claim that JD and Scot are most likely partners…
And how did my reaction suit you anyways?It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Lastly: Other things I had commented on:
Post 24:
I find this one very anti-town… I too have thought about a mass stumping.. but then we lose… We need to focus on finding scum, plain and simple. I we stump to many we lose. So trying to focus on stumping clearly shows some sort of anti-town feelings here…Max wrote:I vote that we instead of voting (to avoid quicklynching we Stump)
If the mod is nice enough to post a stump count, we will be able to (if we reach a majority force someone to stump then we all move on to finding the next stump
Post 39:
Joking or not never do this again…Max wrote: Adele! Stump Stump!!!! (jk)
Post 99:
Or is there???? Seriously… No vote count or anything? Why even post… I think Thok could be a third party scum o.O with mod powers… scary…Thok wrote: Nothing to see in this post
Post 100:
Jerk! I bet if it had been anyone else you woulda done it! You just hate me cause I’m awesome! T_TThok wrote: Since Korlash asked, at this time I'm not planning on replacing Quagmire.
A couple things on Max and a few jokes on Thok... Thats about it...
I promised you guys I would get a case ready and here it is... I have outlined my biggest theory and belief (Quag/JD/Scot) followed with a secondary option of a (Quag/MoS/Adele) bussing partnership.... along with two others i feel are more or less suspicious in some way... I feel with this we can get the last two scum with relatively few stumps...
You guys do with it what you will... Odds are I will be going back to my lack of content posts seeing as how I work just as much this week as last week. I do not see my vote ever changing from Scot voluntarily. So whether he stumps or gets lynched, I want him dead today. The sooner the better...
And for the record, the second I get to L-2 (Depending on the voters) I will stump. Until then peace out. I am very tired and need rest... ZzZzZzZz....
@ MOD:Very sorry for the... um... 6-7 times post in a row... I felt posting it all at once would make it too difficult to read... Don't hurt me for it X.X
Also the jokes are meant all in fun! Hope you understand that!
@ The rest of you: Whether you like my posts or not I couldn't care less. Read em, don't, take it all and use it against me I don't care. I'm too freaking tired to care right now... Besides I doubt you will get much more out of me for a while...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
^^ I am pretty much convinced that JD and Scot are the scum and thus the other four would make up the last 1% between them. Weak explanation yes, but seeing as how we have 5 stumps to deal with, listing 4 townies in my scum list will not effect our win that greatly. I feel if we go along it and they either stump or die accordingly we will hit the two mafia before long!
Also I am sorry about the length... I would actually give you a good month and a half actually...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I really hope that was not your way of asking me to stump... I cannot really understand what your trying to say but... If your being replaced I don't think it matters...Max wrote:As it seems you fail to understand that post it vas obvious we stup as in Stump: Korlash
I have asked to be replaced and this will be the last time I will read this threadIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
You know I was about to come back and tell you to give me some examples but it looks like you just did...
I am all ready to give you the benefit of the doubt, except I have NOTHING but scummy acts from you, and so i highly doubt you actually made a mistake. While at the same time Silver being proven town kinda HAS to be given the benefit of the doubt you know... Not to mention it was kinda you that threw him into stumping, along with JD, and mith to a lesser degree... So I think you should not get to be forgiven for even a "mistake." That mistake got a towny killed you moron and I don't like that. Either way I look at it you still come up lynchable material today.
Hmmm... I woulda been happier with JD's comebacks if they all didn't span around me being dense... As for the 169/172 scandal thats about the only thing I can see your side on. I feel the two sentences are different enough for me to have taken different sides but I can totally see how that makes me look contradicting. Props for having at least one good comeback. Unlike Schot at least... Thats why your my number two
And as far as Long posts go I hate them too... This is probably the only post longer then 4 paragraphs I will ever post here again... That is just all my stuff up to know laid out because I have more or less been totally unhelpful all game.
But Schot, you might as well keep hounding that little bit you got there... I bet it totally gets you out of the gallowsIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Really? I honestly thought you were... So what your "mistakes" that you made when you attacked him were done after he stummped? That seems like a not so scum move..Schot wrote:Also, how did I throw silver into stumping? I wasn't even voting for him on day 2 when he stumped.
Yeah I attacked you for using it because it is not a real reason... So your second point makes no sense to me. And as for your first thing, almost EVERY SINLGE CAN can in some way be called "Opportunism" and it really cannot be proven or disproven. So it is, more or less, a really really bad reason to do anything and a really bad piece of evidence. It's more of an "Opinion" then fact almost every single time it is used. And seeing as how many times you and JD seem to call people "Opportunistic" I think you guys need to find some actual case against someone...Schot wrote:First off, opportunism is a viable reason. Second off, do you not just realize you just attacked me for being opportunistic when you said it was not a real reason?
I have already said I think you are 100% scum, I would advice you not to try and twist my words and put words in my mouth.Schot wrote:So you don't care if I'm scum or not? Even if I'm town you want me dead? [sarcasm]That has got to be the most protown move this entire game.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Well I already said I will stump so there is a very high chance I may in fact come up town... I just figured I would rather lynch him first... =DIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Um... You said you believed he had looked at his role if I remember the 8 times I quoted it correctly... I don;t really see any point you would be lying about that right now so I don't know that it actually means anything... Just feel like pointing it out...
Post 118 if you don't believe me...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Sure... You made a mistake on top of all your scummy actions. I can accept that. Still want you dead. But at least now I feel we can kill each other and still be friends =DIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
You... have.. not... Put words in your mouth? What... So everything you say did not come from your mouth eh... plagiarism is a crime!
And yes, If mafia I want you lynched, and if town I want you to be stumped. So either way I do hope you die today. Now that that is out of the way I need to find some kind of copyright law I can bring up on you...
Ohh a surcharge for sarcasm! Happy days! =DIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
??? Ok... In my last post I was talking about you saying you didn't put words in your mouth not mine... You seem kinda jumpy man... Or paranoid...
When I said you were putting words in my mouth I meant the way you said I thought you were either town or scum when I had already listed you at 100% scum... Granted the post you quoted could be used against me for that, I still feel my scumdar overrides that one little sentence...
However I enjoy how you keep trying to find little holes in my case and try to push them with all your might.. Your not getting out of this... But you are putting up one hell of a fight! Good show ol' chap! Jolly good show!It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Why is that troubling? I already explained my reasonings behind it...Silver wrote:Did Korlash say that during his super-tirade? Hmmm.....troubling....
Yeah but I don;t think he can honestly get out of some of the things I brought up... I just hope people actually read some of my cases and don't just base it off what he is bringing up...Silver wrote:That is what scotmany seems to be good at...
Ehh I'm not worried.. Even the things he is bringing up I know I have good reasons for... So bring it on Scum.. I mean Scot.. sorry.. i always get those two mixed up! GO figure XDIt's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
@DGB: Hey... Your so called theory works with MoS more then it does me... I was almost pro-quag half of day one... Or at least against his lynch... That is definitly not distancing.. now if you wana say I was trying to save a scum partner I would agree you may have a case... But other then what you could call a bus at the end of day one, I see no distancing between me and quag...
@ Adele: I really do not believe that you and MoS are the partners but it seems like the best strategy for the scum to do in this "pro-town" game... I mean you two are the two most likely we never really go after and thus you would make the perfect scum.. just hiding waiting for a couple to stump... Like I said I don't feel the need to push it at all... More confident in my JD and Scot pair...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Huh... DGb sure likes this distancing thing...
As for MoS's questions... No, yes, and no... I wish it was that easy =D
I would never go after you because what Quag did more or less makes you seem innocent... And until you do something really scummy... That more or less means I probably won't find anything at all wrong with you.
Secondly, Quag never mentioned anyone else.. just you two...
Thirdly, I only think you have a chance to be partners if Scot, JD, and D3sisted all turn out tow... So because I "know" I am right I do not think you guys are scum thus.. never go after you...
I just felt seeing as how I was going back through the entire game I woudl throw every possible theory I had any real evidence for at all out there...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Woot! Crap Logic Korlash strikes again!Mith wrote:Ok, I'm going to have to stop there for now. Korlash makes my head hurt.
>.>
<.<
Evil doers beware for I am on the loose... To annoy you silly!!!!!
Ok seriously... Where was I? And why am I wearing spandex?
I know it seems odd, But I really do not fully agree with your "200% max" thing. I mean I tried to fit my thing into yours just so we can try to understand each other but it really doesn't... I mean take DGB's list at the top of the page.. That adds up to 205% if I am not mistaken... I think I counted it right... So not everyone has the same way of listing people as you do Mith.
I rank people I am confident in (being scum) as a high 75-90% depending on how confident. People I will never unvote for because I see NO PROTOWN ACTIONS at all I rank from 95-100% and anyone I do not feel is scummy that much I rank below 60%. I never outright rank someone as town, unless I either have first hand knowledge or a better then educated guess that they are in fact town. (I.e. Some kind of evidence, such as role claim that is not counter claimed or unproven)
If I had to rank the others they would fall below 60%, you would be like... 65% only because of Blapa... D3sisted maybe... 65% also... and the Mith/Adele pair gets a 'maybe 80%" until Both Scot and JD are proven.
Or that's my take on it. If you don't agree thats cool, I like how I rank my scumdar and I don't feel like changing it for anyone... even you...
And dang DGB... What have I done that makes me such a likely candidate as scum? (Other then being annoying muahahahahaha)It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I only herd it from him... Sorry if I didn't answer it before... never saw it... wait wait found it.. post 305...
Ok in my opinion anyone "neutral" is not town... literally. I was against a Quag lynch because it was more or less a consensus on PAGE 3! That was my main reason, my second reason was that the mere "not looking at your PM" does not automatically make you scum. In fact it neither makes you more town nor more scum and thus not a good reason to lynch.
However, playing the game as a neutral is not the same as playing it Pro-town.
I did not lynch Quag for being neutral, I lynched him because he was an ass and the rest of you were pretty much not going to move on... So all in all he was a hindrance to the game... I'm not saying I was right. I'm not saying my hammer was even a good move. I already illustrated my views on the subject the first post (Third actually) of the day. We got lucky, not arguing that.
Does that more or less answer your question? I will be glad to further explain it if you give me some more specifics.
Also, just so I do not further my biasness against you, would you mind pointing out the "second" time it was mentioned... I mean I only saw it twice now.. and you say three times... I would like to know where this other one is. Thanks Schot!It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Ok I wasn't going to but this has been bothering me for a while now... Can you explain this please DGB:
How does a mere 5 FoS's make me the third scum? Where did I distance day 1? And for the love of god I am not obsessed with Adele and MoS... I am obsessed with the deaths of JD and Schot, yes, but am in no way obsessed with Adele and MoS. I find your entire case to be more or less BS... can you enlighten me as to your exact thinking here? Examples maybe...DGB wrote:Let's check out Korlash:
FoS: d3sisted, PookyTheMagicalBear, Mastermind of Sin, and Adele
FoS: MoS...
Overall he's obsessed with Adele and MoS, also scotmany, JDodge, and Adele some more.
That settles it. Korlash is scum #3. Adele, Quag and Korlash are overdoing the Day 1 distancing bit. It backfired on Quag, and now it's going to backfire some more.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I am going after you for a completely different set of reasons.... I think... Damn now I am beginning to doubt my case... Darn you slick mafia plays! Time to list out my reasons me thinks...
Because you asked I will see my main points on you here JD:
1) The reference Quag made in his Firstish post where he more or less calls you two by name. That along with the fact you keep insisting the "Adele" thing was PREDETERMINED! And the only talk before the game was between mafia partners. That is more or less end of story there. Plain and simple, cut and dry, in my mind you two claimed mafia.
2) You never really seemed to give reasons when you originally vote people. You just say "Hi scum" and Vote then explain it later. Not a tell tale sign of being scum but I won't ignore it either.
3) You have been playing "Unseriously" half the game. Or that is what I got from the chat you and Silver had. If that is the case you more or less have been acting "quag" all game, and Quag = scum so... Yeah again not meaning a lot but it all adds up to a character profile...
4) You said, and I quote: "If a scum is playing town he must never be lynched."
...
That is saying you want scum to win... and thus you are either scum or anti-town. Again, cut and dry, plain and simple, I want you dead based on this, reasoning. that makes 2 pieces of scum evidence, and two of minor maybe evidence. Lets see if I have anymore...
5) you still have not explained this: "Everyone, please read the bolded part very carefully. Can you see what I see?" Even after asking you. So I ask you again, please explain it.
6) You keep using the word "Opportunism" as an attack... I have already outlined My thoughts on that matter.
7) You and Scot (The other player I most suspect) seem to be all buddy buddy the entire game. Seems odd because I myself see so many things to comment/attack you two on that neither of you attack the other at all.
8) Post 174: You try to defend Quag on the basis "HE does not want to stump" = not scum... Tat is not what I felt at all. I do feel not stumping = scum... and so I attack you for thinking otherwise.
9) You don't even prove your votes/cases when asked to do so in most cases...
10) In one case in particular you refuse to give your reasons... and have yet too...
So there you have it.. 10 valid (In my mind) points against you, none of which are what I was thinking...
Some of those points, on their own, I would not consider even vote worthy... but together.. they clearly spell out something wrong with you.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
So what exactly is this Scumchat then? Some place to talk about ongoing games or something? seems odd...
Is it in the forum somewhere? I should go look...
*leaves*
Oh even if that is true, it is still a scummy thing to do so I am going to keep it as a point of interest against Scot and JD... I feel I have enough other valid points that they still need to die...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Sure Mith only say that to me and not to the other people who don't follow your stupid rule... That seems fair...
And whether or not it is a "scummy" thing it is still a stupid thing and I add it to reasons I want them dead. Keep only focusing on that one point and you miss the rest of my case. Are you guys just that brain dead or do you hate me that much?
Either way I don't really care.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
I present to you Mith, a counter arguement to your "mathematical" probability... Yes I cannot seem to let my bad math skills go without fuss...
Post 200:
Kinda ironic it being post 200... But it still adds up to 205%... yet you seem to be intent on making me look stupid while conveniently forgetting to even mention her.Adele wrote:mith 10%
max 15%
mos 15%
aimee 20%
d3sisted 20%
silver 25%
korlash 30%
jdodge 35%
scotmany 35%
Then in post 325 DGB also restated that same list. So you had no reason not to see it.
And I'll be damned... If those are not the only two lists of that sort in this entire thread... Mine can't really count because I only listed two players... Guess no one ever feels like sharing their lists... Probably to damaging to their 200% max case eh Mith [/sarcasm]
Ok so either you can accept I am the type of person to list each person on their own separate grid or not I could care less. I would put JD and Scot well over the majority marker anyways. in fact I would leave them at the numbers I have and like i said pull the 1% down into the rest... Hmm... That would be an odd list...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Yet another nothing post from scot... and an only semi worthwhile post from JD... I just feel more and more confident about them as the day progresses onward... *stares into the setting sun*
On that note:
OK! =DMith wrote:I want you to read the last two sentences of my post again, though. You continue to focus on your God-given right to suck at math, while ignoring what is actually scummy about what you did.
I am sure that JD and Scot are scum... two people... Two mafia... Where do you not follow that one?Mith wrote:So, obviously I have a problem with you labelling such numbers as how "sure" you are they are scum. It just doesn't make sense. You simply can not be that sure that so many people are scum, when we know there are only two scum in the game.
I only have Mos/adele listed because if JD or Scot somehow show up town they would be my next targets, right now I feel they are both town.
As for you and D3sisted.. Well I think I had a couple things from both of you I wanted answered from my reread and so I created a post for you two. Not saying you are likely scum but if for some odd reason JD/scot turn out town, and my MoS/Adele case does not find a hell of a lot more support, then you two would be next. And so on, and so forth.
Simple answer: 2 suspects, 2 mafia. I believe I actually did a good job of adding this time... Had to use both my fingers and toes but I got it!
Well let me take a look at them then...Mith wrote:That, at least, I could just pass off as you being really awful at math. However, more damning is the fact that posts 297 and 343 flat out contradict each other.
Nope.. not contradict.. explains each Other...
Note the "I mean I tried to fit my thing into yours just so we can try to understand each other but it really doesn't..."
If you don't agree with my explanations of things that is cool. But explaining why I did something does not contradict the thing I did. And I do not feel like explaining it anymore if you will only continually try to make up cases against me.
o.O That... is the second time someone has mentioned that. I believe it was Mith before, in another game. Odd. You blame the educational system for my crap logic. Kinda funny actually. Seeing as how I was a wiz kid in math. Algebra, geometry, trig, calculus... Sucked at physics though... Did not see that one coming.DGB wrote: Korlash's poor grasp of probability theory should, ideally, be taken care of by the educational system.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Sure... here is a list of posts you have made that did absolutely nothing at all, were in a sense meaningless, or were so vague it really did not prove/disprove/support anything... In a sense this post I am doing is a worthless post... But you asked.... so here it is:
Post #/ Reason
300- Too vague. Did not give any details or explications. Overall no information
185- seems a lot like sarcasm, nothing really stated. Very little information/ could be seen as you setting me up for an attack tomorrow(Today)
So you see a very very very short list, but enough to qualify for the use of the word "Another" =D
(In fact you will find at least... 3... 4 times as many worthless posts from me )
However, I said what I did because I feel you keep ignoring everything thing I have ever put in front of you or attacked you with. You seem to only comment on things that I have either little to no support, or things you are able to twist around to your own side. You do not even try to defend against anything else. I called you 100% scum and you just seem to be ignoring me for the most part. So any time you post and do not address something I have asked of you then I deem it more or less worthless. (In my mind)It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
@ Scot: Yeah I was pretty much hoping you would ask for that eventually. I wanted to do a complete list for you at the time too but lets face it, I am lazy ><
On that note I will make a list ASAP but I just replaced into another game so my time tonight will be spent on that. I will either get to the list afterwards, tomorrow morning, or at the latest tomorrow after work. Just a quick note to let you know I think your request is fair, justified, and I am not trying to ignore it.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
As promised main points against Scot:
1) The reference Quag made in his Firstish post where he more or less calls you two by name. That along with the fact you keep insisting the "Adele" thing was PREDETERMINED! And the only talk before the game was between mafia partners. That is more or less end of story there. Plain and simple, cut and dry, in my mind you two claimed mafia.
- More to the point, a known scum told you to do something, and you did it. Random or not.
2) You seemed to continually put words in people's mouths while providing a defense for Qug and attacking Silver.
- More to the point, you twisted words to protect a known scum and attack a known town.
3) You seemed more inclined to DEFEND Quag day one, instead of just PREVENTING the bad lynch.
-More to the point, You mostly overlooked any reason the lynch had merit, focused solely on the point it was weakest, and then tried to use it as a reason to keep quag alive.
4) Your post 127, where you state plain and simple that Silver had a case if Quag ever turned up scum, which he did. SO logically there is some case against you even you have admitted to.
5) Your post 118 contradiction where you admit to believing Quag looked at his Role PM. Your reasons for this contradiction: A mistake. Well good job. You keep stumping town off mistakes like this and you won't need another night!
6) You wanted us to wait until tomorrow to focus on Quag, thus you WANTED us to go to night instead of making him stump there and then. A very anti-town thing in my opinion.
7) You and JD seem to agree with each other a lot, work with each other on things, use he case cases almost all the time against the same people, and yet have never once commented on anything scummy the other has done.
8) You say we should not focus on the people who d3efended Quag, but more on the people who lynched him. Seems illogical.
9) The way you kept changing your attack on silver, day one it was "yours scum for believing he did not check his role!" Day two it was "your scum for saying you believed he checked his role yesterday but today you don't!"
- In other words, You attacked him for Changing his mind, when he never did.
10) No initial reasons for votes... (Most of the time.) Or at the very least weak and meaningless reasons...
11) You claim JD is the "easy lynch" for today... Why?
We can start with those...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Well at least I am not the only one who thinks Scot should stump. I myself almost said the same thing a while ago but thought about the ramifications it would imply. So I do believe it is just a bad pro-town act seeing as how I almost did it myself.
We have to lynch the scum and so they HAVE to get another NK to win. Trying too hard to appear pro-town scum? I think so...JD wrote:We lynch due to refusal to stump, scum gets a NK
Yeah how can you say anyone looks like they are bussing more then me? Come on Scot... Why is no one else voting him besides me and D? And why do I only have 1 vote? Come on I would think me and Scot are the best choices right now...Aimee wrote:I'm having trouble considering how you could argue that d3sisted seemed like bussing more than both Korlash and Max.It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
And? How is that bad for us? we get one of the most suspicious players to stump, we then get a priority lynch on someone unless they stump, and if they both stump then we get two of the most talked about people proven town. Of course this hurts us by losing two town but overall we are still in the clear. In fact if we had to waste all our stumps i would love to see Scot, D3, JD, myself, and.. well lets just say those four. Because if all of them areproven townthen it of course eliminates the most obvious people we would have lynched.
Now, I am not for a mass stump! I do not want Scot to stump until he gets more votes.. (Come on people, just a couple more XD) And I do not want to stump myself because I need my vote on Scot!!!! However if it is necessary I would just to prove I am town.
As for Aimee... I believe i saw something earlier I wanted to comment on but now I have forgotten it! XD It was nothing big but I wanted an answer... I will try to find it... Back later!It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
This has nothing at all to do with the game but why do you keep putting a "H" in my name??? It's been bugging the crap out of me Schot...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!- Korlash
-
Korlash Krap Logick
- Korlash
- Krap Logick
- Krap Logick
- Posts: 6579
- Joined: August 23, 2007
- Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous
Cause you kept putting one in my name and I felt I should return the favor...It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all! - Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash
- Korlash