In post 898, Dunnstral wrote:Zakk just said he didn't get his role and zachstral is literally blindly defending him regardless
This is the only thing to come out of the 'zakk doesn't have a pm' junk to be particularly of note. Hard townreading a player with as little content as floof is weird, and any reads whatsoever on zakk's play are inconsiquential. I would ask Zach for an explination, but I'm not going to get one.
That being said I still think zach is town. He's just moved from "town I can mostly skim" to "town, but be careful" in my head.
In post 936, Bins wrote:Gah, I've been too trusting of my gut reads. I need a break already.
In post 937, Bins wrote:Maybe I'll revert back to my scum reads in the first few pages because I'm too paranoid.
Something rubbed me wrong about bins most of d2, but nothing as much as this here. Prior to this, bins had just floated tool and I as possible suspects (
924 and
926). Felt like scum fishing for possible alternatives/mislynches down the road. But then bins backtracks in the two quoted posts when no one bit.
Bins moves from "probably town because other people are more scum" to "fairly scum, could wagon"
Hated their entrance into D2 (see
708 for details). Also, this looks awful in light of HA's flip.
In post 393, xyzzy wrote:
357 (Jaack) - I feel like overall,
h_a has made relatively few major contributions, but I feel good about the ones he's made
; he makes it pretty clear that he leans toward you being town, and while I think basing a scum lean solely on the fact that someone is voting for someone you think is town is pretty flimsy, I don't think it's necessarily super telling. I think his small number of contributions is bad, so overall,
I feel a little negative about h_a, but not super negative
. and basically my vote on Zachstralkita is because he's specifically avoided making contributions to the game time and time again without any justifiable reason, and the few contributions he does make all end up using deeply flawed logic. I think he specifically tries to prevent information from flowing through his posts, stalling the game with nonsense. at least Jake (my #2 scum read) has the courtesy to come up with (bad) reasons for his lack of contribution.
Bolded the relevant bad things.
Contradictions on a scum player is not a good look.
More D1 junk - xyzzy'z behavior toward the HA wagon was pretty scummy. They repeatedly said they were fine with an HA lynch, but never voted HA nor gave a good reason for not voting HA if he did indeed support the lynch (more time to discuss is not my idea of a good reason). Had a vote parked on Zach but never really pushed that.
Also, all the stuff Tyler said.
