Mini 107 - Super Mario Bros. Mafia: GAME OVER

korais666 · Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Mon Apr 26, 2004 11:41 am

Sorry, but our /confirm is in another castle!

korais666 · Post Post #27 (isolation #1) » Mon May 03, 2004 3:59 pm

Heh, it's like Mario RPG... but... with Peach being evil too. I wonder who the cohorts are.

vote: Prizm

, because... uhhh... he's evil... I think...

korais666 · Post Post #36 (isolation #2) » Tue May 04, 2004 2:09 pm

Also, there could be some generic guys like goomba, bob-omb, chomp, litaku, or piranna plant.

korais666 · Post Post #45 (isolation #3) » Thu May 06, 2004 10:59 am

You have a point, but we can still go on scum vibes, and all this tells us is not to believe every roleclaim. I don't think it negatively impacts the game for us, at least.

korais666 · Post Post #49 (isolation #4) » Fri May 07, 2004 1:42 pm

I'd go on the "claims to have no leads" logic, but I'm pretty sure we don't have 5-7 mafia. I'm not lynch-happy, but maybe having more than one vote on someone will get them talking.

unvote: prizm, vote: Boomer Sooner

, because he's posting a lot but not contributing.

I know that logic could also apply to several other people, but his posts just happened to jump out at me. Maybe it's his avatar.

korais666 · Post Post #54 (isolation #5) » Sat May 08, 2004 9:15 am

After two votes? It's 6 to lynch, you know. I'd rather see activity than a roleclaim.

korais666 · Post Post #75 (isolation #6) » Sun May 09, 2004 10:45 am

I agree we could use a claim, but I am a bit suspicious of the sanity of our "cops." Unless one of them is corrupt or insane or we have an extra evil person, it would seem unlikely that we'd have more cops.

korais666 · Post Post #78 (isolation #7) » Sun May 09, 2004 1:36 pm

Well, that's the reason why I am not personally voting for you, but I think if we got a claim from you, that would help us decide who to believe. At this point, we're going on what our claimed cop said, because that's our best lead. If someone can debunk him, go ahead. If you turn out to be innocent, we'll lynch prizm pretty much immediately. If we get mafia every other day, we win, which is why it's stupid for mafia to come out and make a bad claim. Unless prizm is some sort of kamekazi, but that would probably be bob-omb. Of course, that's moot, because kamekazi is my thing, yggdrasil can't use it.

korais666 · Post Post #83 (isolation #8) » Mon May 10, 2004 1:00 pm

lynching role? By which I assume you meant killing role? SK, perhaps? I'm guessing you killed peach if that was the case (mafia probably wouldn't kill themselves). Are you claiming to be evil, basically?

korais666 · Post Post #99 (isolation #9) » Tue May 18, 2004 2:55 pm

Well, I'm baffled. Ashes did not say "SK" specifically, but did describe the SK role, and said, very specifically, that she was "eville" (I naturally took that to mean "evil," but I was apparently mistaken)

korais666 · Post Post #109 (isolation #10) » Sun May 23, 2004 2:19 pm

Yeah, I wouldn't have investigated myself if I were you. There's better ways of checking your sanity. Kind of seems like an easy way out, to me.

vote: prizm

korais666 · Post Post #114 (isolation #11) » Sat May 29, 2004 11:44 am

Wow. We're losing. Horribly. We need to hit mafia today, or it's game over. Meh.

korais666 · Post Post #127 (isolation #12) » Mon May 31, 2004 3:24 pm

Indeed it is. I'm going to read over the entire thread tomorrow and make an educated post. I recommend everyone else do the same. If someone has a role that can somehow be confirmed innocent, it wouldn't hurt to come out. We had two cops, so it would follow that we have at least one (hopefully two) doc roles out there.

korais666 · Post Post #149 (isolation #13) » Thu Jun 03, 2004 6:20 am

Well, I can buy the Yoshi thing, Dr. Mario seems suspicious to me, though, since it actually does what it should do. The other roles seem a little odd.

I'm toad, I can give someone a 'shroom and give them 1 night protection for the rest of the game. It's basically an second life, rather than a protection, since it's permanent. I've been taking a chance by not using it up until this point, since I'm kind of paranoid, but at the same time I don't want to accidentally protect scum. I'm thinking Argoti and ID are probably telling the truth, but I don't trust Sycko.

FOS: Sycko

korais666 · Post Post #172 (isolation #14) » Sat Jun 05, 2004 6:17 am

There's usually 3 mafia in a mini. That means we most likely have *two* people lying.

I sort of assumed we had two evil groups (2 mafia + SK, maybe) but then I realized we've only had one nightkill since wario died. Maybe he was a vig but was required to make a hit every night anyways? He probably was the one that killed bowser.

That means we actually *don't* have to hit mafia today, we could go no lynch, and raise our odds tomorrow. I know there's always people who don't want to use this plan, since someone has to die, but mafia *is* a team game.

vote: no lynch

.

korais666 · Post Post #181 (isolation #15) » Sat Jun 05, 2004 5:28 pm

Argoti wrote:since mafia would have to be really stupid to kill themselves...

Well, yes, obviously, but the point was that there might be an SK. You're right, the mafia would not target themselves.

look at korias666's post. Hes definitly mafia because he dosen't want us to lynch so we won't win. Now that seems a little suspicious, doesn't it?

Tha's craplogic and you know it. If you had actually *thought* about what I wrote, perhaps it would have made a little sense.

As it stands right now, we have a 2/6 chance of hitting mafia. 33% chance. If we go no lynch and have someone die, A) we'll have a 2/5 chance (40%, slightly better) and B) based on *who* dies, we can get a better sense of who the mafia is.

And in response to your earlier question which I failed to answer: Why *wouldn't* a mafia member be the one to call for a mass claim? If they have a claim ready, it makes them look less scummy. Even so, you refused to claim first, and said that you'd claim once someone else did. Why bother waiting? You know that everyone is going to claim, no point in making it take longer.

vote: sycko

korais666 · Post Post #182 (isolation #16) » Sat Jun 05, 2004 5:29 pm

That should be

unvote: no lynch, vote: sycko

. Minor technicalities.

korais666 · Post Post #190 (isolation #17) » Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:38 pm

Oh, so NOW you want a no lynch. Mmhmm. Right.

unvote: sycko, vote no lynch

korais666 · Post Post #196 (isolation #18) » Mon Jun 07, 2004 12:27 pm

That would make 4. I guess I won't give anyone the mushroom, just because I'm scared and confused and even though I think some of you are innocent, I'm really not sure enough.

korais666 · Post Post #210 (isolation #19) » Sun Jun 13, 2004 8:38 am

Frankly, I think whoever is in the mafia is somewhat new. It's usually smart to kill someone who's thought to be innocent, and I spent most of yesterday attacking sycko.

Also: Argoti, was it you who ran over MGIA at twillight yesterday? I sort of assumed it was, but I want confirmation. If it wasn't you, we need to know.

Also also: we've confirmed that all the roles are messed up. Yes, I would pick DK to be a townie, which is precisely why I don't think he is.

fos: max

. No vote yet, though, I don't want to end up speed-lynching someone.

korais666 · Post Post #215 (isolation #20) » Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:32 am

Okay, well, that makes you not 100% cleared, but I'm still fairly sure it's not you. You seemed sketchy when you actually delivered the roleclaim. You waited to give the description of the role until after the role's name, even though it should have been obvious that someone would ask you for it.

Not really sure what else to make of the situation.

korais666 · Post Post #224 (isolation #21) » Thu Jun 17, 2004 1:24 pm

Yeah, I'm leaning towards a vote, but I haven't been because I don't want a speed lynch, but I admit that is pretty scummy behavior. I'm still a bit suss of max, though.

If it turns out to be ID, I'm going to be very, very angry.

korais666 · Post Post #236 (isolation #22) » Wed Jun 23, 2004 2:50 am

Sorry, had finals, but now schools out! (and bonus will be starting! yay! but that's neither here nor there)

Anyways, I think we should just make an educated guess, go for the last-ditch effort. It doesn't seem like we're going to get any new info at this point.

vote: max22

korais666 · Post Post #245 (isolation #23) » Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:59 pm

I dunno, I kind of liked it.

I'm not entirely sure why you claimed the vig kill wasn't you, though. Lucky for you I chose not to vote for you anyways, but if you had said "yes, I used my vig powers to kill a mafia member," that would have pretty much confirmed you innocent.

Nice job otherwise, though.

Also: I don't think the game should have ended just yet, since in theory, argoti could have been stupid and attacked ID, who I was planning on giving the mushroom to, then we would have lynched argoti tomorrow, but I guess that probably wouldn't have happened so never mind[/spitballing]

korais666 · Post Post #249 (isolation #24) » Sat Jun 26, 2004 7:03 am

Yes, I could have protected you too, which I "did." The issue is that neither of us could protect me (I couldn't 'shroom myself), and Argoti knew it, so he killed me. My "complaint" was that he *might* have been stupid and attacked you anyways, but that's ridiculous, of course he hit me.